Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
INTRODUCTION
The ideas in these website Hierarchy pages are drawn mainly from the book The Hierarchy of
Heaven and Earth by Douglas Harding (plus some ideas from elsewhere in Harding's work). This
work of philosophy is a contemporary view of our place in the cosmos. It brings back into the
picture of who we are the implications of the presence
and range of the observer. It is a deep book. (Any
errors in terms of the understanding and presentation
of the ideas of this book in these pages are all credited
to Richard Lang! For the way Harding himself presents
these ideas, read his books…)
WHO AM I?
At Centre
For myself at centre I am headless. I am pure
capacity, an empty receptacle. (To test this for yourself, do the experiments.)
This is true at every level. For example, beyond my human region I am capacity for other species.
For the robin in my garden I am not a robin, nor an individual person (John or Mary, say) but a
human being. Though it doesn’t have the language to describe me so, I see myself in this way
through its eyes. I live in other species as a human being just as they live in me as whatever they
are. Thus I rise from the status of a person to that of a species when I enter the society of species
and become self-conscious. At this level I am responsible for all that is human, for the whole body-
mind of humanity is now mine. When I look further I become capacity for other planets and,
learning what I am from their point of view, a planet, are raised to membership of planetary
society - I become a self-conscious planet. At each level I join a society and, taking on board my
identity there, participate in life at that level. My mind (or rather my body-mind) is therefore not
simply human but also vital, planetary, solar, galactic... and cellular, molecular, atomic… My body-
mind expands and contracts depending on the company I keep. This is possible because at centre I
am no-thing – infinitely flexible.
I can never experience my body directly - only others can see my body. Nor can I directly
experience another's mind but only their body. However, if I place myself in another's shoes, so to
speak, I imagine the world from their point of view and so come to understand their mind. Their
view out, their mind, includes their view of me - of my body. Putting myself in another's shoes is
possible because at centre we are identical - we are both no-thing. Though the contents are
different, the Container is the same. It is when I place myself there at another's centre and then
look back at 'myself' that I come to know my body and so become self-conscious.
However, conventionally I divide the contents of my mind, my view out, into 'mind' and 'body'.
Thus I say that my thoughts and feelings are my mind but my hand is my body. This is a useful
convention that facilitates communication with others - a convention that is learned as we grow up.
I am distinguishing between the psychological and physical sides of myself. (As a baby I made no
such distinctions between 'mind' and 'body'.) But from my own point of view my hand and my
thoughts - and everything - are all in my 'mind', in my view out. (I also divide the content of my
view out into 'me' and 'not me'. However, the boundary between the 'me' and the 'not me' is
always shifting. In one moment I may draw the line around my body, in another around my family,
my car, my city, my football club, my nation, my planet, my star... In one moment you may be
included in the 'us' part of 'us and them', in the next you may become part of 'them'!)
Three Stages Of Consciousness
There are three main stages in the evolution of consciousness: unself-conscious, self-conscious,
and self/Self-conscious. (Or, the view out; the view in; the view out/view in.)
1. The view out. At the human level I am born unaware of my appearance. Headless, I am capacity
for my world – without knowing any other way of being. I am aware of my view out into the world
but unaware (in any developed sense) of the views in that others have of me. I am at large. I am
the world.
2. The view in. As an adult I see myself as others see me, identifying with my appearance – the
view in. Unaware of being headless, of being capacity for others, I dismiss the idea of headlessness
as stupid or mad. Overlooking or denying my central timeless immensity that includes all things, I
see myself as a separate mortal thing. Self-conscious, I am one person amongst billions.
3. The view out/view in. As a seer I am aware of both the view in and the view out. Continuing to
take on board what I am for others (a person at the human level) I also take seriously my own
view, that I am capacity for others, capacity for the world.
