Battlefield Air Interdiction By The Luftwaffe At The Battle Of Kursk - 1943
()
About this ebook
The study shows that the Luftwaffe concentrated its efforts at Kursk on Close Air Support and neglected Battlefield Air Interdiction. This was primarily because Close Air Support had proven itself so successful in German experience prior to Kursk. However, the failure of the Luftwaffe to interdict Russian reinforcements at Kursk proved to be critical and contributed to the German defeat.
Air planners must realize that a correct balance between Close Air Support and Battlefield Air Interdiction is essential to the efficient use of airpower during any tactical application in support of ground forces. Neither Close Air Support nor Battlefield Air Interdiction should gain primacy in doctrine, rather, a mix of the two should be applied on a situational basis.
Major William J. Dalecky
See Book Description
Related to Battlefield Air Interdiction By The Luftwaffe At The Battle Of Kursk - 1943
Related ebooks
Why Fight On? The Decision To Close The Kursk Salient Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Beda Fomm: An Operational Analysis [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Operational Level Analysis Of Soviet Armored Formations In The Deliberate Defense In The Battle Of Kursk, 1943 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Study Of The Aerial Interdiction of Railways During The Korean War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAntietam And Gettysburg: Tactical Success In An Operational Void Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKursk: A Study In Operational Art Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Photographic History of Airborne Warfare, 1939–1945 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Aerial War: 1939–45: The Role of Aviation in World War II Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFighting And Winning Encircled Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWestern Front, 1917–1918 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Battle of the Marne Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBuilding Guderian’s Duck: Germany’s Response To The Eastern Front Antitank Crisis, 1941 To 1945 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lorraine Campaign: An Overview, September-December 1944 [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Lucky Seventh in the Bulge: A Case Study for the Airland Battle Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Last Hussar Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAir-Ground Teamwork On The Western Front - The Role Of The XIX Tactical Air Command During August 1944: [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRetreat through the Rhone Valley: Defensive battles of the Nineteenth Army, August–September 1944 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRed Army Auxiliary Armoured Vehicles, 1930–1945 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDefeat At Sea: The Struggle and Eventual Destruction of the German Navy, 1939-1945 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Anvil of War: German Generalship in Defense of the Eastern Front during World War II Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Germany in the Great War: Verdun & Somme Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnited States Army in WWII - the Mediterranean - Salerno to Cassino: [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Command Is Forward Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsM29 Weasel Tracked Cargo Carrier & Variants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe History of the Panzerjäger: Volume 1: Origins and Evolution 1939–42 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5TO BIZERTE WITH THE II CORPS - 23 April - 13 May 1943 [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Operational Implications Of Deception At The Battle Of Kursk Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIn the Shadow of Arnhem Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Wars & Military For You
Blitzed: Drugs in the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Forgotten Highlander: An Incredible WWII Story of Survival in the Pacific Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The God Delusion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Band of Brothers: E Company, 506th Regiment, 101st Airborne from Normandy to Hitler's Eagle's Nest Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hitler's Monsters: A Supernatural History of the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Daily Creativity Journal Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Unacknowledged: An Expose of the World's Greatest Secret Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Wager Disaster: Mayem, Mutiny and Murder in the South Seas Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Doctors From Hell: The Horrific Account of Nazi Experiments on Humans Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War & Other Classics of Eastern Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Churchill's Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare: The Mavericks Who Plotted Hitler's Defeat Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Killing the SS: The Hunt for the Worst War Criminals in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Idaho Falls: The Untold Story of America's First Nuclear Accident Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise of the Fourth Reich: The Secret Societies That Threaten to Take Over America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Art of War: The Definitive Interpretation of Sun Tzu's Classic Book of Strategy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Last Kingdom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unit 731: Testimony Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5About Face: The Odyssey of an American Warrior Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Girls of Atomic City: The Untold Story of the Women Who Helped Win World War II Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Making of the Atomic Bomb Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Faithful Spy: Dietrich Bonhoeffer and the Plot to Kill Hitler Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Resistance: The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Only Plane in the Sky: An Oral History of 9/11 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Related categories
Reviews for Battlefield Air Interdiction By The Luftwaffe At The Battle Of Kursk - 1943
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Battlefield Air Interdiction By The Luftwaffe At The Battle Of Kursk - 1943 - Major William J. Dalecky
This edition is published by PICKLE PARTNERS PUBLISHING—www.picklepartnerspublishing.com
To join our mailing list for new titles or for issues with our books – picklepublishing@gmail.com
Or on Facebook
Text originally published in 1980 under the same title.
