Está en la página 1de 3

Geopier Foundation Company

Project:
Project No:
Engineer:
Date:
Boring

Hospital de Laja
ICL-59
JPR
12/12/2012
S-2

Input Parameters:
Peak ground acceleration (g) =

0.4

Earthquake magnitude, Mw =

7.5

Water table depth (m) =

4.4

14.432 ft

boehole diameter (mm) =

165

6.5 in

Correction for sample liners (YES/NO):

NO

Rod lengths assumed equal to the depth plus 1.5m (for above ground extension).

I. Liquefaction Susceptibility (Existing Conditions)


SPT
Sample
Number
0

Depth (ft)

0.0

Depth (m)

0.00

Moist Unit
Weight
(kN/m^3)
17.3

Saturated
Unit Weight
(kN/m^3)

Measured
N

Soil type
(USCS)

Flag
Energy
"Clay"
Fines Content
Ratio,
"Unsaturated"
(%)
ER (%)
'Unreliable"

2.0

0.62

17.3

18.8

11

SM

unsaturated

5.1

1.56

17.3

18.8

11

SM

unsaturated

8.4

2.55

17.3

18.8

14

SM

unsaturated

11.7

3.58

17.3

18.8

17

SM

unsaturated

15.1

4.60

17.3

18.8

17

SM

18.3

5.59

17.3

18.8

18

SM

21.5

6.54

17.3

18.8

20

SM

24.8

7.56

17.3

18.8

22

SM

28.2

8.59

17.3

18.8

19

SM

10

31.4

9.56

17.3

18.8

21

SM

11

34.6

10.55

17.3

18.8

19

SP

12

38.0

11.60

17.3

18.8

57

SP

13

41.3

12.58

17.3

18.8

55

SW-SM

14

44.6

13.61

17.3

18.8

45

SW-SM

15

47.9

14.59

17.3

18.8

46

SP

16

51.2

15.62

17.3

18.8

39

SP

17

54.3

16.55

17.3

18.8

44

SP-SM

18

57.7

17.59

17.3

18.8

40

SM

19

61.0

18.61

17.3

18.8

42

SM

20

64.2

19.56

17.3

18.8

42

SM

21

67.4

20.55

17.3

18.8

43

SM

22

70.8

21.58

17.3

18.8

49

SM

23

74.4

22.67

17.3

18.8

48

SM

24

77.4

23.60

17.3

18.8

51

SM

25

80.7

24.60

17.3

18.8

58

SM

26

84.0

25.62

17.3

18.8

64

SM

27

87.1

26.57

17.3

18.8

70

SM

16
16
16
18
18
31
31
31
14
14
3
3
12
12
4
4
6
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15

Based on Idriss and Boulanger recommended procedures (EERI 2008)


CE =

Enrergy Ratio = Hammer Energy / 60

CB =

Borehole Correction Factor

CR =

Rod Length Correction

CS =

Sampler Size Correction

CN =

Overburden Correction Factor = SQRT (101/svc') < 1.7 in kPa

(N1)60 = CN*N60
DN (FC) = EXP(1.63+9.7/(FC+0.01)-(15.7/(FC+0.01))^2))

rd =

EXP(-1.012-1.126*SIN(z/11.73+5.133)+MW*(0.106+0.118*SIN(z/11.28+5.142))), z = depth (meters)

CSR =

0.65*PGA*(svc/svc')*rd
MIN(1.8,6.9*EXP(-MW/4)-0.058)

MSF =

Ks
Overburden Correction Factor for CRR
CRR7.5 EXP((N1)60-cs/14.1+((N1)60-cs/126)^2-((N1)60-cs/23.6)^3+((N1)60-cs/25.4)^4-2.8) < 2))
CRR MSF*Ks*CRR7.5

MSF

Ks

CRR7.5

CN

(N1)60

DN (fines
content)

(N1)60-cs

11

1.70

16.1

3.58

20

1.00

0.261

1.00

1.10

0.202

n.a.

27

1.70

17.2

3.58

21

0.99

0.259

1.00

1.10

0.216

n.a.

