Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
that most seasoned practitioners in most industries would consider to be reliable and
would generally endorse. Profitability methods with less general applicability, e.g., the
revenue requirement technique used by electrical utilities or the benefit-cost ratio used in
the public sector, are not included in this RP.
Background
Profitability methods are critical tools for assessing asset performance and making
effective investment decisions. These processes are central to portfolio and program
management in that selecting the right capital or maintenance projects can be as
important to enterprise success as effectively executing any particular project.
CONDUCTING TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS: AS APPLIED
FOR THE PROCESS AND UTILITY INDUSTRIES
(Rev. April 1991)
AACE International Recommended Practice No. 16R-90
TCM
3.2: Asset Planning
Framework: 3.3: Investment Decision Making
COST ESTIMATE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
(Rev. November 29, 2011)
AACE International Recommended Practice No. 17R-97
TCM
7.3: Cost Estimating and Budgeting
Framework:
COST ESTIMATE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM: AS APPLIED IN
ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT, AND CONSTRUCTION FOR THE PROCESS
INDUSTRIES
(Rev. November 29, 2011)
AACE International Recommended Practice No. 18R-97
TCM
7.3: Cost Estimating and Budgeting
Framework:
The Cost Estimate Classification System provides guidelines for applying the general
principles of estimate classification to asset project cost estimates. Asset project cost
estimates typically involve estimates for capital investment, and exclude operating and
life-cycle evaluations. The Cost Estimate Classification System maps the phases and
stages of asset cost estimating together with a generic maturity and quality matrix that
can be applied across a wide variety of industries.
17R-97 provides a generic methodology for the classification of project cost estimates in
any industry, while 18R-97 provides extensions and additional detail for applying the
principles of estimate classification specifically to project estimates for engineering,
procurement, and construction (EPC) work for the process industries.
An intent of the guidelines is to improve communication among all of the stakeholders
involved with preparing, evaluating, and using project cost estimates.
ESTIMATE PREPARATION COSTS: AS APPLIED FOR THE PROCESS
INDUSTRIES
(Rev. June 19, 1998)
AACE International Recommended Practice No. 19R-97
TCM
7.3: Cost Estimating and Budgeting
Framework:
This recommended practice presents benchmark information on the costs to prepare cost
estimates (for engineering, procurement, and construction) in the process industries. It
includes qualitative and quantitative lessons that cost engineers and estimators can use to
benchmark their cost estimating experiences against. The data on preparation costs was
used to develop a parametric cost model that can be used to estimate the cost of preparing
estimates. The effort or cost to prepare a cost estimate is a secondary characteristic of a
cost estimate classification. This Recommended Practice supports AACE Internationals
Recommended Practice 18R-97 Cost Estimate Classification System - as Applied in
Engineering, Procurement, and Construction for the Process Industries.
PROJECT CODE OF ACCOUNTS
(Rev. January 27, 2003)
AACE International Recommended Practice No. 20R-98
TCM
7.1: Project Scope and Execution Strategy Development
Framework: 7.2: Schedule Planning and Development
7.3: Cost Estimating and Budgeting
This guideline establishes the basic principles of codes of accounts (COA) for projects in
any industry. It examines key characteristics including usage, content, structure and
format and describes benefits of establishing standard COAs. Topics such as activitybased costing and work breakdown structures as they relate to COAs are addressed. The
issues of properly defining a WBS and how it should be structured are outside the scope
of this guideline. COAs are applicable to all phases of the asset life cycle, however, this
guideline specifically addresses the project execution phases of asset design development
through to start of normal operation.
A project code of accounts is a coded index of project cost, resource and activity
categories. A complete COA includes definitions of the content of each account code and
is methodically structured to facilitate finding, sorting, compiling, summarizing, defining
and otherwise managing information the code is linked to. The information is used to
support total cost management practices such as cost estimating, cost accounting, cost
reporting, cost control, planning and scheduling. Other names used for COAs are coding
matrices, coding structures, charge accounts, asset or material classification accounts,
value categories, cost elements, work breakdown structures, resource breakdown
structures and activity breakdown structures.
