Mixed-Use Development: Nine Case Studies of Complex Projects
3.5/5
()
About this ebook
Read more from Dean Schwanke
Small-Scale Development: Eight Case Studies of Entrepreneurial Projects Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMultifamily Housing Development: Ten Case Studies of Innovative Projects Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5
Related to Mixed-Use Development
Related ebooks
Business Park and Industrial Development Handbook Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Multifamily Housing Development Handbook Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Dimensions of Parking Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Place Making: Developing Town Centers, Main Streets, and Urban Villages Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Creating Walkable Places: Compact Mixed-Use Solutions Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Retail Development Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Real Estate Development - 5th Edition: Principles and Process Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Finance for Real Estate Development Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Shared Parking Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Building Small: A Toolkit for Real Estate Entrepreneurs, Civic Leaders, and Great Communities Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPedestrian- and Transit-Oriented Design Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Resort Development Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Understanding Land Development: A Project-Based Approach Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe City in 2050: Creating Blueprints for Change Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFoundations of Real Estate Development Financing: A Guide to Public-Private Partnerships Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Developing Sustainable Planned Communities Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Underwriting Commercial Real Estate in a Dynamic Market: Case Studies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDynamic Urban Design: A Handbook for Creating Sustainable Communities Worldwide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Measuring Urban Design: Metrics for Livable Places Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCreating Vibrant Public Spaces: Streetscape Design in Commercial and Historic Districts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUrban Real Estate Investment: A New Era of Opportunity Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Retrofitting Sprawl: Addressing Seventy Years of Failed Urban Form Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Architect's Handbook of Professional Practice Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Real Estate Market Analysis: Trends, Methods, and Information Sources, Third Edition Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Urbanism Without Effort: Reconnecting with First Principles of the City Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Green Infrastructure Planning: Reintegrating Landscape in Urban Planning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBusiness Improvement Districts Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Tactical Urbanism: Short-term Action for Long-term Change Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Writing Architecture: A Practical Guide to Clear Communication about the Built Environment Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Architecture For You
Martha Stewart's Organizing: The Manual for Bringing Order to Your Life, Home & Routines Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Little Book of Living Small Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Become An Exceptional Designer: Effective Colour Selection For You And Your Client Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5House Beautiful: Colors for Your Home: The Ultimate Guide to Choosing Paint Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFeng Shui Modern Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Fix Absolutely Anything: A Homeowner's Guide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Welcome Home: A Cozy Minimalist Guide to Decorating and Hosting All Year Round Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArchitecture 101: From Frank Gehry to Ziggurats, an Essential Guide to Building Styles and Materials Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Home Sweet Maison: The French Art of Making a Home Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Solar Power Demystified: The Beginners Guide To Solar Power, Energy Independence And Lower Bills Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The New Bohemians: Cool & Collected Homes Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Get Your House Right: Architectural Elements to Use & Avoid Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Decorate: 1,000 Professional Design Ideas for Every Room in Your Home Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Year-Round Solar Greenhouse: How to Design and Build a Net-Zero Energy Greenhouse Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Live Beautiful Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5My Creative Space: How to Design Your Home to Stimulate Ideas and Spark Innovation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Down to Earth: Laid-back Interiors for Modern Living Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rustic Modern Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Frommer's Athens and the Greek Islands Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Nesting Place: It Doesn't Have to Be Perfect to Be Beautiful Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Shinto the Kami Way Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Architecture and How to Sketch it - Illustrated by Sketches of Typical Examples Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The New Bohemians Handbook: Come Home to Good Vibes Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Cozy Minimalist Home: More Style, Less Stuff Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Making Midcentury Modern Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Built: The Hidden Stories Behind Our Structures Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Brunelleschi's Dome: How a Renaissance Genius Reinvented Architecture Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Timber Framing for the Rest of Us: A Guide to Contemporary Post and Beam Construction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Build Shipping Container Homes With Plans Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Reviews for Mixed-Use Development
3 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Mixed-Use Development - Dean Schwanke
On the cover:
Top row, from left: Harper Court (Leslie Schwartz Architectural Photography); Woodward’s (Bob Matheson); Altmarkt-Galerie )Pauline Fabry).
Middle row, from left: Life Hub @ Daning (Chongbang); CityCentre (CityCentre); North Hills (Kane Realty).
Bottom row, from left: King’s Cross (King’s Cross Central Limited Partnership); Knowledge and Innovation Community (Shui On Land); Porta Nuova (Hines Italia).
©2016 Urban Land Institute
1025 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW
Suite 500 West
Washington, DC 20007
Printed in the United States of America. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission of the publisher.
