Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
I B R A H I M M. U W A Y D A H 3 A N D R O B E R T L. B A L S T E R
Suspension vehicle
Cannabinols
Supported in part by a contract from NAS-NRC Committee on Problems of Drug Dependence and NIDA grant DA-00490. Send reprint
requests to Robert L. Balster, Box 726, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, VA 23298.
2NIDA postdoctoral fellow, supported by NIDA grant DA-05017. Present address: Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine,
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73190.
3 NIDA postdoctoral fellow, supported by NIDA training grant DA-07027.
357
358
G E N E R A L METHOD
Animals
The experimental animals were male albino mice (ICR,
2 0 - 3 0 g, Dublin Farms) and male rhesus monkeys (Macaca
mulatta). Monkeys were housed in individual primate cages
and had free access to water. Mice were housed 6 per cage
and had free access to food and water. All animals were
housed in temperature controlled rooms which had a 12 hr
light/dark cycle.
Synthesis
(3-HHC)
of
(+_)-9-nor-93-OH-HexahydrocannabinoI
Drugs
Water-soluble drugs were dissolved in 0.9% saline. Waterinsoluble drugs were first dissolved in emulphor:ethanol
Previous work has demonstrated that narcotic analgesics from a wide variety of different chemical classes have
antinociceptive effects when tested in rodents [12].
( + ) - P r o p o x y p h e n e HC1 has been reported to be about
10-times less potent than morphine in these antinociceptive
tests [12]. Because of its limited water solubility, the
napsylate salt of (+)-propoxyphene was selected as a
positive control to evaluate the applicability of the emulphor suspension system. This experiment represents the
first phase in the evaluation of the emulphor suspension
system for use in behavioral research. The bioavailability of
a water-insoluble narcotic was compared to its water-soluble
salt in the mouse tail-flick test for antinociceptive activity.
Method
The animals were male albino mice. They were housed six
per cage and kept in the central mouse facility until used.
All tail-flick tests were conducted on the same day between
10a.m. and 12 noon. Subcutaneous injections were administered 30 min before testing in a volume of 1.0 cc/kg.
The antinociceptive effects of the two propoxyphene salts
were assessed using a modification [11] of the tail-flick
method of D'Amour and Smith [9]. Three doses of each
salt as well as vehicle were tested. Antinociceptive potencies
were calculated as the percentage of the maximum possible
effect (% MPE) according to the method of Harris and
Pierson [20], with a 10 sec cut-off and a control latency of
2 - 4 sec. ED 50 values and confidence limits were determined by the method of Litchfield and Wilcoxon ['23].
( + ) - P r o p o x y p h e n e was delivered using the emulphor suspension system as described in the General Methods
section. A control group of mice was also tested with the
TABLE 1
TAIL-FLICKACTIVITYOF (+)-PROPOXYPHENE SALTSIN MICE*
Drug
(+)-Propoxyphene HC1
(+)-Propoxyphene Napsylate
ED.~ot
Confidence
Limits
Slope (r)
7.63
4.92
4.5-12.8
3.26- 7.26
1.90 (0.99)
1.65 (0.99)
359
360
(+)-PROPOXYPHENE
,2~l"
9-NOR-9~-OH-HEXAHYDROCANNABINOL
FI
FR
FI
150
m 75
=_z
_J
LL
0
I--
125
~< qoo
z 5o
I-z
0
n~
UJ
z5
t~
to
[3_
25
5O
|
SALINE1.0
3.2
~1
I0.0 3;~.0
SALINE1.0
3.2
I0.0
32.0
25
mg/kg
FIG. 1. Effects of (+)-propoxyphene HCI (open symbols) and
(+)-propoxyphene napsylate (solid symbols) on food reinforced
responding under a chain FI FR schedule of reinforcement. The
three different symbols represent the data for three different
monkeys. Data points for the two propoxyphene salts represents a
single determination at each dose. Saline values are the mean (+_ SD)
of 8 observations in each monkey. Injections (IM) were given 5 min
before the start of the session.
