Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Who's in Charge?: Free Will and the Science of the Brain
Who's in Charge?: Free Will and the Science of the Brain
Who's in Charge?: Free Will and the Science of the Brain
Audiobook8 hours

Who's in Charge?: Free Will and the Science of the Brain

Written by Michael S. Gazzaniga

Narrated by Pete Larkin

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

4/5

()

About this audiobook

A powerful orthodoxy in the study of the brain has taken hold in
recent years: Since physical laws govern the physical world and our own brains are part of that world, physical laws therefore govern our
behavior and even our conscious selves. Free will is meaningless, goes
the mantra; we live in a "determined" world.Not so, argues the renowned neuroscientist Michael S. Gazzaniga in this thoughtful, provocative book based on his Gifford Lectures-one of the foremost lecture series in the world dealing with religion, science, and
philosophy. Who's in Charge? proposes that the mind, which is
somehow generated by the physical processes of the brain, "constrains" the brain just as cars are constrained by the traffic they create. Writing with what Steven Pinker has called "his trademark wit and lack
of pretension," Gazzaniga shows how determinism immeasurably weakens our views of human responsibility; it allows a murderer to argue, in effect, "It wasn't me who did it-it was my brain." Gazzaniga convincingly argues that even given the latest insights into the physical mechanisms of the mind, there is an undeniable human reality: We are responsible agents who should be held accountable for our actions,
because responsibility is found in how people interact, not in brains.
An extraordinary book that ranges across neuroscience, psychology,
ethics, and the law with a light touch but profound implications, Who's in Charge? is a lasting contribution from one of the leading thinkers of our time.
LanguageEnglish
Release dateDec 19, 2011
ISBN9781452675732
Author

Michael S. Gazzaniga

Michael S. Gazzaniga is internationally recognized in the field of neuroscience and a pioneer in cognitive research. He is the director of the SAGE Center for the Study of the Mind at the University of California, Santa Barbara. He is the author of many popular science books, including Who’s in Charge? (Ecco, 2011). He has six children and lives in California with his wife.

More audiobooks from Michael S. Gazzaniga

Related to Who's in Charge?

Related audiobooks

Medical For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Who's in Charge?

Rating: 4.02857132 out of 5 stars
4/5

70 ratings6 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Wonderful book by a brilliant yet humble scientist. A great conjunction of brain science and philosophy.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    An interesting study of the interplay between mind and brain. Predominantly through studying of patents who have had their corpus callosum severed, thus separating the hemispheres of the brain, the book exposes how our brains are organized and how the mind processes reality. While not an introductory book for the subject, it's not overly complicated. Neither is it overly simplified. It does a good job of explaining, and giving scientific evidence for, how we build a coherent personal narrative.All and all, it's a good book that takes a reasoned stance for free will.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    "We are people, not brains."

    That sums up the thrust of Gazzaniga's argument in "Who's in Charge?", adapted from his 2009 Gifford Lecture, a thorough and accessible look at trends in modern neuroscience -- and the physical determinism they seem to imply -- and the all-too-real feeling that we are intentional, morally-responsible agents.

    The first three chapters cover basics of neuroscience. What brains are, how they work, what they do. Not much new here if you're familiar with other overviews of this research, but the foundation is still necessary. Chapter 4 is where the book really takes off, as Gazzaniga steps into a field dear to my own interests when he discusses chaotic systems and emergent properties. As much as this topic can be made simple, he does so, and paints a compelling picture of a mind-brain interaction which is both causally "upward" -- neurons and neural modules spread across our brains sparking and creating the myriad phenomena we'd call "mind" -- and "downward" as those emergent mental phenomena simultaneously constrain the physical behavior of said brain.

    He uses the metaphor of a car's relationship to traffic. The entire concept of "traffic" only becomes possible when you have cars and a specific set of environmental conditions in effect. Take any of those ingredients away and you have nothing. Yet, even though traffic emerges from the interaction of cars, sitting in rush hour demonstrates all too well how the traffic can constrain the behavior of any given vehicle. This complementarity between the pieces working up and the whole working down is the ingredient missing from the determinist viewpoint (symbolized so widely by Benjamin Libet's experiments) and, in Gazzaniga's view, is what allows us to transcend that simple model of human agency. There is no "thing" in the brain to symbolize intentionality; only a storm of causes and effects beyond our (or anyone's) ken to predict based on purely physical laws.

    We are indeed more than predictable machines, and this has ramifications for both our social interactions and our legal structures, which are tackled in chapters 5 and 6. Chapter 5 goes into much detail on responsibility, which Gazzaniga treats as a social construct. After divorcing our notion of "free will" from the illusory notions generated by a distributed brain, he elaborates on the similarly emergent structures of society and culture. This chapter alone is worth it for the far-reaching implications in the discussions of gene assimilation and niche construction, which form the basis of a co-evolution between organisms and environments (both physical and social) in another instance of complementary upward and downward causation. This should be mandatory reading for anyone who thinks the Paleo Diet has any merit to its scientific justifications.

    All in all this is a fantastic book that falls into my must-read list for anyone interested in philosophy of mind, neuroscience, ethics, and/or moral philosophy.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    What exactly is the I we think we are? Where does it come from, and is it really in charge? These are the questions tackled in this book, along with issues such as responsibility and how the current neuroscience applies to our society and the law.This is not a very long read, and there are other books out there that go more in-depth, but this one seems a great introduction to what we currently know of how the brain works and the dilemma of determinism over free will. The author explores why determinism alone may not be the final answer on free will, including how chaos theory plays into it and how the final emergent property we call consciousness may rely on all of the sub-systems in the brain.I highly recommend this book if you want to begin exploring such topics, and aren't afraid of how it may challenge long held superstitions and beliefs.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    This is an interesting, engaging discussion about the current state of Neuroscience and the study of the physical brain and its implications for philosophical issues involving free will, responsibility, the law, society, and ethics. Taking the reader from the position that what our brains do is physically/causally determined, Gazzaniga attempts to show how we retain personal responsibility for our actions.This is, by no means, light reading; but it is very accessible to people who are familiar with psychology, neuroscience/biology, or philosophy. Some college-level experience would benefit the reader, but one need not be an academic in order to understand Who's In Charge?. Gazzaniga maintains a conversational level of discourse, and does so pretty much without sacrificing the precision of more scholarly discussions. I am - by inclination, education and profession - a philosopher, and this book is right up my alley. I will, however, restrain myself from making any critical observations about the substance of Gazzaniga's work - even though, like most scientists, he completely misses the essential point that has divided philosophers and scientists for centuries (oops! My brain made me do it!).Very much worth the time, effort and reflection this book requires.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Think originally about that in each of us which most makes each of us who we are.