Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Judicial Activism: A Way to Overcome it
Judicial Activism: A Way to Overcome it
Judicial Activism: A Way to Overcome it
Ebook27 pages21 minutes

Judicial Activism: A Way to Overcome it

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Judicial activism in the U.S. occurs when a few Supreme Court judges decide public policy issues, which normally deal with rights. However, it would be better for the people to decide such issues through their elected representatives. This book proposes a way to remove judicial activism, by returning to an original view of the founding fathers that preferred legislative oversight of rights issues.

LanguageEnglish
Release dateDec 1, 2015
ISBN9781311247308
Judicial Activism: A Way to Overcome it
Author

Duane L. Ostler

Duane L. Ostler was raised in Southern Idaho, and has lived in Australia, Mexico, Brazil, China, Utah, the big Island of Hawaii, and—most foreign of all—New Jersey. He practiced law for over 10 years and has a PhD in legal history. He and his wife have five children and two cats.

Read more from Duane L. Ostler

Related to Judicial Activism

Related ebooks

Law For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Judicial Activism

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Judicial Activism - Duane L. Ostler

    Judicial Activism: A Way to Overcome It

    Copyright 2015 Duane L. Ostler

    All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, copied or distributed without the express permission of the author.

    Cover art: Our Overworked Supreme Court, by J. Keppler, 1885, cover of Puck magazine.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Introduction

    James Madison's Views on the Best Way to Protect Rights

    A Three Step Method to Restore Legislative Oversight of Rights

    Conclusion

    Endnotes

    Other books by the author

    Introduction

    The term judicial activism has become a common part of modern American political speech, though it remains ambiguous and can often mean many different things.[1] The most commonly given meaning for the term applies to judicial decisions that exceed judicial authority on issues that otherwise would be decided by the legislature. This seems to most frequently occur when some aspect of the bill of rights is litigated.

    Political leaders in both parties have condemned judicial activism, particularly where it threatens their party's ideology. For example, in 1968 Richard Nixon stated, I want men on the Supreme Court who are strict constructionists, men that interpret the law and don't try to make the law.[2] In 1986 Ronald Reagan said that America has had too many examples in recent years of courts and judges legislating.[3] Yet Democratic leaders can feel just as much concern for judicial activism as their Republican counterparts. Barack Obama expressed fear in 2012 that a conservative Supreme Court might disagree with the new healthcare law:

    "I'd just remind conservative commentators that, for years, what we have heard is, the biggest problem on the bench was judicial activism ... that an unelected group of people would somehow overturn a duly constituted and passed law. Well ... I'm

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1