Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
we come up with different ways to discriminate against them. The English only movement is an
example of this discrimination. It is a violation of civil rights. The ability to speak another
language is not a detriment; it is necessary advantage to competing in the growing international
market. Additionally, to teach English teachers need to integrate the students native language.
Otherwise, they either sink or swim and cannot succeed in society, school, or the work force.
Cross Examination:
Sarah: Thank you to both sides. Now, we will transition into the Cross Examination. Those for a
national language, you may begin.
Kevin: Hola me llamo Kevin Williams, Gracias por su declaracin: en un intento de mostrar por
qu Ingls tiene que ser la lengua nacional de los Estados Unidos, voy a hacer preguntas al
azar en espaol: por qu crees as? Esto har mucho ms sentido si hablaba en Ingles?
Response: what?
Kevin: see, wouldnt this statement I have made be more effective if I has spoken in a language
we could have all understood? If we had a set national language it would make sense to
everyone. English is most widely spoken language in the United States, if everyone spoke and
understood English, we would not have such communication errors.
Let me ask you a few questions about your argument:
Have you considered that millions of immigrants whom came to the United States seeking a
better life were more than willing to learn the language, while still keeping their own native
tongue?
(Response)
We are not arguing that these people need to give up their native language socially, simply that
all legal documents, information, street signs, and pretty much everything else will be in English
On the education front, you mention that students will either sink or swim when immersed in
English. Have you considered that simple immersion into the English Language is a much better
option for students to learn the language?
(Response)
Wouldnt the standard of having English only unite our country, make it stronger, avoid
confusion, and create a new American identity?
(Response)
In regards to your claim of discrimination, and the idea that a National language will infringe
upon our first amendment rights, it seems that 31 states find that it does not infringe on these
rights as they have adopted English as their official language, so why shouldnt the entire
country follow suit?
(Response)
Final question: Money and maintaining a strict budget is of the upmost importance for schools,
the states, and the National government. How much will maintaining a bilingual system cost
taxpayers? And is it worth the cost?
(response)
Sarah: Thank you. We will now move to those against an official national language.
Laura:
-You opened your statement saying that English was the founding language of our nation. What
about native Americans that were already in the United States before it was founded? Also,
wasnt our nation founded by immigrants from all over Europe?
-You said that you value diversity, well how are you really valuing diversity if you are forcing
individuals to learn a new language? If we were really living in a diverse country or society,
wouldnt you want diverse languages?
-Immigrants to the United States have never been legally required to learn English. Many official
interactions require the use of a translator. By implementing a nation language, wouldnt you be
taking away jobs not only from immigrants, but also, from native English speakers?
-You spoke to us to in Spanish and claimed that our lack of understanding validated instituting a
national language. However, if our nation instead was accepting and encouraging of diverse
languages, wouldnt everyone in this room not only understand what I am saying now, but also
the Spanish you were speaking earlier?
-Are you saying that money is more important than the education of children? Dont you want
your students to be well-rounded, accepting of other cultures, and have the opportunity to
participate in the international market?
-By forcing students into English-only educational environments, arent encouraging a sink-orswim system? Isnt it possible that some students will lose motivation and perform poorly in the
classroom because they are not receiving the supports they need?
Closing Statement
Sarah: Thank you both for your cross examinations. We will now move to closing statements.
Those in favor of an official national language, you may begin.
Emily & Jen: We need to recognize the historical fact that the United States has been an
overwhelmingly English-speaking nation since it was created. Even though the people in the
United States value and respect diversity, we should preserve English as our common language
and therefore immigrants have the responsibility to learn English. Speaking English is a
guaranteed way for new immigrants to succeed in school, increase their earning potential, and
enhance their career options. It is a language that brings people together from different
ethnicities all over the country. In countries all across the world, English is essentially required in
the school systems and in order to obtain a steady job. A whopping 60 of the worlds 196
countries have declared English as their official language, including Australia, Canada, and New
Zealand.
Both the courts and America's citizens and immigrants have sent a clear message: We must
unite our country behind our proud national language, help new immigrants advance by learning
it, and save taxpayer dollars by making English our national language. While we respect
diversity and every individuals right to speak their native language in their homes, learning
English is necessary to succeed in the United States. If we want to ensure the success of our
students in the United States, we need to make English the common language.
Michaela: Implementing English as the official language of the United States would be a
detriment to this great nation. As we mentioned earlier, America is a nation of immigrants and
we should be proud of this heritage, rather than trying to hide it. Also, according to
pewresearch.org, there are more than 37 million speakers in the United States today that speak
Spanish among people ages 5 and older. It is considered one of the fastest-growing languages,
with the number of speakers up 233% since 1980. This shows that the language changes and
that English may not always be the predominant language in America.
Megan: We should embrace our cultural diversity because it is what sets us apart from other
nations. It would not segregate individuals, but rather increase acceptance of different
languages and cultures and would encourage education and the learning of new languages. It
would promote individuals ability to participate in the international market. It would also promote
brain activity and allow for individuals to increase their adaptability and level of function.
Laura: If English is the official language, it would segregate those who cannot learn English
from the rest of their society. We want all of our children to succeed and become participants in
the world community. Allowing for a diversity of languages is necessary in order to make this
happen because students recieve the supports and encouragement they need.To sum up our
argument, implementing an official language is discrimination and against our constitutional
rights.
Sarah: The jury has delivered the verdict. By an overwhelming vote, they have decided to vote
against instating an official national language. The reasons why court decided this was because
in our modern United States society as a developed nation, we should be able to accommodate
all of those whom wish to become successful Americans. In the spirit of that idea, we cannot
allow English to be the official national language. Due to the fact that so many Americans do not
speak English and our need to educate and facilitate the lives of all of our citizens, we should be
accommodation to those other cultures and languages regardless of cost, and therefore should
not instate English as a national language. Thank you all for your time. Court dismissed.