Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
How does this lesson plan connect and is consistent with the unit
of work?
This lesson is clearly linked to the other 2 lessons in the unit of work in
multiple ways. In the first lesson, the students are given the
opportunity to discuss what they think compost is and why we use it.
Then they are able to make their own composts and predict what they
think will happen to their composts over the next week. This is then
linked with our lesson (lesson 2) as we will be evaluating what has and
has not changed in the composts from lesson 1 and the students are
given the chance to update their original predications from lesson 1
stating whether or not they think each of their materials in their
composts will decompose. These predications may have changed as
this lesson not only revisits the discussion that took place in lesson 1
but it also provides a more in-depth discussion and investigation about
what compost is and why we have it. Finally, this lesson (lesson 2) is
linked to the third lesson as they are able to once again revisit their
predictions about their composts whilst also drawing conclusions
regarding what decomposes and what does not. The third lessons
conclusion will draw on all of the ideas that were discussed through
the duration of the unit work.
How does the sequence of activities in this lesson plan reflect a
learning process rather than a series of tasks?
The Sequence of the activities in this lesson plan reflects a learning
process rather than a series of tasks as it utilizes the concept of
scaffolding throughout the duration of the lesson to then releasing the
responsibility to the students where they are able to take control of
their own learning. The lesson begins with a whole class discussion
allowing for a teacher initiated discussion whilst
due to their language background, Case (2002) ensures that ESL students should be
given a writing opportunity as it can be used as important evidence, representing the
newly developed content knowledge whilst still using the individual educational
backgrounds of the students.
This lesson plan takes advantage of technology by using an interactive
whiteboard/projector. This was deliberately utilized as the students are able to get a
visual representation of the content that is being explored. Not only are the students
given images and videos as sources of information but the students are also provided
with a visual representation of the scientific language that is being used as we have
made PowerPoint slides with the prompting questions that we will be asking the
students during class discussion. Stein (2000) assures that a visual image can
produce a deeper understanding that cannot be reduced to a linguistic description.
Therefore, ensuring that visual representations and explanations are imbedded into
the unit of work is essential for meaning making to occur.
To help accommodate ESL students, we have given the students the opportunity to
participate in collaborative activities with their peers. Kasper & Saundra (2005)
encourages the use of a collaborative learning environment as it inspires the students
to take more charge of and assume more responsibility for their own learning. It also
motivates the students to view themselves and their peers as effective sources of
knowledge therefore the students are able to participate in a diverse community of
learners working together to achieve the same goal to construct meaning and
knowledge. Allowing the students to work collaboratively with their peers not only
helps guide their understanding of the content knowledge, but it also encourages
teamwork and communication to take place therefore creating an open and safe
environment for discussion and confidence to thrive.
By ensuring that all of these strategies are applied throughout the duration of the
lesson, the students will be sure to really engage with the content, their peers and
their educators allowing a successful lesson for all.
References:
Allen, H., & Park, S. (2011). Science Education and ESL Students. Science Scope, 35(3), 29-35
Kasper, F., & Saundra, W. (2005). Building ESL students' linguistic and academic literacy through content-based interclass collaboration. Teaching English in
the Two Year College, 32(3), 282-297. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy1.acu.edu.au/docview/220956312?accountid=8194
Stein, P. (2000). Rethinking resources in the ESL classroom: rethinking resources: multimodal pedagogies in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 333
336. http://doi.org/10.2307/3587958
Case, R. (2002). The intersection of language, education, and content: science instruction for ESL students. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational
Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 76(2), 71-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00098650209604952
o The bug that is drawn can be either from what they have seen in the video, or an imagined bug.
o Using 1 or 2 sentences write down what this bugs job is in the compost.
Second workstation:
o Using the composts that were created the previous session, check for any similarities or differences.
o Students to go over their initial hypothesis and check if it has been proven or disproven thus far.
o Using appendix 2, students will draw a sequence of what their compost looked like in session 1, what their compost now looks like, and what
they think it will look like in session 3. Students will be advised to label the different levels of compost and the changes that they see.
Third workstation:
o Using appendix 3 and 4, students must colour in and cut out the pictures (appendix 4) and decide if these items are either compostable or
recyclable and then paste it in the table (appendix 3)
o Extension: students can draw additional items that can be either composted or recycled
Students will be given an opportunity to ask questions, that needs to be clarified.
Attachments:
Teacher resources:
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2011). Level 1. Accessed
from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/
Allen, H., & Park, S. (2011). Science Education and ESL Students. Science Scope, 35(3), 29-35
Davis, J., & Effeney, G. (2013). Education for Sustainability: A Case Study of Pre-service Primary Teachers' Knowledge and Efficacy. AJTE,
38(5). http://eprints.qut.edu.au/59938/1/59938A.pdf
Do the Rot Thing: A teachers guide to compost activities: http://www.cvswmd.org/uploads/6/1/2/6/6126179/do_the_rot_thing_cvswmd1.pdf
Jabareen, Y. (2011). Teaching sustainability: A multidisciplinary approach. Creative Education, 2(4), 388-392. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/914451057?accountid=8194
Online timer: http://www.online-stopwatch.com/
Santone, S. (2003). Education for Sustainability. Educational Leadership, 61(4), 60.
Wilson, S. (2012). Drivers and Blockers: Embedding Education for Sustainability (EfS) in Primary Teacher Education. Australian Journal of
Environmental Education, 28(1), 42-56. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy2.acu.edu.au/10.1017/aee.2012.5
YouTube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBkBwVFFEWw
Appendix 1: PowerPoint presentation will be used throughout the introduction of the lesson.
Stages of compost!
Appendix 3: This t-chart will be used in workstation 3, where the students will be able to paste/draw their pictures.
Cut and paste the pictures into the table where you think they belong.
Recycle!
Appendix 4: This will also be used in workstation 3, for the students to cut out the pictures and add it on to their t-chart.