Humanity
At the level of the human species I was originally unaware of the view in – the view of myself as a
species distinct from other species. Identifying with my view out I embraced the animals and plants
– I was not separate from them, from Mother Nature. Evolving into the second stage I came to see
myself from a distance, through the eyes of the other species. I realized I was different from them
- I was not an animal, not a part of the forest, not one with Life. With this development came
human culture, including language, religion, art, science... Currently most of us see ourselves in
this human way - we are separate from the rest of life. Stage three began appearing several
thousand years ago with the emergence of mystics here and there who realized they were not at
centre what they looked like to others – meaning they saw who they really were. (Of course each
seer has described their experience in different ways depending on their religion, their culture, on
when and where they lived.) It may be these seers are forerunners of a transformation in human
consciousness as a whole. If this is so, then in the (hopefully near) future it will become generally
accepted (because experienced) that consciousness is indivisible - that one's true identity is the
One that includes all. The human species successfully made the evolutionary leap from stage one
to stage two (unlike other species), so there is reason to hope it will make the equally important
evolutionary leap to stage three. Leaping back to the centre (without denying our humanity) we re-
discover our unity with the rest of life. The survival of the species may depend on our coming to
our senses in this way.
The Earth
At the planetary level the broad outlines of the story are the same. In the first stage (view out) we
did not separate ourselves from the living Earth - from our Mother. Consequently we respected her
great living body. In the second stage (view in) we have come to distinguish ourselves from the
planet - we see ourselves (and the rest of life) from the viewpoint of the mountains, the sea, the
air, and we realize how different we are from this inorganic environment. And we say: "We are
alive and the Earth is just a dead rock spinning round the sun." This attitude means we study the
Earth in a way that was impossible before, when we saw her as alive and sacred, so we have now
come to know her as never before. But the view that she is separate from us and dead engenders
a lack of respect towards her which has led us to pollute her body. We close our eyes and think we
can do what we like with no consequences for ourselves. In the third stage we 'remember' - we see
- there is no boundary between inside and outside. Being no-thing at centre, I do not stop at the
boundary of this body but go on to include not only other people and other species but the planet
too. In other words I see I am the Earth, that my life and her life are one life. The life on Earth is
the life of Earth. The living Mother is back. (In fact she never really died - we believed her
senseless and dead but she was only pretending, only sleeping.) Hopefully our recognition of our
oneness with the Earth and of her aliveness will mean that our attitude and behaviour towards the
Earth changes.
Time
Not only is my view out layered spatially from humans in the middle region out to stars and
galaxies in the furthest regions, and in to atoms and particles in the nearest regions, it is also
layered temporally. Close objects have taken only a fraction of a second to arrive here in me
whereas the sun, for example, has taken about eight minutes, and a star may have taken a
thousand years. The further I look, the further I look into the past. I am encircled by increasingly
ancient time zones.
In the same way as others are in time for me, I am in time for others. Self-conscious, I am dated.
And the higher the rank of the object I identify with (reflected back to me by others of the same
rank) the older I am so that as a person I may reckon my age in tens of years, as a species in
millions, and as a star in billions. And the longer my past, the longer my future – as a person I may
have a few dozen years left, but as a galaxy I have many billions.
And yet… I look from the timeless into time. Stripped of time here I am clothed in time there.
There is no separation. In my unborn and deathless being are the lives of all beings and they are
all mine. A perfect arrangement.
A Unitary Science
Each layer of my body has its science. The human sciences study my middle layers; biology,
chemistry and physics my nearer layers; zoology, geography and astronomy my more distant
layers. (Metaphysics belongs to the centre and the Whole, to my No-thingness and my Allness.) At
each level the scientist restricts herself to that zone. It is only the travelling scientist, approaching
and retreating from me, who unites all these separate disciplines into one many-levelled whole.
This is the unitary science of all my levels, a portrait that not only reveals my indivisible wholeness
but sheds new light both on each of my levels and on the relationships between them. It is a
contemporary vision of my - of our - place in the universe. Or rather, of the universe's place within
'us' - within this One Awareness.
The Hierarchy of Heaven and Earth A
View by Richard Lang
MY PERSONAL IDENTITY
The View In
What I am depends on the range from which I am observed.
Trading Faces
Put another way, I am stationed here in her human region where she
manifests as a human being (being no-thing for herself at centre),
and she is stationed there in my human region where I manifest as a
human being (being no-thing for myself at centre).
As my grasp of language grows I begin learning to see myself as others see me. In imagination I
travel several feet away from myself and, turning round, observe myself from that distance
through the eyes of others – with a head on my shoulders. Gradually I learn that the infant in the
mirror is not another infant but is myself - it is (with a few adjustments) what others see when
they look in my direction. Although from my point of view I am headless, spacious, at large,
nobody in my world confirms this private side of me. In fact if I mention it, others laugh at me. So
I begin to overlook and discount my own spacious view of myself. I start imposing here on my
central facelessness the face I see there in the mirror, the face that others tell me is here, even
though I have never see it here. In the company of others I see (imagine) myself face to face with
them, my imagined face here confronting their perceived faces there. I am learning to play a game
- the Face Game - though I'm unaware it's a game. The essence of this game is pretending I have
a face where I don't have one, and taking this on board so thoroughly that I profoundly believe it.
