Ultimate Calibration 2nd Edition

Ultimate Calibration 2nd Edition

Beamex is a technology and service company that develops, manufactures and markets high-quality calibration equipment, software, systems and services for the calibration and maintenance of process instruments. The company is a leading worldwide provider of integrated calibration solutions that meet even the most demanding requirements. Beamex offers a comprehensive range of products and services-from portable calibrators to workstations, calibration accessories, calibration software, industry-specific solutions and professional services. Through Beamex’s global and competent partner network, their products and services are available in more than 60 countries. As a proof of Beamex’s success, there are more than 10,000 companies worldwide utilizing their calibration solutions. Several companies have been Beamex’s customer since the establishment of the company over 30 years ago. For more information about Beamex and its products and services, visit www.beamex.com

Beamex has used reasonable efforts to ensure that this book contains both accurate and comprehensive information. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the content of this book is provided “as is” without any representations, warranties or guarantees of any kind, whether express or implied, in relation to the accuracy, completeness, adequacy, currency, quality, timeliness or fitness for a particular purpose of the content and information provided on this book. The contents of this book are for general informational purposes only. Furthermore, this book provides examples of some of the laws, regulations and standards related to calibration and is not intended to be definitive. It is the responsibility of a company to determine which laws, regulations and standards apply in specific circumstances.

Ultimate Calibration 2nd Edition Copyright © 2009–2012 by Beamex Oy Ab. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Beamex Oy Ab. Requests should be directed to info@beamex.com. Beamex is a trademark of Beamex Oy Ab. All other trademarks or trade names mentioned in this book are the property of their respective holders.

Graphic design: Studio PAP Photos: Mats Sandström and image bank Printed by: Fram in Vaasa 2012, Finland

Contents Preface by the CEO of Beamex Group  7 QUALITY. REGULATIONS AND TRACEABILITY Quality standards and industry regulations  11 A basic quality calibration program  35 Traceable and efficient calibrations in the process industry  57 CALIBRATION MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE Why Calibrate? What is the risk of not calibrating?  73 Why use software for calibration management?  79 How often should instruments be calibrated?  89 How often should calibrators be calibrated?  97 Paperless calibration improves quality and cuts costs  101 Intelligent commissioning  107 Successfully executing a system integration project  115 CALIBRATION IN INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS The benefits of using a documenting calibrator  125 Calibration of weighing instruments Part 1  131 Calibration of weighing instruments Part 2  137 Calibrating temperature instruments  143 Calculating total uncertainty of temperature calibration with a dry block  149 Fieldbus transmitters must also be calibrated  157 Configuring and calibrating smart instruments  163 Calibration in hazardous environments  169 The safest way to calibrate to calibrate Fieldbus instruments  175 APPENDIX:  Calibration terminology A to Z  181 .

foreword 6 .

how to eliminate double work. intelligent commissioning. Presently. who was the key person in organizing and leading the project for the 2nd edition. temperature calibration and configuring. Just like any other business function. The new topics covered in the edition mainly discuss paperless calibration. beamex group 7 . I want to express my special thanks to Pamela at Beamex Marketing. On behalf of Beamex. Calibration and calibrators can no longer be considered as isolated. Beamex aims to be the benchmark in the industry. The main changes to this edition include numerous new articles and a new grouping of the articles to make it easier to find related topics. calibration procedures need to be automated to a higher degree and integrated to achieve improvements in quality and efficiency. new ideas. systems or work processes within a company or production plant. how to reduce production down-time. the primary challenges of industrial metrology and calibration include how to simplify and streamline the entire calibration process. In this area. and how to lower the risk of human errors. I would like to thank all of the people who have contributed to this book. A team of experts in industry and calibration worldwide has put forth effort to its creation. ceo. All of these challenges can be tackled by improving the level of system integration and automation. calibration software and other related equipment have developed significantly during the past few decades in spite of the fact that calibration of measurement devices as such has existed for several thousands of years. This book is the 2nd edition of Ultimate Calibration.preface by the ceo of beamex group Preface C alibrators. Enjoy your reading! raimo ahola. stand-alone devices. and calibration of smart instruments. I hope this book will assist you in learning new things and in providing fresh. This book is the result of work that has taken place between 2006 and 2012.

.

Quality. Regulations and Traceability .

.

(Plato. Magna Carta. and a standard width of dyed russet and cloth.. (Clause 35. (William Thomson.) There shall be standard measures of wine.K. 1st Baron Kelvin. but reason.quality standards and industry regulations Calibration requirements according to quality standards and industry regulations B efore going into what the current standards and regulations actually state. here is a reminder from times past about measurement practices and how important they really are. beer. Surely it is the better part of thought that relies on measurement and calculation. GCVO.A. the Egyptian unit of length came into being. The “Royal Egyptian Cubit” was decreed to be equal to the length of the forearm from the bent elbow to the tip of the extended middle 11 . and there shall be standard weights also. advanced to the stage of science. 360 B. your knowledge is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind. in your thoughts. OM. numbering and weighing. is beautifully restored by measuring. these drive vague notions of greater or less or more or heavier right out of the minds of the surveyor. thus confused by false appearance. Lord Kelvin). The Egyptians studied the science of geometry to assist them in the construction of the Pyramids. It may be the beginning of knowledge. 1215) When you can measure what you are speaking about and express it in numbers. The Republic. you know something about it. PRS.1 One of the earliest records of precise measurement is from Egypt.C. and the clerk of the scales. but when you cannot express it in numbers. but you have scarcely. the computer. and corn… throughout the whole of our kingdom. PC. Immersion in water makes the straight seem bent.C. A. It is believed that about 3000 years B. 26 June 1824–17 December 1907.

If an organization volunteers to meet ISO 9000 standards. a set of guidelines are used to write their quality manual and other standard operating procedures (SOPs) and they show how they comply with the standard. standards. In roughly 756 feet or 230.36276 meters. and regulatory requirements are mandatory. 12 . were supplied with cubits made of wood or granite. In Europe. temples. they achieved an accuracy of 0. the Egyptians achieved surprising accuracy.Volume 4 of “The rules governing medicinal products in the European Union”. In today’s calibration environment. they were within 4. pyramids. if a company is manufacturing a drug that must meet regulatory requirements.05%. Through the use of cubit sticks. Though the punishment prescribed was severe. However.quality standards and industry regulations finger plus the width of the palm of the hand of the Pharaoh or King ruling at that time. With this standardization and uniformity of length. the federal regulations specify in greater detail what a company must do to meet the requirements set forth in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFRs). etc. The biggest difference between the two is simple – ISO standards are voluntary. traceability and calibration recall. The Pharmaceutical Inspection Convention and Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S) aims to improve harmonisation of Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) standards and guidance documents.2 The “Royal Cubit Master” was carved out of a block of granite to endure for all times. the Egyptians had anticipated the spirit of the present day system of legal metrology. They were required to bring back their cubit sticks at each full moon to be compared to the Royal Cubit Master. The Royal Architect or Foreman of the construction site was responsible for maintaining & transferring the unit of length to workers instruments. detailed information for achieving regulatory compliance is provided in Eudralex .5 inches or 11. Workers engaged in building tombs.43 centimeters. they pay a company to audit them to that standard to ensure they are following their quality manual and are within compliance. On the other hand. Failure to do so was punishable by death. In the case of ISO standards. Thousands of workers were engaged in building the Great Pyramid of Giza. there are basically two types of requirements: ISO standards and regulatory requirements. they are inspected by government inspectors for compliance to federal regulations. The need for calibration has been around for at least 5000 years.

§ 820.quality standards and industry regulations Calibration requirements according to the U.5 – Quality system. 13 .25 – Personnel. Subpart G – Production and Process Controls § 820. Subpart D – Document Controls § 820.70 – Production and process controls. § 820.75 – Process validation.50 – Purchasing controls. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Following are examples of some of the regulations required by the FDA.22 – Quality audit.72 – Inspection. Please note that European standards are similar to FDA requirements. Subpart E – Purchasing Controls § 820. that relate to the calibration of test equipment in different situations and environments. Subpart B – Quality System Requirements § 820.60 – Identification. § 820. § 820.30 – Design controls. S. and test equipment. TITLE 21 – FOOD AND DRUGS CHAPTER I – FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES SUBCHAPTER H – MEDICAL DEVICES PART 820 QUALITY SYSTEM REGULATION 22 Subpart A – General Provisions § 820. Subpart F – Identification and Traceability § 820. Listed below are several different parts of 21CFR.65 – Traceability. § 820. Subpart C – Design Controls § 820. and what they say about calibration and what must be accomplished to meet the CFRs. § 820.3 – Definitions. measuring.20 – Management responsibility. § 820.1 – Scope.40 – Document controls.

[Code of Federal Regulations] [Title 21.140 – Handling.250 – Statistical techniques.86 – Acceptance status.170 – Installation. Distribution.80 – Receiving. Subpart K – Labeling and Packaging Control § 820.100 – Corrective and preventive action. Subpart J – Corrective and Preventive Action § 820. in-process. § 820. Subpart I – Nonconforming Product § 820. 2012] [CITE: 21CFR820.180 – General requirements.72] TITLE 2 – FOOD AND DRUGS CHAPTER I – FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES SUBCHAPTER H – MEDICAL DEVICES 14 .198 – Complaint files.130 – Device packaging. Subpart L – Handling. § 820. Volume 8] [Revised as of April 1.186 – Quality system record. and Installation § 820.150 – Storage. Storage. § 820. § 820. Subpart M – Records § 820.160 – Distribution.quality standards and industry regulations Subpart H – Acceptance Activities § 820.90 – Nonconforming product. § 820.200 – Servicing.120 – Device labeling. § 820. § 820. § 820. and finished device acceptance. Subpart O – Statistical Techniques § 820.181 – Device master record.184 – Device history record. § 820. Subpart N – Servicing § 820.

and storage of equipment. inspected. and test equipment shall be traceable to national or international standards. there shall be provisions for remedial action to reestablish the limits and to evaluate whether there was any adverse effect on the device’s quality. or electronic inspection and test equipment.72 Inspection. and the next calibration date shall be documented. 15 . the manufacturer shall use an independent reproducible standard. calibration dates. These activities shall be documented. measuring. including mechanical. When accuracy and precision limits are not met. The equipment identification. Each manufacturer shall ensure that all inspection. If no applicable standard exists. Calibration procedures shall include specific directions and limits for accuracy and precision. If national or international standards are not practical or available. checked. (1)   C alibration standards. (a)  Control of inspection. Each manufacturer shall establish and maintain procedures to ensure that equipment is routinely calibrated. These records shall be displayed on or near each piece of equipment or shall be readily available to the personnel using such equipment and to the individuals responsible for calibrating the equipment. The procedures shall include provisions for handling. 820. and test equipment. the individual performing each calibration. is suitable for its intended purposes and is capable of producing valid results. so that its accuracy and fitness for use are maintained. measuring. and test equipment. the manufacturer shall establish and maintain an in-house standard. (2)   Calibration records. and maintained. measuring. preservation.quality standards and industry regulations PART 820–QUALITY SYSTEM REGULATION Subpart G–Production and Process Controls Sec. (b)   Calibration. Calibration standards used for inspection. automated. and test equipment. These activities shall be documented. measuring.

160 General requirements. (b)  Laboratory controls shall include the establishment of scientifically sound and appropriate specifications. in-process materials. 2012] [CITE: 21CFR211] TITLE 21 – FOOD AND DRUGS CHAPTER I – FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES SUBCHAPTER C – DRUGS: GENERAL PART 211 CURRENT GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE FOR FINISHED PHARMACEUTICALS Subpart D – Equipment Sec. mechanical. packing. Written records of those calibration checks and inspections shall be maintained. 211. closures. inspected. standards. mechanical. processing. Volume 4] [Revised as of April 1. including computers. drug product containers. or related systems that will perform a function satisfactorily. Laboratory controls shall include: (1)  Determination of conformity to applicable written specifications for the acceptance of each lot within each shipment of components. and test procedures designed to assure that components. sampling plans. labeling. and electronic equipment. strength. or checked according to a written program designed to assure proper performance. 211. closures. and purity.quality standards and industry regulations [Code of Federal Regulations] [Title 21.68 Automatic. it shall be routinely calibrated. or electronic equipment or other types of equipment. If such equipment is so used. (a)  Automatic. may be used in the manufacture. Sec. quality. and holding of a drug product. and drug products conform to appropriate standards of identity. drug product containers. 16 .

(4)  The calibration of instruments. (3)  Determination of conformance to written descriptions of sampling procedures and appropriate specifications for drug products. gauges. Samples shall be representative and adequately identified. apparatus. or closure that is subject to deterioration. and recording devices required by 211. and provisions for remedial action in the event accuracy and/or precision limits are not met. 8. Sept. Such samples shall be representative and properly identified. drug product container. Such procedures shall also require appropriate retesting of any component. 29. and recording devices not meeting established specifications shall not be used. Instruments. packing. [43 FR 45077. schedules.160(b)(4). 17 . (2)  Determination of conformance to written specifications and a description of sampling and testing procedures for in-process materials. Sept.194 Laboratory records. apparatus. apparatus.quality standards and industry regulations and labeling used in the manufacture. (d)  Complete records shall be maintained of the periodic calibration of laboratory instruments. The specifications shall include a description of the sampling and testing procedures used. processing. and recording devices at suitable intervals in accordance with an established written program containing specific directions. 211. limits for accuracy and precision. as amended at 73 FR 51932. 2008] Sec. Such samples shall be representative and properly identified. 1978. gauges. or holding of drug products. gauges.

quality standards and industry regulations

TITLE 2 – FOOD AND DRUGS CHAPTER I – FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES SUBCHAPTER A – GENERAL PART 11 ELECTRONIC RECORDS; ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES Subpart A – General Provisions Sec. 11.1 Scope. (a)  The regulations in this part set forth the criteria under which the agency considers electronic records, electronic signatures, and handwritten signatures executed to electronic records to be trustworthy, reliable, and generally equivalent to paper records and handwritten signatures executed on paper. (b)  This part applies to records in electronic form that are created, modified, maintained, archived, retrieved, or transmitted, under any records requirements set forth in agency regulations. This part also applies to electronic records submitted to the agency under requirements of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and the Public Health Service Act, even if such records are not specifically identified in agency regulations. However, this part does not apply to paper records that are, or have been, transmitted by electronic means. (c)  Where electronic signatures and their associated electronic records meet the requirements of this part, the agency will consider the electronic signatures to be equivalent to full handwritten signatures, initials, and other general signings as required by agency regulations, unless specifically excepted by regulation(s) effective on or after August 20, 1997. (d)  Electronic records that meet the requirements of this part may be used in lieu of paper records, in accordance with 11.2, unless paper records are specifically required.

18

quality standards and industry regulations

(e)  Computer systems (including hardware and software), controls, and attendant documentation maintained under this part shall be readily available for, and subject to, FDA inspection. (f)  This part does not apply to records required to be established or maintained by 1.326 through 1.368 of this chapter. Records that satisfy the requirements of part 1, subpart J of this chapter, but that also are required under other applicable statutory provisions or regulations, remain subject to this part. [62 FR 13464, Mar. 20, 1997, as amended at 69 FR 71655, Dec. 9, 2004] Sec. 11.2 Implementation. (a)  For records required to be maintained but not submitted to the agency, persons may use electronic records in lieu of paper records or electronic signatures in lieu of traditional signatures, in whole or in part, provided that the requirements of this part are met. (b)  For records submitted to the agency, persons may use electronic records in lieu of paper records or electronic signatures in lieu of traditional signatures, in whole or in part, provided that: (1)  The requirements of this part are met; and (2)  The document or parts of a document to be submitted have been identified in public docket No. 92S-0251 as being the type of submission the agency accepts in electronic form. This docket will identify specifically what types of documents or parts of documents are acceptable for submission in electronic form without paper records and the agency receiving unit(s) (e.g., specific center, office, division, branch) to which such submissions may be made. Documents to agency receiving unit(s) not specified in the public docket will not be considered as official if they are submitted in electronic form; paper forms of such documents will be considered as official and must accompany any electronic records. Persons are expected to consult with the intended agency receiving unit for details on how (e.g., method of transmission, media, file formats, and technical protocols) and whether to proceed with the electronic submission. 19

quality standards and industry regulations

TITLE 21--FOOD AND DRUGS CHAPTER I--FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES SUBCHAPTER A--GENERAL PART 11 ELECTRONIC RECORDS; ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES Subpart C – Electronic Signatures Sec. 11.100 General requirements. (a)  Each electronic signature shall be unique to one individual and shall not be reused by, or reassigned to, anyone else. (b)  Before an organization establishes, assigns, certifies, or otherwise sanctions an individual`s electronic signature, or any element of such electronic signature, the organization shall verify the identity of the individual. (c)  Persons using electronic signatures shall, prior to or at the time of such use, certify to the agency that the electronic signatures in their system, used on or after August 20, 1997, are intended to be the legally binding equivalent of traditional handwritten signatures. (1)  The certification shall be submitted in paper form and signed with a traditional handwritten signature, to the Office of Regional Operations (HFC-100), 12420 Parklawn Drive, RM 3007 Rockville, MD 20857. (2)  Persons using electronic signatures shall, upon agency request, provide additional certification or testimony that a specific electronic signature is the legally binding equivalent of the signer`s handwritten signature.

20

quality standards and industry regulations

Calibration requirements according to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) Following are examples of some of the regulatory requirements of the EMA, and what they say about calibration and what must be accomplished to meet the GMPs. Eudralex Volume 4 Chapter 3: Premises and Equipment Equipment 3.41 Measuring, weighing, recording and control equipment should be calibrated and checked at defined intervals by appropriate methods. Adequate records of such tests should be maintained. Chapter 4: Documentation Manufacturing Formula and Processing Instructions Approved, written Manufacturing Formula and Processing Instructions should exist for each product and batch size to be manufactured. 4.18 The Processing Instructions should include: a) A statement of the processing location and the principal equipment to be used; b) The methods, or reference to the methods, to be used for preparing the critical equipment (e.g. cleaning, assembling, calibrating, sterilising); c) Checks that the equipment and work station are clear of previous products, documents or materials not required for the planned process, and that equipment is clean and suitable for use; d) Detailed stepwise processing instructions [e.g. checks on materials, pre-treatments, sequence for adding materials, critical process parameters (time, temp etc)]; e) The instructions for any in-process controls with their limits; f ) Where necessary, the requirements for bulk storage of the products; including the container, labeling and special storage conditions where applicable; g) Any special precautions to be observed.

21

•  Summaries of records where appropriate (e. They should be used to record in chronological order.31 Logbooks should be kept for major or critical analytical testing. •  Investigations into deviations and non-conformances. •  Complaints. cleaning or repair operations. production equipment. reports and the associated records of actions taken or conclusions reached. •  Technology transfer. maintenance. 4. as appropriate. any use of the area. equipment/method. including the dates and identity of people who carried these operations out.29 There should be written policies.quality standards and industry regulations Procedures and records Other 4. •  Change control. •  Pest control. •  Recalls.g. •  Returns. for the following examples: •  Validation and qualification of processes. •  Equipment assembly and calibration. •  Environmental monitoring. •  Personnel matters including signature lists. 22 . •  Supplier audits. •  Maintenance. clothing and hygiene and verification of the effectiveness of training. training in GMP and technical matters. calibrations. product quality review). where appropriate. equipment and systems. protocols. cleaning and sanitation. and areas where product has been processed. •  Internal quality/GMP compliance audits. procedures.

•  analytical reports and/or certificates. (c)  icalibration requirements. IQ should include. •  sampling procedures. •  validation records of test methods. but not be limited to the following: (a)  installation of equipment. Annex 15 to the EU Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice Title: Qualification and validation QUALIFICATION Installation qualification 11. where required. piping. where applicable. •  testing procedures and records (including analytical worksheets and/ or laboratory notebooks).7 Laboratory documentation should follow the principles given in Chapter 4. (d)  verification of materials of construction.quality standards and industry regulations Chapter 6 Quality Control Good Quality Control Laboratory Practice Documentation 6. 12. Installation qualification (IQ ) should be performed on new or modified facilities. (b)  icollection and collation of supplier operating and working instructions and maintenance requirements. •  procedures for and records of the calibration of instruments and maintenance of equipment. 23 . systems and equipment. An important part of this documentation deals with Quality Control and the following details should be readily available to the Quality Control Department: •  specifications. services and instrumentation checked to current engineering drawings and specifications. •  data from environmental monitoring.

Evidence should be available to support and verify the operating parameters and limits for the critical variables of the operating equipment. (c)  list of the equipment/facilities to be used (including measuring/ monitoring/recording equipment) together with its calibration status (d)  finished product specifications for release. (f)  proposed in-process controls with acceptance criteria. operator training and preventative maintenance requirements. 24 . Prospective validation should include. but not be limited to the following: (a)  short description of the process. Qualification of established (in-use) facilities. systems and equipment 19. operating and cleaning procedures. (i)  methods for recording and evaluating results (j)  functions and responsibilities. (b)  summary of the critical processing steps to be investigated. the calibration. It should permit a formal “release” of the facilities. (h)  sampling plan. PROCESS VALIDATION Prospective validation 24. The completion of a successful Operational qualification should allow the finalisation of calibration. systems and equipment. Additionally. (k)  proposed timetable. (e)  list of analytical methods. operating procedures and operator training procedures and records should be documented. cleaning. (g)  additional testing to be carried out. as appropriate. with acceptance criteria and analytical validation. preventative maintenance.quality standards and industry regulations Operational qualification 15. as appropriate.

europa. and applies to all forms of computerised systems used as part of GMP regulated activities.htm PDF of Annex 11: http://ec. SANCO/C8/AM/sl/ares(2010)1064599 EudraLex The Rules Governing Medicinal Products in the European Union Volume 4 Good Manufacturing Practice Medicinal Products for Human and Veterinary Use Annex 11: Computerised Systems Legal basis for publishing the detailed guidelines: Article 47 of Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use and Article 51 of Directive 2001/82/EC on the Community code relating to veterinary medicinal products.eu/health/files/eudralex/vol-4/annex11_01-2011_ en.quality standards and industry regulations EU GMP Annex 11 The EU GMP Annex 11 defines EU requirements for computerised systems.europa.Volume 4 Good manufacturing practice (GMP) Guidelines: http://ec.pdf EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Public Health and Risk Assessment Pharmaceuticals Brussels.eu/health/documents/eudralex/vol-4/index_en. Main page for the EudraLex . This document provides guidance for the interpretation of the principles 25 .

Where a computerised system replaces a manual operation. Consequential amendments are also proposed for Chapter 4 of the GMP Guide.Belgium Telephone: (32-2) 299 11 11 Principle This annex applies to all forms of computerised systems used as part of a GMP regulated activities. B-1049 Brussel .org/.quality standards and industry regulations and guidelines of good manufacturing practice (GMP) for medicinal products as laid down in Directive 2003/94/EC for medicinal products for human use and Directive 91/412/EEC for veterinary use. There should be no increase in the overall risk of the process. Deadline for coming into operation: 30 June 2011 Commission Européenne. The application should be validated. PIC/S The abbreviation PIC/S describes both the Pharmaceutical Inspection Convention (PIC) and the Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC Scheme) which operate together. A computerised system is a set of software and hardware components which together fulfill certain functionalities. there should be no resultant decrease in product quality. picscheme. Further information can be found at the PIC/S Web site (http://www. IT infrastructure should be qualified. 26 . process control or quality assurance. B-1049 Bruxelles / Europese Commissie. It aims to promote harmonisation of global regulations for the pharmaceutical industry. Status of the document: revision 1 Reasons for changes: the Annex has been revised in response to the increased use of computerised systems and the increased complexity of these systems.).

the organization entered into a partnership with the ISPE and published its first GAMP® guidelines. There is also a series of related GAMP® guidance on specific topics. The GAMP® COP aims to provide guidance and understanding concerning GxP computerized systems. This is the latest major revision and was released in January 2008. GAMP® Francophone. produce technical content and translate ISPE technical documents. in collaboration with ISPE’s local Affiliates in these regions. such as GAMP® Americas. The most well known GAMP® publication is GAMP ® 5 A RiskBased Approach to GxP Computerized Systems. GAMP® Japan. Since 1994. The GAMP® COP organizes discussion forums for its members and ISPE organises GAMP® related training courses and educational seminars. They also bring the GAMP® community closer to its members. and GAMP® Americas support the GAMP® Council which oversee the operation of the COP and is the main link to ISPE. GAMP® Nordic.quality standards and industry regulations GAMP® GAMP® is a Community of Practice (COP) of the International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering (ISPE). GAMP® Europe. Several local GAMP® COPs. Switzerland). including: •  GAMP ® Good Practice Guide: A Risk-Based Approach to Calibration Management (Second Edition) •  GAMP® Good Practice Guide: A Risk-Based Approach to GxP Compliant Laboratory Computerized Systems (Second Edition) •  GAMP® Good Practice Guide: A Risk-Based Approach to GxP Process Control Systems (Second Edition) •  GAMP® Good Practice Guide: A Risk-Based Approach to Operation of GxP Computerized Systems . COPs provide networking opportunities for people interested in similar topics. GAMP® itself was founded in 1991 in the United Kingdom to deal with the evolving FDA expectations for Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) compliance of manufacturing and related systems. GAMP® Italiano and GAMP® Japan. GAMP® DACH (Germany. Three regional Steering Committees. Austria.A Companion Volume to GAMP® 5 •  GAMP® Good Practice Guide: Electronic Data Archiving •  GAMP® Good Practice Guide: Global Information Systems Control and Compliance 27 .

this is what is required according to ISO 9001:2008 7.quality standards and industry regulations •  GAMP® Good Practice Guide: IT Infrastructure Control and Compliance •  GAMP® Good Practice Guide: Legacy Systems The GAMP® Good Practice Guide: A Risk-Based Approach to Calibration Management (second edition) was developed by ISPE’s GAMP® COP Calibration Special Interest Group (SIG) in conjunction with representatives from the pharmaceutical industry and input from regulatory agencies.  28 . it requires periodic calibration). and corrective actions vital to regulatory compliance. calibration program management. The Guide describes the principles of calibration and presents guidance in setting up a calibration management system. The second edition of the guide has been significantly updated to address the change in regulatory expectations and in associated industry guidance documents. A set of associated attachments are also available through the ISPE website.6  CONTROL MONITORING AND MEASURING EQUIPMENT •  Identify your organization’s monitoring and measuring needs and requirements (if your test instrument makes a quantitative measurement. and select test equipment that can meet those monitoring and measuring needs and requirements. The scope now includes related industries.  •  Establish monitoring and measuring processes (calibration procedures and calibration record templates for recording your calibration results). ISO 9001:2008 Basically. providing a structured approach to instrument risk assessment. laboratory.  •  Calibrate your monitoring and measuring equipment using a period schedule to ensure that results are valid (you should also perform a yearly evaluation of your calibration results to see if there is a need to increase or decrease your calibration intervals on calibrated test equipment). documentation. All calibrations must be traceable to a national or international standard or artifact. and analytical instrumentation.

storage. 29 .  •  Confirm that monitoring and measuring software is capable of doing the job you want it to do (your software needs to be validated before being used. this standard is applicable to all organizations performing tests and/or calibrations. second-. then you do not have any obligation to meet the ISO 17025 standard. and shipping of all test instruments – to include your customer’s items. You already fall under a quality system that takes care of your calibration requirements. there shall be provisions for remedial action to reestablish the limits and to evaluate whether there was any adverse effect on the device’s quality”. your test instruments may need to be qualified prior to use). QSR. and third-party laboratories. Please keep in mind that if your calibration function and/or metrology department fall under the requirements of your company.). ANSI/NCSL Z540. and when required.3-2006 ANSI/NCSL Z540.3-2006 – American National Standard for Calibration-Requirements for the Calibration of Measuring and Test Equipment. especially when the out of tolerance item is a calibration standard. etc. “When accuracy and precision limits are not met. this is just as applicable when dealing with ISO as with any other standard or regulation. rather it be for compliance to an ISO standard (ISO 9001:2008 or ISO 13485) or an FDA requirement (cGMP. and your calibration standards). transportation. According to ISO 17025. preservation.  •  Evaluate the validity of previous measurements whenever you discover that your measuring or monitoring equipment is out-ofcalibration (as stated in the FDA regulations. These include first-. and laboratories where testing and/or calibration forms part of inspection and product certifications.quality standards and industry regulations •  Protect your monitoring and measuring equipment (this includes during handling. ISO 17025 ISO 17025 – General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. and may have affected numerous items of test equipment over a period of time).