44

44

1.51

20.7

3.58

24

0.99

0.256

1.00

1.10

0.274

62

62

1.28

21.2

4.09

25

0.98

0.254

1.00

1.08

0.298

80

78

1.14

21.1

4.09

25

0.97

0.257

1.00

1.04

0.296

svc'
(kPa)

CRR, exist.
P-1

Factor of
Safety

N60

svc (kPa)

9.5

11

10.1

27

0.85

13.7

0.85

16.6

1.15

0.95

18.6

1.00

1.15

0.95

19.7

98

1.00

1.15

0.95

21.9

116

95

1.03

22.5

5.40

28

0.94

0.299

1.00

1.01

0.379

0.383

1.28

1.00

1.15

0.95

24.0

136

105

0.98

23.6

5.40

29

0.93

0.313

1.00

0.99

0.430

0.427

1.36

60

1.00

1.15

21.9

155

114

0.94

20.6

2.91

23

0.92

0.324

1.00

0.98

0.258

0.254

0.78

60

1.00

1.15

24.2

173

123

0.91

21.9

2.91

25

0.90

0.332

1.00

0.97

0.286

0.277

60

1.00

1.15

21.9

192

131

0.88

19.2

0.00

19

0.89

0.337

1.00

0.97

0.196

0.189

0.56

60

1.00

1.15

65.6

211

141

0.85

55.5

0.00

56

0.87

0.341

1.00

0.90

2.000

1.804

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

63.3

230

150

0.82

52.0

2.07

54

0.86

0.343

1.00

0.88

2.000

1.768

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

51.8

249

159

0.80

41.3

2.07

43

0.84

0.344

1.00

0.87

2.000

1.733

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

52.9

268

168

0.78

41.1

0.00

41

0.83

0.344

1.00

0.85

2.000

1.701

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

44.9

287

177

0.76

33.9

0.00

34

0.81

0.343

1.00

0.86

0.889

0.766

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

50.6

305

185

0.74

37.4

0.03

37

0.80

0.342

1.00

0.82

1.927

1.582

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

46.0

324

195

0.72

33.1

3.26

36

0.78

0.339

1.00

0.81

1.509

1.228

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

48.3

343

204

0.70

34.0

3.26

37

0.77

0.337

1.00

0.79

1.868

1.481

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

48.3

361

212

0.69

33.3

3.26

37

0.76

0.334

1.00

0.79

1.574

1.238

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

49.5

380

221

0.68

33.4

3.26

37

0.74

0.331

1.00

0.77

1.612

1.247

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

56.4

399

231

0.66

37.3

3.26

41

0.73

0.328

1.00

0.76

2.000

1.513

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

55.2

420

240

0.65

35.8

3.26

39

0.72

0.325

1.00

0.74

2.000

1.489

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

58.7

437

249

0.64

37.4

3.26

41

0.70

0.322

1.00

0.73

2.000

1.468

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

66.7

456

258

0.63

41.8

3.26

45

0.69

0.318

1.00

0.72

2.000

1.447

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

73.6

475

267

0.62

45.3

3.26

49

0.68

0.315

1.00

0.71

2.000

1.427

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

80.5

493

275

0.61

48.7

3.26

52

0.67

0.312

1.00

0.70

2.000

1.408

2.00

CE

CB

CR

CS

60

1.00

1.15

0.75

60

1.00

1.15

0.8

60

1.00

1.15

60

1.00

1.15

60

1.00

60
60
60

18.8

1
2

Reqd FS
Stress
reduct.
Coeff,
rd

87

1.08

21.2

5.40

27

0.95

CSR

0.281

1.00

1.03

0.334

n.a.
n.a.
0.308
0.343

1.20
1.22

0.84

Geopier Foundation Company


Project:
Project No:
Engineer:
Date:
Boring

Hospital de Laja
ICL-59
JPR
12/12/2012
S-2

Input Parameters:

0.4

Peak ground acceleration (g) =

7.5

Earthquake magnitude, Mw =
Water table depth (m) =

4.4

14.432 ft

boehole diameter (mm) =

165

6.5 in

Correction for sample liners (YES/NO):

NO

Rod lengths assumed equal to the depth plus 1.5m (for above ground extension).

II. Liquefaction Susceptibility (REINFORCED CONDITION)


SPT
Sample
Number

Depth (ft)

Depth (m)

Moist Unit
Weight
(kN/m^3)

Saturated
Unit Weight
(kN/m^3)

Delta N from
Improvement
Based on Soil
Type

Improved
N value

Soil type
(USCS)

Flag
Fines
Energy
"Clay"
Content Ratio, ER
"Unsaturated"
(%)
(%)
'Unreliable"

CE

CB

CR

CS

N60

svc
(kPa)
0

0.75

13.8

11

11

svc' (kPa)

CN

(N1)60

1.70

23.5

Stress
DN (fines
(N1)60-cs reduct.
content)
Coeff, rd

Reqd FS

1.1

CSR

MSF

Ks

CRR7.5

0.261

1.00

1.10

0.348

CRR imp P1

Factor of
Safety

0.0

0.0

17.3

18.8

2.0

0.6

17.3

18.8

16

SM

unsaturated

16

60

1.00

1.15

5.1

1.6

17.3

18.8

16

SM

unsaturated

16

60

1.00

1.15

0.8

14.7

27

27

1.70

25.0

3.58

29

0.99

0.259

1.00

1.10

0.410

n.a.