Recommended bibliographic listing:
Schwanke, Dean, et al. Mixed-Use Development: Nine Case Studies of Complex Projects. Washington, D.C.: Urban Land Institute, 2016.
ISBN: 978-0-87420-401-8
About the Urban Land Institute
The mission of the Urban Land Institute is to provide leadership in the responsible use of land and in creating and sustaining thriving communities worldwide. ULI is committed to
Bringing together leaders from across the fields of real estate and land use policy to exchange best practices and serve community needs;
Fostering collaboration within and beyond ULI’s membership through mentoring, dialogue, and problem solving;
Exploring issues of urbanization, conservation, regeneration, land use, capital formation, and sustainable development;
Advancing land use policies and design practices that respect the uniqueness of both built and natural environments;
Sharing knowledge through education, applied research, publishing, and electronic media; and
Sustaining a diverse global network of local practice and advisory efforts that address current and future challenges.
Established in 1936, the Institute today has more than 37,000 members representing the entire spectrum of the land use and development disciplines. ULI relies heavily on the experience of its members. It is through member involvement and information resources that ULI has been able to set standards of excellence in development practice. The Institute has long been recognized as one of the world’s most respected and widely quoted sources of objective information on urban planning, growth, and development.
Patrick L. Phillips, Global Chief Executive Officer, ULI
About the ULI Case Studies Program
The ULI Case Studies series showcases innovative approaches and best practices in real estate and urban development. Each case study focuses on a specific development project and includes the following features:
A detailed description of the project and the development process;
The story behind the development and the lessons learned, including comments from the developers and other principals involved;
Photos, site plans, floor plans, and a development timeline; and
Site and building data, development cost data, sales and rent figures, vacancy rates, and financial data.
Many of the most recent case studies also feature videos about the project, including interviews with the principals involved, and an interactive map providing easy access to satellite and street views of the site and area.
You can learn more about ULI Case Studies at our website: casestudies.uli.org
.
Dean Schwanke, Senior Vice President, Case Studies and Publications
Principal Author
Dean Schwanke
Senior Vice President, Case Studies and Publications
Urban Land Institute
Principal Contributing Authors
Lucy Anna Scott
Freelance Author
Ken Rhee
Chief Representative, ULI Mainland China
Chief Executive Officer, Huhan Advisory
Contributing Authors
Don Johnson
Independent Urban Planner
Robyn Kinsey Mooring
Independent Author
ULI PROJECT STAFF
Kathleen B. Carey
President and Chief Executive Officer
ULI Foundation
Chief Content Officer
Dean Schwanke
Senior Vice President
Case Studies and Publications
Payton Chung
Director
Case Studies and Publications
James A. Mulligan
Senior Editor
David Rose
Editor
Betsy Van Buskirk
Creative Director
Anne Morgan
Graphic Design
Joan Campbell
Information Center Manager
Contents
Introduction
Observations on the Case Studies
Lessons Learned
Mixed-Use Evolution
Compact, Small-Site Mixed-Use Projects
Harper Court, Chicago, Illinois, United States
Woodward’s, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Mixed-Use Projects Combining Retail Malls, Hotels, and Offices
Altmarkt-Galerie, Dresden, Germany
Life Hub @ Daning, Shanghai, China
Mixed-Use Town Centers and Urban Villages in Suburban Areas
CityCentre, Houston, Texas, United States
North Hills, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Large, Urban Mixed-Use Development Districts
King’s Cross, London, United Kingdom
Knowledge and Innovation Community, Shanghai, China
Porta Nuova, Milan, Italy
Introduction
Mixed-use development is a complex undertaking that requires a wide variety of skills and expertise. Developers must understand not only how to develop various property types-such as office, retail, residential, and hotel—but also how to put them together to maximize synergy. Developers must also understand the nuances of good urban design and place making. There are few formulas that apply to this type of development. Much of what is known or needs to be known is best derived from looking at past experiences and examples. Every situation is different, and no two projects are alike.
This publication provides a detailed look at nine leading examples of mixed-use projects from around the world that have been developed in recent years. The case studies are drawn from the ULI Case Studies program, which showcases innovative approaches and best practices in real estate and urban development.
The nine mixed-use projects featured offer a wide range of approaches to mixed-use development globally, including three developments in the United States, two in China, and one each in Canada, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Italy. The case studies range from high-rise projects in central business districts—such as Porta Nuova in Milan, Italy, and Woodward’s in Vancouver, Canada—to suburban town centers, such as CityCentre in Houston, Texas, United States, and North Hills in Raleigh, North Carolina, United States.
