Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Presentation Outline
Introduction
Definition Selected fish kill events in the world
Control measures
Prevention and investigation Institutional measures Engineering measures
Mitigation of impact
Proposed monitoring and warning system
Conclusions
2
Definition(s)
Fish kill is defined as localized mass die off of fish that can occur in
mortality, is a localized die-off of fish populations which may also be associated with more generalised mortality of aquatic life.(Wikipedia)
A single fish kill event can number from several individuals to
Definition(s)
Standard definition suggested (La and Cooke, 2011):
An event is considered a fish kill : a) if the mortality event is not part of the fishes natural life cycle (e.g.,
mass mortality following spawning activity in semelparous fish);
(b) if a minimum of 25 dead fish are found in one square kilometre (lentic) or river kilometre (lotic) and within a 48-hr period, and
(c) if mortality was not caused by predation, including by humans (i.e., harvest)
Thus , a single fish kill event can number from 25 to millions of dead fish.
recreationally and commercially valuable fish Reducing source of fish protein available for humans. cleanup costs reduced tourism and recreation value Affects usage of body of water for domestic water supply Large fish kills also have a negative effect on regulation of food web dynamics and nutrient balance .
5
Objectives
To understand the causes of fish kills and why they occur in order to implement preventive measures to reduce their frequency and magnitude. Specifically:
Review fish kill events in the world Understand the different causes of fish kills
Propose a protocol for preventing and minimizing impact of fish kills in the
(Thronson and Quigg, 2008). For example, North Carolina reports approximately30 fish kill events per year since 1996 (NCDWQ, 200 ). New South Wales reports an average of 34 fish kills per year, (Koehn, 2004). Reports of fish kill came also from Kenya (Ochumba, 1990), Norway (Leivestad and Muniz, 1976), Brazil (Munoz et al., 1994), United Kingdom,, Ireland, Australia, China, etc.
7
were reported in Kansas, Missouri, Florida, and North Carolina, and a national summary for the United States between 1980 and 1989 (Lowe et al., 1991). Based on EPA data from 19771987, estimated 141 million fish die per year nationally because of fish kills (Pimentel et al., 1993) A review of all fish kill events that were summarized in both the peerreviewed literature and technical reports for North American estuaries and freshwaters from 18902006 (excluding the summaries produced by Kansas, Missouri, Florida, and North Carolina to avoid regional bias) identified 170 fish kill events. (see Table 1
8
10
Fig. 1a. - Trend in number of fish kills reported in the newspapers worldwide
11
1986 2 3 Rhine River, Europe Texas coast, USA White River; West Fork, Indiana, USA River Dee (United Kingdom) Neuse River, North Carolina, USA 1986 01 19971998
1999
4,800,000 100,000[38 ]
2002 07
2004 09
1,900,000 menhaden
10,000 carp
Unknown[41][42]
12
dead crabs, starfish, lobsters, sponges and anemones. Probably killed by hypothermia.
Part of the Zijin mining disaster
2010 07
10
Mississippi River; Plaquemines 2010 09 Parish, Louisiana, USA Jiaxing Xiuzhou District People's Republic of China Redondo Beach, California, USA Nordreisa, Troms, Norway Guangxi, People's Republic of China 2011 01 06
BP oil discharge, High T & low tide Only fish caught from a river under China National Highway 320 east died.
11
12
13 14
[53][54]
13
Event/Location
Laguna de Bay, Looc Laguna de Bay, Central Bay
Date
1972, May
Count
20 000
Species
Milkfish
Cause/Remarks
Algal bloom of microcystis
16
90% of stocks killed in Milkfish several fishpens 996 ha of fishpens affected, 5,000,000 50 metric tons 750 metric tons 500 metric tons >10 metric tons, Not counted
17
Laguna de Bay, Central Bay Taal Lake, Luzon, Philippines Taal Lake, Batangas, Philippines Lingayen Gulf, Anda, Pangasinan, Philippines Laguna de Bay-Jala-jala, Calamba, Sta. Cruz, Pakil
Milkfish
18
19 20 21
2008 01 05
2011 05 29 2011 05 30 2012, MayJune
May be linked to volcanic activity and large fish farms Tilapia, milkfi Caused by oxygen depletion and sh overstocking Oxygen depletion and change of Milkfish water climate DO depletion ; Unexplained dead fish Tilapia, carp in open waters showed bruises and cuts
Tilapia
14
Fig. 1b. Massive fish kill at Lake Elmer in Kingfisher Oklahoma, USA
15
Talisay: More than 800 tons of fish have died and rotted on fish farms in a lake near Taal volcano south
Fig. 1c. Massive fish kill in Plaquemines Parish, West Missippi river, Louisiana USA. Sept. 2010
16
Fig. 1d. Close up of fish kill in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana due to low tide and high temperatures. BP oil discharge was also blamed.