© Pickle Partners Publishing 2014, all rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted by any means, electrical, mechanical or otherwise without the written permission of the copyright holder.
Publisher’s Note
Although in most cases we have retained the Author’s original spelling and grammar to authentically reproduce the work of the Author and the original intent of such material, some additional notes and clarifications have been added for the modern reader’s benefit.
We have also made every effort to include all maps and illustrations of the original edition the limitations of formatting do not allow of including larger maps, we will upload as many of these maps as possible.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS 3
ABSTRACT 4
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 5
CHAPTER I — INTRODUCTION 6
CHAPTER II — BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENT AND EVOLUTION OF THE LUFTWAFFE FROM WORLD WAR I UNTIL 1943 9
CHAPTER III — THE BATTLE OF KURSK 18
CHAPTER IV — ANALYSIS OF THE LUFTWAFFE'S EFFORT 26
CHAPTER V — SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 31
REQUEST FROM THE PUBLISHER 35
APPENDIX 1 — GERMAN-RUSSIAN FRONT – 4 JULY, 1943 36
APPENDIX 2 — KURSK AND OREL SALIENTS/AIR FLEET BOUNDARY 37
APPENDIX 3 — LUFTWAFFE INTERDICTION CAMPAIGN 38
APPENDIX 4 — FOURTH AIR FLEET AND SIXTH AIR FLEET AIR ORDER OF BATTLE-JULY 1943 39
SIXTH AIR FLEET 39
Fighters 39
Bombers 39
FOURTH AIR FLEET 39
Fighters 39
Bombers 39
SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY 42
ABSTRACT
BATTLEFIELD AIR INTERDICTION BY THE LUFTWAFFE AT THE BATTLE OF KURSK-1943, by Major William J. Dalecky, USAF.
This study attempts to show the misapplication of tactical airpower by the Luftwaffe in support of German ground forces during the Battle of Kursk in July 1943. The analysis is based on an investigation of historical references and provides lessons learned which might be applied in future conflicts.
The study shows that the Luftwaffe concentrated its efforts at Kursk on Close Air Support and neglected Battlefield Air Interdiction. This was primarily because Close Air Support had proven itself so successful in German experience prior to Kursk. However, the failure of the Luftwaffe to interdict Russian reinforcements at Kursk proved to be critical and contributed to the German defeat.
Air planners must realize that a correct balance between Close Air Support and Battlefield Air Interdiction is essential to the efficient use of airpower during any tactical application in support of ground forces. Neither Close Air Support nor Battlefield Air Interdiction should gain primacy in doctrine, rather, a mix of the two should be applied on a situational basis.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author would like to express his sincere gratitude to Dr. Roger J. Spiller and the other members of the thesis committee for their genuine interest and guidance in this effort.
The author's wife, Elisabeth, was indispensible for her encouragement and patience throughout a sometimes frustrating process. To her go special thanks.
CHAPTER I — INTRODUCTION
Modern mechanized warfare is characterized by a high level of mobility and lethality. Recent conflicts like the 1973 Yom Kippur War prove this to be true. Future conflicts will also be characterized by high levels of mobility and firepower accompanied by high loss rates on both sides. The three major armed forces of the world today, the Soviet Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the United States of America, have all made significant investments in upgrading the power and speed of their armored and mechanized forces. The overall impact of this fact is that major land battles will continue to be characterized by intense combat and a critical requirement by opposing armies to replace losses with reserve forces and rush them into action.
Battlefield Air Interdiction is that portion of direct air support to the land battle intended to cut off this critical re supply of forces to the main battle. The United States Air Force's doctrine of Battlefield Air Interdiction is not yet fully developed. This is true for several