My growing capacity to see myself as others see me distinguishes me from animals in the sense
that animals do not become self-consciousness like humans. Cats don’t lie around imagining how
they appear to other cats - never mind then going on to admire (or hate) their self-image!
Why do I start making this shift to seeing myself as others see me? Now that as a child I am able
to do more things physically and through language can communicate better, I want to be a part of
what is going on around me, want to join in and enjoy the benefits of being human, want to be a
full member of society. The basic condition for participating is knowing who I am in the eyes of
others and taking responsibility for myself as that person. So I begin accepting I am a thing
separate from all other things. What choice is there anyway? No alternative is offered. Besides, to
reject being the one in the mirror and so not to accept the way others see me would surely be an
experience of profound isolation and meaninglessness – not that I would know it.
Even though I am taking on board here what I am for others there, as a child my self-awareness is
still fragmentary. Much of the time I forget about what I look like - my self-image is not yet firmly
established in my mind. In those blessed childhood hours when I am blissfully unaware of my
image, how bright and vivid the world appears. Looking at a flower I see the flower clearly with no
idea of a face in the way, no self apparently distancing me from those petals, that scent, that
texture. I see the flower, not myself seeing the flower. Without describing it in these terms, I am
the flower. When I am playing, with other children or alone, my full attention goes into what I am
doing - half my attention is not yet bound up with what I look like. Undivided in this way I have
plenty of energy. Not yet over-concerned with what others think about me, I am original and
inventive in my play, carefree, making things up as I go along, inspiration flowing effortlessly from
the no-mind within. Since I don’t yet think of myself as inside a human box, or inside any box, it’s
easy for me to experiment with being all kinds of things – one moment I am a bird, the next a lion
or a train. But then mum or dad comes along and tells me to behave: “You’re not a bird, you’re a
child!” Suddenly I am reminded of their view of me again. But (to their frustration!) just as
suddenly I forget and am a bird again - for the time being anyway! I enjoy easy intimacy with
others because I am capacity for them, unaware in these moments of being face to face with them,
of being distant from them, of being a thing up against and excluding them. Not constricted yet by
worrying about impressing others, I relate simply and openly.
On the road towards adulthood, childhood gives way to adolescence, the time when the necessity
for establishing my identity intensifies. “Who am I? Where do I belong? What do I want to do in my
life?” At this time of life the question is not really, “Who am I for myself at centre?” but, “Who am I
in relation to others in the world?” During this stage I don't want to be a ‘nobody’, a ‘non-entity’, I
want to be ‘somebody’ – a special somebody. Appropriately so. My view of myself at centre where I
am no-thing, capacity, silence – this is not in the forefront of my consciousness. What is important
at this stage is recognizing my objective, separate identity and finding my unique role in the world.
On the one hand this enables me to function in the adult world and enjoy tremendous benefits. I
am now aware of being an individual and aware of the adventure of my life - I am a unique, self-
conscious member of society. (I couldn't be a member of society if I were not self-conscious. Stuck
in the first stage I would need institutional care.)
On the other hand, deep down I feel something isn’t quite right. Something is missing. The denial
and repression of my central spaciousness casts a shadow over my life. Though I have not actually
lost my spaciousness, I feel as though I have – without quite knowing what I have lost. As a baby I
enjoyed being the timeless centre and owner of the world, at large, un-separate from anything –
without knowing any other way of being. Now I am a brief flash in a cosmos that by and large pays
me no attention, that keeps its distance. No wonder if I feel abandoned and excluded, unimportant
and unrecognized, lost and meaningless, angry and depressed … And no surprise if I spend my
time trying to regain my importance and meaning in the only ways I know how, through power,
wealth, fame, love, sex… From being the sole owner of the world I am reduced to owning a
pittance. From being everything, I am a speck of dust. A veil has fallen over the enchanted,
beautiful world I knew as a child. My abandon and enthusiasm has been replaced by caution and
indifference, intimacy by distance, timelessness by change and death. Of course I feel cheated and
robbed – I have been. Of course deep down I am afraid – countless swords of Damocles hang over
my head. I search everywhere for the peace I vaguely remember knowing as an innocent baby –
and the lightness, the joy, the wonder. Dimly recalling my original openness towards others, the
love that excluded nothing and no one, I search for it everywhere. And so on. The loss of Who I
really am affects every area of my life.