17
Fig. 1e. Fish kill in West Pearl river, in New Orleans, LA. August 17, 2011. Caused by black liquor discharge from a paper plant.
18
Fig. 1f. Fish Kill in Dubuque, Iowa, linked to Dairy Farm Runoff. USA
19
Fig. 1g. Massive California fish kill. Estimated 1 Million Sardine Carcasses /March 15th, 2011. Caused by depleted dissolved oxygen level.
20
Fig. 1h. Large quantities of dead fish floats on Guanqiao Lake in Wuhan, Central China's Hubei Province . July 11, 2007.
21
Fig. 1i. More than 800 tons of farmed fish in the northern Philippines died suddenly after the water temperature rose. May, 2011
22
Fig. 1j. Thousands of milk fish float in a cage after a massive fish kill at Taal Lake, Batangas.
23
Fig. 1k. Talisay: More than 800 tons of fish have died and rotted on fish farms in Taal lake , Batangas. May-June 2011
24
activities, while only 10.1% were caused by natural events and 23% were undetermined. (NCDWQ,2000; Thronson and Quigg, 2008).
Table 2 shows the distribution of fish kill causes as follows: agricultural pollution (19.5%), biotoxins (17.2%), and chemical pollution (7.1%). Minor causes were extreme changes in temperatures (5.9%), low dissolved oxygen (5.3%), gas bubble trauma (3.6%), disease (3.6%), exhaustion (2.4%), and acidification (1.2%), and undetermined (23%).
25
Biotoxin - Toxic algal and dinoflagellate blooms that are caused by Karena brevis, Pfiestera, etc. Industrial pollution -Pollution arising from various resource extraction, processing, and
manufacturing activities (e.g., mining, food and kindred products, chemicals, metals, petroleum, and paper products)
Extreme temperature changes - Rapid changes in temperature (e.g., cold shock) Low dissolved oxygen (hypoxia or anoxia)- Low levels of oxygen in the water,
usually associated with urban runoff, algal bloom, decay of organic material (i.e., biological oxygen demand), rainfall events, etc.
5.9% 5.3%
Disease - Various bacteria, parasites, fungus, and viruses Gas bubble trauma - Gas-supersaturation downstream from dams or other infrastructure or
natural barriers
Exhaustion -Physical exhaustion of fish typically leading to cardiac collapse (e.g., during
challenging migration)
Municipal pollution - from refuse disposal, water system, swimming pools, power, and sewage
systems
Transportation pollution- Pollution that pertains to rail, trucks, barge or boats, and pipeline
ruptures
Unknown/undetermined -
26 23%
27
Hypoxia, or oxygen depletion, is a phenomenon that occurs in aquatic environments as dissolved oxygen (DO)
level is reduced to a point where it becomes detrimental to living aquatic organisms. DO is typically expressed as % of O2 or mg/L dissolved at prevailing temp. and salinity (Tables 2a &2b). States of hypoxia in an aquatic environment is shown in Table 2c.
28
0 5 10 15 20 25
30 35 40 45
7.6 7 6.5 6
0 5 10 15 20 25
30 35 40 45
Boundary between anoxic & hypoxic zones 0.07 to 1.98 (2.26 freshwater) 5.28 (6.64 freshwater) Most fish cannot live below 30% 5 mg/L is the water quality criteria for DO
Hypoxic or dysoxic
Healthy or oxic
31
aquatic algae. It can occur in both fresh water and marine environments. Algal blooms are often green, but can also be yellow-brown or red, depending on the species of algae. One common algal bloom is caused by the blue green algae, microcystis sp., a cyanobacteria which may resemble a green blanket covering a body of water during summer especially when the water is calm. (see Figures )
32
Fig. 2a. Algal bloom -The thick green waters of Lake Chaohu, China
33
photosynthesizing algae.
At nightime, DO is reduced by the aerobic respiration of
35
Fig. 2c Aerobic respiration (red arrows) during which both plants and animals utilize oxygen to metabolize organic compounds that were created through photosynthesis (green arrow).
36
anaerobic bacteria producing obnoxious products such as NH3 and H2S sulfide which are both highly toxic to fish (see Box #1).
Under these conditions, no fish or any other benthic organisms can
live.