PROJECT CODE OF ACCOUNTS: AS APPLIED IN ENGINEERING,
PROCUREMENT, AND CONSTRUCTION FOR THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES
(Rev. January 27, 2003)
AACE International Recommended Practice No. 21R-98
TCM
7.1: Project Scope and Execution Strategy Development
It needs to be noted that this Recommended Practice does not define in detail how one
should properly perform the various analytical methods identified herein. The
Recommended Practice gives a brief description of each method only in an effort to help
claimants properly identify the method. That is, different claimants may have differing
nomenclature for the same methodology. In this case, the brief description of each
method is intended to help overcome this situation.
SCHEDULE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
(Rev. November 12, 2010)
AACE International Recommended Practice No. 27R-03
TCM
7.2 Schedule Planning and Development
Framework:
This recommended practice (RP) is intended to serve as a guideline, not a standard. As a
recommended practice of AACE International, the intent of the guideline is to improve
the understanding and the communication among stakeholders involved with preparing,
evaluating, and using project schedules. Various enterprises often misinterpret the quality
and value of the information available to prepare schedules and the various methods
employed during the scheduling process. It is understood that each enterprise may have
its own project scheduling processes and terminology, and may classify schedules in their
own particular ways. This guideline provides a generic and generally acceptable
classification system that can be used as a basis of comparison. If an enterprise or
organization has not formally documented its own schedule classification system, then
this RP guideline can be used to provide an acceptable basis.
This recommended practice introduces a schedule classification system, which provides
the guidelines for applying the general principles of schedule classification to project
schedules. A schedule classification system maps the phases and stages of scheduling
with a generic maturity and quality matrix that can be applied across a wide variety of
industries. It is intended to be applied to any schedule in any industry, and across all
stakeholders including government and academia.
A separate recommended practice provides a guideline for describing the specific use of
schedule levels to project schedules. Schedule levels provide the details necessary to
recognize the characteristics of each of the schedule levels for the purposes of
communicating, executing (controlling and monitoring) and reporting the specific details
of the project. Schedule levels consider reporting requirements for each of the
stakeholders and the appropriate amount of information necessary for effective
communication and decisions.
This recommended practice has been developed such that it:
This classification guideline is intended to help those involved with project schedules to
avoid misinterpretation of the various classes of schedules and to avoid their
misapplication and misrepresentation. Improving communications about schedule
classifications reduces business costs and project cycle times by avoiding inappropriate
business and financial decisions, actions, delays, or disputes caused by
misunderstandings of schedules and what they are expected to represent.
DEVELOPING LOCATION FACTORS BY FACTORING: AS APPLIED IN
ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT AND CONSTRUCTION
(Rev. October 19, 2006)
AACE International Recommended Practice No. 28R-03
TCM
7.3: Cost Estimating and Budgeting
Framework: 10.4: Project Historical Database Management
This recommended practice provides a generic method of developing location factors in
support of the Total Cost Management (TCM) cost estimating and budgeting and
database management processes for construction related projects. The method applies to
construction projects of all types including buildings, infrastructure, utilities, process
plants, and so on. This generic method provides a basis for users to tailor their own
detailed process around their own needs and computing capabilities. Location factors are
used during preliminary project evaluations (i.e., Class 5 or 4 estimates). They are not
intended to be used when preparing appropriation-quality estimates (i.e., Class 3 or better
estimates).
FORENSIC SCHEDULE ANALYSIS
(Rev. April 25, 2011)
AACE International Recommended Practice No. 29R-03
TCM
6.4: Forensic Performance Assessment
Framework:
The purpose of the AACE International Recommended Practice 29R-03 Forensic
TCM
7.2: Schedule Planning and Development
Framework:
This recommended practice (RP) for Determining Activity Durations is intended to
provide a guideline and a resource, not to establish a standard. As a recommended
practice of AACE International, it provides guidelines for the project scheduler to
determine schedule activity durations and understand the limitations and assumptions
involved in such determination as part of the total cost management (TCM) project
planning, scheduling forecasting, and change management processes (7.2).