To the extent I don’t suffer in these ways I remain “a child at heart”, more or less unconsciously in
touch with my spaciousness, with Who I really am.
Stage Three - The Seer (Integrating The View In And The View Out)
One day I see Who I really am. I realize there is a difference between what I am for others and
what I am for myself. I take seriously what I see – that from my own point of view I am the
headless source and container of the world!
At the same time, unlike the baby, I am also aware I have an appearance – I still recognize myself
in the mirror! I know I am an individual in society with a special contribution to make.
Thus I realize I have two sides: for others (and for myself self-reflectively) I am a person with a
face, ‘a self in society’; for myself I am space – all faces, all selves are in me. This realization
combines the baby’s view (the view out) and the adult’s view (the view in).
When I start living in conscious awareness of Who I really am, gradually my life is profoundly
affected. The stress that arises from seeing myself only from outside - as a vulnerable thing -
begins to ease now that I see I am absolutely and always safe as no-thing/everything. Seeing that
all things are within me I realize I am infinitely rich, on intimate terms with everyone and
everything, the immortal source of all things… From feeling hopelessly lost I feel increasingly at
home, anywhere and everywhere. As I experiment living in conscious awareness of Who I really
am, I discover the infinite wisdom and goodness of my True Nature.
MY CELLULAR IDENTITY
Who am I?
Everything I do as a human being is also done by my cells. I lift a finger and billions of them act.
How do they know what to do? Or rather, since these cells are myself at close range, how do we
know what to do? The answer lies in the relationship between these two levels of myself.
As my observer retreats, observing in turn my particles, atoms, molecules, cells and then my
human body, she observes how each level transforms into the next. First she sees one individual in
her field of view, then many, then one again, but this new individual is higher in status. Pulling
away from a single atom she finds other atoms coming into view. Stepping back further she finds
these many atoms joining into one molecule. Pulling away from that molecule she finds it is part of
a community of molecules that, at a greater range, are one cell. And pulling away from the cell she
finds it is a cell-in-community - a vast population which however, when seen from afar, is no longer
a countless number of cells but one person. She notes that my identity evolves to higher and
higher levels the further she retreats from my central nothingness. On the other hand, as my
observer approaches me she finds an individual at one level breaking down into many individuals
and then just one individual at the next level. The closer she approaches my central nothingness,
the more primitive the individual she finds.
My observer's vertical movement, away from me and towards me, reflects the continual traffic of
information flowing between my levels. My behaviour at the human level is continually being
translated downwards or analyzed into my behaviour as billions of cells, and then my behaviour as
one cell, and my behaviour as one cell is continually being translated upwards or synthesized into
my behaviour as billions of cells and then my behaviour as one person. It is by working together in
community that many individuals at one level rise to the status of the individual at the next level.
Each of my cells doing its own job, combined with all its neighbours doing their jobs, results at the
next level in me, say, typing these words. At their own level my cells know nothing about me
typing about them. Or, put another way, at the cellular level I know nothing about Richard. Yet at
the human level I know about my cells. It is because I can take up the mobile viewpoint of my
observer as she moves from my human level to my cellular level and back, reporting to me what
she finds, that I am aware that I am both of these levels. Seen through her eyes and microscope,
'I' the human being and 'I' the cell are two aspects or levels of a 'me' whose levels are many.
This two-way vertical movement through my regions, this continual transformation of one level into
the next, this building up and breaking down of myself that my observer notes as she retreats from
and approaches me, is the key to the way the whole organization (that I am) functions. All my
behaviour begins in my central nothingness and translates upwards through my layers into my
human region (and beyond). The level of behaviour an observer encounters depends on the range
at which she intercepts my actions. Station yourself at close range and I am a cell going about my
own business. Step back and I am billions of cells working together. Step back even further and I
am a person. I am one yet I am many. All my actions as a human being can be 'explained' in terms
of cellular activity, and all my actions as a cell can be extrapolated eventually to my human
behaviour. But look further, beyond these levels, and you will find my behaviour originating at
deeper levels, eventually emerging from the mysterious nothingness at my core. Or, stepping back,
you will find my behaviour as a human being worked up into the behaviour of myself as an
individual at higher and higher levels, so that lifting my little finger now eventually affects the
remotest galaxy.
