Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Bioresource Technology
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biortech
State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, No 73 Huanghe Road, Nangang District, Harbin 150090, PR China
Department of Environmental Science & Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology (Weihai), Weihai 264200, China
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 31 March 2010
Received in revised form 1 June 2010
Accepted 2 June 2010
Keywords:
Chlorella vulgaris
Lipid content
Articial wastewater
Energy and cost analyses
a b s t r a c t
Chlorella vulgaris was used to study algal lipid production with wastewater treatment. Articial wastewater was used to cultivate C. vulgaris in a column aeration photobioreactor (CAP) under batch and semicontinuous cultivation with various daily culture replacements (0.5 l1.5 l per 2 l reactor). The cell density was decreased from 0.89 g/l with the daily replacement of 0.5 l to 0.28 g/l with 1.5 l replacement.
However, C. vulgaris culture achieved the highest lipid content (42%, average value of the phase) and
the lipid productivity (147 mg/l d1) with daily replacement of 1.0 l. And then the nutrient removal efciency were 86% (COD), 97% (NH
4 ) and 96% (TP), respectively. Analyses of energy efciency showed that
the net energy ratio (NER) for lipid production with daily replacement of 1.0 l (1.25) was higher than the
other volume replacement protocols. And cost analyses showed that the algal biomass can be competitive
with petroleum at US$ 63.97 per barrel with the potential credit for wastewater treatment. According to
the above results, it is concluded that the present research will lead to an economical technology of algal
lipid production.
2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Global demand for food is expected to double within 50 years,
and the demand for transportation fuels is expected to increase
even more rapidly (Hill et al., 2006). Diversion of food crops to biofuels would not be right approach to solve the problems because
they compete with food production for high-grade arable land
(Rittmann, 2008). There is a great need for renewable energy supplies that do not cause signicant environmental harm and not
competed with food supply. Because of their higher photosynthetic
efciency, higher biomass production and faster growth compared
with other energy crops, microalgae have been receiving attentions
as candidates for fuel production (Minowa et al., 1995). Microalgae
can be used to produce various forms of biofuel including biodiesel
(Converti et al., 2009; Gao et al., 2010), ethanol (Shirai et al., 1998),
bioelectricity (Powell et al., 2009), hydrogen (Ghirardi, 2006;
Hemschemeier et al., 2009), and methane (Stucki et al., 2009).
Biodiesel is produced from plant oils or animal fats, and biodiesel industries are expanding rapidly both in the United States and
in Europe with soybean or rapeseed oils as the feedstock. However,
the potential market for biodiesel far surpasses the availability of
plant oils, waste cooking oil and animal fats. Therefore, microalgae
have been studied as alternative feedstock for biodiesel production
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 451 86283068; mobile: +13069891017; fax:
+86 451 87162150.
E-mail address: yujief@hit.edu.cn (Y. Feng).
0960-8524/$ - see front matter 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.016
recently. Use of microalgae to produce biodiesel would not compromise production of food, fodder and other products derived
from crops (Chisti, 2007). Many microalgae accumulate lipids as
storage materials and their accumulation is stimulated under environment stress, such as nutrient deciency (Dunahay et al., 1996)
or salt stress (Takagi et al., 2006). Widjaja et al. (2009) reported
that maximum lipid content of Chlorella vulgaris was only 26% under normal nutrition medium with nitrogen (NaNO3) content of
70.02 mg/l. However, after normal nutrition cultivation, the medium was changed into nitrogen depletion(0.02 mg/l) continued
for 7 d and 17 d, and the lipid contents were 36% and 43%, respectively. Furthermore, according to the results obtained by Converti
et al. (2009), a threefold increase (from 5.9% to 15.3%) in lipid content took place with NaNO3 concentration decrease from 1.5 to
0.375 g/l. Hsieh et al. (2009) used urea as the nitrogen source at
concentrations of 0.025, 0.050, 0.100, 0.150, and 0.200 g/l. After
6 days of cultivation, the lipid contents of Chlorella sp. were 66%,
60%, 52%, 37%, and 33% respectively.
