SUMMERHILL
A RADICAL APPROACH TO
CHILD REARING
By A. S. NEILL
With a Foreword by Erich Fromm
HART PUBLISHING COMPANY
New York City
‘The Idea of Summerhill
‘This isa story ofa modern schoo! —Summeshil,
‘Sornmerill was founded in the year x92. The schoo! is situ
ated within the village of Lestn, in Suffolk, England, and is
about one hundeed miles from London.
Just a word about Summerhill pupils. Some children come to
‘Summerhill a the age of five years, and others a late a8 fee.
‘The children generally remain atthe school until they ae sixteen
year old. We generally have about twenty-five boys and twenty
girls.
‘The children are dived into thre age groupe: The youngest
ange from five to sven, the intermediates from eight to ten,
and the ales fom eleven to fiteen.
Generally we have a fairly large sprinkling of children from,
foreign countries. At the present time (1960) we have five Sean-
dinavians,one Hollander, one German and one American.
‘The children are housed by age groups with a house mother
for each group. The intermediates sleep io a stone building, the
seniors sleep in huts. Only one or two older pupils have rooms for
themselves. The boys live two or three or four to a room, and so
do the girls. The pupils do not have to stand room inspection
and no one picks up ater them. They a left fee. No one tells
them what to wear: they put on any kind of costume they want
twat anytime.
[Newspapers call it a Gaer-you-please School and imply that
itisa gathering of wild primitives who know no law and have
Tscems necessary, therefore, for me to write the story of Sum
sesh as honestly as I can. That I write with bis is natural;4 sexcenns sexo
yet shall ty to show the demerits of Suramerhll as wel sits
merits Is merits will be the merits of health, fre childsen|
whos lives are unspoiled by fear and hate.
Obviously, a school that makes active children st at desks
sodying mostly useless subjects is a bad school. It is @ good
school only for thote who belive in sucka school, for those un-
creative citizens who want docile, uncreatve children who will,
fitintoa civilization whote standard of sucess is money.
‘Summerhill began a an experimental school Its no longer
such; itt now a demonstration school, for it demonstrates that
freedom works.
‘When my frst wife and I began the school, we had one main
idea: 10 make the school fit the child—instead of making the
child ft the school.
1 had taught in ordinary schools for many years. I knew the
other way well I knew it was all wrong, Ie was wrong because
it was bared on an adult conception of what a child should be
and of how a child should learn. The other way dated from the
days when psychology was stil an unknown science
‘Well, we set out to make a school in which we should allow
children freedom to be themselves. In order to do this, we had
te renounce all discipline, all direction, all suggestion, all moral
trsiing, all religious instruction. We have been elle brave, but
‘id not requite courage. ll it required was what we had—a
complete belief in the child as a good, not an evi, being. For
almost forty years, thie belief in the goodness of the child has
never wavered; it rather ha become a final faith.
‘My view is that child is innately wise and realistic If left ro
bhimscl without adult suggestion of any kind, he will develop as
far as he is capable of developing. Logically, Summerhill is a
‘place in which people who have the innate ability and wish to
be scholars will be scholars; while those who are only ft to
sweep the streets will sweep the sects. But we have not pro-
‘nit I oF vier 5
duced a sect cleaner so far. Nor do I write this snobbisly, fr T
‘would rather se a school produce a happy street cleaner than &
urate scholar
‘What i Summerhill ike? Wel, for one thing, lestons are op-
tional. Children ean go to them or stay away from them—for
years if they want to, These ira tmetable—but only for the
teachers,
‘The children have clases usually according to their age, but
sometimes according to ther interests, We have no new methods
of teaching, because we do not consider that teaching in ivelf
matters very much. Whetier a school has or has not a speci
method for teaching long division is of no significance, for long
ivsion is of no importance except to those who want to learn
it, And the child who want to learn long division aril lean it
‘no mater how iis taught.
Children who come to Summerhill a kindergartners attend
lessons from the beginning oftheir stay; but pupils from other
schools vow that they wil never attend any bextly lessons again
at any time. They play and cyele and get in people's way, but
they fight shy of lesions. This sometimes goes on for months
‘The recovery time is proportionate tothe hated thei last school
‘gave them. Our record case was a girl from a convent. She
Ioafed for three years. The average period of recovery from les:
son version isthe months
‘Strangers to this idea of freedom will be wondering what sort
of madhous it is where children play ll day if they want to
Many an adult says, "If Thad been sent toa school like that, Td
never have done a thing.” Others say, “Such children will feel
themselves heavily handicapped when they have to compete
against children who have been made to lara.”
T think of Jack who left us atthe ge of seventeen to go into
‘an engineering factory. One day, the managing director sent for
him,6 senna senor
“You are the ld from Summerhil;" he sid "'m curious to
know how such an education appears to you now that you are
mizing with lads from the old schools. Suppose you had 10
choose again, would you go to Eton or Summerhill?”
“Oh, Summerhill, of ours,” replied Jack,
“But what docsitofer thatthe athe schools don’ offer?”
Jack scratched his head. “I dunno.” he sid slowly“ ehink it
gives you afeling of complet self-