In addition to the case studies themselves, this report provides a brief overview of the key traits for this group of case studies, as well as the lessons learned at each project.
Observations on the Case Studies
The mixed-use developments discussed here are characterized by three common features: they have three or more significant revenue-producing uses, they are physically and functionally integrated, and they are developed in conformance with a coherent plan. Beyond these features, mixed-use developments vary greatly—by size, configuration, mix of uses, the process by which they are developed, and many other characteristics. The range of variations for the mixed-use projects discussed in this publication are outlined below.
Site Size
The project sites for these nine case studies range in size from 2.3 acres for Woodward’s and 3.2 acres for Harper Court in Chicago up to 94 acres at North Hills and 121 acres at the Knowledge and Innovation Community (KIC) in Shanghai. The median site is 47 acres, which is the size of CityCentre.
Design and Configuration
The design configurations for these case studies fall into four general categories. Harper Court and Woodward’s are compact, small-site mixed-use projects in urban locations arranged around an internal retail street or courtyard. Altmarkt-Gallerie in Dresden, Germany, and Life Hub @ Daning in Shanghai, China, are essentially retail malls with attached office and hotel uses. CityCentre and North Hills are town center/urban village districts on large sites in suburban locations. And King’s Cross in London, Porta Nuova, and KIC are large, diverse urban districts on redevelopment sites.
Gross Building Area
All the projects are quite large when compared with single-use projects. The largest is KIC, with 8.2 million square feet of space, followed by King’s Cross with about 6 million square feet. The smallest is Harper Court, with 593,502 square feet, followed by Altmarkt-Galerie with 829,000 square feet. The median size is 2.7 million square feet, the size of Life Hub @ Daning.
Office Space
Offices are a key driver in these projects. All nine include office space, ranging from 3.4 million square feet at King’s Cross and 2.3 million square feet at KIC to 67,000 square feet at Woodward’s and 79,000 square feet at Altmarkt-Galerie. The median-sized office component can be found at CityCentre, with 625,000 square feet (more is planned). Office space is a dominant use in several of these developments, including at CityCentre, KIC, King’s Cross, North Hills, and Porta Nuova.
Retail/Restaurant Space
Retail, restaurant, and entertainment uses are also common to all nine of these developments, but the size and importance of these uses vary greatly among the projects.
Life Hub @ Daning has the largest retail/restaurant component, with over 1.1 million square feet, followed by North Hills with 989,000 square feet, KIC with 728,000 square feet, and Altmarkt-Galerie with 693,000 square feet. Retail space and restaurants are also well-represented uses at King’s Cross, Porta Nuova, and CityCentre, each including 400,000 to 500,000 square feet. While Woodward’s and Harper Court both have less than 100,000 square feet of retail/restaurant space, even in these projects this use plays an important role in establishing a sense of place and providing attractive on-site amenities.
In addition, three of the case-study projects have grocery stores—Altmarkt-Galerie, North Hills, and Woodward’s. Many of the developments have cinemas, important drivers of activity on evenings and weekends, including CityCentre, Life Hub @ Daning, North Hills, and Woodward’s. Woodward’s includes not only an art house cinema, but also live theater and other cultural offerings.
Housing
Housing is increasingly important in mixed-use developments and is a critical element in supporting round-the-clock activity. Six of the nine projects include housing, and a seventh—Altmarkt-Galerie—is surrounded on three sides by existing multifamily housing owned by another entity. King’s Cross has the largest number of units planned at 2,000, followed by North Hills with 1,377, KIC with 949, CityCentre with 836, Woodward’s with 746, and Porta Nuova with 403. CityCentre offers primarily rental units, whereas KIC and Porta Nuova favor for-sale units. Woodward’s and King’s Cross include both for-sale housing and a considerable number of affordable housing units for rent.
Hotels
Hotels—also important for activating mixed-use environments throughout the day and week—are included in seven of the nine case-study projects. North Hills has 501 rooms in three separate hotels, followed by Life Hub @ Daning with 326 rooms, CityCentre with 255 in the primary hotel, and Altmarkt-Galerie with 203. Hotel flags include major brands, such as IBIS, Hyatt, Sheraton, and Four Points, as well as much smaller brands, such as Hotel Sorella and Great Northern.
Parking and Transit
Parking is a substantial use in most of these projects. KIC has more than 7,500 spaces, North Hills has 7,500, CityCentre has more than 3,600, and Porta Nuova has 3,000. The developments with the fewest parking spaces are Altmarkt-Galerie, Harper Court, Woodward’s, and King’s Cross, all with fewer than 1,000. Each of these latter projects is well served by nearby transit, as are KIC, Life Hub @ Daning, and Porta Nuova.
