This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
spent during the skiing trip. For example, study time during the reading week, going to a concert during the reading week, or whatever the next best alternative use of the reading week time is. A1-2 False Positive statement is a statement about what actually is (was or will be) opposed to what ought to be. The sentence gave in the question stated that “the government must increase its spending...”, which is talking about the government ought to increase its spending based on value judgement. Therefore, this sentence is an example of normative statement. A positive statement of this sentence should be:”during a recession the government increases its spending to replace reduced private spending and reduce unemployment even this leads to an increase in the national debt” A1-3 True Endogenous variable is a variable that is explained within a theory, which in this case is the price and quantity of corn. Exogenous variable is a variable that is determined outside the theory. It might affect the endogenous variable, but we can safely assume that the exogenous variable is not influenced by the endogenous variable. In this case, the price and quantity of corn are affected by the government ethanol mandates, the local weather during the growing season and the extent of wild fired affecting Russian wheat production and therefore would-wide wheat prices, which are exogenous variable in this case. However, we can safely assume that these exogenous variables mentioned above are not influenced by the price and quantity of corn. A1-4 False Even Japan has an absolute advantage in both cell phone and computer production; there can be mutually beneficial trade between Japan and Finland. The Gains from international trade do NOT depend on the pattern of absolute advantage. It is the comparative advantage that leads to the gain of trade.
In this case, the opportunity cost:
Cell phone Computer Japan 1/3 computer 3 cell phones Finland 1/4 computer 4 cell phones Therefore, Finland has a comparative advantage on cell phone production compare to Japan.
Inferior goods will decrease their prices to compete with higher quality products. everyone must be self-sufficient. then there is going to be an increase in the supply which causes a decrease in the equilibrium price and an increase in the equilibrium quantity exchanged. they can afford to buy higher quality items. region. Everyone has a comparative advantage in something. because the seller holding the stock wishes to sell more at a higher price. then there will be an increase in both the equilibrium price and the equilibrium quantity exchanged. So. The intuitive reasoning behind this is an increase in demand creates a shortage at the initial equilibrium price and the unsatisfied buyer bid up the price. This causes a decrease in both the equilibrium price and the equilibrium quantity exchanged.Gains from trade can be shown if we consider Japan moving 3 unit of resource from cell phone to computer production and Finland moving 1 unit of resources from Computer to cell phone production. the quantity is going to decrease. can each benefit from trade by obtaining a good at a cost below their own opportunity cost. each individual. If the shift in the demand curve is greater than the shift of the supply curve. A 1-7 True The stock prices are falling. This leads to an excess demand which leads to an increase in pricing. Cell phone Japan -3 Finland +4 “World” +1 The Gain of 1 cell phone can be shared (mutually beneficial). However. more is exchanged at a higher price. A 1-8 False If there is an increase in the demand ( a rightward shift in the demand curve). we cannot predict whether more or less of the stock will be traded. therefore. Also. Computer +1 -1 0 . or nation is able to concentrate on producing goods and services that it produces efficiently while trading to obtain good and services that it does not produce efficiently. potential trading parties that have different in opportunity costs. then the quantity is going to increase. This rise in price causes a larger quantity to be supplied with the result that at the new equilibrium. With trade. This is due to there being a decreased demand for such items. there is a decrease in demand. Therefore. If the opposite occurs. As consumer income increases. the increase of consumer income leads to a decrease in the pricing of inferior goods. A1-6 False Some of the prices of the grocery store items will increase because of increased demand. A1-5 True Without trade.
A1-9 the table below lists points on a production possibility frontier or PPF (sometimes called the production possibility boundary or PPB). Good x Good y a) 0 55 1 54 2 52 3 49 4 45 5 40 6 34 7 27 8 19 9 10 10 0 b) Opportunity cost of the nth unit of x in terms of unit of y 1 55 – 54 1 2 54 – 52 2 3 52 – 49 3 4 49 − 45 4 5 45 − 40 5 6 40 – 34 6 7 34 – 27 7 8 27 – 19 8 9 19 – 10 9 10 10 . n= .0 10 The opportunity cost of x increases as more of it is produce is because the each factor of production is not equally useful in producing both x and y.
Let’s start from the point when production of x is zero. . and gradually shift more resources toward the production of x. the relative price of x given this production point is 3. Plug in the number. the opportunity cost of producing x rises as more x is produced. Plug in the number. However. c) The opportunity cost per unit of x is given by. Therefore. Then. This shift of resources will therefore lead to a small reduction in y. but a substantial increase in x. is very useful for making x. Therefore. d) The relative price per unit of x is given by. we must shift more resources that are quite suitable for making y and maybe less suitable for making x.86 units of y. as we produce more x. the opportunity cost of x given this production point is 5 units of y. Therefore. Some resources that may not be very useful for making y. the amount of y that must be forgone to produce one extra unit of x rises. as we produce more and more x.
e) With trade. . By being opened to trade. the economy will be better able to provide x and y to its members by being opened to trade. the consumption possibility curve can lie beyond the production possibility curve. Yes. The point at which it should be produced should shift towards the left on the table given. f) We do not expect the economy to remain at the production point in part d. the economy will be able to provide units of x and y that was previously unattainable as shown in the graph.
This combination is unattainable without trade. . a point outside of the PPF-without-trade will be possible. For example. if we choose to produce 0 x and 55 y as shown in the PPF. if we choose to trade 21 y of our production of 7 x with the rest of the world.For example. a combination of 7 x and (55-21 = 34) y will be achieved.
-50+20P = 100-10P 20P+10P = 50+100 30P = 150 P=5 The equilibrium price is $5. Qs’ = -60+30P 0 = -60+30P P=2 . we find that the equilibrium quantity is 50.00 By setting P=0.5 If production falls to 0.00. subbing in P=5 into the equation for QS. b) To find the equilibrium price.50. QD = 0 100-10P=0 P=10 If consumption falls to 0. the maximum amount that would ever be consumed would be 100.A1-10 a) QS =0 -50+20P=0 20P=50 P=2.50 to $2. c) The price at which there will be no production has changed from $2. then the price would be $2. then the price would be $10.00 To find the equilibrium quantity.
An increase in supply creates a surplus at the initial equilibrium price. The old producer is worse off because a increase in the supply causes a decrease in the equilibrium price which means that they’re selling their product at a lower price and therefore are losing money.d) The price we calculated is no longer the equilibrium price because an increase in supply puts a downward pressure on the price and causes a decrease in the equilibrium price.00 to $1. . e) QS’ = QD -60+30P = 100-10P 40P = 40 P=1 The consumer is better off because the equilibrium prices decreased from $5.5. This drop in price increases the quantity demanded and the new equilibrium is at a lower price and a higher quantity exchanged. At P = 2. they made some profit which is better off than not making any money at all before they were in the market. and the unsuccessful supplier force the price down.00. The new producer is better off because before they joined the market. there is now excess supply. they were not making any profit at all. After joining the market.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?