Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
3.
a) 4. a) c)
d) Aboul Fotouh
e) Moussa
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
Morsi Shafiq
Sabbahi Aboul Fotouh Moussa
+ +
+ +
+/
+/
+/
+
+/
+/
+/
How to read the chart: Governorates with higher illiteracy rates were more likely to vote for Morsi. Governorates with higher HDI or female education were less likely to vote for Morsi.
Key:
Positive Correlation
+/
No Correlation
Negative Correlation
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
Overview of Analysis
Methodology
1. Pulled candidate's vote results and demographic variable (from CAPMAS) on a governorate-level basis 2. Ran statistical analysis to generate the correlation coefficient (called "R" in statistics) 3. Ran another analysis to generate the coefficient of determination ("R2) 4. Based on common statistics classifications, determined whether the correlation between the votes and that specific candidate: none, low, medium or high
Discussion
The Correlation Coefficient (r) measures the strength and the direction of a linear relationship between two variables Additionally, the coefficient of determination (r squared) which gives the proportion of variance in candidate votes that is predicted by a demographic characteristic - was also looked at to validate the conclusions Correlation strength is based on use for social sciences. Scientists measuring physical laws/properties may require at least an r of 0.9 to determine any type of correlation; however, social sciences have more leeway given that there are many more complicating factors to be accounted for. It is important to always remember that correlation does not imply causation (i.e. does not automatically imply that the demographic variable is the cause for vote results) however, it is a necessary step in determining causation and indicates that there may be benefit from further investigation (i.e. it is a hint that a demographic variable causes people to vote for a certain candidate)
Correlation Coefficient
Negative Positive 0.09 to 0.0 0.0 to 0.09 0.3 to 0.1 0.1 to 0.3 0.5 to 0.3 0.3 to 0.5 1.0 to 0.5 0.5 to 1.0
20%
15% 10% 5% 0%
R = -0.71 R2 = 0.50
R = -0.46 R2 = 0.50
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
Summary of Key Findings Sabbahi seems to have taken many of the votes that would have gone to Moussa based on the fact that they share the exact same profile with regards to demographic characteristics. It appears the Islamist push was a large reason that the referendum went through given that both Morsi and Aboul Fotouh correlate with a high percent voting yes in referendum. Additionally, apparently the military effect on that result was not as high given no Shafiq vote correlation. Sabbahi has a very specific voter base it seems literate, urban, educated and prorevolution (the last one based on his negative correlation with referendum yes votes). Additionally, he seems to have garnered the sympathies of the unemployed. Shafiq on the other hand appears to have a broad base with regards to demographic variables several demographic variables showing no correlation with his vote percentage (additionally, only rurality was strongly correlated) It appears that the get out the vote campaigns of Shafiq and Morsi worked as they are the only two candidates to positively correlate with rurality, (both strongly correlated) whereas all other candidates showed negative correlation with rurality.
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
The demographic statistics are based on reporting by CAPMAS, some of which may not be the most accurate (for example, male unemployment ranges between 4%-14% which is unlikely to be very accurate and may explain the lack of any strong correlations) The CAPMAS data is only available on a per governorate basis however, governorates are relatively large and do not exhibit uniform demographics across the whole governorate Given that demographic data is only available on a governorate basis, the vote tallies are also based on governorate level however, districts within the same governorate often exhibit disparate voting (i.e one district in Cairo may have voted for Shafiq in the majority with another district voting for Morsi) A more refined analysis with more granular data would likely produce even stronger correlations than witnessed on that done based on governorate level For Sabbahi, I have excluded Kafr El Sheikh from the correlation analysis as he was MP that explains his high performance there, the demographic characteristics of the governorate are unlikely to have had a large impact (and, given that assumption, they would skew the rest of the data)
@melhoshy www.ducoht.org
1. 2.
3.
a) 4. a) c)
d) Aboul Fotouh
e) Moussa
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
45%
40%
R = 0.4013
10%
5%
0%
10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
R = 0.0618 40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
R = 0.1964 45%
40%
35% 30%
25%
20% 15%
10%
5% 0%
60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95%
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
1. 2.
3.
a) 4. a) c)
d) Aboul Fotouh
e) Moussa
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
60%
R = 0.1322
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
R = 0.0017
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
R = 0.0061 50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100%
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
60%
R = 0.0583
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.7 0.71 0.72 0.73 0.74 0.75 0.76 0.77 0.78 0.79 0.8
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
60%
R = 0.0048
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95%
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
1. 2.
3.
a) 4. a) c)
d) Aboul Fotouh
e) Moussa
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
40%
35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
Rural Percent
45% R = 0.4839
40%
35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
Overall Unemployment
45% R = 0.054
40%
35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20%
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
40%
R = 0.0042 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
45% R = 0.3828
40%
10%
5%
0%
70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100%
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
45% R = 0.4328
40%
10%
5%
0%
0.65 0.67 0.69 0.71 0.73 0.75 0.77 0.79 0.81 0.83 0.85
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
1. 2.
3.
a) 4. a) c)
d) Aboul Fotouh
e) Moussa
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
1. 2.
3.
a) 4. a) c)
d) Aboul Fotouh
e) Moussa
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
R = 0.4027
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
25%
20%
R = 0.1641
15%
10%
5%
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
R = 0.329
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0% 0.65 0.67 0.69 0.71 0.73 0.75 0.77 0.79 0.81 0.83 0.85
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org
R = 0.0503
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
@melhoshy
www.ducoht.org