C o m p a r e d to t h e effects of m o r p h i n e o n the c h a i n F I F R
r e s p o n d i n g (Balster a n d Harris, u n p u b l i s h e d d a t a ) ( + ) - p r o p o x y p h e n e is a b o u t 1/3 as p o t e n t in p r o d u c i n g d i s r u p t i o n
of s c h e d u l e - c o n t r o l l i n g r e s p o n d i n g . This relative p o t e n c y
value for ( + ) - p r o p o x y p h e n e is similar to t h a t observed for
c o d e i n e p r e t r e a t m e n t s , c o m p a r e d to m o r p h i n e , u n d e r a
multiple FR schedule of food and intravenous codeine
r e i n f o r c e m e n t in t h e rhesus m o n k e y [ 6 ] . T h e c o m p a r a b l e
b e h a v i o r a l p o t e n c i e s in t h e m o n k e y for ( + ) - p r o p o x y p h e n e
a n d c o d e i n e relative to m o r p h i n e agree well w i t h t h e
relative p o t e n c y e s t i m a t e s o b t a i n e d in r o d e n t a n t i n o c i c e p t i r e tests [ 1 2 ] .
C o m p a r e d to m o r p h i n e , t 3 - H H C was a b o u t 3 t i m e s m o r e
potent. The a-HHC
was inactive at doses up to
10.0 mg/kg. B l o o m e t a l . [5] a n d Wilson e t a l . [34] have
r e p o r t e d t h a t t h e ~-isomer of HHC is a p o t e n t a n t i n o c i c e p tive agent, while t h e a - i s o m e r is c o n s i d e r a b l y less p o t e n t or
inactive in t h e tail-flick t e s t for a n t i n o c i c e p t i v e activity.
z x 9 - T H C is also c o n s i d e r a b l y less active in this p r o c e d u r e
[51.
The data o b t a i n e d for t h e IM i n j e c t i o n o f t h e wateri n s o l u b l e c o m p o u n d s in m o n k e y s r e s p o n d i n g u n d e r a c h a i n
FI F R s c h e d u l e of f o o d r e i n f o r c e m e n t d e m o n s t r a t e t h a t t h e
e m u l p h o r s u s p e n s i o n s y s t e m was an effective vehicle for
evaluating t h e b e h a v i o r a l effects of w a t e r - i n s o l u b l e analgesics. ( + ) - P r o p o x y p h e n e n a p s y l a t e is p o o r l y w a t e r soluble,
less t h a n 1.5 m g / c c [ 1 9 ] , a n d t h e a- a n d #-isomers of HHC
are o f c o m p a r a b l e w a t e r i n s o l u b i l i t y to ~ 9 _ T H C ,
0.77 m g / l i t e r [ 1 6 ] . It w o u l d have b e e n impossible to test
these c o m p o u n d s w i t h o u t t h e use of a s u s p e n s i o n system.
In a d d i t i o n , u n d e r t h e s e test c o n d i t i o n s the e m u l p h o r
vehicle was w i t h o u t b e h a v i o r a l effects a n d did n o t a p p e a r
to affect the relative p o t e n c y of ( + ) - p r o p o x y p h e n e w h e n
t h e water-soluble a n d w a t e r - i n s o l u b l e salts were c o m p a r e d .
Thus, it appears t h a t t h e e m u l p h o r vehicle w o u l d be an
h
SALINE 0.03
0 1
0,32
1.0
..I__L
SALINE 0.03
0.1
0.32
I0
mg/kg
SELF--ADMINISTRATION
AND
WATER--INSOLUBLE
RHESUS
OF
DRUGS
IN
MONKEYS
W A T E R - I N S O L U B L E DRUG S E L F - A D M I N I S T R A T I O N IN MONKEYS
infusion catheter passed through the metal arm and was
connected to the implanted catheter at the back of the
monkey. IV drug injections (1.0 cc in 10 sec) were delivered by a peristaltic pump (Cole-Parmer). Solid-state
programming and control equipment, digital counters and
cumulative recorders (Ralph Gerbrand, Inc.) were located
in the adjoining room.