This recommended practice provides information about determining the original
durations for activities for developing the project schedule and general considerations
related to the establishment of remaining durations while updating the project schedule.
Specific considerations regarding the topic of establishing the activities remaining
durations for schedule performance assessment are not within the scope of this RP.
Therefore the information presented here generally applies to determining original
activity durations; and general considerations for the establishment of remaining
durations be provided only as appropriate.
This recommended practice offers methods for determining original activity durations
through the analysis of past project data with anticipated future performance data. It also
incorporates an iterative effect-analysis of constraints on activity duration.
BASIS OF ESTIMATE
(Rev. July 28, 2010)
AACE International Recommended Practice No. 34R-05
TCM
7.3: Cost Estimating and Budgeting
Framework:
AACE Internationals Total Cost Management (TCM) Framework identifies a basis of
estimate (BOE) document as a required component of a cost estimate. As a
Recommended Practice (RP) of AACE International, the template outlined in the
following sections provides guidelines for the structure and content of a cost basis of
estimate.
In the TCM Framework, the BOE is characterized as the one deliverable that defines the
scope of the project, and ultimately becomes the basis for change management. When
prepared correctly, any person with capital project experience can use the BOE to
understand and assess the estimate, independent of any other supporting documentation.
A well-written BOE achieves those goals by clearly and concisely stating the purpose of
the estimate being prepared (i.e. cost study, project options, funding, etc.), the project
scope, pricing basis, allowances, assumptions, exclusions, cost risks and opportunities,
and any deviations from standard practices. In addition the BOE is a documented record
of pertinent communications that have occurred and agreements that have been made
between the estimator and other project stakeholders.
DEVELOPMENT OF COST ESTIMATE PLANS AS APPLIED IN
The estimate plan defines what information is required from who and when.
An approved estimate plan provides a duly authorized basis to proceed with the
estimating effort, clarifies requirements and responsibilities.
schedule basis document may accompany the submittal of the project baseline schedule.
The schedule basis further substantiates the confidence and degree of completeness of the
project schedule in order to support change management, reconciliation, and analysis.
This document also doubles as a tool for assisting any personnel who are transitioning
into the project and may be used in claims situations to illustrate a change of scope.
Purpose
This AACE International recommended practice is intended to provide a guideline, not to
establish a standard for documenting the schedule basis for the planning of projects. This
recommended practice is written and intended primarily for use on construction projects
by the project team members and stakeholders involved in the planning and scheduling of
the project work activities. These RP guidelines may be applicable to many other types of
projects. The focus of this recommended practice is on documenting the necessary
elements of the schedule basis. Many project individuals and groups contribute to the
planning and development of the project schedule. By documenting the schedule basis,
the project team captures the coordinated project schedule development process, which is
by nature unique for most construction projects. This improves the final quality and adds
value to the project baseline schedule, which serves as the time management navigation
tool to guide the project team toward successful project completion. The schedule basis
also is an important document used to identify changes during the schedule change
management process.
Background
The requirement to document the basis of the schedule has been an established procedure
for several years with many large corporations, and some federal agencies. This
recommended practice describes the important elements of schedule information that may
be included to document the basis and assumptions of this project management tool.
PROJECT PLANNING - AS APPLIED IN ENGINEERING AND
CONSTRUCTION FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS
(Rev. December 8, 2011)
AACE International Recommended Practice No. 39R-06
TCM
3.1 Requirements Elicitation and Analysis
Framework: 3.2 Asset Planning
4.1 Project Implementation
7.1 Project Scope and Execution Strategy Development
7.2 Schedule Planning and Development
7.3 Cost Estimating and Budgeting
7.4 Resource Planning
7.5 Value Analysis and Engineering
7.6 Risk Management
7.7 Procurement Planning
8.1 Project Control Plan Implementation
This recommended practice (RP) to project planning provides guidelines developed
primarily for engineering and capital construction projects.
hand is "a desirable potential outcome and/or its probability of occurrence", i.e, "upside
uncertainty." The range estimating process for risk analysis quantifies the impact of
uncertainty, i.e. "risks + opportunities".
