REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

MOCK COURT

SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY

COLLEGE OF LAW
BAGUIO CITY
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,
Plaintiff,
CRIM. CASE NO. 005254
-versusOR
GLORIA ARARO-YO y MACAPAGOD,
HOCHOC BOLATE y SABYO and
OF
ELISEO dela PASPAS y VILLARDO,
No. 3019

VIOLATION
R.A.

Accused.
x------------------------------------------------x

FORMAL OFFER OF EVIDENCE

With all due respect to this Honorable Court, The Prosecution formally
offers in evidence the following exhibits:
Document to be Presented
Purpose
Exhibit A The Affidavit-Complaint That he is the judgment-creditor in
of Winston Gaysia, the private the collection suit he filed against
offended party in this case
Hochoc Bolate and that the no
execution of the judgment was made
in his favour which adversely
affected his business and reputation.
Exhibit B The Sworn Statement of To prove that a person witnessed the
Mirriam Sangtago, the Starbucks transaction between Mr. Dela Paspas
Caf cshrier who witnessed the and Atty. Araro-Yo.
delivery of the Toyota Innova Car by
Mr. Dela Paspas to Atty. Araro-Yo
Exhibit
B-1
The
Starbucks To prove that Eliseo dela Paspas was
Customers Card in the name of indeed at Starbucks Coffee Shop on
Eliseo dela Paspas
December 20, 2006.
Exhibit
B-2
The
Starbucks To prove that Eliseo dela Paspas was
Receipt in the name of Eliseo dela indeed at Starbucks Coffee Shop on
December 20, 2006
Paspas
Exhibit C The Sworn Statement To prove that she has knowledge of
of
Jamby
Walangdangal,
the the fact that the execution of the
secretary of Winston Gaysia.
judgment in the case filed by
Winston Gaysia was not made
because of a car that was delivered
to Gloria Araro-Yo, the clerk of court
in charge of the collection suit filed

by Winston Gaysia against Hochoc

Bolate in order not to execute such
judgment.
Exhibit C-1 The journal entry of To prove the events that transpired
Ms. Jamby Walangdangal on October on October 19, 2008 and to show the
facts as narrated by Mr. dela Paspas
19, 2008
and heard by Ms. Walangdangal
pertaining
to
the
events
of
December 20, 2006
Exhibit C-2 A deposition made To prove the emotional condition of
by Mrs. Pia Walangdangal, the ailing Ms. Jamby Walangdangal on the
mother of Ms. Jamby Walangdangal night of October 19, 2008 and to
about the emotional condition of Ms. show that Mr. dela Paspas and Ms.
Jamby Walangdangal on the night of Jamby Walangdangal were together
on that date
October 19, 2008
Exhibit D The Sworn Statement To show that he was not deputized to
of Pingpong Lason
issue the Writ of Execution in favour
of Mr. Gaysia
Exhibit E The Statement of To prove the financial standing of
Assets and Liabilities of Atty. Araro-Yo Atty. Araro-Yo and her financial ability
for the year 2006-2007
to obtain on her personal capacity
the 2006 Maroon Toyota Innova
Exhibit F The Order Promulgated To prove there was indeed a
by Judge Manny Billang in favour of judgment in the collection suit in
Mr. Winston Gaysia
favour of Mr. Winston Gaysia.

With the offer of these documentary exhibits, the admissions made by

the Accuseds, the witnesses, the Prosecution rests its case.
Baguio City, Philippines 25 March 2009.

BERNADETTE C. MENDOZA
GUPAAL
1st City Prosecutor
Prosecutor
City Prosecutors Office
Justice Hall, Baguio City

JHOANIELOU TAULI
2nd City Prosecutor
City Prosecutors Office
Justice Hall, Baguio City

BRENDA
3RD

City

City Prosecutors Office

Justice Hall, Baguio City

APPROVED:
LEA CHRISTINE S. RAMOS
Chief City Prosecutor
City Prosecutors Office
Justice Hall, Baguio City

Cc:
PMA & ASSOCIATES LAW OFFICE
COUNSEL FOR THE ACCUSED
No. 213 Laperal Building
Session Road, Baguio City