Daily self-administration studies were conducted in the
arfimals' home cages for 2 hr at the same time each day.
Monkeys were trained to respond under an FR 10 schedule
of IV cocaine reinforcement as previously described [3, 4,
14]. Under this schedule, every tenth response resulted in
the delivery of an intravenous injection of cocaine
(1 O0 ug/kg/inj). The availability of cocaine injections under
the FR 10 schedule was indicated by the illumination of
two orange lights immediately above the response lever.
Daring cocaine injections the orange lights were extinguished and a white light was illuminated over the lever.
At the end of the 2 hr session all of the lights over the lever
were extinguished. A substitution procedure [3, 4, 14] was
used to test for positive reinforcing properties of the two
salts of (+)-propoxyphene, ~ 9 - T H C and t3-HHC. Doses of
test compounds or vehicle were substituted for cocaine for
six consecutive daily sessions. Which of the 5 animals were
tested with each compound can be determined from the
subject identification numbers included in Figs. 3 - 5 . For
(+)-propoxyphene, equimolar doses of each salt were tested
in sequence before the next pair of doses. For the
cannabinoids, # - H H C was tested before zx~ - T H C . Blocks
of 6 cocaine self-administration sessions alternated with 6
sessions in which test compounds were substituted for
cocaine. The last 3 of the 6 days of drug self-administration
were compared to the last 3 of the 6 days of saline or
emulphor vehicle substitution. A drug was identified as a
positive reinforcer if response rates on the last 3 days of
drug self-administration were above and did not overlap
with rates on the last 3 days of vehicle self-administration.
361
(+)- PROPOXYPHENE
HYDROCHLORtDE
5 0 qg/kg/inj
~5o1
(o.~6 mg/c)
500 qq/kg/inj
to.s~ mg,,~:)
7 5 0 u~/kg/inj
{~.1 ml,'e)
(S* mo,'~=)
14o1
130:
120
II0
I00
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
IO
B4107
120
(o~o ~g/~)
I10
(0.4W m,/cc)
(s.o ~Qtcc)
(4S mgtc)
I00
90
80
70
60
50
.
40
50
20
I0
~4116
IlO
(o.soz m~/1
I00
(3 ~em~/c)
(s,oz ~elc)
go
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
I0
I
45
~ 2
45
SUCCESSIVE
45
~ 2
345
SESSIONS
between 4.5 and 5.4 mg/cc. This exceeds the water-solubility of the compound (1.5mg/cc; ref. [19]). Thus,
without the use of the emulphor suspension system it
would not have been possible to test this high dose of
(+)-propoxyphene.