Timeline
The development timeline—from start of construction to substantial completion—for the nine projects ranged from only two years for Harper Court and Life Hub @ Daning, up to 13 years for King’s Cross and Altmarkt-Galerie and 16 years for North Hills. The median time required for development from start to finish was eight years, the development period for CityCentre in Houston. Most of the nine projects were largely completed in the years between 2010 and 2016; several have additional phases planned or underway, including CityCentre, Harper Court, King’s Cross, and North Hills.
University Partnerships
Four of the projects involve universities as partners. Harper Court was essentially initiated by the University of Chicago to improve a site near campus, and the university is a prime tenant in the office space. The developers of King’s Cross worked with the University of the Arts London to add cultural elements to the project, whereas the developers of KIC partnered with Fudan University and several other leading Chinese universities to create a new technology innovation community on the property. The Woodward’s developer worked with the Simon Fraser University School for the Contemporary Arts to develop a major university facility on the site.
Public/Private Development
Several of the developments involved public/private development efforts as well. At Altmarkt-Galerie, the city of Dresden worked with the developer in revitalizing the city center that had been nearly destroyed during World War II; at Harper Court, the city of Chicago and the university worked together on redevelopment; at KIC, the objective of the developer and the city was to create a new technology hub for Shanghai; at Porta Nuova, the city of Milan sought to repair a major blighted industrial and transportation hub; and at Woodward’s, the developer, the city of Vancouver, and the province of British Columbia sought to redevelop a cherished department store site, repair a blighted area, and provide social housing for the poor and the homeless.
Sustainability, Health, and Preservation
Many of the projects also include other special features. For example, seven of the case studies highlight healthy-place features and elements, eight discuss sustainability, and four of the projects involved historic preservation and/or adaptive use (see exhibit 3).
Lessons Learned
Mistakes made and lessons learned are hallmarks of the ULI Case Studies series, and each case study in this publication provides a section that addresses these lessons. Below is a brief overview of each development and a summary of the key lessons learned.
Compact, Small-Site Mixed-Use Projects
Harper Court, Chicago, Illinois, United States
Harper Court is a mixed-use project—including office, retail, hotel, and parking uses—located on a 3.18-acre site in the Hyde Park neighborhood on the South Side of Chicago near the University of Chicago campus. The project was initiated by the city of Chicago and the university with the objective of revitalizing a strategic commercial location important to the university campus and near transit. The project has been integrated into the existing street fabric and includes a new internal street. A second phase is planned.
The initial success of the project, started during a time of significant distress in the commercial real estate market, was due largely to the strong commitment to the project by the University of Chicago and the city. Partnering with cities and educational institutions during down market cycles can be extremely beneficial for all parties involved because 1) it allows developers to stay active and engaged in development during slow periods, and 2) it allows cities and universities to pursue development objectives at reduced costs when development and construction economies are in the doldrums.
Developing strong partnerships is important in complex projects such as Harper Court. The partnership between Vermilion and JFJ was a critical teaming decision for the project, coupling Vermilion’s expertise in public/private partnerships with the experience of a veteran Chicago developer. Partnering with a hotel developer focused on university-based projects was also a good fit, and the partnership with Canyon-Johnson was essential to bringing much-needed equity to the deal. Complex mixed-use projects require good partners who share the same vision but who also can bring complementary skills to the project.
The developer’s listening skills during the community visioning process were essential. The developer worked hard to hear community constituents and make sure their desires were represented in the final product. Having community members behind a development project is invaluable, whereas having them opposed to it can be disastrous.
A layered and phased financing approach, including a variety of capital sources brought into the process over time, was essential to the project. The ground lease and the tax increment financing (TIF) funds reduced upfront equity requirements for Harper Court Partners; the recovery-zone facility bonds secured in late 2010 made the hotel deal possible; Canyon-Johnson’s equity investment and the bank financing were provided at the start of construction in October 2011; and the land sale to the hotel in August 2012 freed up cash during the construction phase. This phasing and layering of financing over time allowed the project to unfold with adequate funding in place for each stage at a time when development financing was very difficult to obtain.
