Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
PREFERENCES
By:
Paige Charland, Greg Cormier, Liam Moloney,
Tim Norton, Brian ONeil, Lindsay Sweet
Marketing Research (MK 333) Fall 2015
Executive Summary
The purpose of the project is to determine which
media outlets are most effective in
communicating to Franklin Pierce University
students when it comes to information about
campus-related events
Survey 160 Franklin Pierce University students on
and off campus for better indication to staff and
students on what media outlets to use
Problem Statement
Research is necessary to determine Franklin
Pierce students preferred media outlets related to
campus event information.
Research Objectives
1. Review literature related to how students receive
information.
2. Identify various media outlets that are used by
Franklin Pierce Students.
3. Determine which media outlets are most
effective.
4. Determine demographic relationships to the
above research objectives.
Definitions
Audience Response Technology:
Also known as clicker technology allows students to
immediately reflect on their own as well as other
students anonymous responses to see how social
norms are actually perceived by their peers.
Word-of-mouth (WOM):
Refers to a form of promotion in which satisfied
customers recommend or, at least, tell others about a
product, business, or service they were happy with.
This form of marketing is typically unpaid and can be
very effective [1]
Literature
Review
Methodology &
Procedures
Problem Identification
Research is needed to determine the most
effective communication methods on campus
because it is widely unknown among students,
faculty, clubs, and organizations what methods
are currently the best for communicating
information and event knowledge
Development of Survey
Determine popular media outlets
How long and what outlets were used
Determined the demographics of the students taking
the survey
Definition of Population
Franklin Pierce University in Rindge, NH. has about
1400 undergraduate students
Both on and off campus
Sample Size
Total of 160 students surveyed
78 Male, 81 Female, 1 Other
Aimed for an even gender distribution from each
class (20 male, 20 female)
40 total freshmen, sophomores, juniors, seniors
Assumptions
The researchers of this study operated under the
assumption that all questionnaire respondents
answered all of the questions honestly and
accurately
Limitations
Time constraints
Prevented use of probability sampling method
Small sample size
Some discrepancies between responses that were
likely due to the clarity of the questions
Questionnaire
Somewhat
uninformed
2
I dont know/
Neutral
3
Somewhat well
informed
4
Very well
informed
5
Results
15.6
%No
84.4
%Yes
53.3
%
Yes
46.3
%No
34.4
%No
65.6
%
Yes
26.9
%Yes
73.1
%
No
58.1
%
Yes
41.9
%
No
15.6
%No
84.4
%
Yes
28.1
%No
71.9
%Yes
19.4
%No
80.6
%
Yes
18.1
%No
81.9
%
Yes
15.0
%
No
85.0
%
Yes
21.2
%
Yes
78.8
%No
18.1
%
Yes
81.9
%No
12.5
%
23.1
%
58.8
%
9.4%
12.5
%
36.3
%
33.1
%
51.2
%
Yes
46.9
%
No
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
60
50
40
30
20
10
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Very Uninformed
Somewhat Uninformed
I don't know/neutral
14.6
%
No
85.4
%
Yes
18.8
%
No
81.3
%
Yes
54.4
%
Yes
45.6
%
No
60.6
%
Yes
39.4
%
No
27.5
%
Yes
72.5
%
No
63.7
%
Yes
36.3
%
No
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
34
48.8
%
Male
50.6%
Femal
e
25%
Seni
or
25%
Freshma
n
25%
Junio
r
25%
Sophom
ore
92.5%
Oncampus
Cross-tabulation #1
Cross-tabulation #2
Discussion
Email
According to a Pew Internet survey 92% of adults
use email. [2]
In our study 135 students reported that they
learned about campus events through email,
representing 84.4% of the sample population.
Discussion
(continued)
Email (continued)
According to the same Pew Internet survey, 64%
of peoples ages 18-29 use email on a daily basis.
[2]
Discussion
(continued)
Print Media
Following an ad campaign at another campus in
the North East, awareness for a subject showed a
near 30% increase as opposed to the control
group. [6]
From our data we determined that the majority of
students (43.8%) did not have much of an opinion
about print media
Recommendations
Continue using email & posters, as the data
reports that students respond well to these
Try to advertise more efficiently on social media
since so many students already use it
References
1. Entrepreneur staff. (n. d.). Word-of-mouth advertising. Retrieved from
://www.entrepreneur.com/encyclopedia/word-of-mouth- advertising
http
2. Purcell, K. (2011, August 08). Search and email still top the list of most popular online activities.
Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2011/08/09/search-and-email-still -top-the-list-of-mostpopular-online-activities/
3. Chen, Clement C.; Jones, Keith T.; Xu, Shawn (2012, November). The Communication Methods of
Today's Students. Retrieved from https://www.questia.com/read/1P3-2869192151/the-communicationmethods-of-today-s-students
4. Go, A. (2010). Text Message Alerts--a First Look. U.S. News & World Report, 144(1), 66.
5. Boyer, S. L., Edmondson, D. R., Baker, B., & Solomon, P. (2015). WORD-OF-MOUTH,
TRADITIONAL
AND COVERT MARKETING: COMPARATIVE STUDIES. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 19(1), 102-119.
Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/1693219457?accountid= 37705
6. University of New Hampshire. Bringing in the Bystander. Durham: University of New Hampshire.
7. Duggan, M. (2015). The demographics of social media users. Retrieved from
http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/19/the-demographics-of-social-media-users/
8. Mount, Matthew, and Marian Garcia Martinez. "Social Media: A TOOL FOR OPEN INNOVATION."
California Management Review 56.4 (2014): 124-143. Business Source Complete. Web. 6 Oct. 2015.
9. Carlson, Ashley, and C. Christopher Lee. Followership and Social Media Marketing. Academy of
Marketing Studies Journal 19.1 (2015): 80-101. Business Source Complete.