8.4

2.6

17.3

18.8

22

SM

unsaturated

16

60

1.00

1.15

0.85

21.5

44

44

1.51

32.5

3.58

36

0.99

0.256

1.00

1.10

1.415

n.a.

11.7

3.6

17.3

18.8

25

SM

unsaturated

18

60

1.00

1.15

0.85

24.4

62

62

1.28

31.2

4.09

35

0.98

0.254

1.00

1.10

1.180

n.a.

27

1.00

n.a.

15.1

4.6

17.3

18.8

25

SM

60

1.00

1.15

0.95

27.3

80

78

1.14

31.1

4.09

35

0.97

0.257

1.00

1.07

1.152

1.232

2.00

18.3

5.6

17.3

18.8

21

SM

31

60

1.00

1.15

0.95

22.9

98

87

1.08

24.7

5.40

30

0.95

0.281

1.00

1.03

0.494

0.510

1.81

21.5

6.5

17.3

18.8

23

SM

31

60

1.00

1.15

0.95

25.1

116

95

1.03

25.9

5.40

31

0.94

0.299

1.00

1.01

0.576

0.583

24.8

7.6

17.3

18.8

25

SM

31

60

1.00

1.15

0.95

27.3

136

105

0.98

26.8

5.40

32

0.93

0.313

1.00

0.99

0.670

0.665

2.00

28.2

8.6

17.3

18.8

27

SM

14

60

1.00

1.15

31.1

155

114

0.94

29.3

2.91

32

0.92

0.324

1.00

0.97

0.660

0.643

1.98

10

31.4

9.6

17.3

18.8

29

SM

14

60

1.00

1.15

33.4

173

123

0.91

30.3

2.91

33

0.90

0.332

1.00

0.95

0.784

0.748

2.00

11

34.6

10.6

17.3

18.8

12

31

60

1.00

1.15

35.7

192

131

0.88

31.3

0.00

31

0.89

0.337

1.00

0.94

0.576

0.543

1.61

12

38.0

11.6

17.3

18.8

12

69

SP

60

1.00

1.15

79.4

211

141

0.85

67.2

0.00

67

0.87

0.341

1.00

0.90

2.000

1.804

2.00

13

41.3

12.6

17.3

18.8

63

SW-SM

12

60

1.00

1.15

72.5

230

150

0.82

59.5

2.07

62

0.86

0.343

1.00

0.88

2.000

1.768

2.00

14

44.6

13.6

17.3

18.8

53

SW-SM

12

60

1.00

1.15

61.0

249

159

0.80

48.6

2.07

51

0.84

0.344

1.00

0.87

2.000

1.733

2.00

15

47.9

14.6

17.3

18.8

12

58

SP

60

1.00

1.15

66.7

268

168

0.78

51.8

0.00

52

0.83

0.344

1.00

0.85

2.000

1.701

2.00

16

51.2

15.6

17.3

18.8

12

51

SP

60

1.00

1.15

58.7

287

177

0.76

44.3

0.00

44

0.81

0.343

1.00

0.83

2.000

1.669

2.00

17

54.3

16.6

17.3

18.8

12

56

SP-SM

60

1.00

1.15

64.4

305

185

0.74

47.5

0.03

48

0.80

0.342

1.00

0.82

2.000

1.642

2.00

18

57.7

17.6

17.3

18.8

48

SM

15

60

1.00

1.15

55.2

324

195

0.72

39.8

3.26

43

0.78

0.339

1.00

0.81

2.000

1.613

2.00

19

61.0

18.6

17.3

18.8

50

SM

15

60

1.00

1.15

57.5

343

204

0.70

40.5

3.26

44

0.77

0.337

1.00

0.79

2.000

1.586

2.00

20

64.2

19.6

17.3

18.8

50

SM

15

60

1.00

1.15

57.5

361

212

0.69

39.6

3.26

43

0.76

0.334

1.00

0.78

2.000

1.562

2.00

21

67.4

20.6

17.3

18.8

51

SM

15

60

1.00

1.15

58.7

380

221

0.68

39.6

3.26

43

0.74

0.331

1.00

0.77

2.000

1.537

2.00

22

70.8

21.6

17.3

18.8

57

SM

15

60

1.00

1.15

65.6

399

231

0.66

43.4

3.26

47

0.73

0.328

1.00

0.76

2.000

1.513

2.00

23

74.4

22.7

17.3

18.8

56

SM

15

60

1.00

1.15

64.4

420

240

0.65

41.7

3.26

45

0.72

0.325

1.00

0.74

2.000

1.489

2.00

24

77.4

23.6

17.3

18.8

59

SM

15

60

1.00

1.15

67.9

437

249

0.64

43.2

3.26

46

0.70

0.322

1.00

0.73

2.000

1.468

2.00

25

80.7

24.6

17.3

18.8

66

SM

15

60

1.00

1.15

75.9

456

258

0.63

47.5

3.26

51

0.69

0.318

1.00

0.72

2.000

1.447

2.00

26

84.0

25.6

17.3

18.8

72

SM

15

60

