0 calificaciones0% encontró este documento útil (0 votos)
23 vistas4 páginas
The military played a role in shaping Brazil's economy by pushing for foreign investment and development projects in the Amazon that initially boosted economic growth. However, the economy later plunged into recession, decreasing living standards.
In Mexico, one-party rule under the PRI provided some benefits like economic stability and improved lives for peasants and workers.
Argentina's military government was seriously weakened after its loss in the Falklands War, leading the generals to step down from power.
The military played a role in shaping Brazil's economy by pushing for foreign investment and development projects in the Amazon that initially boosted economic growth. However, the economy later plunged into recession, decreasing living standards.
In Mexico, one-party rule under the PRI provided some benefits like economic stability and improved lives for peasants and workers.
Argentina's military government was seriously weakened after its loss in the Falklands War, leading the generals to step down from power.
The military played a role in shaping Brazil's economy by pushing for foreign investment and development projects in the Amazon that initially boosted economic growth. However, the economy later plunged into recession, decreasing living standards.
In Mexico, one-party rule under the PRI provided some benefits like economic stability and improved lives for peasants and workers.
Argentina's military government was seriously weakened after its loss in the Falklands War, leading the generals to step down from power.
a. Brazilia- the capital of Brazil that was built to divert
people away from the coast and spread the population throughout Brazil. b. Land reform- the action of breaking up large estates and distributing that land to peasants. c. Standard of living- the level of material comfort, which is judged by the amount of goods people have. d. Recession- a slowdown or halt in the economy e. PRI- the main political party that was once called Institutional Revolutionary Party f. NAFTA- a treaty called the North American Free Trade Agreement g. Nationalization of an industry- kicking out the foreign companies to create only state-run industries h. Welfare state- a government that attempts to provide for all its citizens needs including health, education, and employment
..
1. What role did the military play in shaping the economy of
Brazil? Although military dictators were harsh in Brazil, they emphasized on boosting the economy. They pushed for a better and more powerful economy for the people and the nation. The military began the plans for foreign investments and huge development projects in the Amazon. With the help of the military the economy was stronger than they could ever imagine Brazil to have. However, recession eventually hit and as quickly as the economy rose, it plummeted, dragging along the standard of living.
2. What were some of the positive benefits of one-party rule
in Mexico? One of the biggest benefits of the one-party rule was the stability in the economy. Also, life for peasants and workers were improved drastically.
3. What effect did the Falklands war have on the military
government in Argentina? The loss in the battle of obtaining the Falkland Islands played a detrimental event in the power of the military dictators and
a final blow. After losing the battle they were completely
disgraced causing the generals to step down from power.
4. Review the chart of Population Living in Poverty
[a] In which three countries of La tin America is the percentage of people living in poverty the lowest? Uruguay, Chile, and Argentina [b] In which three countries i the poverty rate highest? Bolivia, Ecuador, and Columbia
5. After reading this excerpt, in your opinion, has the
military dictatorships in L.A. nations been bad or good for the nations' growth? Explain your answer in two paragraphs After reading this text chapter, I thought the military dictatorships affected the Latin American nations both positively and negatively. Looking at a positive point of view, the military dictatorships a quick short term boom in the economy. The boost that it gave to the nations was much needed and essential to the new independent nations. It showed that they were able to survive and thrive while being an independent nation and they may not have been able to do that without falling into civil war or economic
despair. Along with the benefits of military dictatorships, there
were also downsides to them. Although they were improving the nations economy, the people were being neglected. The government cut down wages and the citizens standard of living decreased. Also, when the citizens decided to protest, the dictatorship became even harsher causing censorship and abuse. Finally, in many of the nations with military dictatorships there were very dark stories that went along with them. During the time of dictatorship, citizens were jailed, tortured, and even killed for no reason other than standing up for their rights. So in conclusion, I think that the nations that had military dictatorships benefited as a nation by sticking through the tough times of neglection.