Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Thomas E. Altizer
English 1010 Bogle
Salt Lake Community College
Altieri, Kathy Marie. Validating the Alcohol and Drug use Survey and
Determining the Relationships
of Familial and Age-Related Variables
with Substance Abuse of Adolescents in a Correctional Facility. Order
No. 3042389 Kent State University, 2001. Ann Arbor: ProQuest. Web. 22
Nov. 2015.
In Kathy Marie Altieris Doctoral Dissertation, Validating the Alcohol and
Drug use Survey and Determining the Relationships of Familial and Age-Related
Variables with Substance Abuse of Adolescents in a Correctional Facility, she
examines the ravages of alcohol and drug addiction in adolescents who are
currently incarcerated. In her essay, she expresses that research has shown that
as much as 80% of all crime is a product in some way of substance abuse.
Moreover, most people who start using illicit drugs start young.
She also expresses the fact that of those inmates, less than twenty per
cent of them actually receive treatment in their lifetime. There just now
emerging resources for drug offenders, particularly in the adolescent justice
system, as early prevention for potential future crime. The way that Altieri says
the need for treatment intervention is assessed is through the ADUS or Alcohol
and Drug Use Survey. Through this survey, clinicians are able to properly assess
the level of care their subjects need to properly mitigate future destructive
behavior as a result of their drug use. Since these intervention procedures, there
has been a dramatic decrease of recurring offenders entering the Ohio detention
system where her study was conducted.
I found fantastic statistical evidence for my question in this article. I was
able to find an actual study that goes hand in hand with my question, Is
treatment for addicts more beneficial than incarceration. In Altieris study, she
actually proves the former, at least in the adolescent community in the Ohio
Juvenile Justice System. Through statistical analysis and on-site interviews with
people undergoing treatment, she is able to successfully prove that treatment
can prevent further crime.
The only caveat to her dissertation is that it virtually only applies to
adolescents. My question more so focusses on adults. But as she mentions, most
adult addicts usually start in their adolescent years, so this essay still carries
weight to my research question. All in all, I completely agree with her, and her
research results add much to the statistical weight of my issue.
Baker, Al. "Governor Offers Legislation to Soften Harsh Drug Laws." New
York Times, Late Edition
(East Coast) ed.Jul 16 2003.ProQuest. Web.
22 Nov. 2015 .
Al Bakers short but poignant New York Times piece, "Governor Offers
Legislation to Soften Harsh Drug Laws.", provides a two part contribution to the
issue. He first of all lays out a bill that Governor Pataki of New York put before the
state legislature in New York to offer treatment instead of incarceration for
addicts. He says the bill came forward in an effort to redo the harsh laws enacted
by Governor Rockefeller in the 1970s, which offered nothing but incarceration
for addicts committing drug offenses. One of these laws that stuck out to me was
that the Rockefeller laws prohibited judges from using their discretion to offer the
option of treatment over incarceration. In other words, if you get caught, there is
only one place you are going, jail.
His other contribution to my issue was that he exposed how much of a
bureaucratic mess getting these kinds of laws enacted truly is. As a matter of
fact, most of his article exposed politicians on both sides of the aisle who critique
and criticize the governor for the various political reasons why he would want to
enact this law.
This article helped me very much because it showed me that this issue is
neither a Democratic or Republican problem. It is very much a bipartisan
problem. If one is to enact legislation on this issue, he or she must get a unified
vote through politicians in order for that to happen.
Everyone has their own opinions on addiction. Nothing made this clearer
than Baker in his article. I was able to locate some of the key road blocks that
law makers face in making these changes happen for their community. Moreover,
I was able to see that change is a slow process, and must go through the proper
channels in order to be accomplished.
simply do not think it will work. I already have bias toward this issue, but it is
valuable to be able to see the valid arguments of the opposition.
Mary Cooper also provided some very poignant statistics that can be
utilized as well. She used graphs to show the availability of street drugs is just as
prominent now as it was before the Reagan laws, but that purity, availability
have also gone up with it as well. In essence, she shows the laws dont work. I
will say that her bias also shows very slightly in this article, but her recognition of
the opposing view shows her willingness to see both sides in order to make an
informed inquiry and essay.
Friedman, J. (2014, May 2). Treating addiction. CQ Researcher, 24, 385408. Retrieved from
http://library.cqpress.com/
In Jane Friedmans CQ Researcher article Treating Addiction, she exposes
the different treatment methods currently in use in the United States. She
exposes the reality of the fiscal, emotional, psychological, and physical cost of
addiction, and how it takes a toll on the American public. She presents several
celebrity stories including that of Philip Seymour Hoffman, who recently died of a
heroin overdose.
She also explores the methods of treatment in the United States for drug
abuse. She offers what she calls the traditional approach of 12 step treatment
coupled with therapy and groups. However she places most of her research in
new alternative ways of treatments for addicts. She offers scientific studies
which show that the traditional method does not work for all addicted people.
My first reaction to this story was a bit heated. I am a member of a twelve
step group, and have utilized therapy and group therapy to battle my own
addiction. I have found that this approach really works for me, and her bias to
the contrary caught me off guard, and quite frankly made me angry.
However, I know that there is more than one road that leads to Rome, and
my approach might not work for everyone. In the end, addiction is the enemy,
not opponents to the twelve steps. After being able to see past my own biases, I
was able to learn about the myriad of different methods for treating addiction
other than the one in which I was familiar. In the end, Friedmans article helped
tremendously in broadening the scope of the different options available for those
who wish to recover from their addiction.
On the other side of the coin, these authors biases were also slightly
present, in that they were obviously proponents of AA and the twelve steps.
However, I enjoyed reading how the complex and intricate care of addiction in
todays society can be stemmed back to two men who wished to recover, did
recover, and wrote a program to help others do the same, made me feel a sense
of pride in my own recovery.
inebriated, and the opportunity to do so in the current age is more available than
ever.
The idea that alcoholics and addicts are bred in our culture affords some
serious reflection for me as an alcoholic. Price recalls my experience growing in
this culture, and drinking some of the same drinks he offers in this report, for the
very same reasons he proposes. Not only that, the culture on television and the
music I listened to all glorified this type of use.