RISK ANALYSIS AND CONTINGENCY DETERMINATION USING
PARAMETRIC ESTIMATING
(May 26, 2011)
AACE International Recommended Practice No. 42R-08
TCM
7.6 Risk Management
Framework:
This recommended practice (RP) of AACE International (AACE) defines general
practices and considerations for risk analysis and estimating cost contingency using
parametric methods. Parametric methods are commonly associated with estimating cost
based on design parameters (e.g., capacity, weight, etc.); in this case, the method is used
to estimate contingency based on risk parameters (e.g. level of scope definition, process
complexity, etc.). This RP includes practices for developing the parametric methods and
models (generally empirically-based). Recommended practice 43R-08 provides example
process industry parametric models (including software) [12]. For scheduling
applications, there is less research and reference material available; therefore schedule
duration risk and contingency will be covered in future revisions of the RP.
RISK ANALYSIS AND CONTINGENCY DETERMINATION USING
PARAMETRIC ESTIMATING EXAMPLE MODELS AS APPLIED FOR THE
PROCESS INDUSTRIES
(Rev. December 28, 2011)
AACE International Recommended Practice No. 43R-08
TCM
7.6 Risk Management
Framework:
These models posit plausible causal relationships between cost growth (i.e., contingency
usage) and schedule slip and various risk systemic drivers such as the levels of
development of process and project scope information and the level of process
technology. They present similar empirical and quantitative analysis of the reasons for
inaccurate estimates of capital costs and schedule duration and provide tools to improve
assessment of the commercial prospects of projects at early stages of scope development
and/or using advancing technologies. Prior to these models, the literature on the causes of
cost and schedule growth for process plants provided little consensus about the relative
contribution of various risk factors. Therefore, the authors of the source documents
measured the factors and statistically assessed their relative influence on cost and
schedule growth for process plant projects undertaken in North America. The results of
their work had a significant impact on the practice of cost engineering and the evolution
of project management phase-gate scope development systems (i.e., these studies are a
basis of AACEs RP on classification of cost estimates; RP 18R-98).
While this document attempts to summarize the basis of the models, it is highly
recommended that users review the source documents before using the tools as a basis for
their own study or development. Instructions for using the tools themselves are included
in worksheets.
RISK ANALYSIS AND CONTINGENCY DETERMINATION USING EXPECTED
VALUE
(Rev. January 26, 2009)
AACE International Recommended Practice No. 44R-08
TCM
7.6 Risk Management
Framework:
This recommended practice (RP) of AACE International (AACE) defines general
practices and considerations for risk analysis and estimating cost contingency using
expected value methods. This RP applies specifically to using the expected value method
for contingency estimating in the risk management "control" step (i.e., after the risk
mitigation step), not in the earlier risk assessment step where it is used in a somewhat
different manner for risk screening.
SCHEDULING CLAIMS PROTECTION METHODS
(Rev. June 1, 2009)
AACE International Recommended Practice No. 45R-08
TCM
6.4: Forensic Performance Assessment
Framework: 7.2: Schedule Planning and Development
8.1: Project Control Plan Implementation
Purpose
This recommended practice (RP) is intended to serve as a guideline, not establish a
standard for schedule claims protection. The RP is intended to provide the scheduling
practitioner with an overview of topics related to schedule delays as well as the various
schedule practices and procedures that should be considered when developing and
managing the project schedule. This RP will explain items to consider when creating and
maintaining a critical path method (CPM) schedule in order to be prepared for potential
delay claims. This RP begins by describing schedule delay terminology and outlining
potential causes and required actions related to schedule delays. The sections following
are related to some of the planning considerations recommended when developing a
project schedule, plus good practices related to the management and control of the
schedule throughout the project.
