Sweden, the EU, and Judicial Review
()
About this ebook
A brief history of judicial review in Sweden is outlined. Following an overview of the current legal codification and the courts interpretation of this ability, the book examines how the European Union has impacted the understanding and use of judicial review within Sweden. Next, the proposed changes to the Constitution regarding judicial review are outlined, and the structural impact and potential change in usage on the domestic and European levels are discussed.
Shawnna Robert
Semi-nomadic, accidental swedophile, wannabe diplomat. Working Baltic Sea + EUSBSR issues @CBSSSecretariat.
Related to Sweden, the EU, and Judicial Review
Related ebooks
The Supreme Court and Constitutional Democracy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCritical and Historical Essays — Volume 2 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Judicial Power of the Purse: How Courts Fund National Defense in Times of Crisis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPolitical Questions Judicial Answers: Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Most Activist Supreme Court in History: The Road to Modern Judicial Conservatism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNatural Monopoly and Its Regulation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFreedom of Speech: The Supreme Court and Judicial Review Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Judging Judges: Values and the Rule of Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTrends in Comparative Law and Economics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPolitical Foundations of Judicial Supremacy: The Presidency, the Supreme Court, and Constitutional Leadership in U.S. History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Law Journal: Volume 125, Number 4 - February 2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThat Eminent Tribunal: Judicial Supremacy and the Constitution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLaw and Public Choice: A Critical Introduction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Future of International Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRonald Dworkin: Third Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJudicial Review and the National Political Process: A Functional Reconsideration of the Role of the Supreme Court Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRunning Elections Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Law Journal: Volume 121, Number 3 - December 2011 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJudicial Reputation: A Comparative Theory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRevolutionary Constitutions: Charismatic Leadership and the Rule of Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Illusion of Net Neutrality: Political Alarmism, Regulatory Creep and the Real Threat to Internet Freedom Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Law Journal: Volume 123, Number 6 - April 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSports law and policy in the European Union Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPublic Policy and the Internet: Privacy, Taxes, and Contract Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Introduction to The International Court of Justice - Icj- Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJudicial Activism: A Way to Overcome it Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Right to Privacy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGlobal eBook 2016: A report on market trends and developments Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFreedom of Expression Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Politics For You
Daily Stoic: A Daily Journal On Meditation, Stoicism, Wisdom and Philosophy to Improve Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Great Reset: And the War for the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Speechless: Controlling Words, Controlling Minds Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The U.S. Constitution with The Declaration of Independence and The Articles of Confederation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Parasitic Mind: How Infectious Ideas Are Killing Common Sense Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Get Trump: The Threat to Civil Liberties, Due Process, and Our Constitutional Rule of Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Girl with Seven Names: A North Korean Defector’s Story Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why I’m No Longer Talking to White People About Race: The Sunday Times Bestseller Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Disloyal: A Memoir: The True Story of the Former Personal Attorney to President Donald J. Trump Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Blackout: How Black America Can Make Its Second Escape from the Democrat Plantation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Son of Hamas: A Gripping Account of Terror, Betrayal, Political Intrigue, and Unthinkable Choices Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Capitalism and Freedom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The January 6th Report Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Devil's Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America's Secret Government Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Only Plane in the Sky: An Oral History of 9/11 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5This Is How They Tell Me the World Ends: The Cyberweapons Arms Race Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fear: Trump in the White House Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ever Wonder Why?: and Other Controversial Essays Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race and Identity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Elite Capture: How the Powerful Took Over Identity Politics (And Everything Else) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Gaza in Crisis: Reflections on the U.S.-Israeli War on the Palestinians Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Cult of Trump: A Leading Cult Expert Explains How the President Uses Mind Control Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Sweden, the EU, and Judicial Review
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Sweden, the EU, and Judicial Review - Shawnna Robert
Sweden, the EU, and Judicial Review
Copyright 2010 Shawnna Robert
Published by Shawnna Robert at Smashwords
Your support and respect for the intellectual property of this author is appreciated.
Introduction
Evolution
Chapter 11, Article 14
The European Factor
Sweden, European Community, and Judicial Review
The Impact of Upcoming Amendments
Figure 1: Supremacy and Judicial Review
Get in touch
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Citations
Introduction
The nature of the practice and legal codification of judicial review in Sweden has been evolving for over a century. Judicial review is when a law is invalidated, usually by a court, and usually because the law in question conflicts with a law that is considered superior. Within domestic politics, a law is often compared to the national constitution in order to determine the validity of the law. In the European Union, national laws and statutes in the Constitution of a member state can be found to be in conflict with European treaties, regulatory agencies’ policies, international agreements, and court decisions.i Judicial review serves many purposes in a legal system, including: protecting the rights of individuals, maintaining the balance between branches of government, and holding a government accountable.ii
The aim of this paper is to explore the topic of judicial review in Sweden and the relationship with European Community laws, and to examine the ways a proposed amendment to the Swedish Constitution will affect the domestic use of judicial review in relation to both Swedish and European law. While the European Court of Justice can use judicial review to invalidate national laws when cases are brought to the court, this paper will focus only on Sweden’s ability to do the same. Also, the Law Council of Sweden, which has the right to make non-binding suggestions on legislation before it is passed, will not be discussed in this paper since judicial preview and judicial review are different.iii
In the following sections, a brief history of judicial review in Sweden will be outlined. Following an overview of the current legal codification and the courts interpretation of this ability, this paper will look at how the European Union has impacted the understanding and use of judicial review within Sweden. Next, the proposed changes to the Constitution regarding judicial review will be outlined, and the structural impact and potential change in usage on the domestic and European levels will be discussed.
First, a basic understanding of Sweden’s political system and form of democracy, which is the result of compromises made over a long period of time, is necessary. One major breakthrough that served to develop democracy in Sweden was the introduction of parliamentarianism in 1917.iv The constitution of Sweden is made up of four documents and is based not on the idea of separation of powers, but that the powers come from one central location – the people. These people