30 . or information. •  the compatibility of measurements with the National Measurement System. This National Standard is written for both Supplier and Customer. •  suppliers when specifying products offered. The “Customer” may be a consumer. industry. client. enduser. In addition. each term being interpreted in the broadest sense. In implementing its objective. This is done through the use of a system of functional components. Part 11 of ANSI/NCSL Z540. Collectively. vendor. or a provider of a product. •  agencies or organizations as a contractual condition for procurement. and •  the traceability of measurement results to the International System of Units (SI). service. and other evaluations of calibration systems and their components. •  applying best practices and experience with related national. international. retailer. this National Standard describes the technical requirements for establishing and maintaining: •  the acceptability of the performance of measuring and test equipment. or purchaser that receives a product or service. •  the suitability of a calibration for its intended application. certification.quality standards and industry regulations The objective of this National Standard is to establish the technical requirements for the calibration of measuring and test equipment. and •  balancing the needs and interests of all stakeholders. and government standards. The “Supplier may be a producer. Reference to this National Standard may be made by: •  customers when specifying products (including services) required. this National Standard includes and updates the relevant calibration system requirements for measuring and test equipment described by the previous standards. •  legislative or regulatory bodies. and •  assessment organizations in the audit. these components are used to manage and assure that the accuracy and reliability of the measuring and test equipment are in accordance with identified performance requirements. distributor.1 (R2002) and Military Standard 45662A. In the development of this National Standard attention has been given to: •  expressing the technical requirements for a calibration system supporting both government and industry needs.

quality standards and industry regulations

This National Standard is specific to calibration systems. A calibration system operating in full compliance with this National Standard promotes confidence and facilitates management of the risks associated with measurements, tests, and calibrations.8 Equipment intended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres (ATEX) What are ATEX and IECEx? ATEX (“ATmosphères EXplosibles”, explosive atmospheres in French) is a standard set in the European Union for explosion protection in the industry. ATEX 95 equipment directive 94/9/EC concerns equipment intended for use in potentially explosive areas. Companies in the EU where the risk of explosion is evident must also use the ATEX guidelines for protecting the employees. In addition, the ATEX rules are obligatory for electronic and electrical equipment that will be used in potentially explosive atmospheres sold in the EU as of July 1, 2003. IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission) is a nonprofit international standards organization that prepares and publishes International Standards for electrical technologies. The IEC TC/31 technical committee deals with the standards related to equipment for explosive atmospheres. IECEx is an international scheme for certifying procedures for equipment designed for use in explosive atmospheres. The objective of the IECEx Scheme is to facilitate international trade in equipment and services for use in explosive atmospheres, while maintaining the required level of safety. In most cases, test equipment that is required to be operated in an explosive environment would be qualified and installed by the company’s facility services department and not the calibration personnel. One must also keep in mind that there would be two different avenues for the calibration of those pieces of test equipment: on-site and off-site. If the test instrument that is used in an explosive environment must be calibrated on-site (in the explosive environment), then all the standards used for that calibration must also comply with explosive environment directives. However, if it were possible to remove the test equipment from the explosive environment when due for their period calibration, then there would be no requirement for the standards used for their calibration to meet the explosive

31

quality standards and industry regulations

environment directives, saving money on expensive standards and possibly expensive training of calibration personnel in order for them to work in those conditions. Having said that, there may be a need for the calibration personnel to be aware of the ATEX regulations. An informative website for information on ATEX can be found by typing in the following link: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/atex/indexinfor.htm. Several languages are available for retrieving the information. Another informative website is the International Electrotechnical Commission Scheme for Certification to Standards Relating to Equipment for use in Explosive Atmospheres (IECEx Scheme). The link is: http://www.iecex.com/guides.htm. 1.  Bucher, Jay L. 2007. The Quality Calibration Handbook. Milwaukee: ASQ Quality Press. 2.  The Story of the Egyptian Cubit. http://www.ncsli.org/misc/ cubit.cfm. (18 October, 2008) 3.  21CFR Part 211.68, 211.160: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/ scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?CFRPart=211/ (5 July, 2012) 4.  21CFR Part 11. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/ RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm125125.pdf (5 July, 2012) and http://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ ucm125067.htm?utm_campaign=Google2&utm_ source=fdaSearch&utm_medium=website&utm_term=21 CFR part 11&utm_content=3 5.  GAMP. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Automated_ Manufacturing_Practice (5 July, 2012) 6.  NCSL International. 2006. ANSI/NCSL Z540.3-2006. Boulder, CO.

32

34

and possibly the ability to stay in business simply because they do not use calibrated test equipment. 35 . criminals are either not convicted or are released on bad evidence. Airliners fly into mountaintops and off the ends of runways because they don’t know their altitude and/or speed. Without calibration. A fairy tale? Not hardly. the cure for cancer is one of them. all of us pay more at the gas pump. and for manufactured goods that do not meet their stated specifications. Measurements made by R&D are different than those made by the operations section.a basic quality calibration program A basic quality calibration program R &D departments are tasked with coming up with the answers to many problems. They are not using calibrated test instruments in the company. Babies are not correctly weighed at birth. for food weighed incorrectly at the checkout counter. which weight is correct? As one can see. Because of poor or incorrect calibration. The company loses time. Their R&D section sends the formula to their operations & manufacturing division. or by using incorrect calibrations. their reputation. The cure cannot be replicated with consistent results. has found the cure for cancer. money. Let’s    imagine that the Acme Biotech Co. then repeatable results would ensure that what’s made in one part of the company is also repeated in another part of the company. Crime labs cannot identify the remains of victims or wrongly identify victims in the case of mass graves. If all test equipment were calibrated to a traceable standard. This scenario is repeated every day throughout the world. or even cause illness or death. The amount of drugs confiscated in a raid determines whether the offense is a misdemeanor or a felony. having the correct measurements throughout any and all industries is critical to national and international trade and commerce. Incorrect amounts of ingredients in your prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs can cost more.

or certain parts of the world. and the unit under test (UUT) or test instrument that is being calibrated (the uncertainty is unknown. When we talk about traceability to a national or international standard. no matter the circumstances is called calibration. let’s discuss the use of uncertainty budgets. However. According to the European cooperation for Accreditation of Laboratories. By definition: Calibration is a comparison of two measurement devices or systems. The calibration of any piece of equipment or system is simply a comparison between the standard being used (with its known uncertainty). Many people are under the misconception that an item must be adjusted or aligned in order to be calibrated. There are basically two ways to maintain traceability during calibration – the use of an uncertainty budget (performing uncertainty calculations for each measurement). Before we can get any deeper into what traceability is. but differ depending on where you are in the chain. we need to clarify two definitions that are critical to this subject – calibration and traceability. It does not make any difference if you adjust. The two examples in figures 1 and 2 are similar. The comparison to a standard that is more accurate. the ‘everyday calibration technician’ is usually situated close to the bottom of the pyramid. It is as simple as that. so a graphic illustration of these pyramids is important. usually national or international standards. nor if you cannot adjust or align it. one of known uncertainty (your standard) and one of unknown uncertainty (your test equipment or instrument). and that is why it is being calibrated). Traceability is the property of the result of a measurement or the value of a standard whereby it can be related to stated references. publication reference (EAL-G12) Traceability of Measuring and Test Equipment to National Standards.a basic quality calibration program The bottom line is this – all test equipment that make a quantitative measurement require periodic calibration. through an unbroken chain of calibrations all having stated uncertainties. and using a test uncertainty ratio (TUR) of ≥ 4:1. before we go any further. the purpose of which is to give guidance on the calibration and maintenance of measuring 36 . Nothing could be further from the truth. we should explain two different traceability pyramids. align or repair the item. First.

a basic quality calibration program BIPM NMIs Reference standards Working metrology labs General purpose calibration labs (inside a company) User’s test equipment Figure 1 SI units Primary stds. 37 . must measure with the ‘same measure’. and customers who install them with other parts. Secondary standards Reference standards Working standards User’s test equipment Figure 2 Note: NMI = National Metrology Institute equipment in meeting the requirements of the ISO 9000 series of standards for quality systems.1  Traceability of measuring and test equipment to national standards by means of calibration is necessitated by the growing national and international demand that manufactured parts be interchangeable. and the EN 45001 standard for the operation of testing laboratories. paragraphs 4 and 5 are very specific in their requirements: 4  Why are calibrations and traceability necessary? 4. supplier firms that make products.

the results must equally be documented. (c)  documentation.g. (b)  measurement uncertainty.2  There are legal as well as technical reasons for traceability of measurement. the measurement uncertainty for each step in the traceability chain must be calculated according to agreed methods and must be stated so that an overall uncertainty for the whole chain may be calculated. that adequate measuring and test equipment was chosen.a basic quality calibration program 4. uncertainty required. by demonstrating that they are accredited. e. 38 . by reference to a systematic and fully documented system. 5  Elements of traceability 5. the laboratories or bodies performing one or more steps in the chain must supply evidence for their technical competence.g. failure to meet these requirements means the absence of a warranted quality with considerable consequent liability. the chain of comparisons must end at primary standards for the realization of the SI units. calibrations must be repeated at appropriate intervals. the length of these intervals will depend on a number of variables.1  Traceability is characterised by a number of essential elements: (a)  an unbroken chain of comparisons going back to a standard acceptable to the parties.4  There are similar technical and legal reasons why calibration and testing laboratory operators should have consistent control of measuring and test equipment in the manner described. Note: If binding requirements for the accuracy of measuring  and test equipment have been stipulated. (e)  reference to SI units. e. is not affected by defects. each step in the chain must be performed according to documented and generally acknowledged procedures. if they are used properly. (d)  competence. 4. (f)  re-calibrations. stability of the equipment. Relevant laws and regulations have to be complied with just as much as the contractual provisions agreed with the purchaser of the product (guarantee of product quality) and the obligation to put into circulation only products whose safety.3  If it becomes necessary to prove absence of liability. usually a national or international standard. way of use. was in proper working order and was used correctly for controlling a product. 4. frequency of use. the producer must be able to demonstrate.

the implementation of EA-4/02 will also foster the global acceptance of European results of measurement. published by seven international organisations concerned with standardisation and metrology. Certification of reference materials is a method that is often used to demonstrate traceability to SI units. Expression of the Uncertainty of Measurement in Calibration. This is correct and acceptable. Keep in mind that a TUR of 4:1 somewhere along the chain of calibrations may not have been feasible. reference materials take the position of physical reference standards. To maintain traceability. the specific demands in reporting uncertainty of measurement on calibration certificates issued by accredited laboratories and to assist accreditation bodies with a coherent assignment of best measurement capability to calibration laboratories accredited by them. without using uncertainty budgets or calculations. if a TUR of equal to or greater than 4:1 is maintained.2 By understanding and following both of these documents. is at the company or shop level. The purpose of this document is to harmonise evaluation of uncertainty of measurement within EA.a basic quality calibration program 5. you must ensure your standards are at least four times (4:1) more accurate than the test equipment being calibrated. It is equally important that such reference materials are traceable to relevant SI units. a calibration function can easily maintain traceable calibrations for the requirements demanded by their customers and the standard or regulation that their company needs to meet. Where does this ratio of four to one (4:1) come from? It comes from the American National Standard for Calibration – (ANSI/NCSL Z540. and uncertainty calculations were performed and their uncertainty stated on the certificate of calibration.32006) which states: “Where calibrations provide for verification that measurement quantities are within specified tolerances…Where it is not practical to estimate this probability. the TUR shall be equal to or greater than 4:1.1 The other document that goes hand-in-hand with this is EA 4/02.2  In many fields. in addition to the general requirements of EAL-R1. to set up. where the need to maintain a TUR of 4:1 comes into play. As the rules laid down in this document are in compliance with the recommendations of the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. then traceability is assured. In most circumstances. where the customer’s test 39 .” So.

Of course not. If everyone was using the calibration procedures like they were supposed to. Once stability and consistency are achieved. the calibration technician must be trained on the change before they can perform the calibration. Process improvements cannot take place across the department if everyone is not doing the job the same way each and every time they perform a calibration. So how does calibration and traceability fit into the big picture? What does the big picture look like? Why do you need a quality calibration program? You need to establish a quality calibration program to ensure that all operations throughout the metrology department occur in a stable manner. But especially true in a metrology department. But they must have their calibration procedure on hand each time they are performing the calibration. Four of them work in another facility calibrating the same types of equipment as the other two.a basic quality calibration program equipment is usually used for production or manufacturing purposes only. We are not ignorant enough to believe that when calibration technicians have performed a particular calibration hundreds or even thousands of times that they are going to follow calibration procedures word for word. One of the four calibration technicians (who are always following the calibration procedures) finds there is a fast. This is applicable in every phase of a production and/or manufacturing program. it is possible to initiate process improvements. therefore. more economical way to perform a specific calibration. in a consistent output from those processes. and the appropriate documentation completed to show that training 40 .3 Let’s take for example a calibration program that has six calibration technicians on staff. However. then this would not have happened. The two ‘old timers’ have a reduction in their production and actually cost the company money. The four calibration technicians that have been following the calibration procedure improve their production and save the company money. They submit a change proposal for the calibration procedure and everyone is briefed and trained on the new technique. the other two have far more experience and through no fault of their own do not use the calibration procedures that are required by their quality system. The effective operation of such a system will hopefully result in stable processes and. If a change has been made to that procedure. They have calibrated the same items for several years and feel there is nothing new to learn.

This includes calibration procedures. All of your calibration procedures should be formatted the same as other SOPs within your company. change a process. Do what you say. you’re required to inform the user/owner of the equipment because they may have to re-evaluate manufactured goods. or perform a function that follows specific written instructions. or upper/lower limits specified in your procedures or instructions. including what your standard(s) read or indicated both before and after any adjustments might be made. Here is an example of common formatting for SOPs: 41 . Record what you did. One of the most stringent requirements can be found in the current Good Manufacturing Procedures (GMP). Check the results. When the proper training is not documented and signed off by the trainer and trainee. accuracies. This includes calibration procedures. and Act on the difference”. work instructions and SOPs. What is a quality calibration program? A quality calibration program consists of several broad items referred to in the Quality System Regulation (QSR) from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). “Say what you do” means write in detail how to do your job.a basic quality calibration program was accomplished and signed off. etc. “Record what you did” means that you must record the results of your measurements and adjustments. or recall a product.3 “Say what you do” means write in detail how to do your job. The basic premise and foundation of a quality calibration program is to “Say what you do. “Check the results” means make certain the test equipment meets the tolerances. then it is the same as if the training never happened. Let’s break these down into simple terms. “Act on the difference” means if the test equipment is out of tolerance. These items are also referred to by other standards (ISO 9000. “Do what you say” means follow the documented procedures or instructions every time you calibrate.) and regulations throughout most industries that regulate or monitor production and manufacturing of all types of products. work instructions and standard operating procedures (SOPs).

a basic quality calibration program 1. and balances/scales.  Related Procedures 7. generally speaking. or perform a function that follows specific written instructions. Then the actual calibration procedure starts in section 5. After that you should have a list of the standards to be used to calibrate the items. pipettes. pressure and vacuum gages. Generic SOPs are written to show how to calibrate a large variety of items in a general context. two types of calibration procedures: Generic: temperature gages and thermometers.  Responsibilities 4. Specific SOPs are written to show stepby-step procedures for each different type of test instrument within a group of items. This table should also include the standard’s range and specifications.  Scope 3. Have a system in place for updating your 42 . Manufacturer’s manuals usually provide an alignment procedure that can be used as a template for writing a calibration procedure. Procedures. along with their range and tolerances.  Definitions 5. A complete calibration must be performed prior to any adjustment or alignment. Definitions. power supplies and water baths. the calibration form is designed to follow specific steps (number wise). They should show what standards accomplish the calibration of a specific range and/or function.  Document History After section 4. micrometers. Have the latest edition of the procedure available for use by your calibration technicians.  Forms and Records 8. Specific: spectrophotometers. This means following published calibration procedures every time you calibrate a piece of test equipment. An alignment procedure and/ or preventive maintenance inspection (PMI) may be incorporated into your SOP as long as it is separate from the actual calibration procedure. There are.  Procedures 2.  Procedure 6. you should have a table listing all of the instruments or systems that would be calibrated by that procedure. thermal cyclers. and removes doubt by the calibration technician on what data goes into which data field. Possibly. “Do what you say” means follow the documented procedures or instructions every time you calibrate.

as well as the test instrument’s ‘As Found’ and when applicable ‘As Left’ readings. their part number and range/tolerance. The location of where the test instrument can be found should also be on the record. Of course there are many ways to accomplish this. Train your technicians on the changes made to your procedures every time the procedure is changed or improved – and document the training. the last time it was calibrated. Certain requirements must be documented in each calibration record. prior to alignment. and the next time it will be due calibration should be on the form. There should be a place to show what the standard read. What do you do when you need to make an improvement.a basic quality calibration program procedures. Excel.g. or update your calibration procedures and/or forms? A formal. A history of each calibration and a traceability statement or uncertainty budget must be included. e. The ‘As Found’ readings are what the test instrument read the first time that a calibration is performed. including: •  pen and paper •  “do-it-yourself ” databases. If an out-of-tolerance (OOT) condition is found. Access •  calibration module of a computerized maintenance management system (CMMS) •  calibration software specifically designed for that purpose These include the identification of the test instrument with a unique identification number. adjustment or repair. including what your standard(s) read or indicated both before and after any adjustments are made. and keep your calibration records in a secure location. 43 . The date of calibration. written process must be in place. The entire calibration is performed to see any part of the calibration is out of tolerance. to include: •  Who can make changes •  Who is the final approval authority •  A revision tracking system •  A process for validating the changes •  An archiving system for old procedures •  Instructions for posting new/removal of old procedures •  A system for training on revisions •  A place to document that training was done “Record what you did” means that you must record the results of your measurements and adjustments.

the standard is set at a predetermined output. collecting the ‘As Found’ data. and the temperature standard is used to record the actual reading. there will be times when this is not possible. there would not be a problem since it was found to be in tolerance during the first calibration. an ‘As Found’ calibration is performed. a complete calibration is again performed. Then. Compare this to the calibration of pressure gages where a pressure standard is set to a standard pressure. alignment or adjustment and that after a final adjustment was completed to bring the unit back into tolerance. The UUT is treated the same as any OOT unit. It would be obvious that something happened during the cleaning. It just dies and cannot be calibrated. but you would not have been able to collect the original “As Found’ readings. The water bath is set to a predetermined temperature. Usually. If the item is found to be out-of-tolerance at that time. and the UUT is read to see how much it deviates from the standard. collecting the ‘As Left’ readings for the final calibration record. This should be noted in the calibration record. There will be times when an instrument has a catastrophic failure. “As Left” readings are taken after repair. In some circumstances. This is why the entire calibration is performed prior to adjustment or alignment. The standard reading. after the UUT is adjusted to be as close to optimum as possible. One example when it would not be practical to set the standard and take a reading is during the calibration of water baths. and an ‘As Left’ set of data is collected. then proceed with the calibration. alignment.a basic quality calibration program record the reading (on the standard and the UUT) and continue with the rest of the calibration to the end of the calibration procedure. or adjustment. will also be recorded on the calibration form. a final ‘As Left’ calibration would be performed. while still meeting its specifications. make an adjustment. 44 . If one were to stop at the point where an OOT is found. In this type of situation. there is a good possibility that the adjustment affected other ranges or parts of the calibration. However. Then the PMI is completed. This is a best practice policy that has been in use in the metrology community since calibration started. once the problem is found and repaired. from the working or reference standard you are using to calibrate the UUT. Another example would be when preventive maintenance inspection is going to be performed on an item. The calibration is performed. Not all UUTs would be considered OOT when “As Left’ readings are taken. it might be metrology department policy to adjust an item if it is more than ½ beyond its in-tolerance range.

paragraph 5.a basic quality calibration program and the gage(s) under test are then read. humidity. There should also be a place to identify which calibration procedure was used. to NIST. List environment conditions when appropriate and show if they pass or fail.3-2006. or to any artifact that was used as a standard.6 Influence factors and conditions: “All factors and conditions of the calibration area that adversely influence the calibration results shall be defined. According to NCSL International Calibration Control Systems for the Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Industry – Recommended Practice RP-6. monitored. then a formal program must be in place for tracking those conditions and reviewing the data. Also on the calibration form should be an area to identify the standard(s) that were used. electromagnetic interference. plus their specifications and range. and their pressures recorded on the calibration record. along with their next calibration due date(s). it is not always possible to set the standard and take a reading from the UUT. along with the procedure’s revision number. You should include any uncertainty budgets if used. and a determination is made as to the in or out of tolerance of the UUT. recorded. If this is the case.3. They. There must be a statement showing traceability to your NMI. along with the standard. then there should be a place in the calibration form for showing that those conditions were 45 .”4 According to ANSI/NCSL Z540. Calibration shall be stopped when the adverse effects of the influence factors ad conditions jeopardize the results of the calibration.”5 If the conditions within the area that calibrations are being performed require monitoring according to the standard or requirements that must be met. vibration. just as the calibration of autoclaves. The UUT is compared to the reference after equilibration. Note: Influencing factors and conditions may include temperature. paragraph 5. In other case. and mitigated to meet calibration process requirements. are placed in a dry block and a particular temperature is set. As can be seen by the above examples. or in the case of most companies in the USA. and compared to the standard to see if they are in or out of tolerance. or at least a statement that a TUR of ≥ 4:1 was met. The same happens when calibrating thermometers.11: “The calibration environment need be controlled only to the extent required by the most environmentally sensitive measurement performed in the area. dust. they are set to complete a sterilization cycle and a temperature device records all of the temperature readings throughout the cycle and the readings are checked to see if the autoclave met its specifications. etc.

were not met. audited. both hard copy 46 . draw a single line through the entry. or transposed the wrong numbers. use whatever tracking system the software uses. Do not use white-out. you find that you have made an error. the calibration record requires a ‘second set of eyes’. or erase the original data.a basic quality calibration program either met. etc. And finally. or are not applicable to that calibration. and date and sign accordingly. and then place your initials and date next to the data using black ink. •  The user/customer was notified and the UUT was taken out of service and tagged as unusable. Enough space should be available for the calibration technician to include information about the calibration. If the UUT had an out-of-tolerance condition. write the correct data. This is called for in all of the standards and regulations. The user/customer. This means that an individual higher up the chain of command (supervisor. What do you do if. with the following possibilities as an example:  •  The user/customer was notified and the UUT was adjusted and meets specifications. even if internal to the company performing the calibrations. then there should be a place to show what happened to the UUT. •  The user/customer was notified and the UUT was given a ‘limited calibration’ with their written approval.) must review the calibration record and also sign and date that it has been reviewed. there should be a place on the form for the final reviewer to sign and date. QA inspector. There should be only one way to file your records. etc. Notice that in each circumstance that the user/customer must be notified of any and all OOTs. and want to correct the error? For hard copy records. There should be an area set aside in the calibration form for making comments or remarks. must be informed if their test equipment does not meet their specifications. what was accomplished if an OOT was found. or inspected before it is considered a completed record. OOT conditions. You should indicate on the form if the calibration passed or failed. In some instances. If this is the case. For making corrections to electronic records (eRecords). after recording your results. manager. the calibration record must be signed and dated by the technician performing the calibration. or make a duplicate record from scratch with the correct data and explain in the comments block what happened.

The use of computerized data collection brings with it not only increased productivity and savings in time and effort. should also be considered. In some instances it is apparent what the tolerances will be for the items being calibrated. Hard copy records collected during the calibration of test instruments have been discussed in detail already. but also new problems in how to collect. In other cases it is not quite so apparent. validation of that software is mandatory. There are various ways to do this. or upper/lower limits specified in your procedures or instructions. But the collection of data by electronic means. data lines and storage systems when going entirely electronic with your calibration records and data management. calibration certificate number and calibration date •  Placed on a secure drive that has regular backup •  eRecords are filed within a specified time frame There are many different ways to manage your calibration data since there are a variety of ways to collect that data. process controllers. review and store the data. “Check the results” means make certain the test equipment meets the tolerances.a basic quality calibration program and eRecords – no matter which system you use. or through the use of calibration software. An example for filing hard copy records: •  Each record is filed by its unique ID number •  Records are filed with the newest in the front •  Records are filed within a specified time frame An example for filing eRecords: •  Filed by ID number. 47 . put it into your written procedures. and eventual storage. analysis.. Is the system validated and instrumentation qualified prior to use? If you are using any type of computerized system. It cannot be emphasized enough the criticality of validating your software. How is the data collected and stored? Is it in its native format or dumped into a spreadsheet for analysis? All of these need to be considered to allow for review. and/or compilation into your forms. etc. accuracies. manage. Calibration forms should have the range and their tolerances listed for each piece of test equipment being calibrated.

According to the FDA: “When accuracy and precision limits are not met.” You should have a written procedure in place that explains in detail: •  What actions are to be taken by the calibration technician? •  What actions to be taken by the department supervisor and/or manager? •  What actions to be taken by the responsible owner/user of the OOT test equipment? You should have an SOP that explains the responsibilities of the calibration technician: •  Do they have additional form(s) to complete when OOT conditions are found? •  Do they require a ‘second set of eyes’ when/if an OOT is found? •  Have they been trained and signed off that they know all the proper procedures when an OOT has been found? You should have an SOP that explains the responsibilities of the supervisor/manager: •  Who notifies the customer – the technician. if so is there a time limit. or upper management notification in case of ‘in action’? 48 . and a paper trail for historical reference? After owner/user notification. is the calibration department responsible for anything else? •  Is the final action by the owner/user sent back for filing or archiving? •  Usually the department that generates an action item is responsible for final archiving. •  Are there any databases that need to be updated.a basic quality calibration program “Act on the difference” means if the test equipment is out of tolerance. change a process or procedure. or recall product. there shall be provisions for remedial action to reestablish the limits and to evaluate whether there was any adverse effect on the device’s quality. supervisor or manager? •  Is a data base maintained on all OOT test equipment? •  Is the customer/user required to reply to the OOT notification. you must inform the user because they may have to re-evaluate manufactured goods.

•  Among the 15% that are found to be OOT some will be due to Start Typical calibration process as shown in a flow chart ‘As found’ test Save ‘As found’ results NO Adjustment required? YES Adjust as needed ‘As Left’ test YES Within limits? NO Save ‘As Left’ results End 49 .a basic quality calibration program Do you have a database of all OOT test equipment for various activities? •  The database can be used for accessing yearly calibration interval analysis. •  Access to OOT data can assist in determining reliability of test equipment. Here is a hypothetical example: from an historical perspective. •  During an audit/inspection (both internal and external) access to past OOT data should be easily available. generally 85% of test equipment passes calibration.

etc. Record what you did. Those include: a master inventory list. scheduling and calibration management software. •  If a higher fail rate is noticed. time and other resources to the best advantage. environmental conditions (vibration. standards. According to most standards and regulations. check that the proper specifications are being used. the ability to see a 30 day schedule of items coming due calibration. bad cables/accessories. Without any one of these programs. you can schedule your technicians. a quality calibration program would be impossible to maintain. and Act on the difference” portion. It is hard to keep your overdue calibrations at a minimum when all of your time is spent reacting to items that keep coming due without your prior knowledge. Any calibration management program worth the money should have a few critical areas built into their basic program. But the different parts that keep a quality calibration program running efficiently consist of elements from a continuous process improvement program. any software program used must be validated prior to implementation. an effective training program. By knowing what is coming due calibration. The “Say what you do. The same can be said of a quality calibration program. the calibration management program should also be able to show calibrations and repairs by individual items. groups of items by location/part number. This can be compared to the person who is trying to drain the swamp while fighting off the alligators.a basic quality calibration program operator error. correct and properly used calibration and equipment labels. a comprehensive calibration analysis program. items that are OOT. before changing calibration intervals. poorly written calibration procedures. the unseen portion is what keeps the iceberg afloat and stable in the ocean. reverse traceability. Do what you say. and other listings that help to manage your department. and the ability to see all items that are currently overdue calibration. Having an effective calibration management program is usually the difference between being proactive and reactive to performing your routine calibrations. bad standards. However.). Only about 10% can be easily seen by the casual observer. Developing a world-class calibration program A quality calibration program might be compared to an iceberg. This can be accomplished using the manufacturer’s 50 . and a visible safety program. along with traceability should be apparent to an auditor or inspector. From a managerial standpoint. Check the results.

environment. Also. How often should each type of test equipment be calibrated? Should the manufacturer’s recommended interval be the determining factor? Or should the criticality of how the test equipment is used in your particular production or manufacturing line be the deciding vote? Your specific situation should be the driving factor in deciding calibration interval analysis. An example of this would be to calibrate all pressure gages that were shown to be stored or used in a specific area. Most manufacturers recommend a 12 month calibration interval. By not having to stand around to wait for the water baths to equilibrate. etc. Another critical yet often times misunderstood program is calibration interval analysis. Calibration interval analysis software can be purchased commercially 51 . and the calibration technician is required to gown-up prior to entry every time then go into the clean-room. you must consider if the test equipment is used to determine final product where specifications are very tight. say outdoors in severe weather. A particular item used in a controlled environment should be more reliable that one used in a harsher situation. Each situation should be considered carefully so that they can be reviewed in the appropriate light. then complete the water baths at their final setting. then perform several pipette or balance calibrations. your validation paperwork needs to be available for inspection during audits and inspections. An example would be to start all temperature calibrations (set water baths up for their initial temperature readings). handling. or used as an item that is coded as “No Calibration Required” on a loading dock. you are using your time more efficiently. Combining the calibration of like items and mixing and matching items could reduce the task of mundane and boring calibrations. or by incorporating an in-house validation system. and using your scheduling software to also perform calibrations in geographical areas or combining calibrations in local areas. Also. increasing productivity. A best practice among experienced calibration practitioners is the calibration of like items. return to set another temperature in the water baths (doing a few at a time). depending on usage.a basic quality calibration program system. if calibrations were to be performed in a ‘clean room’ environment. and keeping the calibration technician involved and focused instead of bored. or floor of a building. return to finish the pipette or balance calibrations. This would be using your time to the best advantage. Either way. then scheduling all of the calibrations in that area could increase production and reduce down time from multiple entries and exits.