Neither ~ ~ - T H C nor ~ - H H C functioned as reinforcers
when substituted for cocaine (Figs. 4 and 5). In general, the
data for the two cannabinoids closely paralleled the vehicle
substitution (extinction) data across the 6 substitution
days. One exception was monkey B002 at the 3.0 and
30.0 ~g/kg/inj doses of t3-HHC. At the 3.0 ~g/kg/inj dose,
responding appeared to alternate across the days between
relatively high and relatively low self-administration rates
compared to vehicle rates, with a general trend downward
362
C A R N E Y , U W A Y D A H A N D BALSTElq
( - ) - A9 - TETRAMYDROCANNABINOL
3.0 qg/kg/inj
30 qg/kg/inj
9-NOR-9B-OH-HEXAHYDROCANNABINOL
300 qg/kg/inj
B002
(0.022 mg/cc)
(0.22 mg/c)
O. 3 0 q g / k g / i n j
3.0 qg/kg/inj
(0 o02m~llecJ
(0 022mglcc)
50 qg/kg/inj
60
(220 rag/co)
BOO2
50
(0 22mglc)
50
40
40
30
30
2O
20
,o
[0
t~
i
,
z
0
F-- 6 0
--
B4114
(o.o2o rag/co)
(o,2o m,;I/CC)
(2.oo rag/co)
6O
50
B4163
5o
40
(0 O02mglcc)
(0
020mglcc)
(0 O02mg/cc)
(o 020rag/co)
(0
20mg/cc)
4o
&
30
3o
o
I--
20
,Y, 2 o
z
I0
I0
4 5
SUCCESSIVE
3 4 5
SESSIONS
B4H4
60
(0 20rag/co}
50
40
30
20
I0
SUCCESSIVE
SESSIONS
WATER-INSOLUBLE
DRUG SELF-ADMINISTRATION
was o b s e r v e d in t h e p r e s e n t s t u d y f o r b o t h p r o p o x y p h e n e
salts a n d has b e e n d e m o n s t r a t e d f o r a wide v a r i e t y o f
s e l f - a d m i n i s t e r e d drugs at doses a b o v e t h o s e w h i c h m a i n t a i n
m a x i m u m rates [3, 4, 7, 14, 17, 22, 3 5 ] . T h e decline in
r e s p o n d i n g o b s e r v e d at t h e h i g h p r o p o x y p h e n e dose m a y
have b e e n d u e t o t h e r e s p o n s e - r a t e decreasing effects of
( + ) - p r o p o x y p h e n e , since pre-session i n j e c t i o n s o f p r o p o x y p h e n e did p r o d u c e dose-related decreases in f o o d - r e i n f o r c e d
r e s p o n d i n g . As s h o w n in Fig. 1, decreases in food-reinf o r c e d r e s p o n d i n g o c c u r r e d at or a b o v e doses o f 1.0 m g / k g
(HC1) or 1.5 m g / k g ( n a p s y l a t e ) . S u c h a p r o p o x y p h e n e dose
w o u l d b e a c h i e v e d a f t e r t h e s e c o n d i n j e c t i o n at t h e h i g h
p r o p o x y p h e n e dose in t h e s e l f - a d m i n i s t r a t i o n e x p e r i m e n t .
W h e t h e r t h e decrease in t h e n u m b e r o f p r o p o x y p h e n e
i n j e c t i o n s / s e s s i o n at t h e h i g h dose was t h e result o f a
generalized d i s r u p t i o n o f o p e r a n t b e h a v i o r o r if it was t h e
result of a r e i n f o r c e r - s p e c i f i c satiation-like effect [6] o f
propoxyphene self-administration cannot be determined
f r o m t h e p r e s e n t l y available data.
N e i t h e r zx9 - T H C n o r ~ - H H C f u n c t i o n e d as r e i n f o r c e r s
w h e n s u b s t i t u t e d for c o c a i n e at t h e doses tested. Similar
negative data f o r zx9 - T H C s e l f - a d m i n i s t r a t i o n was r e p o r t e d
b y Harris etal. [ 2 1 ] . In t h e i r s t u d y , A 9 - T H C failed to
m a i n t a i n s e l f - a d m i n i s t r a t i o n r e s p o n d i n g w h e n it was substit u t e d for cocaine, w h e n naive m o n k e y s were allowed
12 h r access t o THC i n j e c t i o n s , or a f t e r m o n k e y s h a d b e e n
e x p o s e d for 3 0 days to p r o g r a m m e d THC infusions. Pickens
e t a l . [26] r e p o r t e d THC s e l f - a d m i n i s t r a t i o n in r h e s u s
IN M O N K E Y S
363