The Cell For Itself
For my observer, at a fraction of an inch I am cellular. What am I for myself? At the human level I
am capacity for other human beings - just as they are capacity for me. It would make sense if at
the cellular level I were structured in the same way so that each cell in my body is for itself
capacity for its neighbours.
This assumption is supported by the fact that my central emptiness is not simply the source of my
human appearance but is the source of every one of my appearances, no matter what its level.
This mystery that I am is at the heart of my cellular life just as much as it is at the heart of my
human life. Thus to look here is to see the True Nature not only of myself as a person but of myself
as a cell too. Being perfectly placed to see the innermost identity of each of my cells, I report that
the identity of each and every one of them is capacity!
At the cellular level I am capacity for other cells. Of course, the view out at this range will be
nothing like the view out at the human level. Cells are primitive animals - brainless, blind, deaf and
voiceless. But no doubt their view out - from this boundless capacity - is just right for life at this
level. Certainly cells are very good at getting on with what they have to do.
Because each of my cells is capacity for its neighbours, the method by which I as one cell
transform into I as many cells and eventually into I as a person is laid bare - my nature as a cell is
to include and embrace and become the other cells around me. I am my neighbours. Including
every one of them, I am a person. Including only some of my cellular neighbours I contract to the
level of an organ perhaps. Including none but myself I am already breaking down into less than a
cell, for presumably I can see only part of my cellular body, just as at the human level I can see
only part of my human body.
Because my observer is looking from the human level down into the cellular, she can report back to
me at the human level what she finds at the cellular level. You could say that a conversation you
and I might be having about your cells and my cells is a conversation our cells are having with one
another via the human level.
None of us lives simply at the human level but embraces - and is - the continual transformation of
the human into the cellular and the cellular into the human. Without this there is no human life.
MY MOLECULAR IDENTITY
MY ATOMIC IDENTITY
I Am Mysterious
As my observing scientist moves in very close to me, attempting to uncover my innermost reality,
she finds me strange, elusive, packed with hidden power. This is no surprise to me. She is
approaching the mystery of my centre. Here in my centre I know myself as even more
unknowable, impossible to pin down and powerful than she finds me to be at the atomic level. Here
I am absolutely unknowable, unlocatable, powerful...
Of course, if I were to view her at the same range I would register her atomic appearance and
would find her strange, elusive, powerful...
"He (Ezekiel) saw a city set on a hill sloping towards the south, which measured no more than a
rod in length and breadth, that is, six cubits and a palm. But when he was brought into the city and
looked about him he thought it was very spacious… many hundred cubits in length and breadth. It
was extraordinary to him that this city which was so spacious within appeared so small when he
stood outside.". Walter Hilton
The Hierarchy of Heaven and Earth
A View by Richard Lang
MY SUB-ATOMIC IDENTITY
The failure of objective science to uncover my true identity is no surprise to me, for my observer
remains always outside me, always at a distance. How could she step over from the outside to the
inside, collapsing the distance between us to nothing? Nor is her failure a disappointment for me,
for I can do what she cannot do - I can look here into the ground of my being myself and complete
her story. This momentous observation of my own centre is easier than any observation my
observer can make of me, for here is nothing complicated, distant, or difficult to see, nothing that
simply hides something else. My true nature is the bottom line and lies wide open to me, forever.
Go to The Centre
"The revelation by modern physics of the void within the atom is more disturbing than the
revelation by astronomy of the immense void of interstellar space." Eddington
"Hsueh-feng went to the forest to cut trees with his disciple Chang-sheng. 'Don't stop till your axe
cuts to the very centre of the tree,' warned the teacher." The Iron Flute
THE CENTRE
MY IDENTITY AS HUMANITY
London
My name is Humanity.
Human Self-Consciousness
I recognize myself as human when I am in the
presence of (and am capacity for) other species.
Let’s say I am working in the garden. A robin is
watching me dig the ground. It doesn’t know me
as Richard, or as a Londoner, or as an Englishman,
but as a human being. Of course it doesn’t have
these thoughts (it isn’t human) but through its
eyes I see myself as human. If a neighbour
dropped by she would, in the mind of the robin, be
another human being appearing - unlike a fox, say,
who obviously isn't human. Through the eyes of
animals I become self-consciously human.