Microalgal biomass can be produced through autotrophic cultivation in open ponds or photobioreactors by using solar energy
and xing carbon dioxide. Alternatively they are cultivated heterotrophically or mixotrophically using organic compounds as energy
and carbon sources. Due to the reduction in light penetration
(Chaumont, 1993) in autotrophic culture, the cell density is usually
less than 1 g/l (Borowitzka, 1994). So far as we know, there is
no effective cultivated method to increase cell density in the
autotrophic cultivation processes. Therefore, the downstream
102
processing costs are relatively high (Shi et al., 1997). For the heterotrophic or mixotrophic cultivation, organic carbon compounds
such as glucose are responsible for higher production costs.
Glucose used in this process comprises about 80% of the total costs
(Li et al., 2007).
In this work C. vulgaris was used to produce algal lipid using
wastewater as medium. In order to simply investigate the factors
related with algal lipid production during wastewater treatment,
preliminary results were obtained here using synthetic wastewater
instead of real wastewater. The use of wastewater as feedstock for
algal lipid is economically attractive since the production costs can
be reduced with credits for wastewater treatment as well as with
reduction in the greenhouse gas emission.
2. Methods
2.1. Algal strain and culture medium
C. vulgaris (FACHB1068) was purchased from Freshwater Algae
Culture Collection, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of
Sciences (Wuhan, China). The strain was preserved in the BG11
medium containing following chemicals: NaNO3 (1.5 g/l),
K2HPO43H2O (0.04 g/l), MgSO47H2O (0.075 g/l), CaCl22H2O
(0.036 g/l), Na2CO3 (0.02 g/l), citric acid (0.006 g/l), Ferric ammonium citrate (0.006 g/l), EDTA (0.001 g/l), and A5 + Co solution
(1 ml/l) that consists of H3BO3 (2.86 g/l), MnCl2H2O (1.81 g/l),
ZnSO47H2O (0.222 g/l), CuSO45H2O (0.079 g/l), Na2MoO42H2O
(0.390 g/l) and Co(NO3)26H2O (0.049 g/l). C. vulgaris was inoculated at 20% (v/v) in 250 ml Erlenmeyer asks containing 100 ml
BG11 medium. The asks were incubated under stationary condition at 30 C with 3000 lx continuous cool-white uorescent light
illumination, and were hand shaken three to ve times daily to
avoid sticking. The algal cells which just reached the stationary
phase were used to inoculate the column aeration photobioreactor
(CAP).
2.2. Articial wastewater
The articial wastewater was prepared dissolving following
chemicals; glucose (0.4125 g/l), NH4Cl (0.078 g/l), KH2PO4
(0.018 g/l), MgSO47H2O (0.013 g/l), CaCl22H2O (0.043 g/l), FeSO7H2O (0.005 g/l), and A5 + Co solution (1 ml/l). The initial pH
was adjusted to 7.08.0 and sterilized at 121 C for 20 min before
inoculation. The initial N-NH4+, total phosphate (TP), and COD concentration were 20, 4, and 400 mg/l, respectively.
2.3. Reactor design and its operation
Four 2.2 l CAPs were consructed with 2 l effective volume
(10 cm diameter and 25 cm height) using polymethyl methacrylate
(PMMA). The CAPs containing 1.5 l sterilized articial wastewater
were inoculated with 0.5 l ask culture of C. vulgaris. The culture
pH decreased due to NH4+ assimilation, which was observed in
our previous study (data not shown). Therefore, the pH of culture
was maintained between 8 and 10 during Day 2 to 14. All the
experiments were carried out at 30 C and 3000 lx continuous
cool-white uorescent light illumination. The reactors were aerated with sterilized air at 0.5 vvm (volumes of air per total volume
of bioreactor per minute) to provide mixing and CO2, as well as O2
to the algae.