And if these bottom waters with zero DO and containing toxic NH3
and H2S are brought up by turnover or any mixing process, then fish kill will surely occur.(see Fig. 2a)
37
38
Figure 2d. A simplified model of a summer fish kill mechanism. Critical levels indicate high fish kill risk. (After Barica 1973, 1975 b)
39
Fig. 2e. Key Indicators before and after algal collapse: Secchi disc transparency is only 0.20.4 m at bloom phase DO high during bloom phase and falls abruptly during the algal collapse and decay chlorophyll a values of 100200 ug/1 (algal bloom phase) Ammonia at near-zero level starts to increase and reaches maximum after DO drops to zero. pH follows DO, high during bloom phase and low during algal decay.
40
loss of equilibrium, Hyper-excitability, increased breathing, decrease in nitrogen excretion, not to mention death. At lower concentrations: reduced hatch and reduced growth rates.
Percentage of toxic un-ionized NH3 vs. NH4+ ion increases with Temp but decreases with pH. At pH 8.5, - %NH3 is 15.3 at 25oC. and 20.3 at 3ooC At 3ooC , - %NH3 is 7 at pH 8.0 and 2.48 at pH 7.46 However, toxicity of NH3 increases with decreasing pH. (see Table 2e)
41
Table 2e. Lethal ammonia concentrations for salmon at 86 degrees 30oC (by pH, and duration of exposure) (EPA, 1985). pH Duration Lethal* Ammonia Concentration (mg/l) Total NH3 Un-ionized NH 3
14.3 0.73
11.6 0.74 7.3 0.74 3.5 0.47 1.3 0.17
6.5
1-hr 4-hr
1-hr 4-hr 1-hr 4-hr 1-hr 4-hr 1-hr 4-hr
0.036 0.002
0.093 0.006 0.181 0.019 0.27 0.035 0.26 0.035
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
*LC50 levels at which half of the exposed individuals die. U.S. EPA recommends that these levels should not be exceeded more than once in three years.
42
Yellow perch
Fathead minnow Brown trout
Perca flavescens
Pimephales promelas Salmo trutta Stizostedion vitreum
35.6
57.3 7.00
43.4
93.2 -
Walleye
42.0
21.7
How does turnover cause fish kill? How does heavy rain cause fish kill?
Lake is stratified with high DO in upper layer (epilimnion) and low DO at the lower layer (hypolimnion)
During turnover the heavy cold rainwater sinks causing a mixing of the two layers
44
45
48
Saxitoxin
Mammals, human
Cyanotoxins
cyanobacteria (also known as blue-green algae) Microsystis, Anabaena, Planktothrix (Oscillatoria), Nostoc, etc.
51
52
Sources include: agricultural runoffs carrying pesticides, fertilizers, etc. industrial wastes containing toxic chemicals and hazardous wastes such as toxic heavy metals, acidic process waters, etc., hazardous spills such as petroleum products, Sewage surface runoff containing high organic load
53
substance causes direct toxicity or a shift in water temperature or pH that can lead to fish kill. Some notable fish kills in Louisiana in the 1950s were due to a specific pesticide called endrin.[ in 1997 a phosphate plant in Mulberry, Florida, accidentally dumped 60 M gallons of acidic process water into a creek, reducing the pH to less than 4, resulting in the death of about 1.3 million fish.[7] About a million of fish died after an accidental spill of bourbon whiskey into the Kentucky River. However, officials could not determine whether the fish kill was due to the bourbon directly or to oxygen depletion that resulted when aquatic microbes rapidly 54 began to consume and digest the liquor.[7]
by an automotive parts maker which had discharged 10,000 gallons of the chemical HMP 2000 into the river. In Jan. 2012, about 40,000 kg of fish died in Guangxi, People's Republic of China caused by cadmium spill in a river. Cyanide is a particular toxic compound that has been used to poach fish. In cyanide poisoning the gills turn a distinctive cherry red. Chlorine introduced as alkaline hypochlorite solution is also extremely toxic leaving pale mucilaginous gills and an overproduction of mucilage across the whole body.
55
Causes of fish kill (Contd) 4. Climate change: drought & temperature change
Fish kills can also result from a dramatic or prolonged drop in air (and water) temperature.
This kind of fish kill is selective usually the dead fish are species that cannot tolerate cold. Tilapia are unable to survive in temperate climates because
they require warm water. Most species of tilapia will die at a range of 52 to 62 F (11 to 17 C).
56
low oxygen as a result of high temperatures.[23] In September, 2010, a massive (millions) fish kill at the mouth of the Mississippi River in Louisiana, was attributed to a combination of high temperatures and low tide. BP oil discharge was also blamed.
57
Fig. 2d. Massive fish kill in Plaquemines Parish, West Missippi river, Louisiana, Sept. 2010 due to low tide and high temperatures.