SCHEDULE CONSTRUCTABILITY REVIEW
(Rev. August 28, 2009)
AACE International Recommended Practice No. 48R-06
TCM
7.2: Schedule Planning and Development
Framework: 11.5: Value Management and Value Improving Practices (VIPs)
Purpose
This recommended practice (RP) is intended to serve as a guideline, not establish a
standard for schedule constructability reviews. This recommended practice describes the
schedule constructability review (SCR) process and some of the recommended planning
that should be considered when developing a construction project execution-phase
schedule. This recommended practice includes a suggested review process for the
construction project schedule. This RP was written as a stand alone document however it
can be used as a companion guideline with the AACE Recommended Practice 30R-03
Implementing Project Constructability.
IDENTIFYING THE CRITICAL PATH
(Rev. March 5, 2010)
AACE International Recommended Practice No. 49R-06
TCM
7.2: Schedule Planning and Development
Framework: 9.2: Progress and Performance Measurement
10.1: Project Performance Assessment 10.2: Forecasting
Purpose
This recommended practice (RP) for Identifying the Critical Path is intended to serve as a
guideline and a resource, not to establish a standard. As a recommended practice of
AACE International it provides guidelines for the project scheduler when reviewing a
network schedule to be able to determine the critical path and to understand the
limitations and assumptions involved in a critical path assessment. Such a determination
is a part of the total cost management (TCM) project planning, scheduling forecasting,
and change management processes.
TIME IMPACT ANALYSIS: AS APPLIED IN CONSTRUCTION
(Rev. October 19, 2006)
AACE International Recommended Practice No. 52R-06
TCM
6.4: Forensic Performance Assessment
Framework: 7.2: Schedule Planning and Development
10.2: Forecasting
10.3: Change Management
This Recommended Practice for Time Impact Analysis (TIA) is intended to provide a
and/or total cost management (TCM) tool for graphic representation of project
performance.
The RP provides descriptions of S-curves with the intent to improve understanding and
communication among project participants and stakeholders when preparing and
analyzing graphics based upon project schedule information. The RP describes different
types of S-curves that may be generated from a schedule provided the proper information
is loaded into the schedule and the status of the information is maintained throughout the
duration of the project.
COST ESTIMATE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM - AS APPLIED FOR THE
BUILDING AND GENERAL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIES
(Rev. December 13, 2011)
AACE International Recommended Practice No. 56R-08
TCM
7.3 Cost Estimating and Budgeting
Framework:
As a recommended practice of AACE International, the Cost Estimate Classification
System provides guidelines for applying the general principles of estimate classification
to project cost estimates (i.e., cost estimates that are used to evaluate, approve, and/or
fund projects). The Cost Estimate Classification System maps the phases and stages of
project cost estimating together with a generic project scope definition maturity and
quality matrix, which can be applied across a wide variety of construction industries.
This addendum to the generic recommended practice (17R-97) provides guidelines for
applying the principles of estimate classification specifically to project estimates for the
building and general construction industries. It supplements 17R-97 by providing:
a section that further defines classification concepts as they apply to the building
and general construction industries;
a chart that maps the extent and maturity of estimate input information (project
definition deliverables) against the class of estimate.
As with the generic recommended practice, the intent of this addendum is to improve
communications among all of the stakeholders involved with preparing, evaluating, and
using project cost estimates specifically for the building and general construction
industries.
The overall purpose of this recommended practice is to provide the building and general
construction industry definition deliverable maturity matrix which is not provided in
17R-97. It also provides an approximate representation of the relationship of specific
design input data and design deliverable maturity to the estimate accuracy and
methodology used to produce the cost estimate. The estimate accuracy range is driven by
many other variables and risks, so the maturity and quality of the scope definition
available at the time of the estimate is not the sole determinate of accuracy; risk analysis
is required for that purpose.
This recommended practice outlines the common methodologies, techniques and data
used to prepare factored capital cost estimates in the process industries using estimating
techniques such as: capacity factored estimates (CFE), equipment factored estimates
(EFE), and parametric cost estimates. However, it does not cover the development of cost
data and cost estimating relationships used in the estimating process.