My individual identity and my identity as all of Humanity are inseparable. They are two sides of one
coin. An individual by herself, without the rest of humanity, isn't viable, at least as a human being.
In countless ways everything about my individual human identity is linked to and dependent on the
rest of humanity. Language, for example, is meaningless without others to communicate with. And
anyway there is the basic fact that I find my identity in others, just as they find their identity in
me. Without other human beings I am no longer human.
The Tathagata [Awakened One] divides his own body into innumerable bodies, and also restores an
infinite number of bodies to one body. Now he becomes cities, villages, houses… Now he has a
large body, now he has a small body. Mahaparinirvana Sutra
My only claim to this hand is that when it is hurt I am hurt, and what it touches I touch, and all its
deeds are mine; and my only claim to Humanity is that I am responsible for my neighbour,
wherever he lives and whatever he does. For until I am him I am not myself. To know myself I
must study him, and to be at peace with myself I must love him: all my hatred is self-hatred. The
Hierarchy of Heaven and Earth, Douglas Harding
MY IDENTITY AS LIFE
At the same time, investigating the deeper levels of mind, psychologists report mental strata we
share with all of the living. Scratch the surface and we are all animals. At this level, whether I look
at myself from outside or inside, in the past, present or future, I am Life and Life is one.
My approaching observer notes that Life is made of many species, that the human species is made
of many people, and that this person is made of many cells. Each level of my being is distinct from
the others, yet each becomes the others - I am an indivisible, hierarchically organized, living
system.
Self-Conscious Biosphere
It is by studying my lifeless neighbours, by contrasting
myself with them and seeing myself from their point of view that I come to appreciate my vitality
as Life. Just as I find out who I am as a person in human society, and who I am as a species in the
company of other species, so I find out who I am as Life in the company of my inorganic
neighbours. Though I may think I study the atmosphere above and the rocks below as a human
being, really my eyes and mind are Life's.
Marvelling at the 'wonders of instinct', we ask (for instance) how a spider, with so little brain and
no teaching, can build so perfect a web. The answer is already in our heads. The works of that still
humbler creature - the brainless brain-cell - are still more marvellous, and their secret is that the
cell is not brainless: the whole brain is the brain of each of its cells. Similarly the real brains of an
organism are those of its species, and of its genus, and ultimately of Life itself. In the end, my
brains include the spider's, as the spider's include mine. Nor can I spare any of them. If the fowls
of the air and the beasts of the field and the fish of the sea do not draw me to the Kingdom, I shall
never arrive, for they are my vital completion there. The Hierarchy of Heaven and Earth, Douglas
Harding.
The Hierarchy of Heaven and Earth
A View by Richard Lang
I was born about 4.5 billion years ago as the Solar System
formed from a cooling star. Made of very hot, molten rock I gradually developed a crust and an
atmosphere. Relatively complex molecules formed in my shallow seas and about 3.5 billion years
ago these evolved further into simple cells. These in turn developed into multi-cellular organisms
some of whom emerged from my oceans onto dry land. Humans are a very recent development in
this long evolutionary story, their ancestors first appearing only about 3.5 million years ago.
Humans are not alien to me but are myself, the Earth, sprouting hands and feet and eyes - thus
enabling me to write this brief description of my own birth and development!
Self-Conscious Planet
But just as at the human level I am not content simply
to be capacity for my neighbour but place myself in her
shoes to contemplate myself from her point of view,
thereby achieving human self-consciousness, so at the
planetary level. Viewing myself from Mars I see my
Earth-body (and my orbiting moon) and so achieve
planetary self-consciousness. In this way I become a
self-conscious member of planetary society.
Copernicus the adult leaping out of himself to see his Earth self from the sun's viewpoint, and
Copernicus the child leaping out of himself to see his human self from his playmates' viewpoint, are
the same person making the same discovery about himself, and growing by the same means, at
different levels of the personality. The Hierarchy of Heaven and Earth, Douglas Harding.