Woodward’s, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Woodward’s is a mixed-use, urban redevelopment project in the Gastown area of Vancouver’s east side, very near downtown on the site of the former Woodward’s department store. The redevelopment involved demolition of several of the department store buildings, the restoration and adaptive use of one historic structure for office space, and the construction of two new residential towers, nonmarket housing units for both singles and families, new educational and cultural space for Simon Fraser University, an atrium, a daycare center, and ground-level retail space that includes a grocery—all within the confines of a 2.32-acre site in an area with a variety of social and poverty issues. The project includes a total of 1.07 million square feet of space.
The Woodward’s project is a mixed-use social experiment, including substantial social housing, and many drivers and entities came together to make it work. The commitment and cooperation of the city, the provincial government, the university, two private sector developers, a number of social housing groups, the grocery and drugstore anchors, and numerous community groups were exemplary. The fact that the condominium buyers supported the project enthusiastically was also a sign of community support.
Critical to the success of the project was the ongoing dialogue that the developers, architect, and city had with community groups to address the neighborhood’s unique social needs. In the end, the Woodward’s project was about the Vancouver community coming together to bring about an important transformation of a historic site at the heart of the city. Most of the participants were on the same page in terms of achieving both social and economic objectives.
Also critical was getting representatives of all the uses to commit to it, because each component was vital. This was achieved through leasing momentum. Because the provincial government committed to the project, the federal government committed to rent space. Because Nesters grocery committed to rent space, London Drugs also committed to the space. Because of the condos, the retail shop space leased for reasonable rents.
A project can respect the heritage of a site in many ways that go beyond simply restoring historic buildings. The commissioning of a photographer/artist to create a large photograph that depicts the Gastown riots is one example of this. Videos in the atrium and panels around the building also highlight the history of the site.
Some aspects of the project still need attention. For instance, the community arts space on the second level of the office building failed and now is largely underused, as is one of the retail spaces facing the atrium. Community groups often need more help to succeed than initially expected. It is not enough to offer free space and hope the programming comes.
Cost sharing and operating expenses among uses are an ongoing challenge, as is the case with many mixed-use developments. Allocating the costs for maintaining common spaces and elements is always a sensitive matter. Each use had different concerns: social housing operators want low expenses; retail users want high standards for maintenance and security; market-rate condo associations want low costs but also strong security. Complaints from the condominium owners regarding shared expenses are a consistent source of conflict.
The Woodward’s redevelopment changed the neighborhood for the better in a number of ways. People who were homeless or living in substandard housing now have good housing. High-quality groceries are readily available now. The streets are safer. There is a diverse mix of people in the neighborhood. There is new culture and nightlife. Property values and the property tax base have increased, generating new revenue for the city. Woodward’s was one of the first examples in Canada of mixing social housing and market-rate condo housing, and the success of the project was a landmark in demonstrating that such a mix could work.
Mixed-Use Projects Combining Retail Malls, Hotels, and Offices
Altmarkt-Galerie, Dresden, Germany
Altmarkt-Galerie is a retail-oriented mixed-use development in the center of Dresden, Germany, that features a shopping center containing 64,400 square meters (693,200 sq ft) of gross leasable area (GLA) that was originally opened in 2002 and then expanded in 2009-2011. The project also includes a 5,300-square-meter (57,049 sq ft) hotel and 7,300 square meters (78,577 sq ft) of office space. The first phase of the project includes three modern retail blocks, arranged north to south in a courtyard—surrounded on three sides by existing four- to six-story apartment buildings. The retail blocks are connected by glass-covered pedestrian walkways. An extension, which opened in 2011, added 19,200 square meters (206,700 sq ft) across a T-shaped block at the north of the original site. During the expansion, an existing 1960s office block was demolished and replaced with a modern building, while a listed building was renovated. The expansion added 93 retail shops on three floors, with offices and a hotel above.
Altmarkt-Galerie has ignited and revitalized Dresden’s city center, thanks to close collaboration between developers and the local government, a great central location, a strong leasing operation, and a compelling plan and design.
According to developer ECE, one of the main reasons for the project’s success is a cooperative working relationship with Dresden’s city council, with which it established a steering committee. The committee, which had a municipal coordinator for the coordination of all city offices, was in place from the beginning so that politicians and all other stakeholders of the city were committed to the project and promoted it.
Altmarkt-Galerie also illustrates how a prime, central location and creative urban design solutions can elevate a project and allow it to overcome other challenges. The fact that the first phase of the project was surrounded on three sides by multistory housing blocks and had no frontage on a heavily traveled fourth side did not deter the developers nor hinder the performance of the shopping center. By creating numerous, highly visible entrances into the courtyard and the shopping center, and by designing compelling courtyard and interior spaces within the center, the developers were able to shape a highly successful retail center that attracted both retailers and customers