Before the cultures reach stationary phase various volume was
replaced daily with fresh medium to operate the reactors in the
semi-continuous mode. When the cell density reached about
0.8 g/l on Day 4 after the inoculation, the culture was operated in
the rst phase of semi-continuous cultivation for 3 d by replacing
R2 0:9962
103
40
1.6
30
1.2
cell density
0.8
lipid content
10
0.4
0
20
6
8 10 12
Days of cultivation
14
batch
60
40
100
20
0
6
8 10 12
Days of cultivation
14
16
4
TP concentrations
(mgP/l)
3
2
semi-continuous
80
batch
60
40
removal efficiency
in semi-continuous
20
0
100
0
2
6
8 10 12
Days of cultivation
14
16
25
100
20
semi-continuous
80
15
batch
60
10
40
removal efficiency
in semi-continuous
5
0
6
8 10 12
Days of cultivation
14
20
16
Table 1
Cell density and lipid content of C. vulgaris in different phases of the semi-continuous
cultivation.
0
16
Fig. 1. Cell density and lipid content of C. vulgaris culture in the batch cultivation.
semi-continuous
200
+
NH4 concentrations
(mgN/l)
80
300
100
400
COD concentrations
(mg/l)
First
Second
Third
0.5
0.89
20
44
1.0
0.69
42
147
1.5
0.28
38
79
Cell density, lipid content and productivity were average value in the phase.
104
Table 2
Comparative analyses of algal biomass and lipid production in different phases of the
semi-continuous cultivation.
Variable
First
Second
Third
0.89
4
0.223
1246
0.69
2
0.346
803
0.28
1.3
0.21
1323
20
22
53
66,038
42
47
53
42,550
38
42
53
70,119
2054.05
772.93
0.38
1323.48
1651.27
1.25
2180.99
1475.60
0.68
a
Determined by dividing the annual biomass production by the volumetric
productivity.
b
Determined by dividing the product of annual biomass and lipid content by the
density of lipid (assumed to be 0.9 kg/l).
c
Determined by multiplying the energy consumption by the reactor volume
required.
d
Determined by multiplying the energy consumption by the number of hours of
air pumping (it was 24 h of one day).
e
Determined by multiplying the net lipid yield by energy content of lipid
(assumed value of 35, 133.33 kJ/l).
z x D y=D L
Acknowledgements
The research is supported by the Scientic Research Foundation
for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry, China. The authors also acknowledge the support of the National Creative Research Groups of China (50821002) and the
technical and nancial support of the State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment (2010TS08), HIT, China. Prof.
Byung Hong Kim (Water Environment and Remediation Research
Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology) is gratefully
thanked for his efforts on this paper.
References
Ahmad, I., Hellebust, J., 1990. Regulation of chloroplast development by nitrogen
source and growth conditions in a Chlorella protothecoides strain. Plant
Physiology 94 (3), 944949.
Babel, S., Takizawa, S., Ozaki, H., 2002. Factors affecting seasonal variation of
membrane ltration resistance caused by Chlorella algae. Water Research 36
(5), 11931202.
Bligh, E.G., Dyer, W.J., 1959. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and
purication. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology 37 (8), 911917.
Borowitzka, M.A., 1994. Large-scale algal culture systems: the next generation.
Australasian Biotechnology 4 (4), 212215.
Chaumont, D., 1993. Biotechnology of algal biomass production a review of
systems for outdoor mass-culture. Journal of Applied Phycology 5 (6), 593604.
Chisti, Y., 2007. Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnology Advances 25 (3), 294
306.
Chisti, Y., 2008. Biodiesel from microalgae beats bioethanol. Trends in
Biotechnology 26 (3), 126131.
Converti, A., Casazza, A.A., Ortiz, E.Y., Perego, P., Del Borghi, M., 2009. Effect of
temperature and nitrogen concentration on the growth and lipid content of
Nannochloropsis oculata and Chlorella vulgaris for biodiesel production. Chemical
Engineering and Processing 48 (6), 11461151.
Dunahay, T.G., Jarvis, E.E., Dais, S.S., Roessler, P.G., 1996. Manipulation of microalgal
lipid production using genetic engineering. Applied Biochemistry and
Biotechnology 5758, 223231.
Gao, C.F., Zhai, Y., Ding, Y., Wu, Q.Y., 2010. Application of sweet sorghum for
biodiesel production by heterotrophic microalga Chlorella protothecoides.