The Hierarchy of Heaven and Earth
A View by Richard Lang
Viewed from another star in the night sky, I am a star too, member of a
glittering society of a hundred billion suns. In stately fashion I revolve
with them round the centre of the Galaxy, participating in a majestic
celestial dance. I am about 30,000 light years from the centre of the
Galaxy - about half way out on one of its spiral arms. It takes about
225 million years for me to do a complete orbit round the Galaxy’s
centre – so far in my solar life I’ve been round 20 times! If I lived
nearer the crowded core of the Galaxy, stars there are so plentiful and
shine so brightly that I would never experience darkness.
On Closer Inspection
Closer inspection reveals me to be a developed solar system. Born probably from the cooling
embers of a supernova explosion about 5 billion years ago, I developed from a swirling cloud of
dust and gas into a sun orbited by planets, asteroids, meteors and comets. My eight major planets
include Neptune, icy in its remote orbit; Mercury, burning in the great heat near the Sun; and
Earth, perfectly placed for the emergence of Life.
I will shine steadily for another five billion years. Because I'm not a very large star, my death will
be a gradual cooling down over millions of years. If I were larger, in another supernova I would
scatter my flaming gases through space, gradually then to cool down and condense into another
solar system.
Time
The great distances between myself and other stars make
clear what is true at every level, that I look out into the
past. The further I look, the further back in time, for light
takes time to reach me. Thus the star I am observing this
evening may have died centuries ago. Of course it works
the other way round as well. By the time my starlight
reaches the star Rigel, 775 years have passed. We stars
take our time to communicate!
Viewed from a neighbouring galaxy I who am nothing but capacity here at centre, manifest over
there as a spiral galaxy - the Milky Way. Spinning majestically like a slow Catherine wheel I am
composed of perhaps 100 billion stars and am about 13.6 billion years old, give or take 800 million
years! I am a fairly large spiral galaxy some 120,000 light years across and 3000 light years thick
in my centre. I live in a cluster of about 30 galaxies known as the Local Group, the other large
galaxy in this group, the Andromeda Nebula, being about 2 million light years away (from the
Earth). Currently I am colliding with a small neighbouring galaxy, the Sagittarius Dwarf Galaxy, but
not for the first time. It will probably pass through me without causing any serious damage. The
most distant group of galaxies I've so far discovered is 13.5 billion light years away. I am one
among 100 billion or more galaxies (who knows?) rushing outwards from some mysterious primal
explosion.
If I am able to see the Milky Way, a concentration of stars forming a long white pathway across the
sky, then I am looking in towards the centre of my disk-like galactic body where stars are most
numerous. This is the equivalent, at the human level, of looking down at the torso of my own
(headless) body. In both instances I am looking out of my central emptiness at my body, but at the
galactic level I am simply looking further.
Galactic Self-Consciousness
At the galactic level I cannot see my face (just as I
cannot see my face at the human level). It is only
by observing my galactic neighbours that I can
build up an idea of my own galactic shape, size,
age, behaviour and so on, as if I were seeing
myself through their eyes. Thus I enjoy not only
my view of them but their view of me. This galaxy
on the right is called the Pinwheel Galaxy. It is 27
million light-years away and is a spiral galaxy like
myself. Looking at it is like looking in a mirror -
except the Pinwheel Galaxy is twice my size, so in
a photograph it took of me I would be smaller. The
stars in the foreground are part of my galactic
body - I am looking through them at my galactic
neighbour. This is the equivalent at the human
level of looking at a friend, but seeing my nose at the same time. In both instances I am looking
out of aware nothingness, past my own body, at a friend, but at the galactic level I am looking
millions of light-years whereas at the human level I'm looking only a few feet.
Perhaps my ever more distant observers don't keep seeing more of me. Perhaps I become one of a
group of galaxies that shrink to a point of light which then disappears over the cosmic horizon - my
observer's horizon. My glorious, angelic body vanishes into endless darkness. Whether my observer
keeps seeing more of me, or I disappear, my attempt to gain complete self-knowledge and
wholeness by expansion - by seeing myself objectively at ever greater distances through the mind
of another - fails.
Till now we have worked from the outside on what is within; now we tarry in the centre and rule
what is external. Hitherto it was a service in aid of the Master; now it is a dissemination of the
commands of this Master. The Secret of the Golden Flower
You are like a mirage in the desert, which the thirsty man thinks is water; but when he comes up
to it he finds it is nothing. And where he thought it was, there he finds God. Similarly, if you were
to examine yourself, you would find it to be nothing, and instead you would find God. That is to
say, you would find God instead of yourself, and there would be nothing left of you but a name
without a form. Al-Alawi