It provides information needed to design. This Recommended Practice (RP) is intended to provide a guide for the establishment and adjustment of calibration intervals for equipment subject to periodic calibration. implement and manage calibration interval determination. Not only is calibration a requirement. Several methods of calibration interval analysis and adjustment are presented. set a cut off for increasing or decreasing calibration intervals •  Consider increasing a calibration interval if the pass rate ≥ 95% (by ½ up to double the current calibration interval) •  Consider decreasing a calibration interval if the pass rate ≤ 85% (by ¾ to ½ of the current calibration interval) No matter which route you take for calibration interval analysis – ensure you are on the cutting-edge – not on the ragged-edge by extending your intervals too fast without solid data. divide result by the number of calibrations. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are described and guidelines are given to assist in selecting the best method for a requiring organization. or are on a tight budget and are willing to do their own computations. Establishment & Adjustment of Calibration Intervals. and to your company’s reputation! The cost and risk of not calibrating Are there costs and/or risks associated to not calibrating your test equipment? This is a double edged sword. Also. Here is an example. but 52 . in time and money.a basic quality calibration program and used to evaluate your test equipment. then take the result times 100 for the pass rate •  Make a risk assessment of each item for your company’s needs. Both management and technical information are presented in this RP. but one of the foundations for any quality system in the 21st century. adjustment and evaluation programs. It isn’t a question of do you have a quality calibration program in place. A company could also do their own analysis if they support a limited number of items. industries and even countries. NCSL International has RP-1. On one side we have the requirement of standards and regulations that govern various companies. recalls can be very expensive. collect data over a one year period on: number of calibrations and number of items OOT •  Take the number of calibrations minus the number of OOTs. •  For each type of equipment.

But it doesn’t end there. The cost is huge in terms of lost production. The basic belief is this – it is absolutely essential to have a quality calibration program in place to make a quality product.a basic quality calibration program does it comply with all the requirements of the appropriate standard or regulation to which your company must conform? The other side of the double edged sword is having a calibration program in place without any type of quality. traceability or documentation. and reputation. calibration interval analysis. shape. there can be no repeatability. you must also have all the parts needed to support traceable calibration: calibration procedures. so the company would never be able to stay in business long enough to impact their market segment. money. then it is assumed that to have a quality calibration program. international. what are the responsibilities of a quality calibration department and also those of their customer? A calibration/metrology department should be responsible for: •  Listening to their customers to understand their requirements and needs 53 . The question that should be asked is: “Do you have a quality calibration program that has traceable results to a national or international standard”? If the answer is yes. Referring to a double edged sword. Therefore there can be no quality in the product. Then you can say you have a quality calibration program. This would equate to not having any type of calibration program at all. calibration records. and the ability to provide quality customer service in a timely manner. document control procedures. or intrinsic). no matter the size. traceable documentation. time. a training program. If a manufacturer produces any type of product or service where repeatable measurements take place then their test equipment/instruments need to have repetitive outputs. So is there cost and risk? Absolutely. pharmaceutical drugs and products that impact human safety – the cost could be immeasurable…with the possibility of death among the results. In the case of companies that have untraceable calibration in the production of medical devices. documented training for all your calibration technicians. continuous process improvements. or quantity. an out-oftolerance program and procedures. Without calibration to a traceable standard (national. a comprehensive calibration management software package.

2. Milwaukee: ASQ Quality Press. November 1995. 2006.  Bucher.  NCSL.a basic quality calibration program •  Translating those requirements to the accuracy and specifications of the test equipment and support services that meet or exceed their quality expectations •  Delivering test equipment that consistently meets requirements for reliable performance •  Providing knowledgeable and comprehensive test equipment support •  Continuously reviewing and improving their services and processes Your customers should be responsible for: •  Informing Metrology of their requirements and needs •  Getting the proper training in the correct and safe usage of test equipment •  Maintaining their test equipment without abusing. December 1999 rev00. Calibration Control Systems for the Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Industry. 54 . Jay L. The Quality Calibration Handbook.  NCSL International. Traceability of Measurement. contaminating or damaging it under normal operating conditions •  Using their work order system for requesting service when equipment is broken. 4. you cannot improve it. RP-6. Edition 1. “If you cannot measure it. Boulder. 1999.” 1. 2007. malfunctioning. ANSI/NCSL Z540. Expression of the Uncertainty of Measurement in Calibration. Boulder. 3. CO.  EA-4/02. CO.  EAL-G12.3-2006. or in need of calibration As Lord Kelvin was quoted as saying. 5.

55 .

.

i. uncertainty. put new and tight requirements on the accuracy of process instruments and on process control. Fortunately. terminology and methods involved in calibration must be known and understood in order to perform according to International Quality Systems. Calibration can briefly be described as an activity where theinstrument being tested is compared to a known reference value. which means that the calibrator used should have a valid.  What is calibration and why calibrate Calibration can brief ly be described as an activity where the instrument being tested is compared to a known reference value. calibrator. To be able to answer the question why calibrate. modern calibration techniques and calibration systems have made it easier to fulfill the requirements on instrumentation calibration and maintenance in a productive way. call for systematic and well-documented calibrations.e. Quality systems. 57 . with regard to accuracy. 1. traceable calibration certificate.traceable and efficient calibrations Traceable and efficient calibrations in the process industry T oday’s modern process plants.e. However. production processes and quality systems. The keywords here are ‘known reference’. confidence levels etc. repeatability. some understanding of the techniques. Does this mean that the electricians and instrumentation people should be calibration experts? Not really. calibrator. we must first determine what measurement is and why measuring is necessary. i. but this topic should not be ignored. such as the ISO9000 and ISO14000 series of quality standards.

” What is then the value of quantity? According to the standards the true value of a quantity is: “The value which characterizes a quantity perfectly defined during the conditions which exist at the moment when the value is observed. Note: the true value of a quantity is an ideal concept and.” Therefore all instruments display false indications! A set of experimental operations for the purpose of determining the value of a quantity. HIERARCHY OF ACCURACY TRUE VALUE International National standard Authorized Laboratories Instr. in general.traceable and efficient calibrations WHAT IS MEASUREMENT? In technical standards terms the word measurement has been defined as: “A set of experimental operations for the purpose of determining the value of a quantity. Departments House and working standards Process instrumentation 58 . it cannot be known.

This conversion always involves optimizing. energy. regardless of how advanced the process automation system is. EVERYTHING IS BASED ON MEASUREMENTS PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEM MEASUREMENTS CONTROLS INSTRUMENTATION MEASUREMENTS ADJUSTMENTS Production Factors PROCESS Products 59 . which must be done better than the competitors. In practice. in other words. the control cannot be better than the quality of measurements from the process. optimization is done by means of process automation.  Why measure? The purpose of a process plant is to convert raw material. they drift and lose their ability to give accurate measurements.  Why calibrate The primary reason for calibrating is based on the fact that even the best measuring instruments lack in absolute stability. 3. manpower and capital into products in the best possible way. The primary reason for calibrating is based on the fact that even the best measuring instruments lack in absolute stability.traceable and efficient calibrations 2. Anyhow. in other words.

Even instruments of the same manufacturer. QUALITY MAINTENANCE QUALITY QP C1 C2 C1–C7 CALIBRATIONS C3 C4 “GOOD AS NEW” C5 C6 C7 QM LOWER TOLERANCE Q1 Q2 Q3 QZM PURCHASE T1 T2 T3 TIME QP – PURCHASED QUALITY QZM – ZERO MAINTAINED QUALITY QM – MAINTAINED QUALITY 60 . systematic calibrations. which produces uniform quality and minimizes the negative impacts on the environment. This drift makes recalibration necessary. elapsed time and type of application can all affect the stability of an instrument. Other good reasons for calibration are: •  To maintain the credibility of measurements •  To maintain the quality of process instruments at a good-as-new level •  Safety and environmental regulations •  ISO9000. Environment conditions. Environment conditions. type and range can show varying performance. while another performs differently. elapsed time and type of application can all affect the stability of an instrument.traceable and efficient calibrations they drift and lose their ability to give accurate measurements. other quality systems and regulations The ISO9000 and ISO14000 can assist in guiding regular. One unit can be found to have good stability.

This is done prior to initial use and reconfirmed as necessary.1  ISO9001: 2008 The organization determines the monitoring and measurements to be performed.traceable and efficient calibrations 4. If no such standards exist. as well as the measuring devices needed to provide evidence of a product’s conformity to determined standards. The organization then takes appropriate action on the equipment and any product affected. SI-UNITS International standards National standards Reference standards Working standards Process standards 61 . the basis used for calibration or verification is recorded. to ensure valid results. protected from damage and deterioration during handling.  Regulatory requirements for calibration 5. In addition. measuring equipment is calibrated or verified with measurement standards traceable to national or international standards at specified intervals. 5. the organization assesses and records the validity of the previous measuring results when the equipment is found not to conform to requirements. Where necessary. Traceability is a declaration stating to which national standard a certain instrument has been compared.  Traceability Calibrations must be traceable. When used in the monitoring and measurement of specified requirements. The organization establishes the processes for ensuring that measurements and monitoring are carried out and are carried out in a manner consistent with the monitoring and measurement requirements. safeguarded against adjustments that would invalidate the measurement result. identified for the determining of the calibration status. maintenance and storage. Note: See ISO 10012 for further information. Records of the calibration and verification results are then maintained. the ability of computer software to satisfy the intended application is confirmed. adjusted or re-adjusted as necessary.

Food and Drug Administration) Any pharmaceutical company that sells their products in the USA must comply with FDA regulations. •  Calibration standards should be traceable to national and international standards. or delete data from an electronic record. •  Calibration records must be maintained. •  A calibration period and error limits should be defined for each instrument. User Management. and Security System to be able to comply with these regulations. •  There must be documented evidence that personnel involved in the calibration process have been trained and are competent. Users must understand their responsibilities once they give an electronic signature. Audit Trail. Software systems need features such as Electronic Signature. •  There should be a record of the history of each instrument. Electronic Signatures” Software systems need features such as Electronic Signature. process and safety instruments should be physically tagged. regardless of where the products are manufactured. and Security System to be able to comply with these regulations. all product. approved procedures. An Audit Trail is required to support change management. User Management. U. Audit Trails should record all modifications.traceable and efficient calibrations 5. 62 .2  PHARMACEUTICAL (FDA. •  Calibrations must be done in accordance with written.S. Audit Trail. the Electronic Signature is considered equivalent to a hand-written signature. •  All instruments used must be fit for purpose. •  Documented change management system must be in place. In such a system. •  All instrumentation should have a unique ID. which add. •  Calibration standards must be more accurate than the required accuracy of the equipment being calibrated. edit. •  All of the above should be implemented in conjunction with following regulations: –  21 CFR Part 211 – “Current Good Manufacturing Practice for Finished Pharmaceuticals” –  21 CFR Part 11 – “Electronic Records. •  All electronic systems must comply with FDA’s 21 CFR Part 11.

Please note that the definitions listed here are simplified. Non-linearity Non-linearity is the maximum deviation of a transducer’s output from a defined straight line.3 PHARMACEUTICAL (EU GMPs) Any pharmaceutical company that sells their products in the European Union must comply with EU GMPs. The requirements for EU GMPs are similar to those of the US FDA. 6. including Annex 11.traceable and efficient calibrations 5. regardless of where the products are manufactured.2. Validation Validation of measurement and test methods (procedures) is generally necessary to prove that the methods are suitable for the intended use. Validation of measure­ ment and test methods (procedures) is generally necessary to prove that the methods are suitable for the intended use.  DEFINITIONS OF METROLOGICAL TERMS Some metrological terms in association with the concept of calibration are described in this section. Non-linearity is specified by the Terminal Based method or the Best Fit Straight Line method. Calibration An unknown measured signal is compared to a known reference signal. as described in Section 5. Resolution Resolution is the smallest interval that can be read between two readings. Quite a few of the following terms are also used on specification sheets for calibrators. 63 .

when first approaching this point with increasing values.  64 Stability is expressed as the change in percentage in the calibrated output of an instrument over a specified period. hysteresis. usually 90 days to 12 months. Good resolution is required in order to detect sensitivity. The temperature coefficient is usually expressed as % F. which can be detected as an output. The only way to compare accuracy presented in different ways is to calculate the total error at certain points.S. Drift is usually given as a typical value. The difference between these two expressions is great. Accuracy Generally accuracy figures state the closeness of a measured value to a known reference value. Hysteresis The deviation in output at any point within the instrument’s sensing range. or % of RDG + adder. usually 90 days to 12 months.S. Accuracy is usually expressed % F. Repeatability Repeatability is the capability of an instrument to give the same output among repeated inputs of the same value over a period of time. It must also be checked if errors like non-linearity. under normal operating conditions.traceable and efficient calibrations Sensitivity Sensitivity is the smallest variation in input. temperature effects etc. Stability Often referred to as drift. and then with decreasing values. Temperature coefficient The change in a calibrator’s accuracy caused by changes in ambient temperature (deviation from reference conditions). stability is expressed as the change in percentage in the calibrated output of an instrument over a specified period. The accuracy of the reference value is generally not included in the figures. under normal operating conditions. . / °C or % of RDG/ °C. Repeatability is often expressed in the form of standard deviation. are included in the accuracy figures provided.

Values belonging to this category may be derived from: It should be noted that. 65 . which contain the true value. there will be an observable difference in the values measured. at a given cover factor (or confidence level). in an unpredictable manner. for a series of measurements under the same conditions. or the use of inappropriate technology. Examples of systematic effects include errors in reference value.traceable and efficient calibrations Uncertainty Uncertainty is an estimate of the limits. The standard deviation.e. set-up of the measuring. Type B uncertainty is used when the uncertainty of a single measurement is expressed. i. It should be noted that. errors due to observer fallibility cannot be accommodated within the calculation of uncertainty. often called the “root-mean-square repeatability error”. Type A involves the statistical analysis of a series of measurements. in general. is used for calculation. in general. Standard deviation is used as a measure of the dispersion of values. Uncertainty is evaluated according to either a “Type A” or a “Type B” method. If there is sufficient resolution in the measurement. Systematic errors or effects remain constant during the measurement. Type B. Type A uncertainty The type A method of calculation can be applied when several independent measurements have been made under the same conditions. ambient conditions. which can vary in magnitude and in sign. The other group of components. Type B uncertainty Type B evaluation of uncertainty involves the use of other means to calculate uncertainty. rather than applying statistical analysis of a series of measurements. could be said to be of a systematic nature. It involves the evaluation of uncertainty using scientific judgement based on all available information concerning the possible variables. the effects of these components include measurement errors. Examples of such errors include: errors in recording data. uncertainty is calculated using Type A uncertainties. etc. In this case. errors due to observer fallibility cannot be accommodated within the calculation of uncertainty. errors in calculation.

It is a skill that can be learnt with practice. especially in a measurement situation where a Type A evaluation is based only on a comparatively small number of statistically independent measurements. in ISO9001: 2008. The maintenance management system may alert when calibration is 66 . should be used.traceable and efficient calibrations •  Experience with or general knowledge of the behavior and properties of relevant materials and instruments •  Ambient temperature •  Humidity •  Local gravity •  Atmospheric pressure •  Uncertainty of the calibration standard •  Calibration procedures •  Method used to register calibration results •  Method to process calibration results The proper use of the available information calls for insight based on experience and general knowledge. the standard coverage factor. For uncertainty specifications. Usually one of the following confidence levels are used: 1 s = 68% 2 s = 95% 3 s = 99% For uncertainty specifications.  CALIBRATION MANAGEMENT Many companies do not pay enough attention to calibration management although it is a requirement e. Expanded uncertainty The EA has decided that calibration laboratories accredited by members of the EA shall state an expanded uncertainty of measurement obtained by multiplying the uncertainty by a coverage factor k. A well-based Type B evaluation of uncertainty can be as reliable as a Type A evaluation of uncertainty. 7. there must be a clear statement of cover probability or confidence level. there must be a clear statement of cover probability ­ or confidence level. The expanded uncertainty corresponds to a coverage probability (or confidence level) of approximately 95%.g. k=2. In cases where normal (Gaussian) distribution can be assumed.

Choosing professional tools for maintaining calibration records and doing the calibrations can save a lot of time. Depending on what process variable is calibrated and how many calibration points are recorded. All this saves an extensive amount of time and prevents the user from making mistakes. Calibration records. including the full calibration history of an The instrument’s measurement ranges and error limits are defined in the software and also downloaded to the calibrator. If something is documented. effort and money. it is usually in the form of a hand-written sheet that is then archived. Thus the calibrator is able to detect if the calibration was passed or failed immediately after the last calibration point was recorded. When the technician is about to calibrate an instrument. are needed. and there is no need to write down anything with pen. etc. (s)he simply downloads the instrument details from the calibration management software into the memory of a documenting calibrator. The “As Found” and “As Left” are saved in the calibrator’s memory. While the calibration results are uploaded onto the database. Once the job has been done. 67 . An efficient calibration management system consists of calibration management software and documenting calibrators. and the traceability chain is documented without requiring any further actions from the user. finding the sheets requires a lot of effort. There is no need to make tricky calculations manually in the field. The increase in work productivity allows for more calibrations to be carried out within the same period of time as before. It automatically creates a list of instruments waiting to be calibrated in the near future. the work order will close and the maintenance system will be satisfied. The instrument’s measurement ranges and error limits are defined in the software and also downloaded to the calibrator.traceable and efficient calibrations needed and then opens up a work order. If the software is able to interface with other systems the scheduling of calibrations can be done in the maintenance system from which the work orders can be automatically loaded into the calibration management software. If the calibration results need to be examined at a later time. what happens between opening and closing of the work order is not documented very often. Modern calibration management software can be a tool that automates and simplifies calibration work at all levels. no printed notes. using automated tools can be 5 to 10 times faster compared to manual recording. Unfortunately. the software automatically detects the calibrator that was used.

If the system manufacturer has paid attention usability. Implementing a modern calibration management system benefits everybody who has anything to do with instrumentation. If the calibration management software includes the right tools. In addition to the conventional mA output of a transmitter. software displays the “History Trend”. Good calibration tools help technicians work more efficiently and accurately. it does not mean the job is an enormous one. modern calibrators can also read HART. When many tasks are automated. printing them must. When an auditor comes for a visit. be possible. QA will find a calibration management system useful. The requested calibration records can be viewed on screen with a couple mouse clicks. For instance the maintenance manager can use it as a calibration planning and decision-making tool for tracking and managing all calibration related activities. If paper copies of certificates are preferred. Today’s documenting calibrators are capable of calibrating many process signals. instrument. it is possible to manage calibration records on computer without producing any papers. of course. There are probably thousands of instruments that need to be entered into the database and all the details must be checked and verified before the system is up and running. are kept in the database. which assists in determining whether or not the calibration period should be changed. therefore accessing previous results is also possible in just a few seconds. Although there is a lot of data involved. When an instrument has been calibrated several times. It is not very uncommon to have a calibrator that calibrates pressure. If a calibrator drifts out of its specifications. One of today’s trends is to move towards to a paperless office. it is possible to use a “reverse traceability report” to get a list of instruments that have been calibrated with that calibrator. 68 . Foundation Fieldbus or Profibus output of the transmitters.traceable and efficient calibrations Implementing a modern calibration management system benefits everybody who has anything to do with instrumentation. the system is easy to learn and use. Transferring to a new calibration system may sound like a huge task and it can be a huge task. the users can concentrate on their primary job. and they can be even used for configuring these “smart” transmitters. When all calibration related data is located in a single database the software is obviously able to create calibration related reports and documents. temperature and electrical signals including frequency and pulses.

The vendor of the calibration system is most likely able to import most of the existing data to the calibration database saving months of work. more accurately and with better results than what could be reached with a manual system. scheduling. automated calibration system reduces workload because it carries out tasks faster. Electronic Signatures” [3] 21 CFR Part 211: “Current Good Manufacturing Practice for Finished Pharmaceuticals” A good. automated calibration system reduces workload. CONCLUSION A good. 69 .traceable and efficient calibrations Nowadays most companies have instrumentation data in some type of electronic format: as Excel spreadsheets. Requirements” [2] 21 CFR Part 11: “Electronic Records. It assists in documenting. analyzing and finally optimizing the calibration work. etc. References [1] ISO9001: 2008 “Quality Management Systems. planning. Maintenance databases.

Calibration Management and Maintenance

why calibrate

Why Calibrate? What is the risk of not calibrating?

C

alibration can be briefly described as an activity where the instrument being tested is compared to a known reference value. At the simplest level, calibration is a comparison between measurements – one of known magnitude or correctness made or set with one device, and another measurement made in as similar a way as possible with a second device. The device with the known or assigned correctness is called the standard. The second device is the unit under test or test instrument. Calibration is often required with a new instrument or when a specified time period or a specified number of operating hours has elapsed. In addition, calibration is usually carried out when an instrument has been subjected to an unexpected shock or vibration that may have put it out of its specified limits. Calibration in industrial applications When a sensor or instrument experiences temperature variations or physical stress over time, its performance will invariably begin to decline, which is known as ‘drift’. This means that measurement data from the sensor becomes unreliable and could even affect the quality of a company’s production. Although drift cannot be completely eliminated, it can be discovered and rectified via calibration. The purpose of calibration is to determine how accurate an instrument or sensor is. Although most instruments provide high accuracy these days, regulatory bodies often need to know just how inaccurate a particular instrument is and whether it drifts in and out of specified tolerance over time.

Although drift cannot be completely eliminated, it can be discovered and rectified via calibration.

73

Product manufacturing also depends on accurate masses and so laboratories and production departments in the food and beverage. In certain situations. also need to calibrate their weighing instruments. power. oil and gas. harsh 74 Even the highest quality instruments will drift over time and lose their ability to provide accurate measurements. calibration has costs associated with it and in uncertain economic times. Even the highest quality instruments will drift over time and lose their ability to provide accurate measurements. It is therefore critical that all instruments are calibrated at appropriate intervals. if the instrument is critical to a process or is located in a hazardous area. harbors and retail outlets. Furthermore. product and process quality issues or even product recalls and rework. Why is calibration important? Calibration ensures that instrument drift is minimized. aviation companies. This is particularly true for the food and beverage sector and for pharmaceutical manufacturers. who invoice customers based on the mass of what they supply (fiscal metering). Determining the correct mass of a product or material is particularly important for companies that supply steel. paper and pulp. energy. . Fluctuating temperatures. However. Invoicing in these industries is often based on process measurements. These companies need to prove not only that the mass is accurate but also that the equipment producing the readings was correctly calibrated. The stability of an instrument very much depends on its application and the environment it operates in. Weighing instruments also need to be calibrated regularly. this activity can often become neglected or the interval between calibration checks on instruments can be extended in order to cut costs or simply through a lack of resources or manpower. this may even lead to a company losing its license to operate due to company not meeting its regulatory requirements. an end product manufactured by a plant with poorly calibrated instruments could present a risk to both consumers and customers. There is therefore a growing need to have the metrological quality of these weighing instruments confirmed by calibration. chemical and pharmaceutical industries. Similarly.why calibrate The costs and risks of not calibrating Unfortunately. neglecting calibration can lead to unscheduled production or machine downtime. allowing that sensor to drift over time could potentially result in a risk to employee safety.

instrument calibration can help to optimize a company’s production process or to increase the plant’s production capacity. Calibration also ensures that product or batch quality remains high and consistent over time. Incorrect measurements in a hazardous area could lead to serious consequences.6%. Armando Rivero Rubalcaba is head of Instrumentation at beer producer Heineken (Spain). All product. process and safety instruments should also be physically tagged. On the people side. ISO 9002 and ISO 14001 require systematic. In the power generation. at the Almaraz Nuclear Power Plant in Spain. Safety is another important reason to calibrate instruments. energy and utilities industries. the quality of the beer is a number one priority. The role of calibration is very important to ensure the quality and safety of the processes. requires that calibration records are maintained and calibrations have to be carried out in accordance with written. enabled the reactor power in each unit to be increased by 1. 75 . by improving the measurement of reactor power parameters from 2% to 0. Typically. there must be documented evidence that employees involved in the calibration process have been properly trained and competent.4%. well-documented calibrations with respect to accuracy. The role of calibration is very important to ensure the quality and safety of the processes. Furthermore. GMP.why calibrate manufacturing conditions (dust and dirt) and elapsed time are all contributing factors here. This affects all process manufacturers.” Pharmaceutical manufacturers must follow current Good Manufacturing Practices. in addition to the BRC certificate of food safety. He comments: “For Heineken. with all electronic systems complying with FDA regulations 21 CFR Part 11. We must therefore ensure that all processes correspond to the planned characteristics. which has a significant effect on annual production capacity. each instrument has a master history record and a unique ID. Standards must also be more accurate than the required accuracy of the equipment being calibrated. Even instruments manufactured by the same supplier can vary in their performance over time. For example. Production environments are potentially high risk areas for employees and can involve high temperatures and high pressures. a calibration interval and error limits should be defined for each instrument and standards should be traceable to national and international standards. uncertainty and confidence levels. The company must also have a documented change management system in place. repeatability. approved procedures. Quality systems such as ISO 9001. All the plants in Spain have received ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 certifications.

calibration was mainly driven by economic motives: even the smallest of errors in delivery quantities are unacceptable in Shell’s operation due to the vast sums of money 76 .why calibrate Calibration is of great importance. Therefore. The impact of even a small measurement error can be tremendous in terms of lost revenue. Indeed. This means that requirements for the calibrators are especially high. particularly in the oil and gas. Similarly. especially from the viewpoint of production safety and quality of the final product. Proper invoicing is therefore critical to energy and utilities companies. When only large companies with revenues of more than 1 billion US dollars are considered. This is particularly true if sales invoicing is based on accurate process measurements. including sensors used for measuring CO2 and NOX emissions.7 million US dollars every year. petrochemicals and chemicals sectors. for example. Heikki Karhe is a measurement technician at the tyre manufacturer Nokian Tyres. gas conversion devices must be extremely accurate in measuring delivered gas. Calibrating instruments can help to make combustion more efficient in industrial ovens and furnaces. As Jacek Midera. poor quality calibration is on average costing manufacturers more than 1. The latest Government regulations relating to carbon emissions may also require that companies calibrate specific instruments on a regular basis.” Today. especially from the viewpoint of production safety and quality of the final product. this figure rises dramatically to more than 4 million US dollars per year. Measuring instruments that yield wrong values could easily ruin the final product. As Ed de Jong. accurate measurements ensure proper billing. according to recent research by Nielsen Research/ ATS Studies. The factory is also full of pressure instruments and so it is also important for the safety of the workers that those instruments show the right values. manufacturers of food and beverage or pharmaceutical products could put their customers’ lives at risk by neglecting to calibrate their process instruments. Instrument Maintenance Engineer at Shell (Netherlands) explains: “Until recently. controlling emissions is another critical factor for many process manufacturers. measurement specialist at Mazovian Gas Company states: “Most importantly. Preparation of the right rubber mixture is precision work and a sample is taken from each rubber mixture to ensure quality. As he puts it: “Calibration is of great importance.” Neglecting to calibrate process instruments can also affect a company’s bottom line profits. weighing scales or gas conversion devices. Customers want to pay for the exact amount of gas they’ve received.

