How to Read Foucault's Discipline and Punish
By Anne Schwan and Stephen Shapiro
5/5
()
About this ebook
Undergraduates across a wide range of disciplines are expected to have a solid understanding of Foucault's key terms, which have become commonplace in critical thinking today. While there are many texts that survey Foucault's thought, these are often more general overviews or biographical précis that give little in the way of robust explanation and discussion.
In contrast, Schwan and Shapiro take a plain-speaking, yet detailed, approach, specifically designed to give students a thorough understanding of one of the most influential texts in contemporary cultural theory.
Anne Schwan
Anne Schwan is Associate Professor in English Literature at Edinburgh Napier University. She is a member of the Royal Society of Edinburgh's Young Academy of Scotland and a Fellow of RSA. She is the co-author of How to Read Foucault's Discipline and Punishment (Pluto, 2011).
Related to How to Read Foucault's Discipline and Punish
Related ebooks
Speaking the Truth about Oneself: Lectures at Victoria University, Toronto, 1982 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMarxism and Form: 20th-Century Dialectical Theories of Literature Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Madness, Language, Literature Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSartre, Foucault, and Historical Reason, Volume Two: A Poststructuralist Mapping of History Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Chomsky-Foucault Debate: On Human Nature Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Government of Life: Foucault, Biopolitics, and Neoliberalism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLives on the Left: A Group Portrait Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Abnormal: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1974-1975 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5About the Beginning of the Hermeneutics of the Self: Lectures at Dartmouth College, 1980 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Biopower: Foucault and Beyond Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Wrong-Doing, Truth-Telling: The Function of Avowal in Justice Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Discourse and Truth and Parresia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMichel Foucault's Archaeology of Western Culture: Toward a New Science of History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHuman Nature: Justice Versus Power: The Chomsky-Foucault Debate Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFoucault's Critical Ethics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDialectic of Enlightenment Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Genealogy as Critique: Foucault and the Problems of Modernity Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Between Genealogy and Epistemology: Psychology, Politics, and Knowledge in the Thought of Michel Foucault Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSenses of the Subject Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Michel Foucault and the Politics of Freedom Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Durkheim: A Critical Introduction Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Simone de Beauvoir, Philosophy, and Feminism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5On Ideology Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Slavoj Zizek: A Critical Introduction Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Sartre, Foucault, and Historical Reason, Volume One: Toward an Existentialist Theory of History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unravelling Gramsci: Hegemony and Passive Revolution in the Global Political Economy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSocial Structure & Person Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Jacques Lacan: A Critical Introduction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Deleuzian Concepts: Philosophy, Colonization, Politics Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Social Science For You
Come As You Are: Revised and Updated: The Surprising New Science That Will Transform Your Sex Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Men Explain Things to Me Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dumbing Us Down - 25th Anniversary Edition: The Hidden Curriculum of Compulsory Schooling Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Sun Does Shine: How I Found Life and Freedom on Death Row (Oprah's Book Club Selection) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5All About Love: New Visions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A People's History of the United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Witty Banter: Be Clever, Quick, & Magnetic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Like Switch: An Ex-FBI Agent's Guide to Influencing, Attracting, and Winning People Over Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Fourth Turning Is Here: What the Seasons of History Tell Us about How and When This Crisis Will End Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Just Mercy: a story of justice and redemption Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Denial of Death Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Close Encounters with Addiction Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Freedom Is a Constant Struggle: Ferguson, Palestine, and the Foundations of a Movement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Prisoners of Geography: Ten Maps That Explain Everything About the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Song of the Cell: An Exploration of Medicine and the New Human Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I Don't Want to Talk About It: Overcoming the Secret Legacy of Male Depression Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5King, Warrior, Magician, Lover: Rediscovering the Archetypes of the Mature Masculine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5You're Not Listening: What You're Missing and Why It Matters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Human Condition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Reset: And the War for the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for How to Read Foucault's Discipline and Punish
1 rating0 reviews
Book preview
How to Read Foucault's Discipline and Punish - Anne Schwan
Part One: Torture
The first section of the first part of Discipline and Punish acts as an overview of the book’s argument. Here Foucault outlines his main themes and makes some, perhaps overly, brief comments on the assumptions driving his method of interpreting historical evidence. On first reading, this is one of the book’s most dense and at times elusive sections. Consequently, it is helpful to re-read it after having read through to the end of Discipline and Punish so that you can begin to notice the moves that Foucault makes and positions he takes very early on in the book.