1.00

1.15

82.8

475

267

0.62

50.9

3.26

54

0.68

0.315

1.00

0.71

2.000

1.427

2.00

27

87.1

26.6

17.3

18.8

78

SM

15

60

1.00

1.15

89.7

493

275

0.61

54.3

3.26

58

0.67

0.312

1.00

0.70

2.000

1.408

2.00

SP

18

3.58

Based on Idriss and Boulanger recommended procedures (EERI 2008)


CE =

Enrergy Ratio = Hammer Energy / 60

CB =

Borehole Correction Factor

CR =

Rod Length Correction

CS = Sampler Size Correction


N60 = N*CE*CB*CR*CS
CN = Overburden Correction Factor = SQRT (101/svc') < 1.7 in kPa
(N1)60 = CN*N60
DN (FC) = EXP(1.63+9.7/(FC+0.01)-(15.7/(FC+0.01))^2))

rd =

EXP(-1.012-1.126*SIN(z/11.73+5.133)+MW*(0.106+0.118*SIN(z/11.28+5.142))), z = depth (meters)

CSR =

0.65*PGA*(svc/svc')*rd

MSF =

MIN(1.8,6.9*EXP(-MW/4)-0.058)

Ks
Overburden Correction Factor for CRR
CRR7.5 EXP((N1)60-cs/14.1+((N1)60-cs/126)^2-((N1)60-cs/23.6)^3+((N1)60-cs/25.4)^4-2.8) < 2))
CRR MSF*Ks*CRR7.5

1.95

III. - CONCLUSION FROM LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS


Geopier elements need to be installed to increase CRR to to provide
adequate FS against liquefaction potential.

V - GEOPIER DESIGN SOLUTION

Hospital de Laja, Bio-Bio, Chile


ICL-59

S-2

CRR exist, CRR impr, CSR

A - From Reference 2, Equation No. 1.


0.00

(ts/s'v)/(t/s'v) = CRRrq'd/CSR = 1/(1-4Ra+2.5RaRs)

FS=

kgp =

275

pci

ks =

27

pci

0.70

0.80

10.2
Selected R s for design

40.0

(Improvement Case)

C - Calculate Ra (area ratio) necessary for design (Improvement Case)


From equation 1 above:
Ra =
0.012
Ra =

0.60

30.0

Depth (ft)

Rs =

0.50

1.1

B - From Lawton 1999, Rs > 30

0.40

20.0

1.00

Rs = kgp/ks

0.30

10.0

0.290
0.290

CRR rq'd /CSR =

0.20

0.0

ts/t = 1/(1-4Ra+2.5RaRs)

CRR rq'd =
CSR =

0.10

50.0

60.0

1.00 = 1/(1-4Ra+2.5RaRs)
70.0

1.2%
80.0

D - Site Coverage
1.2% Site Areal Coverage Selected for design.
3.14159 Effective area of influence for one (1) Geopier element, (sf)

90.0

267 Area of soil treated by one element, (sf)


16.34 Rectangular grid spacing required between elements (ft)

100.0

4.98 (m) Rectangular grid spacing required between elements


B - From Lawton 1999, Rs > 30
Rs = kgp/ks

(No-Improvement Case)
kgp =

275

pci

ks =

27

pci

CSR
CRR, exist. P-1
CRR imp P1

D - Site Coverage
1.7% Site Areal Coverage Selected for design.
3.142 Effective area of influence for one (1) Geopier element, (sf)
184 Area of soil treated by one element, (sf)
13.6 Rectangular grid spacing required between elements (ft)

Rs =
6.85

10.2
Selected R s for design

(No-Improvement Case)

C - Calculate Ra (area ratio) necessary for design (Improvement Case)


From equation 1 above:
Ra =
0.017
Ra =

1.7%

1.00 = 1/(1-Ra+RaRs)

4.1 (m) Rectangular grid spacing required between elements


REFERENCES:
1- Youd, T.L., Idriss, I.M., et al., 1997, "Summary Report - Procedings of the NCEER Workshop on the Evaluation of
Liquefaction Resistance of Soils," Techical Report NCEER-97-0022, December 1997.
2- Wissmann, K.J., Lawton, E.C., & Farrell, T.M., 1999, "Behavior of Geopier-Supported Foundation Systems During
Seismic Events," Geopier Foundation Co., Inc. Technical Bulletin No. 1.
3- Lawton, E.C., 1999, "Results of I-15 Research Testing" University of Utah

También podría gustarte