In this way. Another common misunderstanding is that new instruments do not require calibration. a company is able to enter all the necessary instrument data to its calibration database or calibration management software. Again.” Common misconceptions There are some common misconceptions when it comes to instrument calibration. calibration has an important role especially for the license to operate. this does not eliminate the need for calibration. The optimal calibration interval for different instruments can only be determined with software-based history trend analysis. highly stable sensors are not calibrated as often as those sensors that are more susceptible to drift. Nowadays. some manufacturers claim that they do not need to calibrate their fieldbus instruments because they are digital and so are always accurate and correct. The most effective method of determining when an instrument requires calibrating is to use some sort of history trend analysis. By calibrating an instrument before installation. for example. This interval may be decreased if the instrument is being used in a critical process or application. the manufacturer of the instrument will provide a recommended calibration interval. instruments related to CO2 and NOX emissions. The most effective method of determining when an instrument requires calibrating is to use some sort of history trend analysis. First. This is simply not true. 77 . Changing the output signal does not change the need for periodic calibration. all instruments require calibrating at set intervals. Quality standards may also dictate how often a pressure or temperature sensor needs calibrating. this is not true. When to calibrate Due to drift.why calibrate involved for both customers and governments [fiscal metering]. Just because a sensor is newly installed does not mean that it will perform within the required specifications. Although fieldbus transmitters have been improved in terms of their measurement accuracy when compared to analogue transmitters. as well as begin to monitor the stability or drift of the instrument over time. For example. The main difference between fieldbus and conventional transmitters is that the output signal is a fully digital fieldbus signal. How often they are calibrated depends on a number of factors. Government regulations demand that specific instruments must be calibrated.

78 .

All plant instruments and measurement devices need to be listed. comprising of planning and decision-making. then classified into ‘critical’ and ‘non-critical’ devices. organisation. it is important to consider the typical calibration management tasks that companies have to undertake. the calibration range and required tolerances need to be identified. Once this has been agreed. Plant instrumentation devices such as temperature sensors. Decisions then need to be made regarding the calibration interval for each instrument. Finally.why use software for calibration management Why use software for calibration management? E very manufacturing plant has some sort of system in place for managing instrument calibration operations and data. quality. followed by the selection of suitable calibration methods and tools for execution of these methods. execution. different companies from a diverse range of industry sectors use very different methods of managing these calibrations. the company must identify current calibration status for every instrument across the plant. and accuracy of data and their level of automation. Careful planning and decision-making is important. with documentation being a critical part of this. and analysis. Calibration software is one such tool that can be used to support and guide calibration management activities. pressure transducers and weighing instruments – require regular calibration to ensure they are performing and measuring to specified tolerances. But in order to understand how software can help process plants better manage their instrument calibrations. efficiency. There are five main areas here. Calibration software is one such tool that can be used to support and guide calibration management activities. with documentation being a critical part of this. These methods differ greatly in terms of cost. However. 79 . The creation and approval of standard operating procedures (SOPs) for each device is then required. documentation.

for example. making notes of calibration results in the field. which may then have to be scrapped. Staff carrying out these activities must follow the appropriate instructions before calibrating the device. including any associated safety procedures. a safety problem or leading to batches of inferior quality goods being produced.why use software for calibration management All plant instruments and measurement devices need to be listed. then created documents copied and archived. Resources then have to be organised and assigned to actually carry out the scheduled calibration tasks. organisation. This means an instrument engineer can spend as much as 50 per cent of his or her time on documentation and paperwork – time that could be better spent on other value-added activities. service engineers. If. The documentation and storage of calibration results typically involves signing and approving all calibration records that are generated. The effectiveness of calibration needs to be reviewed and calibration intervals checked. These intervals may need to be adjusted based on archived calibration history. Based on the calibration results. The execution stage involves supervising the assigned calibration tasks. then classified into ‘critical’ and ‘non-critical’ devices. a sensor drifts out of its specification range. This paperwork typically involves preparing calibration instructions to help field engineers. companies then have to analyse the data to see if any corrective action needs to be taken. resulting in costly production downtime. approved procedures. the consequences could be disastrous for the plant. The next calibration tasks then have to be scheduled. process and quality engineers and managers – in using the chosen tools and how to follow the approved SOPs. and documenting and archiving calibration data. calibration labels need to be created and pasted. involves training the company’s calibration staff – typically maintenance technicians. The calibration is then executed according to the plan. Imagine how long and difficult a task this is if the plant has thousands of instruments that require calibrating on at least a sixmonthly basis? The amount of manual documentation increases almost exponentially! 80 . although further instructions may need to be followed after calibration. The next stage. ISO 9001:2008 and the FDA both state that calibration records must be maintained and that calibration must be carried out according to written. Documentation Documentation is a very important part of a calibration management process.

analysis of paper-based systems and spreadsheets can be almost impossible. where 21 per cent of firms said they calibrated their instruments more than 2. whilst others used a calibration module within an existing Computerised Maintenance Management System (CMMS). 40 per cent of companies surveyed said that they calculated calibration intervals by using historical trend analysis – which is encouraging. In the Power & Energy sector. However. a mere 25 per cent of companies with 500+ employees (across the industry sectors mentioned above) said that they did use specialist calibration management software. Gas & Petrochemicals is similarly high. In the highly regulated pharmaceuticals sector. 42 per cent of companies perform more than 2.000 calibrations per year. The other 60 per cent of companies determined This means an instrument engineer can spend as much as 50 per cent of his or her time on documentation and paperwork – time that could be better spent on other value-added activities. different industry sectors have different requirements and regulations. The figures outlined appear to suggest that companies really do require some sort of software tool to help them manage their instrument calibration processes and all associated documentation. the picture in reality can be very different. Only a quarter of companies use calibration software In Beamex’s own Calibration Study carried out recently.000 calibrations each year. This equates to a huge amount of paperwork for any process plant. Furthermore. The percentage is still quite high in the food & beverage sector.why use software for calibration management When it comes to the volume of documentation required. paper-based system. Oil. A significant proportion (almost 20 per cent) of those surveyed said they used a manual. Noting down calibration results by hand in the field and then transferring these results into a spreadsheet back at the office may seem archaic.000 times every year. but many firms still do this. let alone time consuming. 81 . for example. In a recent survey conducted by Control Magazine. just under a third of companies (with 500+ employees) typically have more than 5.000 calibrations each year. many of these firms said they were doing it without any sort of calibration software to assist them. a massive 75 per cent of companies carry out more than 2. Many other companies said that they relied on generic spreadsheets and/or databases for this. Any type of paper-based calibration system will be prone to human error. with 55 per cent of companies performing more than 2. However.000 instruments that require calibrating.

easier and more accurate analysis of calibration records and identifying historical trends. every instrument calibration has to be documented and these documents need to be easily accessible for audit purposes. While using a manual. the plant may be able to extend these intervals by looking closely at historical trends provided by calibration management software. by analysing the calibration history of a flow meter that is located in a ‘non-critical’ area of the plant.why use software for calibration management Using software for calibration management enables faster. Rather than rely on the manufacturer’s recommendation for calibration intervals. these notes are then tidied up or transferred to another paper document. Regardless of industry sector. Paper-based systems These systems typically involve hand-written documents. Just as important. Companies could save so much time and reduce costs by using calibration management software to analyse historical trends and calibration results. On returning to the office. after which they are archived as paper documents. Furthermore. for improved safety. easier and more accurate analysis of calibration records and identifying historical trends. the company may be able to decrease the frequency of calibration. a process plant may find it necessary to increase the frequency of some sensors that are located in a hazardous. this might include engineers using pens and paper to record calibration results while out in the field. paper-based system requires little or no 82 . How to plan and keep track of each instrument’s calibration procedures means that planning and scheduling is important. there seems to be some general challenges that companies face when it comes to calibration management. or they used a uniform interval across the plant for all instruments. Using software for calibration management enables faster. instrument calibration intervals based on either the manufacturer’s own recommendation. Plants can therefore reduce costs and optimise calibration intervals by reducing calibration frequency when this is possible. Typically. For example. or by increasing the frequency where necessary. Neither method is ideal in practice. Instrument ‘drift’ can be monitored closely over a period of time and then decisions taken confidently with respect to amending the calibration interval. The number of instruments and the total number of periodic calibrations that these devices require can be several thousand per year. saving time and resources. potentially explosive area of the manufacturing plant.

The software manages and stores all instrument and calibration data. Also. FDA) for managing calibration records. automatic alarms cannot be set up on instruments that are due for calibration.g. soaks up a lot of resources and typing errors are commonplace. In-house legacy systems (spreadsheets. Although instrument data can be stored and managed efficiently in the plant’s database. it is very labour-intensive and means that historical trend analysis becomes very difficult to carry out. users are provided with an easy-to-use Windows Explorer-like interface. but the calibration cannot be automated because the system is not able to communicate with ‘smart’ calibrators. calibration data is typically entered manually into a spreadsheet or database. production of reports. the calibration data is not easily accessible. and Regardless of industry sector. This includes the planning and scheduling of calibration work. The system is time consuming. the calibration process itself cannot be automated. certificates and labels. For example. Dual effort and re-keying of calibration data are also significant costs here. but the recording of calibration information is still time-consuming and typing errors are common. Calibration module of a CMMS Many plants have already invested in a Computerised Maintenance Management (CMM) system and so continue to use this for calibration management. Furthermore. Plant hierarchy and works orders can be stored in the CMM system. In these systems. the level of automation is still low. analysis and optimisation of calibration frequency. etc. 83 . using an in-house legacy system to manage calibrations has its drawbacks. such as the scheduling of tasks and entry of calibration results. In addition.) Although certainly a step in the right direction. databases. Calibration software With specialist calibration management software. The data is stored in electronic format.why use software for calibration management investment. CMM systems are not designed to manage calibrations and so often only provide the minimum calibration functionality. communication with smart calibrators. there seems to be some general challenges that companies face when it comes to calibration management. the CMM system may not meet the regulatory requirements (e. In addition.

automated calibration process. These instructions can also be downloaded to a technician’s handheld documenting calibrator while they are in the field. then automatically uploaded back to the calibration software.why use software for calibration management easy integration with CMM systems such as SAP and Maximo. reports and labels can all be printed out on paper or sent in electronic format. The result is a streamlined. Also. such as Change Management. complies with FDA requirements. Procedures and calibration strategies can be planned and all calibration assets managed by the software. Execution is more efficient and errors are eliminated. enabling engineers to optimise calibration intervals using the software’s History Trend function. Benefits of using calibration software With software-based calibration management. Audit Trail and Electronic Signature functions. easier and more accurate analysis of calibration records and identifying historical trends. Calibration certificates. 84 . The system no longer requires pens and paper. plant productivity and efficiency. while automatic alerts for scheduled calibrations can be set up. There is no re-keying of calibration results from a notebook to a database or spreadsheet. Using software-based calibration management systems in conjunction with documenting calibrators means that calibration results can be stored in the calibrator’s memory. Documentation is also improved. The software generates reports automatically and all calibration data is stored in one database rather than multiple disparate systems. The Change Management feature in Beamex’s CMX software. when a plant is being audited. Calibration software has many functions that help in meeting these requirements. which improves quality. Locating records and verifying that the system works is effortless when compared to traditional calibration record keeping. for example. Organisation also improves. Regulatory organisations and standards such as FDA and ISO place demanding requirements on the recording of calibration data. Position. Calibration instructions are created using the software to guide engineers through the calibration process. calibration software can facilitate both the preparation and the audit itself. Human error is minimised and engineers are freed up to perform more strategic analysis or other important activities. planning and decisionmaking are improved. Analysis becomes easier too. device and calibrator databases are maintained. Using software for calibration management enables faster.

Here. those instruments that perform better than expected may well justify a reduction in their calibration frequency. with no manual documentation procedures. is suitable for process manufacturers with multiple global sites. These savings come from the now-paperless calibration process.Business benefits For the business. Integration also enables the plant to automate its calibration management with smart calibrators. reduce costs and increase productivity by preventing unnecessary double effort and re-keying of works orders in multiple systems. the calibration management software can utilise the records available in the CMM system database. For relatively small plants. CHECKLIST Choosing the right calibration software •  Is it easy to use? •  What are the specific requirements in terms of functionality? •  Are there any IT requirements or restrictions for choosing the software? •  Does the calibration software need to be integrated with the plant’s existing systems? •  Is communication with smart calibrators a requirement? •  Does the supplier offer training. a central calibration management database is often implemented that is used by multiple plants across the world. which simply is not possible with a standalone CMM system. If the plant instruments are already defined on a database. Benefits for all process plants Beamex’s suite of calibration management software can benefit all sizes of process plant. Beamex CMX Professional is ideal. multilingual users and a very large amount of instruments that require calibration. only a few instruments require calibrating and where regulatory compliance is minimal. The integration will save time. which is particularly beneficial if the company is replacing a lot of labour-intensive calibration activities. Engineers can analyse calibration results to see whether the calibration intervals on plant instruments can be altered. Costly production downtime will also be reduced. For medium-to-large sized companies that have multiple users who have to deal with a large amount of instruments and calibration work. calibration management software can be easily integrated to this system. CMX Enterprise. Beamex’s high-end solution. Beamex CMX Light is the most appropriate software. validated processes. implementing software-based calibration management means overall costs will be reduced. Plant efficiencies should also improve. where calibration data is needed for only one location. as the entire calibration process is now streamlined and automated. For example. as well as strict regulatory compliance. support and upgrades? •  Does the calibration software need to be scalable? •  Can data be imported to the software from the plant’s current systems? •  Does the software offer regulatory compliance? •  Supplier’s references and experience as a software developer? 85 . Manual procedures are replaced with automated. implementation. Even if a plant has already implemented a CMM system.

Compared to traditional. The results showed that 82% of CMX Calibration software customers said that using Beamex products had resulted in cost savings in some part of their operations. increased productivity and reduced costs of the entire calibration process. in-house built legacy calibration systems or calibration modules with CMM systems.why use software for calibration management SUMMARY Calibration software improves calibration management tasks in all these areas •  Planning & decision-making •  Organisation •  Execution •  Documentation •  Analysis Beamex users Beamex conducted recently a survey of its customers. 94% of CMX users stated that using Beamex products had improved the efficiency of their calibration processes. regardless of industry sector. can benefit from implementing specialist calibration management software. using dedicated calibration management software results in improved quality. paper-based systems. Summary Every type of process plant. whilst 92% said that using CMX had improved the quality of their calibration system. Despite these benefits. across all industry sectors. only one quarter of companies who need to manage instrument calibrations actually use software designed for that purpose. The business benefits of using software for calibration management •  Cost reduction •  Quality improvements •  Increase in efficiency 86 .

87 .

.

Plants can improve their efficiencies and reduce costs by using calibration ‘history trend analysis’. safety issues or possibly leading to batches of inferior quality goods being produced. with increasing demands and cost issues being placed on manufacturers these days. Adjusting calibration intervals based on history trend analysis Manufacturing plants need to be absolutely confident that their instrumentation products – temperature sensors. 89 . If sensors drift out of their specification range. This can sometimes lead to instruments being prioritised for calibration. resulting in costly production downtime.how often should instruments be calibrated How often should instruments be calibrated P lants can improve their efficiency and reduce costs by performing calibration history trend analysis. but for other sensors that are deemed less critical to production. Most process manufacturing plants will have some sort of maintenance plan or schedule in place. which then have to be scrapped. a plant is able to define which instruments can be calibrated less frequently and which should be calibrated more frequently. Calibration history trend analysis is only possible with calibration software that provides this functionality. pressure transducers. the time and resources required to carry out these calibration checks are often scarce. with those deemed critical enough receiving the required regular checks. flow meters and the like – are performing and measuring to specified tolerances. which ensures that all instruments used across the site are calibrated at the appropriate times. However. the consequences can be disastrous for a plant. By doing it. being calibrated less frequently or not at all. a function available within Beamex® CMX calibration software.

90 . due to it being a highly regulated industry. 59% said they calibrated once a year and 30% said they calibrated twice a year. oil and gas. The analyses of historical trends and how a pressure sensor. Beamex conducted a survey that asked process manufacturing companies how many instruments in their plant required calibrating and the frequency with which these instruments had to be calibrated. manufacturing. chemicals. by calibrating less frequently where instruments appear to be highly stable according to their calibration history. Current practices in process plants But in reality. With this function. a function available within Beamex® CMX calibration software. The survey covered all industry sectors. food and beverage. Interestingly. In addition. how often do process plants actually calibrate their instruments and how does a maintenance manager or engineer know how often to calibrate a particular sensor? In March 2010. service. the study proved also that the pharmaceuticals sector typically possesses a significantly higher number of instruments per plant that require calibrating. including pharmaceuticals. is only possible with calibration software that provides this type of functionality. drifts in and out of tolerance over a given time period. First. Perhaps unsurprisingly. paper and pulp. the plant can analyze whether it should increase or decrease the calibration frequency for all its instruments. This type of practise is common in companies that employ an effective ‘Preventive Maintenance’ regime. power and energy. Cost savings can be achieved in several ways. ensuring that instruments are checked and corrected before they drift out of tolerance. these plants also calibrate their instruments more frequently than other industry sectors. Second. 56% of the respondents said they calibrated their instruments no more than once a year.how often should instruments be calibrated Sensors that are found to be highly stable do not need to be re-calibrated as often as sensors that tend to drift. for example. But plants can improve their efficiencies and reduce costs by using calibration ‘history trend analysis’. in the pharmaceuticals sector. by calibrating instruments more often when they are located in critical areas of the plant. However. the survey showed that from all industry sectors.

he says. Doing this. perhaps less obvious benefits of looking at the historical drift over time of a particular sensor or set of measuring instruments. or even years of operation and which can be left for longer periods. If it hasn’t. actually performed within the specified tolerance over a certain time period. weeks. Calibration software such as CMX can also help with the planning of calibration operations. With CMX’s History Trend Option.” But that’s not all. without of course sacrificing the quality of the product or process or the safety of the plant and its employees. He comments: “The largest savings from using the History Trend Option are in the pharmaceuticals sector. enables maintenance staff to concentrate their efforts only where they are needed. 91 . He specialises in selling the Beamex® CMX to different customers across all industry sectors. says Mäki. the engineer can now verify that the sensor he or she has purchased. But there are other. the historical trend) companies can reduce costs and improve their efficiencies. This makes it an invaluable tool for maintenance or quality personnel who. which helps companies identify the optimal calibration intervals for instruments. is determining which sensors should be recalibrated after a few days. therefore eliminating unnecessary calibration effort and time.how often should instruments be calibrated The benefits of analyzing calibration history trends But regardless of the industry sector. but all industry sectors can benefit from using the software tool. The function enables users to plan the optimal calibration intervals for their instruments. Sensors that are found to be highly stable do not need to be re-calibrated as often as sensors that tend to drift. As Mäki explains: “When an engineer buys a particular sensor. without doubt.” The trick. by analysing an instrument’s drift over time (ie. The History Trend function also means that a plant can now compare the quality or performance of different sensors from multiple manufacturers in a given location or set of process conditions. Pertti Mäki is Area Sales Manager at Beamex. Calibration schedules take into account the accuracy required for a particular sensor and the length of time during which it has previously been able to maintain that degree of accuracy. can use the functionality to compare different sensor types to see which one best suits the new process. the supplier provides a technical specification that includes details on what the maximum drift of that sensor should be over a given time period. in setting up a new process line for example. the engineer now has data to present to the supplier to support his findings.

using the ‘Report Design’ tool option. can analyze an instrument’s drift over a certain time period. The ‘History Trend’ window enables users to view key figures of several calibration events simultaneously. the user can get an overview of how a particular device drifts between calibrations and also whether the drift increases with time. Reporting is straightforward and the user can even tailor the reports to suit his or her individual needs. Once implemented. Based on this information. allowing to evaluate the calibrations of a position or a device for a longer time period compared to the normal calibration result view. Also.how often should instruments be calibrated History Trend displays the instrument’s drift over a given period both numerically and graphically. maintenance personnel. the engineer can analyze how different devices are suited for use in a particular area of the plant or process. for example. For example. it is then possible to make decisions and conclusions regarding the optimal calibration interval and the quality of the instruments with respect to measurement performance. 92 . The History Trend function enables users to plan the optimal calibration intervals for their instruments. History Trend displays the instrument’s drift over a given period both numerically and graphically.

•  The Beamex® CMX stores every calibration event into the database. 93 . the history trend is made automatically without any extra manual work.how often should instruments be calibrated CALIBRATION HISTORY TREND ANALYSIS Calibration history trend analysis allows you to analyze the instrument’s drift over a certain time period. HISTORY TREND REPORT HISTORY TREND USER-INTERFACE The graphical display of the history trend helps in visualizing and optimizing the calibration interval for the instruments. This helps in comparing differences between devices. •  The Beamex® CMX also indicates when new devices have been installed and calibrated. •  The graphical display of the history trend helps in visualizing and optimizing the calibration interval for the instruments.

manual methods •  Enables engineers to check that the instruments they have purchased for the plant are performing to their technical specifications and are not drifting out of tolerance regularly •  Supplier evaluation: the performance and quality of different sensors from different manufacturers can be compared quickly and easily. When calibration frequency can be decreased: •  If the instrument has performed to specification and the drift has been insignificant compared to its specified tolerance •  If the instrument is deemed to be non-critical or in a low priority location When calibration frequency should be increased: •  If the sensor has drifted outside of its specified tolerances during a given time period •  If the sensor is located in a critical process or area of the plant and has drifted significantly compared to its specified tolerance over a given time period •  When measuring a sensor that is located in an area of the plant that has high economic importance for the plant •  Where costly production downtime may occur as a result of a ‘faulty’ sensor •  Where a false measurement from a sensor could lead to inferior quality batches or a safety issue 94 .how often should instruments be calibrated SUMMARY The benefits of calibration history trend analysis: •  Analyzing and determining the optimal calibration interval for instruments •  Conclusions can be made regarding the quality of a particular measuring instrument •  Time savings: faster analyses is possible when compared to traditional.

The organization shall take appropriate action on the equipment and any product affected. against measurement standards traceable to international or national measurement standards. or prior to use.4). In addition. c)  be identified to enable the calibration status to be determined. measuring equipment shall a)  be calibrated or verified at specified intervals. where no such standards exist. Records of the results of calibration and verification shall be maintained (see 4. maintenance and storage. The organization shall establish processes to ensure that monitoring and measurement can be carried out and are carried out in a manner that is consistent with the monitoring and measurement requirements.2. the organization shall assess and record the validity of the previous measuring results when the equipment is found not to conform to requirements. d)  be safeguarded from adjustments that would invalidate the measurement result.how often should instruments be calibrated ISO 9001:2008 quality management requirements 7. the ability of computer software to satisfy the intended application shall be confirmed. Where necessary to ensure valid results.6 Control of monitoring and measuring devices The organization shall determine the monitoring and measurement to be undertaken and the monitoring and measuring devices needed to provide evidence of conformity of product to determined requirements. b)  be adjusted or re-adjusted as necessary. e)  be protected from damage and deterioration during handling. 95 . When used in the monitoring and measurement of specified requirements. This shall be undertaken prior to initial use and reconfirmed as necessary. the basis used for calibration or verification shall be recorded.

.

how often should calibrators be calibrated

How often should calibrators be calibrated

A

s a general rule for Beamex’s documenting MC calibrators, starting with a 1-year calibration period is recommended, because the calibrators has a 1-year uncertainty specified. The calibration period can be changed in the future, once you begin receiving cumulated stability history, which is then compared to the uncertainty requirements. In any case, there are many issues to be considered when deciding a calibrator’s calibration period, or the calibration period for any type of measuring device. This article discusses some of the things to be considered when determining the calibration period, and provides some general guidelines for making this decision. The guidelines that apply to a calibrator, also apply to other measuring equipment in the traceability chain. These guidelines can also be used for process instrumentation. An important aspect to consider when maintaining a traceable calibration system is to determine how often the calibration equipment should be recalibrated. International standards (such as ISO9000, ISO10012, ISO17025, CFRs by FDA, GMP, etc.) require the use of documented calibration programs. This means that measuring equipment should be calibrated traceably at appropriate intervals and that the basis for the calibration intervals should be evaluated and documented. When determining an appropriate calibration period for any measuring equipment, there are several things to be considered. They are discussed below.

Uncertainty need is one of the most important things to consider when determining the calibration period.

97

how often should calibrators be calibrated

Uncertainty need One of the first things to evaluate is the uncertainty need of the customer for their particular measurement device. Actually, the initial selection of the measurement device should be also done based on this evaluation. Uncertainty need is one of the most important things to consider when determining the calibration period. Stability history

In critical applications, the costs of an outof-tolerance situation can be extremely high (e.g. pharmaceutical applications) and therefore calibrating the equipment more often is safer.

When the customer has evaluated his/her needs and purchased suitable measuring equipment, (s)he should monitor the stability history of the measuring equipment. The stability history is important criteria when deciding upon any changes in the calibration period. Comparing the stability history of measuring equipment to the specified limits and uncertainty needs provides a feasible tool for evaluating the calibration period. Naturally, calibration management software with the history analysis option is a great help in making this type of analysis. The cost of recalibration vs. consequences of an out-of-tolerance situation Optimizing between recalibration costs and the consequences of an outof-tolerance situation is important. In critical applications, the costs of an out-of-tolerance situation can be extremely high (e.g. pharmaceutical applications) and therefore calibrating the equipment more often is safer. However, in some non-critical applications, where the out-oftolerance consequences are not serious, calibration can be made less frequently. Therefore, evaluating of the consequences of an out-oftolerance situation is something to be considered. The corrective actions in such a case should also be made into an operating procedure. Some measurements in a factory typically have more effect on a product quality than others, and therefore some measurements are more acute than others and should be also calibrated more often than others. Initial calibration period When you purchase calibration equipment with which you are not familiar, you still need to decide the initial calibration period. In this

98

how often should calibrators be calibrated

situation, abiding by the manufacturer’s recommendation is best. For more acute applications, using a shorter calibration period right from the beginning is recommended. Other things to be considered There are also other issues to be considered when determining the calibration period, such as the workload of the equipment, the conditions where the equipment will be used, the amount of transportation and is the equipment look damaged. In some cases, crosschecking with other similar measuring equipment is also feasible for detecting the need for calibration. Crosschecking may be carried out before every measurement in some acute applications. Naturally, only appropriate, metrological, responsible personnel in the company may make changes to the calibration equipment’s calibration period.

In some cases, crosschecking with other similar measuring equipment is also feasible for detecting the need for calibration.

SUMMARY

The main issues to be considered when determining the calibration period for measuring equipment should include at least following: •  The uncertainty needs of the measurements to be done. •  The stability history of the measuring equipment. •  Equipment manufacturer’s recommendations. •  The risk and consequences of an out-of-tolerance situation. •  Acuteness of the measurements.