As we will see, Foucault divides his history of prisons into three historical phases, some of which overlap with one another, causing him sometimes to repeat points in different sections. In general, though, each of the book’s first three parts is devoted to a particular period, with Part Four as his critical overview and summary. In the second section of Part One, Foucault details the first of these three phases, what we might call the Age of Terror.
1. The body of the condemned
Discipline and Punish begins by contrasting two visions of criminal punishment: the 1757 public execution of Robert-François Damiens (1715–1757) for an attempted assassination of the French King Louis XV and the 1838 daily schedule for prisoners’ activities proposed by the journalist, and later centre-right French minister for the Interior, Léon Faucher (1803–1854).
Foucault starts with contemporaneous newspaper accounts of Damiens’ gruesome death. After Damiens was publicly branded with red-hot irons, flesh torn away and body drawn and quartered, as horses ripped the limbs away from his torso, he was finally burnt alive. Against this horrifying, excessive carnival of an individual’s suffering, Faucher’s calmly regulated plan for the prisoners’ day appears to handle criminals in a more dignified and reasonable way, one that carefully avoids chaotic scenes and screams of human pain.
Foucault chooses to contrast the ‘public execution and a time-table’ (7) as the two overarching markers in his study about changes within the history of punishment. He acknowledges that these two moments are not exactly comparable as items of representative evidence, since they deal with different kinds of crime, the attempted murder of a king, on one hand, and most likely small thefts or disorderly conduct, on the other. Yet the examples of a king’s would-be murderer and plans for anonymous men imprisoned for minor crimes neatly captures three larger themes that Foucault highlights throughout Discipline and Punish, involving the links among subjectivity, knowledge and power. Foucault argues that during the eighty years separating these scenes ‘the entire economy of punishment was redistributed’ (7). In the interval between these two events, a wave of prison reform swept across the West as these societies lost their tolerance for circus-like open-air spectacles where the ‘tortured, dismembered, amputated body, symbolically branded on face or shoulder’ was ‘exposed alive or dead to public view’ (8). Although Foucault’s illustrations are almost entirely French ones, he argues that they are representative of a ‘Western’ general trend throughout Europe (including Russia) and North America.
While most histories of penal justice celebrate the removal of apparently senseless, grotesque punishment of criminals in favour of rational codes of law, involving juries and time-delimited imprisonment, as an humanitarian advance, Foucault suggests that before we rush to congratulate ourselves on this removal of public torture, we need to pay attention to what social interests motivated the disappearance of the body as ‘the major target of penal repression’ within a ‘gloomy festival of punishment’ (8) at the end of the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. There are two significant features to this historical shift.
Firstly, there ‘was the disappearance of punishment as spectacle’ (8), such as when prisoners were either brought on top of a platform for public retribution or forced to labour in easily visible chain-gangs cleaning the streets or repairing roads. Enlightenment-era reformers were increasingly worried that public executions might encourage a shocked public to commit violence against authorities, given the open cruelty of the older forms of punishment that made justice seem itself criminal-minded and uncivilized. Consequently, reformers used a ‘humanitarian’ language to argue for a less aggressive and risky way of treating criminals.
In this light, the second main change in punishment is the removal of pain. The modern ‘punishment-body relation’ (11) seeks to cause less bodily hurt and looks more to deprive someone of ‘a liberty that is regarded as a right and as property’ involving limits to free movement and use of the individual’s time. The ‘outside’ of the criminal’s body is handled less and less as it becomes manipulated more intangibly and peacefully through confinement. Even when people are executed in the modern-day West, ‘the disappearance of the spectacle and the elimination of pain’ (11) remains a concern, as death sentences are usually carried out before small, invitation-only audiences and the prisoner is often either sedated before being killed or every effort is made for the death to be swift and ‘gentle’.
The change in punishment’s form from spectacular, public punishment in the mid eighteenth century to more discreet forms of imprisonment in the early and mid nineteenth century has several social and tactical consequences, according to Foucault. With imprisonment, punishment becomes more ‘private’, isolated and hidden from the public’s gaze. While the performance of deliberative justice, the judging of guilt, becomes more visible, as trials are usually open to all and performed in the public record (whereas before they were secret), the execution of that trial’s punishment becomes more invisible, especially since few of us step inside a penitentiary, which, in any case, cannot easily be visited without some degree of permission by state officials or