Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Student Name
Student ID
264804
Assessment Title
Abstract
PRT550
Lecturer/Tutor
Date Submitted
10/09/2015
Date Received
Office use only
KEEP A COPY
Please be sure to make a copy of your work. If you have submitted assessment
work electronically make sure you have a backup copy.
PLAGIARISM
Plagiarism is the presentation of the work of another without acknowledgement.
Students may use a limited amount of information and ideas expressed by others
but this use must be identified by appropriate referencing.
CONSEQUENCES OF PLAGIARISM
Plagiarism is misconduct as defined under the Student Conduct By-Laws. The
penalties associated with plagiarism are designed to impose sanctions on
offenders that reflect the seriousness of the Universitys commitment to
academic integrity.
I declare that all material in this assessment is my own work except where there is a clear
acknowledgement and reference to the work of others. I have read the Universitys Academic and
Scientific Misconduct Policy and understand its implications.*
http://www.cdu.edu.au/governance/documents/AcademicandScientificMisconductPolicyv
1.03Jan2011.pdf.
SignedDoanTrong Tien..Date9/09/2015..
Abstract
Motivation/ problems: Interactivity has been trended as one effective method in
attracting and retaining students in studying online in Australia universities.
Charles Darwin University is a regional university that delivers approximately 98
% of its courses in higher education using Learning Management System (LMS)
Software. Learning management is central to learn and experience at Charles
Darwin University, but how can these experiences be learning made more
interesting engaging for students. This project aim to design and build an
interactive eLearning object repository with appropriate usability, efficient,
satisfying, and user-friendly experience. Those tools will be hosted on CDU
Blackboard for lecturers create online lessons and support students
collaborative learning experiences and collective meaning-making.
Method: A user centred development methodology will be used to build the
software. Central to this process is user central research so a range of qualitative
research has been conducted in lecturers and students with face-to-face
interviews, diary and journal exercises; by telephone, via videoconferencing or
via the Internet to determine software and requirements. In addition, the
research also learn from the software Articulate Storyline to create a software.
Result: TAB
Conclusion/implication: TAB
Key words
eLearning, appropriate usability, user centred, face-to-face interviews.