99

a paper-based calibration system involves the use of handwritten documents.com). significant benefits in minimising the use of paper. weighing instruments and pressure transducers.paperless calibration improves quality and cuts costs Paperless calibration improves quality and cuts costs P aper is part of our everyday lives – whether in the workplace or at home. As manufacturing companies. as businesses. which means they are missing out on the benefits of moving towards a paperless calibration system. Today. Globally. almost 4 billion trees or 35% of the total trees cut down across the world are used in paper industries on every continent (source: www. So let’s not add to this already heavy burden on our forests and the environment. software and electronic devices readily available today which render the use of paper in the workplace unnecessary. our consumption of paper is far higher than it needs to be. Take a minute to look around the room you are in and you’ll notice how many objects are made from paper: books. 101 . which means they are missing out on the benefits of moving towards a paperless calibration system. amongst the process manufacturing industries. Other than helping to save our planet and reducing the number of trees cut down each year. magazines. Whilst out in the field. a maintenance or service Far too many of these companies still use paper-based calibration systems. Take the calibration of plant instrumentation devices such as temperature sensors. printer paper. perhaps even a poster on the wall. there are other. Traditional paper-based calibration systems Typically. Far too many of these companies still use paper-based calibration systems. ecology. calibrating instruments is an enormous task that consumes vast amounts of paperwork. Global consumption of paper has grown 400% in the last 40 years. especially given that there are technologies.

blank calibration certificates. these notes are then tidied up and/or transferred to another paper document. when these records can all be combined into a single electronic record? Improved workflow With paper-based systems. it is not practicable to store or carry lots of paperwork. as those individuals who need to sign off records or calibration 102 . in industrial environments. whilst also improving quality. Often. engineer will typically use a pen and paper to record instrument calibration results. However. There will be less waiting time. After all. which is time-consuming. these organisations can significantly reduce their paper consumption. While using a manual. Furthermore. paper records that need approval have to be routed to several individuals. So why would these companies generate and store separate paper copies of important records such as works orders. it is extremely labourintensive and means that historical trend analysis of calibration results becomes very difficult. every square foot of the business has an associated cost.paperless calibration improves quality and cuts costs With paperless systems. they soak up lots of company resources and manual (typing) errors are commonplace. On returning to the office. These same companies that use paper-based calibration systems are together generating hundreds of thousands (millions?) of paper calibration certificates each year. workflow and making other significant cost savings for the business. important paper records could potentially be lost or damaged in an accident or fire. standard operating procedures (SOPs). Practical benefits of using less paper Aside from the financial benefits of moving towards a paperless calibration system. workflow improves dramatically. paper-based system requires little or no investment in new technology or IT systems. Dual effort and the re-keying of calibration data into multiple databases become significant costs to the business. In addition. Paper systems are time consuming. With paperless systems. workflow improves dramatically. etc. there are practical reasons why firms should go paperless. after which they are archived as paper documents. accessing calibration data quickly is not easy. by utilising the latest software-based calibration management systems from companies like Beamex.

engineers and management will have more confidence in Paperless calibration systems improve plant efficiencies because the entire calibration process is now streamlined and automated. whilst mistakes and manual errors will be virtually eliminated. Just as important.paperless calibration improves quality and cuts costs documents can share or access electronic records simultaneously from a central database. Historical trending becomes easier. Locating records and verifying that the system works becomes effortless when compared to traditional paper-based record keeping. Costly production downtime due to unforeseen instrument failures will also be reduced. Paperless calibration systems improve plant efficiencies because the entire calibration process is now streamlined and automated. the business benefits are significant. Paper records may not always reflect the truth. 103 . this means that operators. Business benefits For those more enlightened companies that use software-based calibration systems. Calibration intervals can be optimised. Transcription errors such as these can lead to all sorts of problems for a business and can take months to rectify or to identify the rogue data. Illegible handwritten notes are also a problem. For example. calibration software facilitates both the preparation and the audit itself. which again has cost reduction benefits to the business. In turn. When a plant is being audited. particularly when using weighscales or other instruments that are open to an individual’s own interpretation of the data. especially if these paper records need to be typed or transcribed to a computer system or database. faster and more reliable. The cost and time associated with printing copies of paper documents is also eliminated. as well as the cost of filing and storing those paper records. Data integrity The integrity of paper-based calibration systems cannot be relied upon. For example. those instruments that are performing better than expected may well justify a reduction in their calibration frequency. The whole calibration process – from initial recording of calibration data through to historical trend analysis – will take less time. manual errors such as misreadings can occur. Sometimes users may inappropriately modify the results data due to work pressures or lack of time/resources. electronic records enable easier analysis of data. particularly calibration results.

104 . Commissioning At plant commissioning times. electronic records simplify the handover of plant and equipment. electronic records are easy to manipulate and can be re-used in different IT systems. particularly when it comes to plant audits. end-to-end workflows. One way to overcome these error prone data capture methods is to use portable documenting calibrators to measure what can be measured and provide intelligent. The un-editable electronic data stored on high performance multifunction calibrators can be uploaded to calibration management software for safe storage and asset management. in reality. Electronic data also provides an excellent foundation for ongoing plant operation and maintenance. often in difficult industrial environments that would make the use of portable office computers impractical. resulting in completely paperless. and for control systems. A key part of paperless calibration records is the capture of data at point of work. technician friendly interfaces on industrialized PDA or tablet based hardware when manual data entry cannot be avoided. Although handover by commissioning teams that use paper records is straightforward and of universal format. the calibration data is shared with other business IT systems electronically. In other words. business management systems. end-to-end workflows. this greater confidence in calibration data leads to a better understanding and analysis of business performance and KPIs (particularly if the calibration software is integrated with other business IT systems such as a CMMS) leading to improved processes. data historians.paperless calibration improves quality and cuts costs the data. resulting in completely paperless. Companies can go even further than this and use electronic records for works orders. without needing to collect all the plant data again. How paperless should you go? Of course. The calibration data is shared with other business IT systems electronically. and the manual entry of calibration results into unintelligent calibration forms on portable industrial computers prone to eye-to-hand data mis-reads and repetitive strain induced error. In addition. increased efficiencies and reduced plant downtime. many companies are neither completely paperless nor rely solely on paper-based systems – the process is sometimes a hybrid of the two.

as this will help companies to overcome the natural resistance to change amongst the workforce. Here.” Education and training for users is critical. paper-based systems. Chemicals. Croda uses the CMX calibration management software system from Beamex. training & education Paperless systems also need validating in the user’s own environment.” Today. as well as the sensors that monitor the incoming chemical additives and the outgoing effluent. Validation. Oil Gas & Petrochemicals companies. including Pharmaceuticals. Senior Instrument Technician David Wright recalls what it was like to perform all of those calibration operations with paper and pencil during the company’s regularly scheduled maintenance shutdowns: “It took us one week to perform the calibrations and a month to put together the necessary paperwork. Education and training for users is critical. which may be used to dealing with traditional. This includes a functionality check on all of the pressure instrumentation. Beamex provides comprehensive validation. Amongst these customers is UK firm Croda Chemicals Europe. Based in East Yorkshire near Goole. “It’s faster. which coordinates data collection tasks and archives the results. the Croda plant uses pressurised vessels to purify lanolin for healthcare and beauty products. easier and more accurate than our old paper-based procedures. it is better to source the data electronically using documenting calibrators that are specifically designed for this task. Case study Beamex is helping many organisations to implement paperless calibration management systems. education and training services for customers. Power & Energy.paperless calibration improves quality and cuts costs Suitable hardware Rather than rely on engineers in the field accurately keying in calibration results into suitably robust laptops or PDAs. which may be used to dealing with traditional. 105 . paper-based systems. Each vessel needs to be certified at least once every two years in order to demonstrate that the vessel is safe and structurally sound. “It’s saving us around 80 manhours per maintenance period and should pay for itself in less than three years.” says Wright. as this will help companies to overcome the natural resistance to change amongst the workforce.

106 .

At the completion of commissioning. In general. What is process instrument commissioning? Successful commissioning of process instrumentation must be considered within the context of the overall commissioning program. or any defined part of a plant. operational testing of plant equipment. This article explains process instrument commissioning and the benefits of calibration during the commissioning phase. Pre-commissioning activities are those which have to be undertaken 107 . Plant commissioning involves activities such as checking to ensure plant construction is complete and complies with the documented design or acceptable (authorized and recorded) design changes. commissioning activities are those associated with preparing or operating the plant or any part of the plant prior to the initial start-up and are frequently undertaken by the owner or joint owner/ contractor team. is ready for commissioning when the plant has achieved mechanical completion. Energizing power systems. Commissioning may involve mock operations which are commissioning activities conducted to allow operational testing of the equipment and operator training and familiarization. testing of the control systems as well as verification of the operation of all interlocks and other safety systems are also typical commissioning tasks.intelligent commissioning Intelligent commissioning C alibration plays a vital role in process plant commissioning and when installing new instruments. the plant will be fully ready for production operation. Successful commissioning of process instrumentation is an essential requirement for ideal plant performance. These activities are usually described as ‘cold commissioning’. A plant. calibration of instrumentation.

intelligent commissioning There are many reasons why instruments should be calibrated during the commissioning phase before start-up. An extra day taken for commissioning means the same to the plant owner as an extra day taken during designing or construction. in fact. detailed planning of commissioning and plant handover are essential elements of the overall project plan and schedule as any other grouping of activities. as the plant owner’s commitments in terms of product marketing and operational costs are likely to be higher. The rate 108 . prior to operating equipment. This can prove to be a worthwhile investment for large plants because it allows for dedicated responsibility and focus in operations and significant improvements to schedules. plant operation and plant maintenance. It is essential to comprehend the scope and length of commissioning activities and include them in the initial project plan and budget allocations. Mechanical completion of a plant or any part of a plant occurs when the plant or a part of the plant has been completed in accordance with the drawings and specifications. Each of the commissioning activities must be broken down into a number of manageable tasks. and adverse incidents at the start-up phase can be avoided. Basically. because the funds have been allotted to cover budget overruns. and ensure this commitment is maintained. such as adjustments and checks on machinery performed by the construction contractor prior to commissioning and without which the installation cannot be said to be mechanically complete. and a schedule needs to be established for each task including benchmarks for monitoring purposes. personnel and cost of commissioning Since commissioning takes place toward the end of the project. Commissioning requires a team of people with a background in plant design. physically installing the field device. Some companies employ specialized commissioning engineers. it may cost more. Management. these steps must be repeated with every field device that will be installed at the plant. and the re-commissioning activities have been completed to the extent where the owner approves the plant and can begin commissioning activities. The cost of process instrument commissioning is typically affected by the following issues: learning and familiarizing with the field device. there is a risk that the work may be under-resourced. As there are many cost factors in the commissioning process. configuring the required parameters and testing the configuration and interface to other systems. connecting to and identifying the field device.

documentation. However. and the size of the team and composition of specialists depends on the nature and scope of the system. of commissioning is measurable (e. communications. such as the Beamex® CMX Calibration Software.g. instrument and process engineers. teamwork and training are all essential. especially if there has been obvious 109 . Calibration and the commissioning of field instrumentation New process instrumentation is typically configured and calibrated by the manufacturer prior to installation. Sequence of activities leading to commissioning and acceptance of a plant. Successful commissioning of process instrumentation must be considered within the context of the overall commissioning program. coordination. The commissioning team consists of a mixture of specialists. thereby enabling progress to be reviewed regularly. number of loops or sequence of steps tested per day). instruments are often recalibrated upon arrival at the site.intelligent commissioning Construction Pre-commissioning Mechanical completion Commissioning Trial operation Initial start-up Examine product specification Examine production performance Acceptance of plant The calibration database can be calibration software designed specifically for managing calibration assets and information. Good planning.

You can check the overall quality of the instrument to see if it is defective and to ensure it has the correct. the fact that an instrument or transmitter is new does not automatically mean that it is within required specifications. Transmitters that are found to be highly stable need not be recalibrated as often as transmitters that tend to drift. By calibrating the transmitter before installation and on a regular basis thereafter. the calibration serves also future purposes. The transmitter information is critical in defining the quality of the instrument and for planning the optimal calibration interval of the instrument. weeks. Assuring transmitter quality First of all. as well as to monitor the instrument’s stability. The trick is determining which sensors should be recalibrated after a few hours. Calibrating a new instrument before installing or using it is a quality assurance task.intelligent commissioning damage in transit or storage. specified settings. However. Reconfiguring a transmitter The trick is determining which sensors should be recalibrated after a few hours. or years of operation and which can be left as is for 110 . specified settings. or years of operation and which can be left as is for longer periods without sacrificing quality or safety. The calibration database can be calibration software designed specifically for managing calibration assets and information. it is possible that the original planned settings are not valid anymore and they need to be changed. as was explained in the previous paragraph. when the initial planned specifications have been changed. Calibration is therefore a key element in the process of reconfiguring an uninstalled transmitter. Entering the necessary transmitter data into a calibration database By calibrating an instrument before installation it is possible to enter all the necessary instrument data into the calibration database. By calibrating an instrument you can check the settings of the instrument. There are also many other reasons why instruments should be calibrated during the commissioning phase before start-up. it is possible to reconfigure the transmitter. weeks. it is possible to monitor the stability of the transmitter. The new uninstalled instrument or transmitter may have the correct. Monitoring the quality and stability of a transmitter When calibration procedures are performed for an uninstalled instrument. such as the Beamex® CMX Calibration Software. After you have performed this task.

such as analog. Intrinsically safe calibrators for potentially explosive environments are also available. Foundation Fieldbus and Profibus. smarter and more accurate management of all calibration assets and procedures. The Beamex calibrators are all-in-one calibrators. the calibration results are stored automatically in the calibrator’s memory during the calibration process. productivity and cost-effectiveness of a plant’s calibration process. thereby eliminating unnecessary calibration work. Using the CMX gives always a clear status of the transmitters. Therefore. The Beamex calibrators support various different transmitter protocols. making the entire process much quicker and reducing costs. does anyone perform the calibration (check in/out function) and what is the instrument/position status (pass/fail). Engineers performing calibrations no longer have to write down any results on paper. The Beamex® CMX Calibration Software can be used for improving the quality. temperature. are they installed and ready for calibration. The Beamex® MC series documenting calibrators can be used for calibrating pressure. overlooked or become overdue. improves the quality and efficiency of the entire calibration system through faster. Having a fully integrated calibration management system – using documenting calibrators and calibration management software – is important. overlooked or become overdue. All calibration documentation is Beamex® CMX Calibration Software ensures that calibration procedures are carried out at the correct time and that calibration tasks do not get forgotten. managing and storing all calibration data as well as analyzing and optimizing the calibration interval. Doing so allows maintenance personnel to concentrate their efforts only where needed. consisting of calibration software and documenting calibration equipment. HART. for instance. Integrated calibration solution by Beamex The Beamex® Integrated Calibration Solution. which mean that they can be used to replace several individual measurement devices.intelligent commissioning longer periods without sacrificing quality or safety. Beamex® CMX Calibration Software ensures that calibration procedures are carried out at the correct time and that calibration tasks do not get forgotten. electrical and frequency signals. entering the instrument data into a calibration management system is part of the calibration procedures performed on an instrument before it is installed and in use. 111 . By using a documenting calibrator. The Beamex® CMX can be used for planning and scheduling calibrations.

again. The quality and accuracy of calibration results also improve. as there are fewer mistakes due to human error. saving time and money. The calibration results are transferred automatically from the calibrator’s memory to the computer/ database. instead of typing the data manually into the calibration database.intelligent commissioning By using a documenting calibrator. Major time-savings can also be achieved by using Beamex’s documenting MC calibrators HART and/or Fieldbus functionality to enter transmitter data into the calibrators’ memory where the data can be populated to the CMX Calibration Software. therefore automatically produced when using the Beamex® Integrated Calibration Solution. the calibration results are stored automatically in the calibrator’s memory during the calibration process. This means that engineers do not spend their time transferring the results from their notepad to final storage on a computer. SUMMARY Calibration is beneficial during process plant commissioning for various different reasons: • Transmitter quality assurance • Reconfiguring a transmitter • Monitoring the quality and stability of a transmitter •  Entering the necessary transmitter data into a calibration database and defining the optimal calibration interval 112 .

113 .

114 .

If stoppages to production lines due to equipment breakdowns are costly. paper. the consequences can be disastrous. For this. has proved itself time and time again across many industry sectors. In the process industries. 115 . is critical to business efficiency. Manufacturing plants need to be sure that their instrumentation products – temperature sensors. Beamex® CMX. a small. chemicals. flow meters and the like – are performing and measuring to specified tolerances. conveyor systems or hydraulic pumps – is equally critical for these companies. Maintaining plant assets – whether that includes production line equipment. complex and expensive. Beamex’s calibration management software. furnaces. metal processing. profitability and growth. where equipment and plant infrastructure is large.successfully executing a system integration project Successfully executing a system integration project F or process manufacturers today. including pharmaceuticals. boilers. In the process industries. having a reliable. perhaps resulting in costly production downtime. oil and gas. nuclear. pressure transducers. special purpose machines. or across multiple sites. which then have to be scrapped. seamlessly integrated set of IT systems across the plant. especially if the company is part of an asset-intensive industry. but critical part of a company’s asset management strategy should be the calibration of process instrumentation. but critical part of a company’s asset management strategy should be the calibration of process instrumentation. a small. safety issues or batches of inferior quality goods being produced. If sensors drift out of their specification range. Maintenance management has become an issue which deserves enterprise-wide and perhaps multi-site attention. implementing the latest computerized maintenance management systems (CMMS) might save precious time and money.

SAP or Datastream CMM system or even a company’s own. whether it is a Maximo. once the calibration work order has been executed. CMX sends an acknowledgement order of this work back to the customer’s CMM system. most process manufacturers use some sort of computerized maintenance management system (CMMS) that sits alongside their calibration management system. Beamex® CMX Professional or Beamex® CMX Enterprise software can easily be integrated to CMM systems. plan. Integrating CMX with a CMM system means that plant hierarchy and all work orders for process instruments can be generated and maintained in the customer’s CMM system. Calibration work orders can easily be transferred to CMX Calibration Software. reminders and safety-related information. like procedures. The integration project involves three main parties: Beamex. Beamex® CMX helps companies document. As well as retrieving and storing calibration data. Integration project A customer may have a large CMM system and a considerable amount of data keying to perform before integration is complete. CMX also stores the complete calibration history of process instruments and produces fully traceable calibration records. analyze and optimize their calibration work. All detailed calibration results are stored and available on the CMX database.successfully executing a system integration project Seamless communication Today. Beamex® CMX Professional or Beamex® CMX Enterprise software can easily be integrated to CMM systems. elimination of human error associated with manual recording. 116 . in-house software for maintenance management. whether it is a Maximo. Seamless communication with calibrators also provides many practical benefits such as a reduction in paperwork. Then. Seamless communication between CMX and ‘smart’ calibrators means that companies have the ability to automate predefined calibration procedures. the customer and the CMM system software partner. schedule. CMX can also download detailed instructions for operation before and after calibrating. in-house software for maintenance management. SAP or Datastream CMM system or even a company’s own. and the ability to speed up the calibration task. A data exchange module or interface that sits between the two systems is required.

Scope of Work 2. Each project phase should be approved according to the acceptance procedures defined in the offer. agreement. it’s important that the right people and decision-makers are involved and participate right from the beginning of the project.successfully executing a system integration project Project organization and resourcing In order to have a successful integration. Moreover. The role. the customer and the CMM system software partner. The project steering group is responsible for making key decisions during the project. The role of each member should be defined and project managers appointed. Testing 4. The integration project involves three main parties: Beamex. It’s also essential that the main roles and responsibilities of the parties are specified before the project evolves. A schedule is usually defined for the completion of the entire project as well as for the completion of each project phase. The project manager is usually responsible for the operative management of the project. 117 . a project organization should be established and include members from both the supplier’s and the customer’s organization. Project phases The integration project is divided into four main phases: 1. as a successful project requires input from both parties. Verification and Training The four main phases are also often divided into sub-phases. Development and Implementation 3. tasks and authority of the project steering group must be defined as well as the decision-making procedures. In addition. a project steering group may need to be established. Installation. project plan or other document annexed to the offer / agreement.

which will direct the project back to phase one where a review of the scope is necessary. defining the correct scope of work (SOW) is crucial. scheduling and costs of the project depend greatly on the scope of work. However. questions or problems may appear later in the project. as changes to the original scope of work may be necessary and required even in projects where the SOW phase has been done carefully. This means that establishing some framework and limitations for the project are also very important. The SOW is often developed through pre-studies and workshops. The scope of work should include a brief project description. 118 . Defining what is not included in the scope of work is just as important as defining what is included in it. it is important that the supplier and customer agree on change management procedures as early as the starting phase of the project. This is an urgent but time-consuming matter and can be avoided if the right people and decision-makers participate in the first project phase. main roles.successfully executing a system integration project Scope of work To ensure successful integration with a satisfied customer. partner responsibilities and the desired outcome. If the scope of work is not defined carefully. as the resourcing. services provided. The scope of work is important to make sure that both the supplier and the customer have understood the project in question and they have similar expectations from it.

the customer has a system that saves time. in order to be able to continue the development work to next phase. • Purpose / needs • Target • Supplier’s responsibilities • Customer’s responsibilities • Project management and project steering group Scope of work (SOW) Specifications documentation • Change management Development and implementation Implementation documentation • Testing and acceptance procedures Testing Testing documentation • Final approval by customer Installation Verification Training Instructional documentation FOLLOW UP CLOSURE OF INTEGRATION PROJECT 119 . assist with informing.successfully executing a system integration project Development and implementation When the scope of work has been defined and approved by both parties. The supplier will. reduces costs and increases productivity by preventing unnecessary double effort and rekeying of procedures in separate systems. Installation. and at the final stage of the project. reduces costs and increases productivity by preventing unnecessary double effort and re-keying of procedures in separate INTEGRATION PROJECT PHASES When the integration is finished. Testing Testing occurs both during the project after each partial delivery. When the integration is finished. which is the actual development and implementation of the project deliverables. the integration can enter the next phase. The testing. approval procedures and timelines should be defined when agreeing on the project. if required and agreed. The project manager at the buyer’s facility now plays a major role in the success of the integration process. the customer has a system that saves time. verification and training The final stage in the integration process is the installation and testing at the customer’s facility and taking the system into production use. training and providing training materials.

more efficient use of maintenance staff.successfully executing a system integration project Integrating a CMM system with calibration management software is an important step in the right direction when it comes to EAM. a corresponding increase in asset utilization or plant uptime. 120 . better management of spare parts and equipment stocks. and optimized scheduling of maintenance tasks and resources. Savings from EAM are reasonably well-documented and come in various guises. Integrating a CMM system with calibration management software is an important step in the right direction when it comes to EAM. This improves the quality of the entire system. the most common benefits being: less equipment breakdowns (leading to a reduction in overall plant downtime). EAM is more than just maintenance management software. Enterprise Asset Management. A CMMS integration will enable the customer company to automate its’ management with smart calibrators. Enterprise Asset Management. But the key to success is really the quality of information you put in the software. However. systems. typing errors are eliminated. It’s about companies taking a business-wide view of all their plant equipment and coordinating maintenance activities and resources with other departments and sites. particularly with production teams. the data has to be as close to 100% accurate as possible to get maximum benefit from the system. When there is no need to manually re-key the data.

121 .

.

Calibration in Industrial Applications .

124 .

However. regular calibration of instruments throughout a manufacturing plant is common practice. temperature and electrical signals. What is a documenting calibrator? A documenting calibrator is a handheld electronic communication device that is capable of calibrating many different process signals such as pressure. Foundation Fieldbus or Profibus output of the transmitters and can even be used for configuring ‘smart’ sensors. time constraints or the pressure of everyday activities. safety or custody transfer. Although most instruments are very accurate these days. Some calibrators can read HART.the benefits of using a documenting calibrator The benefits of using a documenting calibrator F   or process manufacturers. Many process plants are under pressure to calibrate instruments quickly but accurately and to ensure that the results are then documented for quality assurance purposes and to provide full traceability. and then automatically documenting the calibration results by transferring them to a fully integrated calibration management software. the key final step in any calibration process – documentation – is often neglected or overlooked because of a lack of resources. regulatory bodies often need to know just how inaccurate a particular instrument is and whether it drifts in and out of a specified tolerance over time. In plant areas where instrument accuracy is critical to ensure product quality. 125 . The purpose of calibration itself is to determine how accurate an instrument or sensor is. including frequency and pulses. calibration every six months – or even more frequently – is not unusual. many process plants are under pressure to calibrate instruments quickly but accurately and to ensure that the results are then documented for quality assurance purposes and to provide full traceability. Indeed.

This means the engineer does not have to spend time transferring the results from his notepad to final storage on a computer. “I would define a documenting calibrator as a device that has the dual functionality of being able to save and store calibration results in its memory. especially if calibration is one of the many tasks that the user has to carry out in his daily maintenance routine. such as the 126 . or stores calibration data from instruments but is not integrated to a calibration management system. which makes the entire process much faster and consequently reduces costs. spreadsheet or paper filling system. As Laurila states. The quality and accuracy of calibration results will also improve. which makes the entire process much faster and consequently reduces costs. With instrument calibration. the calibration procedure can be automatically transferred from the computer to the handheld calibrator before going out into the field. the calibration procedure itself is critical. who are out in the field performing instrument calibrations. Product Manager at Beamex in Finland comments. Performing the calibration procedure in the same way each time is important for the consistency of results. Also. The engineer does not have to write any results down on paper. Calibration results have to be keyed manually into a separate database. “Engineers.” With a multi-functioning documenting calibrator. Why use a documenting calibrator? The engineer does not have to write any results down on paper. With a documenting calibrator. as well as detailed instructions on how to calibrate the transmitter. By using a documenting calibrator. having an easy-touse documenting calibrator is definitely the way forward.” A non-documenting calibrator is a device that does not store data. but which also integrates and automatically transfers this information to some sort of calibration management software. The calibration results are automatically transferred from the calibrator’s memory to the computer/database. as there will be fewer mistakes due to human error. The tolerances and limits for a sensor. receive instant pass or fail messages with a documenting calibrator. saving time and money. again.the benefits of using a documenting calibrator Heikki Laurila. the calibration results are stored automatically in the calibrator’s memory during the calibration process. This means calibrations are carried out in the same way every time because the calibrator tells the engineer which test point he needs to measure next. are entered once into the calibration management software and then downloaded to the calibrator.

handwrites the results onto a paper form and then reenters this information into a database when he returns to the office.* Why? Because the devices provide higher accuracy. the user can download calibration instructions for hundreds of different instruments into the device’s memory before going out into the field. Unintentional errors often occur and the whole process is timeconsuming. Beamex® CMX Calibration Software ensures that calibration procedures are carried out at the correct time and that calibration tasks are not forgotten. The corresponding calibration results for these instruments can be saved in the device without the user having to return to his PC in the office to download/upload data. speed and accuracy are critical. Foundation Fieldbus H1 or Profibus PA transmitters. Using the MC6 or MC5 with CMX software means that calibration instructions for an instrument and calibration orders are downloaded to the calibrators and ready to guide the engineer in the field with correct calibration procedures. the user doesn’t need to carry as much equipment while out in the field. January. the calibration process is much faster. Both calibrators can be used also to calibrate. such as the MC5 or the MC6. When you’ve got to calibrate instruments throughout a site. Laurila continues. the field engineer calibrates the instrument. 2004 Calibration software ensures that calibration procedures are carried out at the correct time and that calibration tasks are not forgotten. and the system provides full traceability. typically with five-point checks on each instrument. configure and trim HART.” Having a fully integrated calibration management system – using documenting calibrators and calibration management software – is important. ___________________ * Reported to the Industrial Instrumentation and Controls Technology Alliance and presented at the TAMU ISA Symposium.the benefits of using a documenting calibrator Beamex® MC5 or MC6. overlooked or overdue. This means the user can work in the field for several days. “With a documenting calibrator. paper-based systems for documenting. Using Beamex® CMX Calibration Software and the documenting Beamex® MC6 or MC5 Multifunction Calibrators provides full control of the entire calibration process and reduces costs by up to 50 % . Benefits in practice Conventional calibration work relies on manual. overlooked or overdue. Manual calibration takes more time and is more prone to error. 127 . Oftentimes.

again. SUMMARY The benefits of using a documenting calibrator Calibration results are automatically transferred from the calibrator’s memory to a computer or fully integrated calibration management system. consistency and quality of calibration results. saving time and money and simplifying the process. •  Calibration results are automatically transferred from the calibrator’s memory to a computer or fully integrated calibration management system. 128 . •  No manual printing or reading of calibration instructions is required. •  The calibration procedure itself is guided by the calibrator. •  Calibration results are automatically stored in the calibrator’s on-board memory during the calibration procedure. •  Improved accuracy.the benefits of using a documenting calibrator After completing instrument calibrations. •  Reduced costs from a faster and more efficient calibration process. •  A fully traceable calibration system for the entire plant. which uploads detailed instructions from the computer or calibration management software. This not only ensures full traceability but also reflects full and traceable documentation of the completed work. the system provides a full quality assurance report of all instruments calibrated along with a required calibration certificate. •  Less paperwork and fewer manual errors.

129 .

.