All data presented in this document is only for illustrative purposes to demonstrate
principles.
Although the data has been derived from industry sources, it is not intended to be used
for commercial purposes. The user of this document should use current data derived from
other commercial data subscription services or their own project data.
DEVELOPING THE PROJECT CONTROLS PLAN
(Rev. December 21, 2011)
AACE International Recommended Practice No. 60R-10
TCM
8.1 Project Control Plan Implementation
Framework:
This recommended practice is intended to serve as a guideline, not a standard. As a
recommended practice of AACE International, the intent of the guideline is to improve
the communication among stakeholders involved with preparing, evaluating, and using
project controls information. This recommended practice (RP) of AACE International
defines the overall development, implementation and management of a project controls
plan. This deliverable can be included as part of an overall project execution plan (PEP),
or considered a stand alone document that describes specific approaches that each
functional entity will use (engineering, procurement, construction, safety, quality, etc.).
The project controls plan describes specific processes, procedures, tools and systems that
guide and support effective project control. The plan is a narrative or qualitative
representation of the project control process, while the estimate, budget, schedule, etc.
represent the quantitative aspects. Organizations may use this RP to develop a fit-for-use
template as a model document, which is further customized for each specific project.
IDENTIFICATION AND QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS
(Rev. May 11, 2012)
AACE International Recommended Practice No. 62R-11
TCM
7.6 Risk Management
Framework:
This recommended practice (RP) of AACE International defines the expectations,
requirements, and practices for identifying and qualitatively analyzing risk drivers as part
of the overall risk management process. It expands on TCM Framework section 7.6.2.2
Risk Assessment, sections a) Risk Identification and b) Qualitative Risk Analysis,
covering common practices and tools such as brainstorming, interviews, and checklists. It
also covers documentation for and the deliverables from the process step (e.g., risk
register). It does not cover quantification of risks or risk treatment planning.
In TCM, the risk management process is applied in the strategic asset management and
project control processes. In the strategic arena, the risk focus tends to be on the state of
the current asset, the business environment, and other issues that differentiate alternative
asset solutions (e.g. varying levels of scope definition). In project control, the risk focus
expands to more specific project conditions, plans, deliverables, and events affecting a
defined project scope while strategic risks remain. This RP is intended to be generic to
either any focus area and any project scope.
Risk identification may require skills and knowledge of behavioral psychology because
methods such as brainstorming and Delphi must deal with participant biases.
This RP is intended to provide guidelines, not a standard, for developing a process to
identify project risks and perform qualitative risk analysis that most practitioners would
consider to be practices that can be relied upon and that they would recommend be
considered for use. It provides a foundation for developing risk treatment plans as
described in RP 63R-11, Risk Treatment. Ideally, the risk management process provides
an opportunity for all stakeholders and contracting parties to work together and manage
project risk for their collective benefit. The implementation of all or part of this RP will
depend on the size and complexity of the project but the basic processes described should
be used in all cases.
This RP outlines the processes and practices but is not a detailed "how-to" in each case.
In that respect it will most benefit those that are new to risk management or to decision
and risk management professionals who want to refresh their knowledge of
recommended practices.
CPM SCHEDULE RISK MODELING AND ANALYSIS: SPECIAL
CONSIDERATIONS
(May 2, 2012)
AACE International Recommended Practice No. 64R-11
TCM
7.6 Risk Management
Framework:
This recommended practice (RP) of AACE International defines general practices and
considerations for the various aspects of conducting a project schedule risk analysis using
a critical path method (CPM) network of activities and Monte Carlo methods to estimate
contingency and/or to understand the projects behavior in consideration of risk. This RP
does not present a standalone methodology, but is an extension of other RPs that present
CPM-based approaches to schedule risk analysis and contingency estimating. This RP
discusses key procedural, analytical and interpretive considerations in preparation and
application of a CPM model; considerations that were not covered in the broader
methodological RPs.