Applied Energy 87 (3), 756761.
Ghirardi, M.L., 2006. Hydrogen production by photosynthetic green algae. Indian
Journal of Biochemistry and Biophysics 43 (4), 201210.
Hemschemeier, A., Melis, A., Happe, T., 2009. Analytical approaches to
photobiological
hydrogen
production
in
unicellular
green
algae.
Photosynthesis Research 102 (23), 523540.
105
Hill, J., Nelson, E., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., Tiffany, D., 2006. Environmental, economic,
and energetic costs and benets of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103 (30),
1120611210.
Hsieh, C.H., Wu, W.T., 2009. Cultivation of microalgae for oil production with a
cultivation strategy of urea limitation. Bioresource Technology 100 (17), 3921
3926.
Jorquera, O., Kiperstok, A., Sales, E.A., Embirucu, M., Ghirardi, M.L., 2010.
Comparative energy life-cycle analyses of microalgal biomass production in
open ponds and photobioreactors. Bioresource Technology 101 (4), 14061413.
Lau, P.S., Tam, N.F.Y., Wong, Y.S., 1995. Effect of algal density on nutrient removal
from primary settled waste-water. Environmental Pollution 89 (1), 5966.
Li, X.F., Xu, H., Wu, Q.Y., 2007. Large-scale biodiesel production from microalga
Chlorella protothecoides through heterotropic cultivation in bioreactors.
Biotechnology and Bioengineering 98 (4), 764771.
Li, Y.Q., Horsman, M., Wang, B., Wu, N., Lan, C.Q., 2008. Effects of nitrogen sources
on cell growth and lipid accumulation of green alga Neochloris oleoabundans.
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 81 (4), 629636.
Miao, X.L., Wu, Q.Y., 2004. High yield bio-oil production from fast pyrolysis by
metabolic controlling of Chlorella protothecoides. Journal of Biotechnology 110
(1), 8593.
Minowa, T., Yokoyama, S., Kishimoto, M., Okakura, T., 1995. Oil production from
algal cells of Dunaliella tertiolecta by direct thermochemical liquefaction. Fuel
74 (12), 17351738.
Paralkar, A., Edzwald, J.K., 1996. Effect of ozone on EOM and coagulation. Journal
American Water Works Association 88 (4), 143154.
Powell, E.E., Mapiour, M.L., Evitts, R.W., Hill, G.A., 2009. Growth kinetics of Chlorella
vulgaris and its use as a cathodic half cell. Bioresource Technology 100 (1), 269
274.
Richardson, B., Orcutt, D.M., Schwertner, H.A., Martinez, C.L., Wickline, H.E., 1969.
Effects of nitrogen limitation on the growth and composition of unicellular
algae in continuous culture. Applied Microbiology 18 (2), 245250.
Rittmann, B.E., 2008. Opportunities for renewable bioenergy using microorganisms.
Biotechnology and Bioengineering 100 (2), 203212.
Shi, X.M., Chen, F., Yuan, J.P., Chen, H., 1997. Heterotrophic production of lutein by
selected Chlorella strains. Journal of Applied Phycology 9 (5), 445450.
Shirai, F., Kunii, K., Sato, C., Teramoto, Y., Mizuki, E., Murao, S., Nakayama, S., 1998.
Cultivation of microalgae in the solution from the desalting process of soy sauce
waste treatment and utilization of the algal biomass for ethanol fermentation.
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 14 (6), 839842.
Stucki, S., Vogel, F., Ludwig, C., Haiduc, A.G., Brandenberger, M., 2009. Catalytic
gasication of algae in supercritical water for biofuel production and carbon
capture. Energy and Environmental Science 2 (5), 535541.
Takagi, M., Karseno, Yoshida, T., 2006. Effect of salt concentration on intracellular
accumulation of lipids and triacylglyceride in marine microalgae Dunaliella
cells. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 101 (3), 223226.
Widjaja, A., Chien, C.C., Ju, Y.H., 2009. Study of increasing lipid production from
fresh water microalgae Chlorella vulgaris. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of
Chemical Engineers 40 (1), 1320.