131 . Calibration and legal verification Weighing instruments may also possess special features. and the user must have the knowledge to apply the information achieved through calibration. How the weighing instrument is used and how reliable the weighing results are can be very different.calibration of weighing instruments  part 1 Calibration of weighing instruments Part 1 F rom the point of view of the owner. the quality of a weighing instrument is already defined in OIML regulations. but in the EU they are the same. If a weighing instrument is used in a quality system. In any case. (S)He must select the weighing instrument and maintenance procedure to be used to reach the required measurement capability. whereas verification depicts the In any case. From a regulatory point of view. Calibration depicts the deviation between indication and reference (standard) including tolerance. at least at the stage when the weighing instrument is being introduced into use. at least in Europe. it is the owner or the user of the instrument that carries the final responsibility of measurement capability and who is also responsible for the processes involved. it is the owner or the user of the instrument that carries the final responsibility of measurement capability and who is also responsible for the processes involved. usually called scales or balances. for example when invoicing is based on the weight of a solid material. The features may vary slightly from country to country. weighing instruments. One of these features includes making measurements for which legal verification is required. the user must define the measurement capability of it. should provide the correct weighing results. Using weighing instruments for legal purposes must have legal verification. Calibration is a means for the user to obtain evidence of the quality of weighing results. Verification and calibration abide by a different philosophy.

and it displays the history of calibrations and in this way provides the user with comprehensive information concerning measuring capability. if necessary. are based on these practices of calibrating and verifying. 132 . and. The practical work for both methods is very similar and both methods can be used to confirm measurement capability. and for weighing technology in general. This type of program is able to store all the history of calibrated weighing instruments. to be able to define the measuring tolerance. such as repeatability. as long as legal verification is not needed. The terminology and practices used previously for verifying measurement capability. It is also handy for monitoring measuring systems. we need more information about the weighing instrument. In practice. One calibration provides information on a temporary basis and a series of calibrations provides time-dependent information. The method of calibration should be selected such that it provides sufficient information for evaluating the required measuring tolerance. The method should be precise for achieving comparable results during all calibrations. this means investigating the efficiency of the weighing instrument. even if it was a question of general weighing (non-legal).calibration of weighing instruments  part 1 maximum permissible amount of errors of the indication. This is a feasible practice for all weighing. eccentric load. this operation is known as calibration (or verification). including information for other measuring devices. etc. We must remember that the quality of the evaluation of measuring tolerance depends on the collected information through calibration. However. hysteresis. Confirming the capability of weighing instruments should happen by estimating the quality of the measuring device in the place where it will be used. Using a calibration program. The most important aspect of a calibration program is that it allows the user to select the calibration method that corresponds to the required level of measuring tolerance. Comparing the indication of weighing instruments with a set standard gives the deviation or error. Confirmation is the collecting of information We must remember that the quality of the evaluation of measuring tolerance depends on the collected information through calibration. produces a calibration certificate – is the best way to achieve reliable information to use in comparisons. which goes through the same steps for every calibration – calculates deviation and measuring tolerance.

The calibration certificate of a single measuring device is used as a tool for evaluating the process of measuring tolerance and for displaying the traceability of the device in question. If these values are exceeded. a quality system is usually concerned with the traceability of measurements and the known measuring tolerance of the measurements made. The user must define the limits for permitted deviation from a true value and required measuring tolerance.calibration of weighing instruments  part 1 The purpose of calibration and complete confirmation Calibration is a process where the user is able to confirm the correct function of the weighing instrument based on selected information. the idea is that the weighing instrument remains in good working condition until the next calibration. They possess several possibilities for adjusting parameters in measuring procedures. the user must determine all of the external factors which may influence the proper functioning of the weighing instrument. 133 . it is important to always have the manual for using the weighing instrument easily available to the user. Performing calibrations based on the measuring tolerance is better than doing routine measuring. Calibration itself. however. Since there are several parameters in use. The content of the calibration certificate Very often the calibration certificate is put on file as evidence of a performed calibration to await the auditing of the quality system. as well as many other instruments. is a short-term process. For this reason. It is very important that the users of the weighing instruments. Calibration should be carried out using settings based on the parameters for normal use. as well as calibration personnel. an adjustment or maintenance is necessary. Calibration itself. the idea is that the weighing instrument remains in good working condition until the next calibration. Today. regular monitoring of the zero point and the indication number with a constant mass. the function of weighing instruments. is based on microprocessors. is a short-term process. Therefore. however. The factors in question may include the effect of the environment where the weighing instrument is used and how often the instrument needs to be cleaned. are familiar with these parameters and use them as protocol. the user must evaluate the process of measuring tolerance and compare this value with the required measuring tolerance of the process. However.

The following must be taken into consideration: •  the type of procedure to be applied in confirming measuring tolerance •  the interpretation of information while abiding by the calibration certificate •  changing procedures based on received information Quality calibration methods and data handling systems offer state-of-the-art possibilities to any company. It also assists the user in obtaining the required quality of measurements in a process. 134 .calibration of weighing instruments  part 1 SUMMARY Calibration (or verification) is a fundamental tool for maintaining a measuring system.

calibration of weighing instruments  part 1 135 .

.

often need to know just how inaccurate a particular scale may be. Originally. tests for determining minimum weighing capability are also performed. Guidelines on the Calibration of Non-automatic Weighing Instruments. 137 . If you weigh the object Weighing instruments are often highly accurate.and/or industry-specific guidelines or regulations. i. Subsequently.calibration of weighing instruments  part 11 Calibration of weighing instruments Part 2 W eighing is a common form of measurement in commerce. One clear and thorough guide is the EA-10/18. the object being weighed is placed on the load receptor and the weighing result is read only once. but users. Typical scale calibration involves weighing various standard weights in three separate tests: •  repeatability test •  eccentricity test •  weighing test (test for errors of indication) In the pharmaceutical industry in the United States. often need to know just how inaccurate a particular scale may be.e. their customers and/or regulatory bodies. Weighing instruments are often highly accurate. Typical calibration procedures Calibrating scales involves several different procedures depending on national. i. Repeated weighing measurements provide different indications Usually. which was prepared by the European Co-operation for Accreditation. and published by the European Collaboration in Measurement and Standards (euromet).e. industries and households. or on the potential consequences of erroneous weighing results. but users. this information was obtained by classifying and verifying the equipment for type approval. their customers and/or regulatory bodies. the equipment was tested or calibrated on a regular basis.

but users. If the scale’s maximum load limit is extremely large.73%.g.e. Test for errors in indication The weighing test examines the error of the indication on the scale for several predefined loads.1% of the weight. You can determine how much the eccentricity of the load will affect the indication on the scale by weighing the same weight at the corners of the load receptor. with a probability of 99. 138 . their customers and/or regulatory bodies. In such a case. Center of gravity matters The eccentricity test involves placing the object being weighed in the middle of the load receptor as accurately as possible. you will notice slight. You must also know how certain you can be about the error found at each point of calibration. This enables you to correct the errors and definitions for non-linearity and hysteresis. Substitution mass should also be used if the construction of the scale does not allow the use of standard weights. A truck scale is unsuitable for weighing letters The purpose of the minimum weight test is to determine the minimum weight. The repeatability test involves weighing an object several times to determine the repeatability of the scale used. This is sometimes difficult due to the shape or construction of the object being weighed. There are several sources of uncertainty of the error. Typical calibration procedures include the eccentricity test. random variation in the indications. suitable substitution mass is used instead.: Weighing instruments are often highly accurate. Combined standard uncertainty of the error U(E) Knowing the error of the scale indication at the point of each calibration is not sufficient. This condition is met if the measurement error is less than 0. which can be assuredly and accurately measured using the scale in question. it may be impractical to use standard weights for calibrating the entire range. often need to know just how inaccurate a particular scale may be. e. i.calibration of weighing instruments  part 11 repeatedly.

5 g and u(E) = ±0. •  A substitute load is used in calibrating the scale.calibration of weighing instruments  part 11 •  The masses of the weights are only known with a certain uncertainty.5 g and the actual error.27%. air temperature and humidity.2 g.45 % U(E) = 3u(E) 99. which correspond to one standard deviation of a normally distributed variable. •  Analogous scales have limited readability.27%). •  There are random variations in the indications as can be seen in the Repeatability Test. The combined standard uncertainty of the error at a certain point of calibration has a coverage probability of 68. which means that the calculated error in the indication is 2.73 % 3. •  Air buoyancy around the weights varies according to barometric pressure.8 g and 3.9 g 4.27% as well. 139 .5 g ±u(E) 68.7 g. with a coverage probability of 68.g.4 g 1.8 g 0. is between is between 1. E = 2. 1.27% U(E) = 2u(E) 95.2 g 3. •  Digital scale indications are rounded to the resolution in use.1 g 2. •  The weights are not in the exact middle of the load receptor.6 g Example: The calibration error and its uncertainty at the calibration point of 10 kg may be expressed e. The values of uncertainty determined at each point of calibration are expressed as standard uncertainties (coverage probability: 68. •  Air convection causes extra force on the load receptor.

while calibration is made at certain calibration points. Standard and expanded uncertainties of weighing results are calculated using technical data of the weighing instrument. the uncertainty of the results of later routine weighings is usually larger. it is extended to a level of 95.1 g and 3. Uncertainty of a weighing result The purpose of calibration is to determine how accurate a weighing instrument is.4 g. •  Tare balancing device may be used in routine weighing. a coverage probability of 68. However.0011 kg and 10. •  Loading/unloading cycles in calibration and routine weighing may be different. •  The temperature.45% by multiplying it with the coverage factor k = 2.calibration of weighing instruments  part 11 Expanded uncertainty in calibration U(E) In practice.27% is insufficient. 140 .9 g.45%. barometric pressure and relative humidity of the air may vary.45% of the time. at least once. or the reliability of the standard uncertainty value is insufficient. then a larger value should be used for the k-factor. knowledge of its typical behaviour and knowledge of the conditions of the location where the instrument is used. is between 1. with a coverage probability of 95.5 g and U(E) = ±1. •  The adjustment of the weighing instrument may have changed. the indication of weighing an object of 10 kilograms will be between 10. for all The purpose of calibration is to determine how accurate a weighing instrument is. you know that if you repeat the calibration several times. If you are able to use the k = 2 coverage factor. Defining the uncertainty of weighing results is highly recommended.5 g and the actual error. Normally.0039 kg 95. •  Finer resolution is often used in calibration. This means that the calculated error of the indication is 2. As the above-mentioned case indicates. If the distribution of the indicated error cannot be considered normal. •  A load may be situated eccentrically in routine weighing. Typical reasons for this are: •  Routine weighing measurements involve random loads. •  Routine weighing measurements are not repeated whereas indications received through calibrations may be averages of repeated weighing measurements. then the error and its extended uncertainty at the point of calibration are E = 2. its calibration results.

It allows you to enter additional.calibration of weighing instruments  part 11 typical applications and always for critical applications. Calculating the uncertainty of weighing results assists you in deciding whether or not the accuracy of the weighing instrument is sufficient and how often it should be calibrated. However. CMX’s scale calibration enables you to uniquely configure calibration and test each weighing instrument. Wide variation in user-specific limits is also possible. CMX’s versatile calibration certificate and possibility to define a user specific certificate assure that you can fulfill requirements set for your calibration certificates. 141 . Calibrating and testing weighing instruments using CMX CMX’s scale calibration enables you to uniquely configure calibration and test each weighing instrument. determining the uncertainty of weighing results is not part of calibration. Error limits can be set according to OIML or Handbook-44. Correspondingly. user-defined uncertainty components in addition to supported uncertainty components. copying configurations from one scale to another is easy. CMX calculates combined standard uncertainty and expanded uncertainty at calibration of the weighing instrument.

142 .

makes it different from other quantities. it is necessary to calibrate the instrument and the temperature sensor.g. they nevertheless do not determine the permanency of accuracy. show incorrectly. and its influence on e. a model that includes all influencing factors must be created. energy consumption and environmental emission is significant. the user must be sure to verify the permanency of accuracy. Temperature. calibration will prove by how much. Temperature greatly influences many physical features of matter. While standards determine accuracy to which manufacturers must comply. they nevertheless do not determine the permanency of accuracy. RTD) or convert temperature into low voltage (Thermocouples. including sensors. For each measurement. RTD’s are based While standards determine accuracy to which manufacturers must comply. The polynoms are specified in ITS 90 table (International Temperature Scale of 1990). which makes the temperature calibration process slow and expensive. being a state of equilibrium. Therefore. They either convert temperature into resistance (Resistance Temperature Detectors. 143 . Metrology contains mathematic formulas for calculating uncertainty. T/C). Temperature sensors The most commonly used sensors in the industry used for measuring temperature are temperature sensors. If temperature is a significant measurable variable from the point of view of the process. quality. It is important to keep in mind an old saying: all meters. Every temperature measurement is different. A temperature measurement consists of several time constants and it is crucial to wait until thermal equilibrium is reached before measuring.calibrating temperature instruments Calibrating temperature instruments T he most commonly and most frequently measurable variable in industry is temperature.

it also has an impact on the total accuracy. The heat source may also have an internal temperature measurement that can be used as reference. R. an external reference temperature sensor is recommended. Therefore. but the difference in temperature. are also being adopted. transmitters with a digital output signal. Thermocouple consists of two different metal wires connected together. The most important criterion in the calibration of temperature sensors is how accurate the sensors are at the same temperature. Nowadays. The most common T/C type is the K-type (NiCr/NiAl). Many factors influence the total uncertainty. Calibrating temperature instruments To calibrate a temperature sensor. and performing calibration is not the least influencing factor. Sensors are calibrated either by using temperature dry blocks for industrial field or liquid baths (laboratory). such as Fieldbus transmitters. Despite their lower sensitivity (low Seebeck coefficient). To make comparisons. but to achieve better accuracy and reliability. If the connections (hot junction and cold junction) are at different temperatures. A temperature transmitter can be calibrated using a temperature calibrator. and therefore the transmitter must be calibrated on regular basis. All heat 144 . PtRh/Pt/Rh) are used especially in high temperatures for better accuracy and stability. Pt100 is a common RTD type made of platinum and its resistance in 0 ˚C (32 ˚F) is 100∧.calibrating temperature instruments on the fact that the resistance changes with temperature. This means that the thermocouple is not measuring the temperature. the noble thermo-elements S-. while the transmitter converts the sensor signal. temperature transmitters were developed to convert the sensor signal into a format that can be transmitted easier. Temperature transmitters The signal from the temperature sensor cannot be transmitted a longer distance than the plant. The most important criterion in the calibration of temperature sensors is how accurate the sensors are at the same temperature. the transmitter converts the signal from the temperature sensor into a standard ranging between 4 and 20 mA. we compare the sensor to be calibrated and the reference sensor. a small temperature dependent voltage difference/current can be detected. The uncertainty of calibration is not the same as the accuracy of the device.or B-type (PtRh/Pt. it must be inserted into a known temperature. Most commonly.

stability and immersion depth. The uncertainty of calibration is not the same as the accuracy of the device. Immersion depth To achieve a more stable calibration. The major sources of measurement uncertainty are axial homogeneity. Stem conduction. These effects can be quantified to determine the heat source’s contribution to the measurement uncertainty. Guidelines for minimizing measurement uncertainty should be applied according to Euramet/cg-13/v.01 (former EA-10/13). they will affect accuracy.calibrating temperature instruments sources show measurement errors due to their mechanical design and thermodynamic properties. heat flux along the length of the thermometer stem. Measurement uncertainty Axial homogeneity Axial homogeneity is the temperature distribution in the measurement zone along the boring (axial temperature distribution). loading effect. Stability Stability means variation of the temperature in the measurement zone over time when the system has reached equilibrium. the immersion depth for a probe should be sufficient for the sensor being calibrated. 145 . Loading effect When several sensors are placed in the borings of the heat source. Radial homogeneity Radial homogeneity can be explained as the difference in temperature occurring between the borings. affects both the reference sensor and the unit being tested. This phenomenon is called loading effect. radial homogeneity. Thirty minutes is commonly used.

the calibration of instruments effecting production. The dry blocks communicate with the Beamex documenting multifunction calibrators enabling fully automated temperature calibration and documentation. CEO of Beamex Group. The ISO quality control system presupposes the quality control of calibration. a complete calibration solution that enables faster. where the computer controls the calibration event. both in numeric and in graphic form. the calibration device must always be more accurate than the instrument or sensor being calibrated. The Beamex® Integrated Calibration Solution concept is the combination of calibrator. which is useful in making decisions about purchasing new instruments. such as a series of highquality dry blocks for field and laboratory use. “This helps the client to follow the condition of the instrument. The calibration results can then be uploaded from the documenting calibrators to the Beamex® CMX Calibration Software. determining service in advance and recalibration. smart reference probes and temperature calibration laboratory services. regular calibration of sensors and traceable calibration as well as calibration documentation. more accurate and efficient management of all calibration assets and procedures”. you can print out a calibration report as well as a traceable. The Beamex® FB and MB dry blocks are part of the Beamex® Intergrated Calibration Solution. It is a complete solution for temperature calibration with various products and services. With the CMX Software. more efficient and accurate solution for calibrating temperature. calibration software and PC for online calibration. The instrument’s calibration information is saved in the calibrator and History Trend reports. However.calibrating temperature instruments The calibration of instruments and sensors must be performed periodically. “The temperature products and services we are now introducing form an integral part of the Beamex® Integrated Calibration Solution. 146 . However. the calibration device must always be more accurate than the instrument or sensor being calibrated. The level of performance a calibration device needs to have depends on the accuracy requirements determined by each company. says Raimo Ahola. Integrated calibration solution – a smarter way to calibrate temperature Beamex has introduced a smarter. Calibration of instruments and sensors can be carried out either on site or in a laboratory. The instrument to be calibrated is connected to the calibrator controlled by a computer.

The Beamex® Integrated Calibration Solution concept is the combination of calibrator.calibrating temperature instruments accredited calibration certificate. 147 . calibration software and PC for online calibration. Our integrated calibration solution concept saves valuable time. eliminates any errors related to manual entry and assures repeatable calibration procedures”. Mr Ahola adds.

148 .

in temperatures above 200 °C liquids can produce undesirable fumes or there may be fire safety issues. If a drop of water gets into hot silicon oil. controller.total uncertainty of temperature calibration Calculating total uncertainty of temperature calibration with a dry block T   his article will discuss the various uncertainty components related to temperature calibration using a temperature dry-block. They may actually even impede the dry block’s performance and damage its internal components. it could even cause a small steam explosion which may splash hot oil on the user. EURAMET The EURAMET guideline (EURAMET /cg-13/v. an internal control sensor and optional readout for external reference sensor. Heat transfer fluids or pastes are sometimes used around or inside the insert. July 2007 [previously EA-10/13]): • The Euramet calibration guide defines a normative way to calibrate There are fast and lightweight dry blocks for industrial field use as well as models that deliver near bath-level stability in laboratory use.01. It will also present how to calculate the total uncertainty of a calibration performed with a dry block. What is a temperature dry block? A temperature dry block consists of a heatable and/or coolable metallic block. 149 . There are also some work safety issues that favor dry blocks in preference to liquid baths. There are fast and lightweight dry blocks for industrial field use as well as models that deliver near bath-level stability in laboratory use. Dry blocks are almost without exception meant to be used dry. This article will focus on models that use interchangeable metallic multi-hole inserts. For example. but they don’t necessarily improve performance.

the internal control sensor is typically located inside the actual block. or to use an external reference temperature probe inserted in the block as a reference measurement. the products are easier to compare.0 mm at +660…1 300 °C) Related uncertainty components Uncertainty components that are related to temperature calibration are relevant to all manufacturers’ dry blocks. With dry blocks. the following uncertainty components should be taken into account: •  D isplay accuracy (accuracy of the internal measurement) It is important to remember that all of the thermometers based on thermal contact measure their own temperature. It is possible to use a dry block with the block’s internal measurement as the reference (true value). •  Main topics in the EURAMET guideline include: – Display accuracy – Axial uniformity – Radial uniformity – Loading – Stability over time – Hysteresis – Sufficient immersion (15 x diameter) – Stem loss for 6 mm or greater probes – Probe clearance (<= 0. 150 . The Euramet calibration guide defines a normative way to calibrate dry blocks.total uncertainty of temperature calibration dry blocks. There is always thermal resistance between the internal sensor and the probes inside the insert and other sources of uncertainty need to be considered. As most of the manufacturers nowadays publish their product specifications including the main topics in the Euramet guide. Some manufacturers specify these components and some do not. Internal measurement as reference When using a dry block’s internal measurement as reference.5 mm at –80…660 °C) (<= 1. whereas the probes to be calibrated are immersed in the insert.

thermal properties of materials and alignment of the insert holes. for example.total uncertainty of temperature calibration MAIN PARTS OF THE DRY BLOCK Stem conductance Sensor to be calibrated Reference sensor Axial uniformity Internal sersor Radial uniformity Uncertainty components that are related to temperature calibration are relevant to all manufacturers’ dry blocks. “dry wells should have a zone of sufficient temperature homogeneity of at least 40 mm in length” at the bottom of the insert. The Euramet calibration guide states. The thermocouple typically has its “hot junction” close to the tip of the probe whereas the PRT sensing element may be 30 to 50 mm long. 151 . The purpose of this homogenous measurement zone is to cover various sensor constructions. by the placement of the heaters. •  Axial uniformity  Axial uniformity refers to the variation in temperature along the vertical length of the insert. Related uncertainty is caused. a homogenous zone of at least 60 mm is recommended. • Radial uniformity   Radial uniformity refers to the variation in temperature between the holes of the insert. With this in mind. Non-symmetrical loading or probes with significantly different thermal conductivity (for example large diameter probes) may cause additional temperature variation.

To minimize the stem conduction error it’s recommended. as a rule of thumb. –  The Euramet calibration guide defines stability as a temperature variation over a 30-minute period. 152 . when the system has reached equilibrium. then the uncertainty caused by the insufficient immersion should be estimated/ evaluated. The specifications for the above uncertainty components should be in the block’s specifications. wall thickness. This means that the temperature of the dry block may be a bit different depending on the direction from which the set point is approached. Stability describes how well the temperature remains the same during a given time. As the probe constructions vary greatly (sheet material. If sufficient recommended immersion cannot be reached. plus the length of the sensing element. The more the load.). Sufficient immersion depth and dual zone control helps to reduce load-related uncertainties. the more the ambient temperature will affect the measurements. lead wire thermal conductivity etc. • Hysteresis Hysteresis causes the internal sensor to be dependent on its previous  exposure. • Stability over time –  Stability describes how well the temperature remains the same during a given time. The loading effect is not visible in the control sensor indication and the controller cannot completely compensate for this shift.total uncertainty of temperature calibration • Loading effect Every probe in the insert conducts heat either from or into the  insert. it should be estimated or evaluated.  The Euramet calibration guide states that the immersion depth should be at least 15 x the probe’s outer diameter. a test for each individual probe type to be calibrated should be made. to use immersion depth of 20 x the diameter. The hysteresis is greatest at the mid-point and is proportional to the temperature range. • Immersion Sufficient immersion is important in any temperature measurement. If some component has not been specified.

Using an external reference sensor enables smaller total uncertainty of the system. mechanical robustness is usually inversely proportional to good performance: stability. It helps to minimize calibration uncertainty but also provides reliability in measurements.total uncertainty of temperature calibration Using an external reference sensor as reference Unlike using the dry block’s internal sensor as a reference. the user may obtain good results. In case the probe to be calibrated is short and won’t reach the measurement zone at the bottom of the insert. • Radial uniformity Radial uniformity is still present when using an external reference  probe and should be taken into account as specified. Using an external reference sensor enables more accurate measurement of the temperature of the probes to be calibrated. If the reference sensor and the sensor to be calibrated are sufficiently similar in diameter and thermal conductivity. the user can reduce the axial uniformity well below specification. the following uncertainty components should be taken into account: • Axial uniformity A xial uniformity-related uncertainty can be minimized by aligning  the centers of the sensing elements. There are many advantages to using a separate reference sensor. Therefore. Of course. • Loading effect Since the internal sensor cannot completely compensate the load related temperature shift inside the insert. etc. The loading effect is usually much less significant with an external reference sensor. Unfortunately. The internal sensor is used just to adjust temperature close to the desired calibration point and keep it stable. In the case of using an external reference sensor. the external reference enables more accurate measurement of the temperature of the probes to be calibrated. the external reference sensor is inside the insert together with the probes to be calibrated. The internal sensor has to deal with quick temperature changes. the stem conductance has to be taken into account. vibration and possible mechanical shocks so it has to be quite a robust mechanically. 153 . hysteresis. the external reference sensor is within the same calibration volume as the sensors to be calibrated. In many cases. the reference probe can be drawn out to match the immersion.

All of the previously mentioned uncertainty factors need to be carefully considered. • External reference sensor – The external reference sensor (PRT) is typically much more capable of producing accurate measurements than the internal sensor. and it may often be smaller than the specification. the external reference sensor needs a unit that measures the sensor. but depending on.total uncertainty of temperature calibration • Stability over time The external reference sensor can be used to measure the actual  temperature deviation inside the insert. It can be the block or an external device. – Uncertainty related to the reference probe components includes the probe’s calibration uncertainty. However. for instance. It also helps the user to see when the unit has truly stabilized. stem conduction. drift. and the readout device’s uncertainty. – Of course. Dry blocks usually have a stability indicator. there may still be some difference between the block and the insert temperatures when the indicator shows the unit has stabilized. The external reference sensor can be used to measure the actual temperature deviation inside the insert and it also helps the user to see when the unit has truly stabilized. the different loads. 154 . hysteresis. using an external reference does not automatically mean better results.

003 0. The standard uncertainties are combined as the root sum of the squares.014 0. MB155R with internal measurement @0 °C Component Display Accuracy Hysteresis Axial Uniformity Radial Uniformity Stability Loading Effect Specification (°C) 0.005 0. That is why they are divided by the square root of three to get Standard Uncertainty.135 MB155R with external measurement @0 °C Component Axial Uniformity Radial Uniformity Stability Loading Effect Ref sensor measurement Specification (°C) 0. they are divided by the square root of three to get the Standard Uncertainty.012 0.01 0.006 0.10 0.003 0.010 0.034 Standard Uncertainty (°C) 0.005 0.007 0.007 0.01 Combined Uncertainty: Expanded Uncertainty: MB155R and RPRT-420 Combined uncertainty: Expanded Uncertainty: 0.004 0. As can be seen in the examples the total expanded uncertainty using the internal reference sensor is 135 mK (0.017 0.014 0.003 0.01 0.02 0. The temperature in both examples is 0 °C.006 0.02 0. 155 .058 0.020 Standard Uncertainty (°C) 0.034 °C).029 0.012 0.005 0. The various uncertainty components used in the examples can be found in the specifications in the product brochures.006 Combined Uncertainty: Expanded Uncertainty: Reference Sensor (Beamex RPRT-420) Component Short-term repeatability Drift Hysteresis Calibration uncertainty Specification (°C) 0.135  °C).006 0. In both cases the MB155R is used as the dry block. One is done using the internal temperature measurement and the other with a reference probe. When using an external reference sensor the total expanded uncertainty is 34 mK (0.total uncertainty of temperature calibration CALCULATION EXAMPLES ■  Here are two examples of total uncertainty calculations.067 0.028 All specifications have a rectangular probability distribution.05 Combined Uncertainty: Expanded Uncertainty: Standard Uncertainty (°C) 0. Due to the rectangular probability distribution of the specifications.025 0.004 0.003 0.01 0. Finally the combined uncertainty has been multiplied by two to get the expanded uncertainty.006 0.

.

Each transmitter needs a dedicated pair of cables. manufacturers battled to see whose fieldbus would be the one most commonly used. Being an open standard. higher-level fieldbus backbone. History of fieldbus Back in the 1940s. A standard was finally set in the year 2000 when the IEC61158 standard was approved. The first digital. and I/O subsystems are required to convert the analog mA signal to a digital format for a control system. In the 1970s. using first proprietary protocols.fieldbus transmitters must also be calibrated Fieldbus transmitters must also be calibrated F ieldbus is becoming more and more common in today’s instrumentation. During the 1960s. instruments from any manufacturer can be connected to the same fieldbus as plug-and-play. and throughout the 1990s a number of various fieldbuses were developed. smart transmitter was introduced in the 1980s. one way. The Fieldbus transmitters must be calibrated as well. but how can it be done? 157 . Fieldbus transmitters are able to deliver a huge amount of information via the quick two-way bus. During the 1990s. Conventional I/O systems are no longer needed because segment controllers connect the instrument segments to the quicker. instrumentation utilized mainly pneumatic signals to transfer information from transmitters. making things much easier. Several transmitters can be connected to the same pair of wires. But what is fieldbus and how does it differ from conventional instrumentation? Fieldbus transmitters must be calibrated as well. the mA signal was introduced. The first fieldbus was introduced in 1988. computerized control systems began to make their arrival. but how can it be done? Conventional transmitters can deliver only one simultaneous parameter.

less planning/drawing costs. This is caused by many reasons. offering maintenance savings. Both Foundation Fieldbus and Profibus have reached such a large market share that both buses will most likely remain also in the future. such as reduction in field wiring. Future of fieldbus Currently. Other areas are more divided. The development of new fieldbuses has slowed down and it is unlikely that new fieldbus standards will appear in the near future to challenge the position of Foundation Fieldbus or Profibus. The improved system performance is important criteria for some plants. A large portion of new projects is currently being carried out using fieldbus. and no need for conventional I/O subsystems. were chosen as standards. Remote configuration also helps to support reduced downtime. 158 . lower installation labour cost. One important reason is the better return on investment. a large number of fieldbus installations already exist and the number is increasing at a huge rate. or even a little bit more. There are also certain applications that prefer certain fieldbus installations despite the geographical location. For the most part. Fieldbus benefits for industry Obviously process plants would not start utilizing fieldbus. There are also other advantages compared to conventional instrumentation. Critical applications and hazardous areas have also begun to adopt fieldbus.fieldbus transmitters must also be calibrated Foundation Fieldbus H1 and the Profibus PA. Although fieldbus hardware may cost the same as conventional. The Foundation Fieldbus and Profibus have begun to clearly dominate the fieldbus market. Recent co-operation between Foundation Fieldbus and Profibus suppliers will further strengthen the position of these two standards. The Foundation Fieldbus and Profibus have begun to clearly dominate the fieldbus markets. if it would not offer them benefits compared to alternative systems. Another big advantage is the on-line self-diagnostics that helps in predictive maintenance and eventually reduces the downtime. both used in process instrumentation. one can say that the Foundation Fieldbus is dominating the North American markets and the Profibus is the market leader in Europe. the total installation costs for a fieldbus factory is far less than conventional.