m o n k e y s t h a t h a d b e e n t r a i n e d to r e s p o n d u n d e r a
p h e n c y c l i d i n e s e l f - a d m i n i s t r a t i o n baseline. H o w e v e r , res p o n d i n g f o r THC was n o t c o n s i s t e n t l y m a i n t a i n e d across
sessions and, as suggested b y Harris etal. [ 2 1 ] , t h e
a p p a r e n t THC s e l f - a d m i n i s t r a t i o n m a y have b e e n due to
s o m e s t i m u l u s p r o p e r t y o f THC w h i c h was c o m m o n t o t h a t
of p h e n c y c l i d i n e a n d f u n c t i o n e d as a s e c o n d a r y r e i n f o r c e r ,
w h i c h w o u l d e x t i n g u i s h at a slower rate t h a n saline
s u b s t i t u t i o n . T h e failure of # - H H C to m a i n t a i n self-adminis t r a t i o n r e s p o n d i n g is o f i n t e r e s t since it is a p o t e n t
a n t i n o c i c e p t i v e c o m p o u n d in t h e r o d e n t [ 5 ] . # - H H C is
a b o u t 3 t i m e s m o r e p o t e n t t h a n m o r p h i n e in d i s r u p t i n g
o p e r a n t b e h a v i o r . T h u s , t h e failure o f #-HHC t o f u n c t i o n as
a r e i n f o r c e r was n o t due t o a relatively w e a k b e h a v i o r a l
p o t e n c y . It a p p e a r s t h a t c a n n a b i n o i d s like # - H H C m a y
r e p r e s e n t a class o f c e n t r a l l y active analgesics w h i c h have
p o t e n t a n t i n o c i c e p t i v e effects a n d p o t e n t effects in disrupting schedule-controlled responding, but which do not
f u n c t i o n as positive r e i n f o r c e r s in IV s e l f - a d m i n i s t r a t i o n
studies in m o n k e y s .
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank Dr. William L. Dewey for conducting the
antinociception studies. The technical assistance of George W.
King III, J. Marshall Newbern and Dr. Thomas G. Aigner in
conducting the behavioral studies is gratefully acknowledged.
REFERENCES
1. Balster, R. L. and L. D. Chair. The behavioral pharmacology of
phencyclidine. Clin. Toxic. 9: 5 1 3 - 5 2 8 , 1976.
2. Balster, R. L., L. D. Chair and G. W. King III. The effects of
acute and chronic phencyclidine on schedule-controlled behavior in the rhesus monkey. Fedn Proc. 3 5 : 5 6 4 (abstract),
1976.
3. Balster, R. L., C. E. Johanson, R. T. Harris and C. R. Schuster.
Phencyclidine self-administration in the rhesus monkey. Pharmac. Biochem. Behav. 1: 167-172, 1973.
4. Balster, R. L. and C. R. Schuster. A comparison of d-amphetamine, ~-amphetamine and methamphetamine self-administration in rhesus monkeys. Pharmac. Biochem. Behav. 1:
2 7 6 - 2 8 1 , 1973.
5. Bloom, A. S., W. L. Dewey, L. S. Harris and K. K. Brosius.
9-nor-9/3-Hydroxyhexahydrocannabinol, a cannabinoid with
potent and antinociceptive activity: Comparisons with morphine. J. Pharmac. exp. Ther. 200: 2 6 3 - 2 7 0 , 1977.
6. Carney, J. M. Selective modulation of codeine-reinforced
responding in rhesus monkeys. Doctoral Thesis submitted to
faculty of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1976.
7. Carney, J. M., M. E. Llewellyn and J. H. Woods. Variable
interval responding maintained by intravenous codeine and
ethanol injection in the rhesus monkey. Pharmac. Biochem.
Behav. 5: 5 7 7 - 5 8 2 , 1976.
8. Cradock, J. C., J. P. Davignon, C. L. Litterst and A. M.
Guarino. An intravenous formulation of A9-tetrahydrocan nabinol using a nonionic surfactant. J. Pharrn. Pharmac. 25:
345, 1973.
9. D'Amour, F. E. and D. L. Smith. A method for determining
loss of pain sensations. J. Pharrnac. exp. Ther. 72: 7 4 - 7 9 ,
1941.