58
A drought can lead to lower water volumes to the extent that the
Low river flows also reduce the available dilution for permitted
Underwater explosions can lead to fish kill, and fish with swim
bladders are more susceptible. Sometimes underwater explosions are used on purpose to induce fish kills, a generally illegal practice known as blast fishing. Underwater explosions may be accidental or planned, such as for construction, seismic testing, mining or blast testing of structures under water. Volcanic emissions resulting in the release of H2S which is very toxic to fish.
60
anthropogenically which comprised about 80% of all causes. Foremost among this is anoxia caused by several factors such algal bloom, dumping of high BOD wastes like sewage, garbage, oil, etc.
61
chemical treatment using herbicide/algaecide, to maintain SD transparency above 60 cm. Do not kill all the algae but treat 1/3 of your pond/farm at a time and avoid treatment on extremely hot sunny days. Treat early before the onset of calm summer days before April. Do not overstock fish. Avoid over feeding. Use feeding trays to minimize unused feeds from falling down to the bottom.
62
BOD load into your immediate surroundings. Check BOD load of sediment under the fishpen area and make sure it does not exceed the WQ criteria. Monitor key WQ parameters such as DO, SD, pH, T, NH3 , Chla. Check DO level daily at the break of dawn during summer or when nearing harvest time. Install an emergency aeration system either subsurface or surface aerators to maintain DO level above 4 mg/L.
63
65
globally accepted standard protocol. Many countries in the developed world have specific provisions in place to encourage the public to report fish kills[30] so that a proper investigation can take place. Investigation of the cause of a kill requires a multi-disciplinary approach including:
a) on-site environmental measurements, b) investigation of inputs, c) review of meteorology and past history, d) toxicology, e) fish autopsy, f) invertebrate analysis and g) a robust knowledge of the area and its problems.
66
protocol by the Commonwealth of Australia (2007). It sets a standard minimum requirements for each stage of management of a fish kill incident and includes: a) useful flowcharts, b) information on sampling methods, c) the roles and responsibilities of officers assigned to fish kills investigation, and d) resources for investigating officers. Some states in the USA have their own protocols for fish investigations, but these are localized in approach and difficult to adopt by less developed countries. In view of this, La and Cooke (2011) proposed a framework for a more scientific and systematic approach to fish kill investigation, determining the proximate and ultimate causes and promulgating action plan for its prevention and impact mitigation that can be adopted worldwide (Table 3a).
67
Table 3a. Framework for fish kill investigation (adopted from Meyer and Barclay, 1990)
Generalized Investigation Steps 1. Fish kill reported/ suspected 2. Investigator designated Current Status and Challenges Opportunities for Improvement
Create training programs for two sets of investigators (1) First responder: general knowledge of fish kills and ability to take samples (2) Specialist: specialized in fish kill research and has knowledge of all assessment methods and investigative tools Few visits per kill; often delayed or Require more site-visits per kill non-existent immediately after fish kill is Implement long-term monitoring reported/suspected programs Create standard protocol No standard protocol
68
by fax, mail, or telephone by public Can be tedious and timeconsuming Time lag between fish kill notification and scientific investigation Often regional biologist with little expertise on fish kill investigation
Reporting by web-based submission or phone call using fish kill hotlines Reduce time lag between fish kill notification and scientific investigation
5 Fish kill count to evaluate resource damage and monetary value assessment
69
8 Prepare a report
Some monitoring; most do not have fish kill management plans Reactive approach to fish kills rather than attempting to predict and prevent events
Implement annual reporting on regional/national/global levels on fish kills Publish case studies in peerreviewed outlets Implement long-term monitoring programs Identify potential causes and structure management action in response to those causes Adopt a proactive approach to fish kill prevention
70
should strive to formulate a national protocol for investigation and prevention of fish kills.
The national agencies and instrumentalities involved in the
management of our aquatic and marine resources such as the PCAMRD, BFAR, DENR, LLDA, etc. should collaborate for the formulation of the national protocol.
In the mean time, I would venture to propose a fish kill
71
Framework Plan for the Control and Impact Mitigation of Fish Kill in Laguna de Bay
This plan consists of two phases:
Phase 1. Review and Cause Analysis of Fish Kills in Laguna de Bay and Other Places
Based on this review, the causal factors will be identified, classified, and their specific effects will be ascertained based on observation and scientific findings. For quantifiable factors the critical level of toxicity to fish and other impacts will be determined from published data.
Table 1 shows the different factors to be considered.