Naturally these two people need to communicate with each other in order to perform and document the calibration. In some cases you can use a portable fieldbus communicator or a laptop computer with dedicated software and hardware. you need to find other ways to read the transmitter’s output. The other parts of a fieldbus transmitter are mainly comparable to conventional or HART transmitters. When fieldbus is up and running. Reading the digital output is not always an easy thing to do. In terminology pertaining to metrology. “calibration” means that you compare the transmitter to a traceable measurement standard and document the results. Changing the output signal does not change the need for periodic calibration. So it is not possible to calibrate a fieldbus transmitter using only a configurator or configuration software. it is not possible to calibrate a fieldbus transmitter remotely. While your fieldbus and process automation systems are idle. the total installation costs for a fieldbus factory is far less than conventional. Although fieldbus hardware may cost the same as conventional. There are also many other reasons. 159 . “calibration” is often used to mean the configuration of a transmitter. it does not eliminate the need for calibration. Also. The input is measured with a traceable calibrator. but you also need to have a way to read the output of the fieldbus transmitter. Calibrating fieldbus transmitters The word “calibration” is often misused in the fieldbus terminology when comparing it to the meaning of the word in metrology.fieldbus transmitters must also be calibrated Fieldbus transmitters must also be calibrated The main difference between a fieldbus transmitter for pressure or temperature and conventional or HART transmitters is that the output signal is a fully digital fieldbus signal. that make the periodic calibrations compulsory. Fieldbus transmitters are calibrated in very much the same way as conventional transmitters – you need to place a physical input into the transmitter and simultaneously read the transmitter output to see that it is measuring correctly. such as quality systems and regulations. or even a little bit more. you can have one person in the field to provide and measure the transmitter input while another person is in the control room reading the output. Although modern fieldbus transmitters have been improved compared to older transmitter models. In fieldbus terminology.

The Beamex® MC6 can be used as a communicator for the configuration as well as a calibrator for the calibration of smart instruments with the supported protocols. There is no need for an additional communicator.fieldbus transmitters must also be calibrated Fieldbus instruments are increasing in popularity and calibration can in many cases be cumbersome. The calibration results can be automatically stored into the memory of the MC6 or uploaded to calibration software. The Beamex® MC6 will help to overcome these challenges by combining a full field communicator and an extremely accurate multifunctional process calibrator. The Beamex® MC6 can be used as a communicator for the configuration as well as a calibrator for the calibration of smart instruments with the supported protocols. time-consuming and may require an abundance of resources. 160 .

.

.

These new smart instruments bring new challenges to the calibration and configuration processes. a modern smart transmitter typically outperforms an older type of conventional transmitter regarding measurement accuracy and stability. it will utilize a microprocessor and should also have a digital communication protocol that can be used for reading the transmitter’s measurement values and for configuring various settings in the transmitter. produce diagnostics. etc.) and generates an output signal proportional to the measured input. etc. There is no standardized technical definition for what smart really means in practice. Generally. The term “smart” is more of a marketing term than a technical definition. What is a “smart” transmitter? A process transmitter is a device that senses a physical parameter (pressure. that will help to overcome these challenges. for the engineers who need to configure and calibrate the transmitter. temperature. But what are these smart instruments and what is the best way to configure and calibrate them? Beamex has recently introduced a new revolutionary tool. A microprocessorbased smart transmitter has a memory that can perform calculations. The vast majority of delivered instruments today are smart instruments. the Beamex® MC6 –Advanced Field Communicator and Calibrator. in order for a transmitter to be called smart. In any case. Furthermore. the digital communication protocol is the biggest difference compared to conventional transmitters.configuring and calibrating smart instruments Configuring and calibrating smart instruments S o called “smart” instruments are ever more popular in the process industry. Engineers can A modern smart transmitter typically outperforms an older type of conventional transmitter regarding measurement accuracy and stability. 163 .

Configuration of a smart transmitter refers to the setting of the transmitter parameters.e. but they need to have the possibility to communicate with the transmitter and read the digital signal. would be a transmitter with a purely analog (or even pneumatic) output signal. etc. including HART. This article will discuss “smart” transmitters. a non-smart transmitter. These parameters may include engineering unit. Foundation Fieldbus and Profibus PA protocols. So in order to do the configuration. That brings a whole new challenge .configuring and calibrating smart instruments no longer simply measure the output analog signal. but these seem to be fading out in popularity and favor is being given to protocols based on open standards because of the interoperability that they enable. Most of the protocols are based on open standards. The configuration needs to be done via the communication protocol. contain only a digital output. Configuration One important feature of a smart transmitter is that it can be configured via the digital protocol. WirelessHART. i. Some are proprietary protocols of a certain manufacturer. The fieldbuses. Foundation Fieldbus and Profibus are gaining a larger foothold on the process transmitter markets. to support the selected protocol. A HART transmitter contains both a conventional analog mA signal and a digital signal superimposed on top of the analog signal. it is not a reference standard and therefore cannot be used for metrological calibration. Since it also has the analog signal.how can the digital output be read? Thinking of the opposite of a smart transmitter. 164 . typically also called a communicator. Smart transmitter protocols There are various digital protocols that exist among transmitters considered smart. Recently the HART protocol seems to be getting more boosts from the newest WirelessHART protocol. it is compatible with conventional installations. sensor type. you will need to use some form of configuration device. such as Foundation Fieldbus and Profibus. It is crucial to remember that although a communicator can be used for configuration. no analog signal. The most common transmitter protocol today is the HART (Highway Addressable Remote Transducer) protocol.

you need a dual-function calibrator able to process transmitter input and output at the same time. several types of devices may be needed and several people to do the job. a HART communicator is needed. The calibration may. or alternatively two separate singlefunction calibrators. especially a mobile one. by using a calibrator. calibration is a comparison of the device under test against a traceable reference instrument (calibrator) and documenting the comparison. Configuring the parameters of a smart transmitter with a communicator is not in itself a metrological calibration (although it may be part of an adjustment/trim task) and it does not assure accuracy. In this case calibration is quite easy and straight forward. Calibration of a smart transmitter According to international standards. i. be calibrated? Obviously the transmitter input still needs to be generated/measured the same way as with a conventional transmitter.e.e. a device or software able to read and interpret the digital protocol is needed. or to read the digital output signal (if it is used). with output being a digital protocol signal. which can read the digital output. If the calibration is done with a documenting calibrator. to do any configuration or trimming. it will automatically document the calibration results. to see what the transmitter output is. it is not a reference standard and therefore cannot be used for metrological calibration. For a real metrological calibration. by using a calibrator. but in order to see what the transmitter output is. Wired HART (as opposed to WirelessHART) is a hybrid protocol that includes digital communication superimposed on a conventional analog 4–20mA output signal. therefore. potential adjustments are often included when the calibration process is performed. you will need some device or software able to read and interpret the digital protocol. be a very challenging task. However. The 4–20mA output signal of a wired HART transmitter is calibrated the same way as a conventional transmitter. i. To calibrate a conventional. analog transmitter. by definition a traceable reference standard (calibrator) is always needed. Sometimes it is very difficult or even impossible to find a suitable device. 165 . But how can a smart transmitter. you can generate or measure the transmitter input and at the same time measure the transmitter output. Although the calibration formally does not include any adjustments. However.configuring and calibrating smart instruments It is crucial to remember that although a communicator can be used for configuration. The transmitter input needs to be generated/ measured the same way as with a conventional transmitter.

The operation modes are: meter. Foundation Fieldbus H1 and Profibus PA protocols. which means that it is fast and easy to use. The robust IP65-rated dustand water-proof casing. The MC6 also contains a full fieldbus communicator for HART. WirelessHART. The MC6 is one device with five different operational modes. calibrator. About Beamex® MC6 Beamex® MC6 is an advanced. ergonomic design and light weight make it an ideal measurement device for field use in various industries. typically only for one protocol (mostly HART) and offering very limited support. Foundation Fieldbus and Profibus PA instruments. the MC6 includes a full field communicator for HART. The results can be automatically stored into the memory of the MC6 or uploaded to calibration software. Any additional communicator is therefore not needed. the smart transmitter’s input can be generated/ measured at the same time as reading the digital output. With the Beamex® MC6. In practice. The MC6 supports all of the protocol commands according to the transmitter’s device description file. All required electronics are built-in. food and beverage. The Beamex® MC6 can be used both as a communicator for the configuration and as a calibrator for the calibration of smart instruments with the supported protocols. With the Beamex® MC6. temperature and various electrical signals. high-accuracy field calibrator and communicator. service as well as the petrochemical and chemical industries. The usability and ease-of-use are among the main features of the MC6.configuring and calibrating smart instruments The solution The new Beamex ® MC6 is a device combining a full field communicator and an extremely accurate multifunctional process calibrator. and you can carry less equipment in the field. It offers calibration capabilities for pressure. 166 . oil and gas. a separate communicator is needed in any case. When it comes to configuration of the smart transmitters. including power supply and required impedances for the protocols.7" color touch-screen with a multilingual user interface. It has a large 5. There are some other “smart” process calibrators on the market with limited support for different protocols. such as the pharmaceutical. energy. the smart transmitter’s input can be generated/ measured at the same time as reading the digital output.

standards. Foundation Fieldbus and Profibus PA instruments. environmental systems. •  Even the best instruments and sensors drift over time. In conclusion. A short summary of the main reasons include. etc. •  Environmental reasons. the MC6 communicates with Beamex® CMX Calibration Software. especially when used in demanding process conditions. the MC6 is more than a calibrator. the output protocol of a transmitter does not change the fundamental need for calibration.configuring and calibrating smart instruments documenting calibrator. safety systems. data logger and Fieldbus communicator. There are numerous reasons to calibrate instruments initially and periodically.employee safety as well as customer/patient safety. •  Safety reasons. 167 . enabling fully automated and paperless calibration and documentation. such as quality systems. The MC6 also contains a full fieldbus communicator for HART. •  Regulatory requirements. •  Economical reasons – any measurement having direct economical effect. Why calibrate? A modern transmitter is advertised as being smart and extremely accurate and sometimes sales people tell you they don’t need to be calibrated at all because they are so “smart”. In addition. So why would you calibrate them? First of all. •  To achieve high and consistent product quality and to optimize processes.

.

water/ wastewater. The materials and fluids used in some processes can be hazardous in the sense that they can ignite or explode. may pose hazards as well. such as natural gas. For example. oil refineries. are used in all industries. Even seemingly safe water treatment systems use combustible materials such as chlorine in their processes. Similarly. universities. retail.calibration in hazardous environments Calibration in hazardous environments S triking a match in an environment that contains combustible gas is nothing short of dangerous – personal injury and property damage are likely consequences. leaks. and in the home. Hydrocarbons and other flammable fluids are not limited to the petroleum and chemical industries. certain areas of food plants. such as reactors that hydrogenate oils. Improperly calibrating an instrument in this hazardous environment can be almost as dangerous. This means that certain areas of a water treatment plant may well be considered hazardous. it is important for plants to examine their processes and identify hazardous locations so that the proper instruments are Many materials and fluids used in seemingly “safe” industries are themselves flammable. including agriculture. many materials and fluids used in seemingly “safe” industries are themselves flammable. an external flame would not ignite the hydrocarbons. pharmaceuticals. Therefore. If this were truly the case. combustible fuels. In addition. power generation. hydrocarbons in mines. abnormal conditions. food. pulp/paper. in many locations. For example. However. 169 . and fluid accumulation may allow hydrocarbons to be present such that the flame could ignite the hydrocarbons with disastrous results. and chemical plants are flammable and are typically contained within vessels and pipes.

frequency of the hazard. Group IIC Acetylene Group IIB+H2 Hydrogen Group IIB Ethylene Group IIA Propane The hazardous area classifications (IEC 60079-10) in order of decreasing frequency are: Zone 0 Flammable material present continuously Zone 1 Flammable material present intermittently Zone 2 Flammable material present abnormally Intrinsic Safety (IS) is the most common protection concept applied to calibrators that are used in hazardous locations. In general. Groupings (IEC 60079-10) in order of decreasing ignition energy (with an example of a gas in the group) are: Intrinsic Safety (IS) is the most common protection concept applied to calibrators used in hazardous locations.calibration in hazardous environments selected. ib Flammable material present intermittently Zone 2 ia. the IS concept is to design the calibrator such that it limits the amount of energy available such that it cannot ignite a combustible gas mixture. Temperature classes limit the maximum surface temperature between 450˚C (T1) and 85˚C (T6). 170 . The intensity with which various vapors can combust is generally different. and maintained in accordance with practices that are appropriate for the hazard. installed. a hot surface temperature on a device can cause ignition. ib Flammable material present abnormally In addition. Adding the applicability of IS designs to various hazards in the previous table yields: Zone 0 ia Flammable material present continuously Zone 1 ia. and the protection concept applied. Equipment requirements in hazardous locations Protection requirements for hazardous locations vary according to the type of material present.

RTD. and frequency measurements. pulse. The Beamex multifunction IS-calibrators are portable and intrinsically safe and have modules that can accommodate wide ranges and many types of pressure. creates documentation. As such. The ergonomic design and modular construction allow the user to select the necessary functions in a cost-effective manner. In some applications. voltage. and tracks calibration history. The Beamex® CMX software integrates calibration management by allowing efficient planning and scheduling of calibration work. The Beamex® CMX software integrates calibration management by allowing efficient planning and scheduling of calibration work. This software generally makes calibration work faster and easier and is designed to integrate into management systems such as SAP and Maximo. adheres to GMP regulations (21 CFR 11). 171 . temperature. pressure. Fortunately. The Beamex modular calibration system is a test bench and calibration system for workshops and laboratories that incorporates the functionality of the MC5 multifunction calibrator and can measure/generate additional parameters such as precision pressures. it is practical to remove these instruments and calibrate them on the workshop with a calibration test bench. and other variables designed in hazardous locations are generally used to monitor and control the process.calibration in hazardous environments Beamex calibrators for hazardous locations are designed and certified for Ex ia IIC T4 hazards per the ATEX Directive and are applicable to all vapor hazards where a temperature class of 135˚C in a 50˚C ambient is acceptable. This is usually not the case. thermocouple. Calibration solutions for hazardous locations Instruments designed to measure flow. It not only alerts you when to calibrate. current. level. there are calibrators that are specifically designed to operate safely in rugged environments and hazardous locations. but also automatically takes data. they can be used for the overwhelming majority of applications where a vapor hazard is present. which means that many instruments are calibrated in the field.

and maintained in accordance with requirements for the hazardous location. Hazardous locations can exist in virtually all industries. operated. and in the home. installed. stores.calibration in hazardous environments A few points to remember •  Improper actions in hazardous locations can result in property damage and bodily injury. •  Instruments should be specified. •  Hazardous locations can exist in virtually all industries. 172 . and in the home. stores. •  Portable Beamex calibrators for hazardous locations are designed to be used in virtually all vapor hazards.

calibration in hazardous environments 173 .

.

such as gases. The idea behind intrinsic safety is to make sure that the available electrical and thermal energy in a system is always low enough that ignition of the hazardous atmosphere cannot occur. Intrinsically safe calibrators are designed for potentially explosive environments. intrinsically safe fieldbus calibrators enter into the picture. a flammable substance and oxygen. rigs and processing plants. There are also industrial environments where the calibration of fieldbus instruments should not only be made accurately and efficiently. Intrinsically safe calibrators are also often referred to being “Ex calibrators”. and if it occurs it will exist only for a short time. The concept has been developed for safely operating process control instrumentation in hazardous areas. Zone 2: an explosive gas & air mixture is not likely to occur in normal operation. mists. Zone 1: an explosive gas & air mixture is likely to occur in normal operation. 175 . such as oil refineries. gas Hazardous area classifications in IEC/ European countries are: Zone 0: an explosive gas & air mixture is continuously present or present for a long time. An intrinsically safe calibrator is therefore designed to be incapable of causing ignition in the surrounding environment with flammable materials.the safest way to calibrate fieldbus instruments The safest way to calibrate fieldbus instruments F ieldbus transmitters must also be calibrated just like conventional instruments. or “IS calibrators”. When safety becomes a top priority issue in calibration. intrinsic safety (IS) is a protection technique for safely operating electronic equipment in explosive environments. An Ex Area also refers to an explosive environment and an Ex calibrator is a device designed for use in the type of environment in question. vapors or combustible dust. “calibrators for Ex Areas”. but also safely. A hazardous atmosphere is an area that contains elements that may cause an explosion: source of ignition. By definition. Where is intrinsically safe calibration required? Many industries require intrinsically safe calibration equipment.

as well as pharmaceutical plants. First of all. A documenting intrinsically safe calibrator. Are intrinsically safe calibrators technically different from regular industrial calibrators? Intrinsically safe calibrators are different from other industrial calibrators in both design and technical features. intrinsically safe calibrators are the only technique permitted for Zone 0 environments (explosive gas and air mixture is continuously present or present for a long time). temperature and electrical signals. In view of safety. the calibrators provide performance and functionality. Performance and functionality Multifunctional intrinsically safe calibrators provide the functionality and performance of regular industrial calibration devices. as they can be safely used in environments where the risk of an explosion exists. Secondly.the safest way to calibrate fieldbus instruments pipelines and distribution centres. 176 .IS. Safest possible technique Intrinsically safe calibrators are safe for employees. any potentially explosive industrial environment can benefit from using intrinsically safe calibrators. In addition. any potentially explosive industrial environment can benefit from using intrinsically safe calibrators. it is the safest possible technique. Basically. which should be read carefully before using the device. petrochemical and chemical plants. They can be used for calibration of pressure. there are also some guidelines and constraints for how to use them in hazardous areas. Basically. but in a safe way. What are the benefits of using intrinsically safe calibrators? There are clear benefits in using intrinsically safe calibration equipment. Every intrinsically safe calibrator is delivered with a product safety note. This eliminates the need of manual recording of calibration data and improves the quality and productivity of the entire calibration process. The product safety note lists all the “do’s and don’ts” for safe calibration. such as the Beamex® MC5. provides additional efficiency improvements with its seamless communication with calibration software.

ATEX 95 equipment directive 94/9/EC concerns equipment intended for use in potentially explosive areas. while maintaining the required level of safety. Companies in the EU where the risk of explosion is evident must also use the ATEX guidelines for protecting the employees. the ATEX rules are obligatory for electronic and electrical equipment that will be used in potentially explosive atmospheres sold in the EU as of July 1. The surface of the device is made of conductive material. quicker to discharge • Battery must be charged in a non-Ex area • When using external pressure modules. explosive atmospheres in French) is a standard set in the European Union for explosion protection in the industry. Making a calibrator safe and unable to cause ignition – typical technical differences: • Surface made of conductive material • Constraints in using the device (listed in Product Safety Note) • Small differences with electrical ranges (e. 177 The differences in design and technical features were made with one purpose in mind – to ensure that the device is safe to use and is unable to cause an ignition. maximum is lower) • Battery slower to charge. The battery of an intrinsically safe calibrator is usually slower to charge and it discharges quicker. The objective of the IECEx Scheme is to facilitate international trade in equipment and services for use in explosive atmospheres. In addition. maximum is lower). Many times intrinsically safe equipment operate only with dry batteries. but the Beamex intrinsically safe calibrators operate with chargeable batteries.g. The IEC TC/31 technical committee deals with the standards related to equipment for explosive atmospheres.the safest way to calibrate fieldbus instruments The differences in design and technical features were made with one purpose in mind—to ensure that the device is safe to use and is unable to cause an ignition. it must be done in a non-Ex area. they must be IS-versions What are ATEX and IECEx? ATEX (“ATmosphères EXplosibles”. but they must also be intrinsically safe. IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission) is a nonprofit international standards organization that prepares and publishes international standards for electrical technologies. 2003. There are also usually small differences with electrical ranges compared to regular industrial calibrators (e.g. . When charging the battery. External pressure modules can be used with IS-calibrators. IECEx is an international scheme for certifying procedures for equipment designed for use in explosive atmospheres.

all-in-one calibrator for extreme environments. The MC5-IS also has HART communication. The best way to do this is to send it to the manufacturer or to an authorized service company for repair. the MC5-IS replaces many individual measurement devices and calibrators. Is service different for intrinsically safe calibrators? There are certain aspects that need special attention when doing service or repair on an intrinsically safe calibrator. The MC5-IS can also be used for calibrating Foundation Fieldbus H1 or Profibus PA transmitters. it ensures the calibrator is fit for its intended purpose and that sufficient information is supplied with it to ensure that it can be used safely. electrical and frequency signals.the safest way to calibrate fieldbus instruments As Beamex® MC5-IS Intrinsically Safe Multifunction Calibrator is certified according to ATEX and the IECEx Scheme. It is a documenting calibrator. Using documenting calibrators with calibration software can remarkably improve the efficiency and quality of the entire calibration process. Being an all-in-one calibrator. The MC5-IS also has HART communication. which means that it communicates seamlessly with calibration software. temperature. 178 . The most important thing to remember is that an intrinsically safe calibrator must maintain its intrinsic safety after the service or repair. The MC5-IS is also ATEX and IECEx certified. Recalibration can be done by calibration laboratories (still preferably with ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation). The most important thing to remember is that an intrinsically safe calibrator must maintain its intrinsic safety after the service or repair. The MC5-IS has calibration capabilities for pressure. Safe fieldbus calibration with the Beamex® MC5-IS Intrinsically Safe Multifunction Calibrator The Beamex® MC5-IS Intrinsically Safe Multifunction Calibrator is a high accuracy.

.

.

However. journals. the purpose of common dictionaries is to record the ways that people actually use words. 2004. and other publications. Those documents give the intended meaning of the word. its definition from a common grammar dictionary should never be used in work where the technical standard can apply. so everyone in the business knows what it is. NCSL Glossary. It is a supplement to the VIM. not to standardize the way the words should be used. ______________ 1. and the information in the other references listed at the end. The Metrology Handbook. international and industry standards. as well as publications of relevant technical and professional organizations. If a word is defined in a technical standard. In technical work. scientific and engineering work (such as metrology) it is important to correctly use words that have a technical meaning. 181 . The technical definitions may be different from the definitions published in common grammar dictionaries. Milwaukee: ASQ Quality Press.  Bucher. Many of these definitions are adapted from the references. In technical. GUM.appendix: calibration terminology a to z 1 Calibration terminology A to Z 1 T his glossary is a quick reference to the meaning of common terms. only the technical definitions should be used. In some cases several may be merged to better clarify the meaning or adapt the wording to common metrology usage. Definitions of these words are in relevant national. Jay L.

ANSI/NCSL Z540-2-1997. The certificate. Geneva: ISO. but should be considered an addition to the references listed above. U. IUPAC. Accreditation certificate – Document issued by an accreditation body to a laboratory that has met the conditions and criteria for accreditation. 3. BIPM. 1997. Some terms may be listed in this glossary in order to expand on the definition. accuracy of a measurement is always 182 .  ANSI/NCSL. An accreditation certificate without the documented parameters is incomplete. 1993. IFCC. and OIML. S. (VIM. CO: NCSL International. IEC. 2. CO: NCSL International. Accreditation body – An organization that conducts laboratory accreditation evaluations in conformance to ISO Guide 58. not a replacement of them. Boulder. (It is assumed that a calibration or metrology activity owns copies of these as part of its basic reference material.) Glossary Accreditation (of a laboratory) – Formal recognition by an accreditation body that a calibration or testing laboratory is able to competently perform the calibrations or tests listed in the accreditation scope document. Accreditation includes evaluation of both the quality management system and the competence to perform the measurements listed in the scope. Boulder.appendix: calibration terminology a to z 1 Terms that are not in this glossary may be found in one of these primary references: 1.5) Because the true value is always unknown. 3. Accuracy (of a measurement) – Accuracy is a qualitative indication of how closely the result of a measurement agrees with the true value of the parameter being measured. International vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology (called the VIM). 1999. Accreditation criteria – Set of requirements used by an accrediting body that a laboratory must meet in order to be accredited. NCSL Glossary of metrology-related terms. with the documented measurement parameters and their best uncertainties.  ISO. serves as proof of accredited status for the time period listed.  NCSL. IUPAP. 2nd ed. Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (called the GUM). ISO.