A quantitative schedule risk analysis is an important aspect of risk management on a
project. It can help project teams understand how project risks and uncertainty may
impact the project schedule and when key milestones will be achieved. The analysis
should be conducted by a skilled risk analyst. This analysis is typically performed during
project development prior to key approval points, but can also be used during project
execution to assess the current status of the project schedule risks.
Most schedule risk analyses utilize a CPM network as the base tool for conducting a
Monte Carlo type simulation of project schedule variability. The CPM model for risk
analysis must be properly constructed and realistically reflect how the identified risks
may impact the project activities and overall duration. The identified schedule risks may
be linked to the activities in the model in a variety of ways, depending on the software
used and user preference. Regardless of how the risks are linked to activities in the
software, the analysis needs to be based on a comprehensive list of schedule risks and an
understanding of how they may impact the project. Understanding the compromises,
assumptions and basis of the analytical methods and what the resulting schedule risk
analysis means are key to developing appropriate risk treatment plans, contingency
estimates, and making well supported value adding project decisions.
This RP is applicable to any industry or project where the CPM approach is used. It
addresses considerations for risk analysis as they relate to the CPM model and not to any
integration with cost risk analysis.
INTEGRATED COST AND SCHEDULE RISK ANALYSIS AND CONTINGENCY
DETERMINATION USING EXPECTED VALUE
(May 2, 2012)
AACE International Recommended Practice No. 65R-11
TCM
7.6 Risk Management
Framework:
This recommended practice (RP) of AACE International (AACE) defines general
practices and considerations for integrated cost and schedule risk analysis and estimating
contingency using expected value methods.
This RP is intended to provide guidelines, not standards, for contingency estimating that
most practitioners would consider to be good practices that can be relied upon and that
would be recommend for use where applicable. There is a range of useful risk analysis
and contingency estimating methodologies; this RP will help guide practitioners in
developing or selecting appropriate methods for their situation.
This RP is an extension of 44R08, Risk Analysis and Contingency Determination
Using Expected Value, that addresses using expected value methods only for cost.
However, integrated cost and schedule methods are generally recommended; this RP for
expected value methods, or 57R09, Integrated Cost and Schedule Risk Analysis Using
MonteCarlo Simulation of a CPM Model, for CPMbased methods.
ESCALATION ESTIMATING USING INDICES AND MONTE CARLO
SIMULATION
(May 2, 2012)
AACE International Recommended Practice No. 68R-11
TCM
7.6 Risk Management
Framework:
This recommended practice (RP) of AACE International defines basic principles and
methodological building blocks for estimating escalation using forecasted price or cost
indices while also addressing uncertainty using Monte Carlo simulation. The methods in
this RP are an extension of the principles and methods in RP 58R-10, Escalation
Estimating Principles and Methods Using Indices, from a probabilistic and
scenario/sensitivity viewpoint. This RP will guide practitioners in developing or selecting
appropriate methods for their definitions and situation. While this RP discusses the
relationships of escalation estimating to other risk cost and schedule accounts (namely
contingency), dealing with those cost types is not the focus of this RP. This RP assumes
that practitioners are already familiar with Monte Carlo simulation as typically applied in
spreadsheet applications.
Escalation estimating is an element of both the cost estimating and risk management
processes. Like other risks, escalation is amenable to mitigation, control, etc. However,
this RP is focused on escalation quantification, not on treatment (i.e., how it is addressed
through contracting, bidding, schedule acceleration, hedging, etc.) or control. In terms of
cost estimating, this RP covers practices applicable to all classes of estimates. Escalation
uncertainty is partly driven by schedule risk; therefore this RP also references AACEs
RPs on integrated cost and schedule risk analysis and contingency estimating. The
examples in this RP emphasize capital cost estimating and scheduling, but the principles
apply equally to operating, maintenance and other cost and time evaluations. While a
model such as that covered in this RP could be used for schedule optimization in
consideration of escalation, optimization is not covered here.
As with RP 58R-10, Escalation Estimating Principles and Methods Using Indices, this RP
recommends segregating escalation versus exchange rate impacts and their estimation for
projects with resources priced in currencies other than the base currency.