72
Framework Plan for the Control and Impact Mitigation of Fish Kill in Laguna de Bay
Phase 1: Table 1 - Data and information to be collected 1. Spatial data and stocking density Location of fish kill Density of fish pens in the lake (% of surface area, by location i.e. East, West, or South Bay) Stocking rate (number of fingerlings per square meter) Feeding practice (method, frequency and quantity per stocking load) Water depth in the affected area Proximity to anthropogenic sources of toxic pollutants (nearby factories, industrial establishments, agricultural runoffs, sewage & garbage disposal, etc.) 2. Temporal data What season of year fish kill occurred Which months fish kill more prevalent Duration of fish kill 3. Fish health data Occurrence of fish diseases Presence of parasites Other threats to fish health such as toxins, knifefish attacks, etc.
73
Framework Plan for the Control and Impact Mitigation of Fish Kill in Laguna de Bay
Framework Plan for the Control and Impact Mitigation of Fish Kill in Laguna de Bay
Phase 2: Development of a monitoring and warning system for preventing fish kill
Based on the results of Phase 1, a model monitoring and warning system that could prevent or signal an impending fish kill will be developed, tested and deployed in strategic places. Pending the results of Phase 1 study, the conceptual framework for this monitoring system is envisioned to have four components: a) a set of policy and regulatory measures and guideline on fishpen zoning, stocking density, feeding rate and frequency; b) monitoring of key water quality parameters such as pH, Temperature, DO, BOD/COD, Total Ammonia, Secchi disc reading, and Chlorophyll a or algal growth, c) Fish health management measures, and d) stakeholders and communication network.
A set of critical values for key water quality parameters will be formulated to serve as warning or alert levels to institute remedial measures before a critical condition for fish kill is reached. Table 2 shows the conceptual framework for the monitoring and warning system.
75
Phase 2: Table 2 Conceptual Framework for the Monitoring and Warning System for Fishkill Prevention
Factors Guideline
1. Policy and regulatory measures to be imposed and monitored Fish pen zoning - based on physiographic and hydrological data Total fishpen area based on carrying capacity data Stocking density must not exceed the optimum or maximum prescribed by BFAR Where to locate, density of fishpens What is total fishpen area to be allowed in the Lake? Maximum number per cubic meter Feeding method, frequency rate, quality and quantity of feed per fingerling,
Feeding practice method, frequency, quality and quantity of feeds, 2 Fish health management measures Fish disease prevention and detection Parasites control Fish farm sanitation practice Aerators
How to detect and prevent fish diseases How to control parasites Proper sanitation practices Need for aerators
76
3. Monitoring of key water quality parameters to detect critical levels* pH Temperature Dissolved Oxygen BOD/COD Total Ammonia Secchi disc transparency (Turbidity) Chlorophyll a or algal growth 6.5 -8.5 Ambient 3oC >5.0 mg/L < 10/20 mg/L 0.17- 0.73 mg/L (pH & T dependent) 20 -40 cm (Class C criteria=100 cm) < 100 g/l (as chlorophyll a) , How to prevent algal bloom
4. Stakeholders and communication network Involvement of stakeholders - (LLDA, LGUs, Fishpen owners, fishermen, etc.) Mass education of the people on the scientific aspect and risk involved Communication network to enhance exchange of information among stakeholders involved
Led by LLDA or a management group Proper education of the people especially fishermen and fishpen operators Set up an early warning system based on modern communication facilities.
77
CONCLUSIONS
Review of fish kills events revealed a widespread and worldwide occurrence
of this phenomenon in both freshwater and marine environments. A survey of fish kill reports in 350 major newspapers representing the major continents except South America shows an exponential increase from less than 50 fish kill events per year in the 1970s to about 900 events per year in the 1990s before leveling off beyond year 200. Determination of the causes of fish kills shows that majority (about 70%) are due to anthropogenic activities with only 10.1 % due to natural events, while 23% were unknown or undetermined. Agricultural pollution topped the list of anthropogenic causes with 19.5% followed by biotoxins from harmful algal blooms with 17.2% and the rest with contributions below 10 %. Extreme temperature changes, either too hot or too cold, is the top natural cause of fishkill.
78
CONCLUSIONS (Contd)
The common ultimate cause of fish kill reported is low DO (hypoxia or
anoxia) which is associated with urban runoff, algal bloom, decay of organic material, rainfall events, drought and prolonged high temperature, etc. The common control or preventive measures for fish kill are algal bloom prevention, prevention of runoffs with high BOD load, no overstocking, no overfeeding, detection and treatment of fish diseases and parasites, and installation of emergency aeration systems. The need for the formulation of a national protocol for investigation and prevention of fish kills is suggested. A framework plan for the development of a monitoring and warning system for the prevention of fish kills in Laguna de Bay is proposed.
79
SALAMAT PO
80