(VIM. Bias – Bias is the known systematic error of a measuring instrument. Calibration is performed with the item being calibrated in 183 . realize.appendix: calibration terminology a to z 1 an estimate. Contrast with: accuracy (of a measuring instrument) Accuracy (of a measuring instrument) – Accuracy is a qualitative indication of the ability of a measuring instrument to give responses close to the true value of the parameter being measured. It is the process of verifying the capability and performance of an item of measuring and test equipment by comparison to traceable measurement standards. 5. Bespoke/Customized computerised system – A computerised system individually designed to suit a specific business process Best measurement capability – For an accredited laboratory. Adding a correction. (See VIM 6. compensates for the bias.11 and NCSL pages 4–5 for primary and secondary definitions. or when performing more-or-less routine calibrations of nearly ideal measuring instruments designed for the measurement of that quantity. 5. See also: correction. conserve. It has quantitative value only when accompanied by information about the uncertainty of the measuring system. (VIM.) Calibration is a term that has many different – but similar – definitions.25) The value and direction of the bias is determined by calibration and/or gage R&R studies. systematic error Calibration – (1).” (EA-4/02) The best measurement capability is based on evaluations of actual measurements using generally accepted methods of evaluating measurement uncertainty. the best measurement capability for a particular quantity is “the smallest uncertainty of measurement a laboratory can achieve within its scope of accreditation when performing more or less routine calibrations of nearly ideal measurement standards intended to define. An accuracy statement by itself has no meaning other than as an indicator of quality.18) Accuracy is a design specification and may be verified during calibration. Contrast with: accuracy (of a measurement) Application – Software installed on a defined platform/hardware providing specific functionality Assessment – Examination typically performed on-site of a testing or calibration laboratory to evaluate its conformance to conditions and criteria for accreditation. which is always the negative of the bias. or reproduce a unit of that quantity or one or more of its values.

or minor adjustment such as zero and span. calculation of correction factors or adjustment of the instrument being compared to reduce the magnitude of the inaccuracy. Calibration is performed according to a specified documented calibration procedure. to a measurement system or device of specified capability and known uncertainty in order to detect. report.appendix: calibration terminology a to z 1 its normal operating configuration – as the normal operator would use it. or the determination of one or more corrections. See also: performance test. fuses. The result of a calibration is a determination of the performance quality of the instrument with respect to the desired specifications. •  In some cases. may be included as part of the calibration. •  Calibration does not include any maintenance or repair actions except as just noted. or artifacts as needed to verify the performance. Calibration provides assurance that the instrument is capable of making measurements to its performance specification when it is correctly used. measurement standards. This may be in the form of a pass/fail decision. minor repair such as replacement of batteries. but of unverified accuracy. 184 . under a set of specified and controlled measurement conditions. The calibration process uses traceable external stimuli. if necessary. •  The calibration process may include. calibration procedure Contrast with: calibration (2) and repair Calibration – 2 A) Many manufacturers incorrectly use the term calibration to name the process of alignment or adjustment of an item that is either newly manufactured or is known to be out of tolerance. The calibration process consists of comparing an IM&TE unit with specified tolerances. Notes: •  A requirement for calibration does not imply that the item being calibrated can or should be adjusted. or lamps. and with a specified and controlled measurement system. determining or assigning one or more values. Many calibration procedures in manufacturers’ manuals are actually factory alignment procedures that only need to be performed if a UUC is in an indeterminate state because it is being manufactured. or minimize by adjustment any deviations from the tolerance limits or any other variation in the accuracy of the instrument being compared. or is otherwise in an indeterminate state.

or an industry-specific name. or any combination or variation of these. IM&TE instruction manuals may use calibration to describe tasks normally performed by the operator of a measurement system.appendix: calibration terminology a to z 1 is known to be out of tolerance. When calibration is used to refer to tasks like this. It provides a list of recommended calibration standards to use for the calibration. including subsidiary operations of a larger entity. (2) In a laboratory database program. which are repair activities and excluded from the metrological definition of calibration. It may be external or internal. The certificate identifies the item calibrated. the organization presenting the certificate. or tolerances for a model of measuring or testing equipment. It may be called a calibration laboratory. shop. if it is amended later a new certificate is created. and the effective date. A calibration certificate should provide other information to allow the user to judge the adequacy and quality of the calibration. Examples include performing a selftest as part of normal operation or performing a self-calibration (normalizing) a measurement system before use. See also: calibration report Calibration procedure – A calibration procedure is a controlled document that provides a validated method for evaluating and verifying the essential performance characteristics. Contrast with: calibration (1) See also: normalization. (B) In many cases. A laboratory database certificate is a record that cannot be changed. or after it is repaired. a certificate often refers to the permanent record of the final result of a calibration. calibration means the same as alignment or adjustment. Calibration certificate – (1) A calibration certificate is generally a document that states that a specific item was calibrated by an organization. A calibration procedure documents one method of verifying the actual performance of the item being calibrated against its performance specifications. When used this way. specifications. a means to record 185 . standardization Calibration activity or provider – A laboratory or facility – including personnel – that perform calibrations in an established location or at customer location(s). a metrology laboratory or department. or department. self-calibration. These and similar tasks are excluded from the metrological definition of calibration. the intent is that they are part of the normal work done by a trained user of the system.

placard. or measurement transfer standard that is designated as being used only to perform calibrations of other IM&TE items. 6. Calibration report – A calibration report is a document that provides details of the calibration of an item. 6. A calibration seal is usually imprinted with a legend similar to “Calibration Void if Broken or Removed” or “Calibration Seal – Do Not Break or Remove. The purpose of a calibration seal is to ensure the integrity of the calibration. A calibration procedure always starts with the assumption that the unit under test is in good working order and only needs to have its performance verified. they are more closely controlled and characterized than the workload items they are used for. and the actual measurement results and uncertainty. clearly indicates tampering. a calibration report includes details of the methods and standards used. and test and measuring equipment (IM&TE). and NCSL pages 36–38.14. standard reference material.9. or label that.) A calibration standard is an IM&TE item. artifact. and information sufficient to determine if the unit being calibrated is operating within the necessary performance specifications.appendix: calibration terminology a to z 1 quantitative performance data both before and after adjustments. In addition to the basic items of a calibration certificate. Designation as a 186 .13. and by virtue of its design and material.” A calibration seal provides a means of deterring the user from tampering with any adjustment point that can affect the calibration of an instrument and detecting an attempt to access controls that can affect the calibration of an instrument. A calibration program may also be called a measurement management system (ISO 10012:2003). the parameters checked.1 through 6. and the process of calibrating IM&TE used to determine conformance to requirements or used in supporting activities. Calibration program – A calibration program is a process of the quality management system that includes management of the use and control of calibrated inspection. Note: A calibration seal may also be referred to as a tamper seal. Calibration standard – (See VIM. As calibration standards are used to calibrate other IM&TE items. See also: calibration certificate Calibration seal – A calibration seal is a device. Note: A calibration procedure does not include any maintenance or repair actions. when removed or tampered with. and 6. Calibration standards generally have lower uncertainty and better resolution than general-purpose items.

s is the sample standard deviation. in a group of identical instruments. slopes. (GUM. The confidence interval is calculated from sample statistics. 187 . Note: The word qualification is sometimes used in the personal sense. x is the sample mean. Confidence interval – A range of values that is expected to contain the true value of the parameter being evaluated with a specified level of confidence. For a person. the demonstrated ability to apply knowledge and skills. the demonstrated ability to perform the tests or calibrations within the accreditation scope and to meet other criteria established by the accreditation body. Competence – For a laboratory. For example. 2. whose fitness for use is demonstrated by a broad spectrum of users. and so on. See also: standard (measurement) Combined standard uncertainty – The standard uncertainty of the result of a measurement. n is the number of items in the sample. the confidence interval is: p (1 – p) s CI = x ¯ ± t = –––   or   CI = p ±  ––––––––– n    n where CI is the confidence interval.3. Confidence intervals can be calculated for points. however. lines. standard deviations. Calibration standards are often called measurement standards. when that result is obtained from the values of a number of other quantities. one might be designated as a calibration standard while the others are all general purpose IM&TE items. weighted according to how the measurement result varies with changes in those quantities. and t  is the Student’s T value for α ⁄2 and (n – 1) (α is the level of significance). p is the proportion of items of a given type in the population.4) See also: expanded uncertainty Commercial of the shelf software – Software commercially available. It is equal to the positive square root of a sum of terms. For an infinite (or very large compared to the sample) population.appendix: calibration terminology a to z 1 calibration standard is based on the use of the specific instrument. since it is a synonym and has more accepted usage in the United States. The terms are the variances or covariances of these other quantities. not on any other consideration.

15) Any residual amount is treated as random error. random error. (B) A formal.12–3. Deficiency – Nonfulfillment of conditions and/or criteria for accreditation. and NCSL pages 11–13. error or systematic error. See also: bias. See also: bias. systematic error Gage R&R – Gage repeatability and reproducibility study. 3. sometimes referred to as a nonconformance. (VIM.14. It is usually given the value 2. random error. Equivalence – (A) Acceptance of the competence of other national metrology institutes (NMI). correction (of error). it is always an estimate.6) The coverage factor is identified by the symbol k. Departure value – A term used by a few calibration laboratories to refer to bias. The exact meaning can usually be determined from examination of the calibration certificate. An example is the value calculated to compensate for the calibration difference of a reference thermometer or for the calibrated offset voltage of a thermocouple reference junction. which approximately corresponds to a probability of 95 percent for degrees of freedom > 10’. error (or measurement error) is an estimate of the difference between the measured value and the probable true value of the object of the measurement. accreditation bodies. The correction value is equal to the negative of the bias. Systematic error (also known as bias) may be corrected. 3.) In metrology.3. Error may be systematic and/or random. Compare with: preventive action Coverage factor – A numerical factor used as a multiplier of the combined standard uncertainty in order to obtain an expanded uncertainty. 2. and/or accredited organizations in other countries as being essentially equal to the NMI. accreditation body. documented determination that a specific instrument or type of instrument is suitable for use in place of the one originally listed. The error can never be known exactly. Error (of measurement) – (See VIM. systematic error Corrective action – Corrective action is something done to correct a nonconformance when it arises. 3. and/or accredited organizations within the host country. (GUM. including actions taken to prevent reoccurrence of the nonconformance. for a particular application. which 188 . error.appendix: calibration terminology a to z 1 Correction (of error) – A correction is the value that is added to the raw result of a measurement to compensate for known or estimated systematic error or bias.10.

International Organization for Standardization (ISO) – An international nongovernmental organization chartered by the United Nations in 1947. or after a process. and diagnostic equipment). measurements. with headquarters in Geneva. Note: Organizations may refer to IM&TE items as MTE (measuring and testing equipment). during. and test equipment. and length of time are established to be statistically valid consistent with the size and level of activity of the organization. The mission of ISO is “to promote the development of standardization and 189 . and evaluation of tests or calibrations on the same or similar items or materials by two or more laboratories in accordance with predetermined conditions. IM&TE items are typically used in applications where the measurement results are used to determine conformance to technical or quality requirements before. The data captured are analyzed statistically to obtain best measurement capability. and so on) where a tolerance is not specified and the indication is not critical to safety. GUM – An acronym commonly used to identify the ISO Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. This term includes all items that fall under a calibration or measurement management program. The number of instruments. GPETE (general purpose electronic test equipment). U. personnel.appendix: calibration terminology a to z 1 (typically) employs numerous instruments. PMET (precision measuring equipment and tooling). measuring. so it is a first-party audit. In the United States. or SPETE (special purpose electronic test equipment). TMDE (test. and measurements over a period of time to capture quantitative observations. Internal audit – A systematic and documented process for obtaining audit evidence and evaluating it objectively to verify that a laboratory’s operations comply with the requirements of its quality system. Switzerland. personnel. Interlaboratory comparison – Organization. IM&TE – The acronym IM&TE refers to inspection. performance. An internal audit is done by or on behalf of the laboratory itself. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. measuring. the equivalent document is ANSI/NCSL Z540-2-1997. S. Some organizations do not include instruments used solely to check for the presence or absence of a condition (such as voltage. which is expressed as an uncertainty with a coverage factor of k = 2 to approximate 95 percent. PME (precision measuring equipment). pressure.

scientific. formal. 2. France. The SI system is popularly known as the metric system.) SI is international system of measurement for all physical quantities. Level of confidence – Defines an interval about the measurement result that encompasses a large fraction p of the probability distribution characterized by that result and its combined standard uncertainty. Measurement – A set of operations performed for the purpose of determining the value of a quantity. specification. programming.) The name also symbolizes the mission of the organization – to equalize standards worldwide. Management review – The planned. thermodynamic temperature. time. and maintenance. installation. ISO is not an acronym. which makes it possible for the application to function. and to developing cooperation in the spheres of intellectual. (The United States is represented by ANSI. (If the acronym was based on the full name were used. The members of ISO are the designated national standards bodies of each country.) SI units are defined and maintained by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) in Paris. IT Infrastructure – The hardware and software such as networking software and operation systems.appendix: calibration terminology a to z 1 related activities in the world with a view to facilitating the international exchange of goods and services. ISO – Iso is a Greek word root meaning equal. (Mass. the coverage level expressed as a percent. technological and economic activity. so it will be a constant in all languages. industry and commerce except electrical and electronic engineering. In this context.” The scope of ISO’s work covers all fields of business. The International Organization for Standardization chose the word as the short form of the name. periodic. electric current. it would be different in each language. and luminous intensity. testing.1) 190 . Effectively.) See also: ISO International System of Units (SI) – A defined and coherent system of units adopted and used by international treaties. Life cycle – All phases in the life of the system from initial requirements until retirement including design. length. and scheduled examination of the status and adequacy of the quality management system in relation to its quality policy and objectives by the organization’s top management. amount of substance. and p is the coverage probability or level of confidence of the interval. operation. (VIM. (The acronym SI is from the French Systéme International.

then the theoretical thermoelectric emf measured at the copper wires should be zero. conditions. NCSL has member organizations from academic. NCSL was formed in 1961 to “promote cooperative efforts for solving the common problems faced by measurement laboratories. home. or commerce. and the physical environment. the ratio of a circle’s circumference to its diameter (p). and other quantifiable factors that combine to determine the success of a measurement process. The measurement system includes at least the test and measuring instruments and devices. vehicle. associated materials and accessories. the procedures used. or the use of a virtual office. scientific. Any value other than zero is an offset created by inhomogeneity of the thermocouple wires combined 191 . Mobile operations – Operations that are independent of an established calibration laboratory facility. development.” Normalization. Mobile operations may include work from an office space. the personnel. the triple point of water (273. commercial and government facilities around the world.2). if the thermocouple alloy leads of a reference junction probe are formed into a measurement junction and placed in an ice point cell. Examples of natural physical constants important in metrology are the speed of light in a vacuum (c). whose membership is open to any organization with an interest in the science of measurement and its application in research. NCSL promotes technical and managerial excellence in the field of metrology. people. and the reference junction itself is also in the ice point. and test and measurement. Metrolog y – Metrology is the science and practice of measurement (VIM.16 K). the gravitational constant (G). Natural constants are used in the basic theoretical descriptions of the universe. 2. instrument calibration. Normalize – See: self-calibration Offset – Offset is the difference between a nominal value (for an artifact) or a target value (for a process) and the actual measured value. and the base of natural logarithms (e). NCSL is a nonprofit organization. Natural (physical) constant – A natural constant is a fundamental value that is accepted by the scientific community as valid. For example.appendix: calibration terminology a to z 1 Measurement system – A measurement system is the set of equipment. NCSL international – Formerly known as the National Conference of Standards Laboratories (NCSL). the quantum charge ratio (h/e). education. measurement standards. methods. industrial.

There may be more than one procedure for a given policy. A policy describes what management intends to have done regarding a given portion of business activity. Calibration: see calibration procedure. Precision is a measure of the repeatability of a measuring system – how much agreement there is within a group of repeated measurements of the same quantity under the same conditions. even though such an event has not yet happened. (NCSL. Policies can also be in the organization’s policy/procedure manual. See also: procedure Precision – Precision is a property of a measuring system or instrument. See also: calibration (1) Policy – A policy defines and sets out the basic objectives. error On-site operations – Operations that are based in or directly supported by an established calibration laboratory facility. but actually perform the calibration actions at customer locations. Preventive action helps improve the system. Contrast with: corrective action Procedure – A procedure describes a specific process for implementing all or a portion of a policy. while others may only have a few general guidelines. (VIM. This includes climate-controlled mobile laboratories. Some policies may be implemented by fairly detailed procedures. See also: policy Process owner – The person responsible for the business process. A performance test is the same as a calibration (1). Policy statements relevant to the quality management system are generally stated in the quality manual. The level of detail needed should correlate with the level of education and training of the people with the usual qualifications to do the work and the amount of judgment normally allowed to them by management. goals. 3. A performance test is done with the item in its normal operating configuration. A procedure has more detail than a policy but less detail than a work instruction. Performance Test – A performance test (or performance verification) is the activity of verifying the performance of an item of measuring and test equipment to provide assurance that the instrument is capable of making correct measurements when it is properly used. Compare with: bias. vision.appendix: calibration terminology a to z 1 with other uncertainties. or general management position on a specific topic. 192 . page 26) Precision is not the same as accuracy.5) Preventive action – Preventive action is something done to prevent the possible future occurrence of a nonconformance.

The need for repair may be indicated by the results of a calibration. Note: Contrary to popular belief. Repair includes adjustment or alignment of the item as well as component-level repair. In addition to its regular use by the organization. See also: error Compare with: systematic error Repair – Repair is the process of returning an unserviceable or nonconforming item to serviceable condition. but Type B methods are also used in some situations.13) Random error causes scatter in the results of a sequence of readings and. Random error – Random error is the result of a single measurement of a value. it does not usually contain any detailed policies and never contains any procedures. the GUM specifically does not replace random error with either Type A or Type B methods of evaluation. therefore. work instructions. minor repair is always followed by calibration of the item. Passing the calibration test indicates success of the repair. Quality manual – The quality manual is the document that describes the quality management policy of an organization with respect to a specified conformance standard.) The need for repair may be indicated by the results of a calibration. or has covers removed. Examples include replacement of batteries. repair is always followed by calibration of the item. 3. or lamps.appendix: calibration terminology a to z 1 Proficiency testing – Determination of laboratory testing performance by means of interlaboratory comparisons. Random error is usually evaluated by Type A methods. (VIM. minus the mean of a large number of measurements of the same value. For calibratable items. or proprietary information. auditors use the quality manual when they audit the quality management system. or is removed from its case and may be disassembled to some degree. For calibratable items. Therefore. Contrast with: calibration (1). Passing 193 . or minor cleaning of switch contacts. The quality manual briefly defines the general policies as they apply to the specified conformance standard and affirms the commitment of the organization’s top management to the policy. is a measure of dispersion. or repairing a broken wire. The instrument is opened. (Some minor adjustment such as zero and span may be included as part of the calibration. or replacing one or two in-stock components. fuses. The quality manual is generally provided to customers on request. repair (minor) Repair (minor) – Minor repair is the process of quickly and economically returning an unserviceable item to serviceable condition by doing simple work using parts that are in stock in the calibration lab.

The process may be required at intervals such as every power-on sequence. or calibrations and their best measurement. Minor repairs are defined as repairs that take no longer than a short time as defined by laboratory management. The accreditation body usually defines the format and other details. most reported values will be in one of these formats: •  Measurement result and uncertainty. the scope is a documented list of calibration or testing fields. Round robin – See: Interlaboratory Comparison Scope of accreditation – For an accredited calibration or testing laboratory. The specific type and format vary according to the type of measurement being made. specific measurements. uncertainty. The reported value is the difference between the nominal value and the mean of a number of repeat measurements. and where substantial disassembly of the instrument is not required. The value may be reported this way when it is known that the instrument is part of a measuring system and the systematic error will be used to calculate a correction that will apply to the measurement system results. The scope document is an attachment to the certificate of accreditation and the certificate is incomplete without it. with the associated measurement uncertainty. or once per shift. Self-calibration – Self-calibration is a process performed by a user for the purpose of making an IM&TE instrument or system ready for use. The uncertainty of the deviation is usually expanded uncertainty as defined in the GUM. Contrast with: calibration (1). •  Estimated systematic error and uncertainty. as recorded on a calibration report or certificate. The uncertainty is usually expanded uncertainty as defined in the GUM. Only the calibration or testing areas that the laboratory is accredited for are listed in the scope document.appendix: calibration terminology a to z 1 the calibration test indicates success of the repair. and where no parts have to be ordered from external suppliers. In general. or week of continuous operation. or if the ambient temperature changes by a specified 194 . day. and only the listed areas may be offered as accredited calibrations or tests. The reported value is usually the mean of a number of repeat measurements. parameters. •  Deviation from the nominal (or reference) value and uncertainty. repair Reported value – One or more numerical results of a calibration process.

Measurement standards are generally used in calibration laboratories. an étalon) is a system. if an instrument requires self-calibration before use. instrument. a specification is a documented statement of the expected performance capabilities of a large group of substantially identical measuring instruments. or international standard. given in terms of the relevant parameters and including the accuracy or uncertainty. The value and uncertainty of the standard define a limit to the measurements that can be made: a laboratory can never have better precision or accuracy than its standards. Once initiated. repair. Standard (document) – A standard (industry. Items with similar uses in a production shop are generally regarded as working-level instruments by the calibration program. or the methods for evaluation of any of these. Standard (measurement) – A standard (measurement standard. Customers use specifications to determine the suitability of a product for their own applications. the process may be performed totally by the instrument or may require user intervention and/or use of external calibrated artifacts. Self-calibration is not equivalent to periodic calibration (performance verification) because it is not performed using a calibration procedure and does not meet the metrological requirements for calibration.appendix: calibration terminology a to z 1 amount. Primary standard. then that will also be accomplished at the start of a calibration procedure. national. or scrapping. Selfcalibration may also be called normalization or standardization. Also. A product that performs outside the specification limits when tested (calibrated) is rejected for later adjustment. The usual purpose is accuracy enhancement by characterization of errors inherent in the measurement system before the item to be measured is connected. calibration standard. a national standard that describes the requirements for the quality management system of a calibration organization and the requirements for calibration and management of the measurement standards used by the organization. Compare with: calibration (2. government. laboratory standard.B) Contrast with: calibration (1) Specification – In metrology. device. An example is ANSI/NCSL Z540-11994. artifact. a norme) is a document that describes the processes and methods that must be performed in order to achieve a specific technical or management objective. reference standard. Accepted as having the highest metrological 195 . or material that is used as a defined basis for making quantitative measurements.

3. found in national and international metrology laboratories.2. a certificate or other documentation which is issued by NIST… Standard reference materials are…manufactured according to strict specifications and certified by NIST for one or more quantities of interest. SRMs represent one of the primary vehicles for disseminating measurement technology to industry. Working standard.appendix: calibration terminology a to z 1 qualities and whose value is accepted without reference to other standards of the same quantity. The highest accuracy level standards in a particular laboratory generally used only to calibrate working standards. (GUM. Examples: triple point of water cell and caesium beam frequency standard. Standard reference material – A standard reference material (SRM) as defined by NIST “is a material or artifact that has had one or more of its property values certified by a technically valid procedure. expressed as a standard deviation. Transfer standard. Note: Contrary to popular belief. The highest level standards. Secondary standard. A device used to transfer the value of a measurement quantity (including the associated uncertainty) from a higher level to a lower level standard. Systematic error is a measure of magnitude and may be corrected. Systematic error may be evaluated by Type A or Type B methods. Also called a reference standard. procedures. or traceable to. (3. 3. and is accompanied by. A standard that is used for routine calibration of IM&TE. according to the type of data available. (VIM. 2. See also: calibration standard Standard operating procedure (SOP) – A term used by some organizations to identify policies. note) See also: bias. Systematic error is also called bias when it applies to a measuring instrument. the GUM specifically does not replace systematic error with either Type A or Type B methods of evaluation. Systematic error – A systematic error is the mean of a large number of measurements of the same value minus the (probable) true value of the measured parameter.14) Systematic error causes the average of the readings to be offset from the true value. correction (of error) Compare with: random error 196 .1) Standardization – See: self-calibration. are the realizations or representations of SI units.” Standard uncertainty – The uncertainty of the result of a measurement. or work instructions. error.3.

If the accuracy tolerances are expressed as decibels. the test accuracy ratio (TAR) is the ratio of the accuracy tolerance of the unit under calibration to the accuracy tolerance of the calibration standard used.appendix: calibration terminology a to z 1 System owner – The person responsible for the availability. Note: The uncertainty of a measurement standard is not necessarily the same as its accuracy specification. or another ratio. page 2) TUR =  UUT_tolerance  STD_uncert The TUR must be calculated using identical parameters and units for the UUC and the calibration standard. Third Party – Parties Tolerance – A tolerance is a design feature that defines limits within which a quality characteristic is supposed to be on individual parts. the TAR is the ratio of the tolerance of the parameter being measured to the accuracy tolerance of the IM&TE. Note: TAR may also be referred to as the accuracy ratio or (incorrectly) the uncertainty ratio. and maintenance of a computerised system and for the security of the data residing on that system. they must be converted to absolute values of the basic measurement units. the test uncertainty ratio (TUR) is the ratio of the accuracy tolerance of the unit under calibration to the uncertainty of the calibration standard used. Compare with: specification. percentage. they must be converted to absolute values of the basic measurement units. (NCSL. Test uncertainty ratio – In a calibration procedure. page 2) TAR =  UUT_tolerance  STD_tolerance The TAR must be calculated using identical parameters and units for the UUC and the calibration standard. (NCSL. A tolerance is a property of the item being measured. Tolerances are applied during design and manufacturing. percentage. it represents the maximum allowable deviation from a specified value. uncertainty 197 . (2) In the normal use of IM&TE items. If the accuracy tolerances are expressed as decibels. Test accuracy ratio – (1) In a calibration procedure. or another ratio.

or from a secondary standard to a working standard in order to create or maintain measurement traceability. from a primary standard to a secondary standard. (VIM. through an unbroken chain of comparisons each having stated uncertainties. ratio type comparisons. 6. and singlevalue standard resistors. provided all of the conditions just listed are met. Evidence of traceability includes the calibration report (with values and uncertainty) of calibration standards. traceability – Traceability is a property of the result of a measurement. a calibrated IM&TE.appendix: calibration terminology a to z 1 Traceable. A calibration system operating under a program controls system only implies traceability. fundamental or physical natural constants that are reproducible and have defined values. (NCSL. 6. Only the result of a specific measurement can be said to be traceable. That number is merely a catalog number of the specific service provided by NIST to a customer so it can be identified on a purchase order. capacitors. providing the ability to relate the measurement result to stated references. pages 42–43) The stated references are normally the base or supplemental SI units as maintained by a national metrology institute. Transfer measurement – A transfer measurement is a type of method that enables making a measurement to a higher level of resolution than normally possible with the available equipment. or any other thing is not and be traceable to a national standard. but the report alone is not sufficient. The laboratory must also apply and use the data.10) Traceability is a demonstrated or implied property of the result of a measurement to be consistent with an accepted standard within specified limits of uncertainty. Examples of typical transfer standards are DC volt sources (standard cells or zener sources). a measurement system. A calibration laboratory. Reference to a NIST test number is specifically not evidence of traceability. a calibration report. or inductors.8) Typical applications of transfer standards are to transfer a measurement parameter from one organization to another. 198 . certified standard reference materials. or industry or other accepted consensus reference standards. Common transfer methods are differential measurements and ratio measurements. (VIM. Traceability provides the ability to demonstrate the accuracy of a measurement result in terms of the stated reference. Measurement assurance methods applied to a calibration system include demonstration of traceability. Transfer standard – A transfer standard is a measurement standard used as an intermediate device when comparing two other standards.

and/ or other applicable measurement criteria. See also: Type A evaluation. which are used in the text of the calibration procedure for convenience. range of measurement. UUC. methods.3. VIM – An acronym commonly used to identify the ISO International 199 .appendix: calibration terminology a to z 1 Type A evaluation (of uncertainty) – Type A evaluation of measurement uncertainty is the statistical analysis of actual measurement results to produce uncertainty values. the result is a value with a calculated uncertainty. categorized by type of measurement. with a specified level of confidence. Validation – Substantiation by examination and provision of objective evidence that verified processes. After an item that has a specified tolerance has been calibrated using an instrument with a known accuracy. 3. (GUM.5) Uncertainty can only be evaluated by Type A methods if the laboratory actually collects the data. Also may be called device under test (DUT) or equipment under test (EUT). Type B evaluation Uncertainty budget – The systematic description of known uncertainties relevant to specific measurements or types of measurements. Both random and systematic error may be evaluated by Type A methods.3. effects that contribute to the dispersion may be random or systematic. 3. and/or procedures are fit for their intended use. Total uncertainty may consist of components that are evaluated by the statistical probability distribution of experimental data or from assumed probability distributions based on other data. Verification – Confirmation by examination and provision of objective evidence that specified requirements have been fulfilled. Uncertainty is an estimate of dispersion. (GUM. Type B evaluation (of uncertainty) – Type B evaluation of measurement uncertainty includes any method except statistical analysis of actual measurement results. UUT – The unit under calibration or the unit under test – the instrument being calibrated. Uncertainty – Uncertainty is a property of a measurement result that defines the range of probable values of the measurand.3. These are standard generic labels for the IM&TE item that is being calibrated.3.3 through 3.2.3) Uncertainty is an estimate of the range of values that the true value of the measurement is within.5) Data for evaluation by Type B methods may come from any source believed to be valid.3 through 3. (GUM. 2. Both random and systematic error may be evaluated by Type B methods.

200 . Work instructions are used only where they are needed to ensure the quality of the product or service. The level of education and training of the people with the usual qualifications to do the work must be considered when writing a work instruction. a calibration procedure is a type of work instruction.appendix: calibration terminology a to z 1 Vocabulary of Basic and General Terms in Metrology. In a metrology laboratory. The Metrology Handbook. 2004. 1. (The acronym comes from the French title.) Work Instruction – In a quality management system.  Bucher. Jay L. a work instruction defines the detailed steps necessary to carry out a procedure. Milwaukee: ASQ Quality Press.

201 .

PORTABLE CALIBRATORS WORKSTATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CALIBRATION SOFTWARE 202 .

International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) and International Accreditation Forum Inc. such as automotive. training. validation. 203 . •  Beamex’s Accredited Calibration Laboratory is accredited and approved by FINAS (Finnish Accreditation Service).000 companies worldwide utilize Beamex’s calibration solutions. power and energy. More than 10. oil and gas. Why is Beamex better Accuracy assured Accuracy is assured when you decide to purchase a Beamex® calibrator. accessories. with global customer base and partner network. Help Desk and re-calibration services available. contractor engineering. metal and mining. i. system integration. database conversion. European co-operation for Accreditation (EA). aviation. pharmaceutical. manufacturing. •  Customers from wide range of industries. education. Industry pioneer with global presence A forerunner in developing high-quality calibration equipment and software. food and beverage. calibration software and professional services form an integrated. nuclear. Support Installation. (IAF). marine. ease-of-use and reliability. High customer satisfaction Constantly improving understanding of customer needs and developing solutions to meet them. accredited calibration certificate. They are all delivered with a traceable. versatility. •  Certified in accordance with the ISO 9001:2008 quality standard. automated system.about beamex About Beamex •  One of the world’s leading providers of calibration solutions. workstations. •  Develops and manufactures high-quality calibration equipment. professional services and industryspecific solutions. •  Comprehensive product range includes portable calibrators. •  Products and services available in more than 60 countries. •  For customers with requirements for accuracy. Integrated calibration solutions Beamex calibrators. petrochemical and chemical. workstations. systems and services for the calibration and maintenance of process instruments. FINAS is a member of all Multilateral Recognition Agreements / Mutual Recognition Arrangements (MLA/MRA) signed by European and other international organizations. and pulp and paper. efficiency. calibration software. software.e.

Master your semester with Scribd & The New York Times

Special offer for students: Only $4.99/month.

Master your semester with Scribd & The New York Times

Cancel anytime.