10. Deneau, G., T. Yanagita and M. H. Seevers. Self-administration
of psychoactive substances by the rhesus monkey. A measure
of psychological dependence. Psychopharmacologia
16:
3 0 - 4 8 , 1969.
364
21. Harris, R. T., W. Waters and D. McLendon. Evaluation of
reinforcing capability of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in rhesus
monkeys. Psychopharmacologia 37: 23-29, 1974.
22. Hoffmeister, F. and U. U. Schlichting. Reinforcing properties
of some opiates and opioids in rhesus monkeys with histories
of cocaine and codeine self-administration. Psychopharmacologia 23: 5 5 - 7 4 , 1972.
23. Litchfield, J. T., Jr. and F. Wilcoxon. A simplified method of
evaluating dose effect experiments. J. Pharmac. exp. Ther. 96:
99-113, 1949.
24. McMillan, D. E. Behavioral pharmacology of the tetrahydrocannabinols. In: Advances in Behavioral Pharmacology, Vol. I,
edited by T. Thompson and C. B. Dews. New York: Academic
Press, 1977, pp. 1-34.
25. McMillan, D. E. and W. H. Morse. Some effects of morphine
and morphine antagonists on schedule-controlled behavior. J.
Pharmac. exp. Ther. 157: 175-184, 1957.
26. Pickens, R., T. Thompson and D. Muchow. Cannabis and
phencyclidine self-administration by animals. In: Bayer
Symposium IV: Psychic-Dependence, edited by L. Goldberg
and F. Hoffmeister. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1973, pp.
78-86.
27. Ravin, H. A., A. M. Seligman and J. Fine. Polyvinylpyrrolidone
as a plasma expander. Studies on its excretion distribution and
metabolism.New Engl. J. Med. 247: 921-929, 1952.
28. Schaeppi, U. and R. S. Phelan. Emulphor (EL-620) vehicle:
Blood pressure effects of IV infusion in dogs and rhesus
monkeys. U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical
Information Service, PB-220 052, 1972.
C A R N E Y , U W A Y D A H AND B A L S T E R
29. Schuster, C. R. and C. E. Johanson. The use of animal models
for the study of drug abuse. In: Research Advances in Alcohol
and Drug Problems, edited by R. S. Gibbons, Y. Israel, H.
Kalant, R. E. Popham, W. Schmidt and R. G. Smart. New
York: John Wiley and Sons, 1974, pp. 1-31.
30. Sofia, R. D., R. K. Kubena and H. Barry III. Comparison of
four vehicles for intraperitoneal administration of xl-tetrahydrocannabinol. J. Pharm. Pharmac. 2 3 : 8 8 9 - 8 9 1 , 1971.
31. Talley, W. H. and I. Rosenblum. Self-administration of
dextropropoxyphene by rhesus monkeys to the point of
toxicity. Psychopharmacologia 27: 179-182, 1972.
32. Thompson, T., J. Trombley, D. Luke and D. Lott. Effects of
morphine on behavior maintained by four simple food-reinforcement schedules. Psychopharmacologia 17: 182-192,
1970.
33. Wilson, R. S. and E. L. May. Analgesics properties of the
tetrahydrocannabinols, their metabolites and analogs. J. Med.
Chem. 18: 700-703, 1975.
34. Wilson, R. S., E. L. May, B. R. Martin and W. L. Dewey. The
9-nor-9-hydroxy-hexahydrocannabinols. Synthesis, some behavioral and analgesic properties and comparison with tetrahydrocannabinols. J. Med. Chem. 19:1165-1167, 1976.
35. Winger, G. D. and J. H. Woods. The reinforcing property of
ethanol in the rhesus monkey: I. Initiation, maintenance and
termination of intravenous ethanol-reinforced responding. Ann
N.Y. Acad. SoL U.S.A. 215: 162-175, 1973.