Cargando
Información sobre el libro
The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America
Escrito por Louis Menand
Narrado por Henry Leyva
Acciones del libro
Comenzar a escucharDescripción
This organization consisted of four members and probably existed for less than nine months. Yet its impact upon American intellectual life remains incalculable.
Hardly a club in the conventional sense, the organization referred to in the title of this superb literary hybrid—part history, part biography, part philosophy—consisted of four members and probably existed for less than nine months. Yet its impact upon American intellectual life remains incalculable. Louis Menand masterfully weaves pivotal late 19th-and early 20th-century events, colorful biographical anecdotes, and abstract ideas into a narrative whole that both enthralls and enlightens.The Metaphysical Club is a compellingly vital account of how the cluster of ideas that came to be called pragmatism was forged from the searing experiences of its progenitors' lives. Here are Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, and John Dewey, all of them giants of American thought made colloquially accessible both as human beings and as intellects.
Acciones del libro
Comenzar a escucharInformación sobre el libro
The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America
Escrito por Louis Menand
Narrado por Henry Leyva
Descripción
This organization consisted of four members and probably existed for less than nine months. Yet its impact upon American intellectual life remains incalculable.
Hardly a club in the conventional sense, the organization referred to in the title of this superb literary hybrid—part history, part biography, part philosophy—consisted of four members and probably existed for less than nine months. Yet its impact upon American intellectual life remains incalculable. Louis Menand masterfully weaves pivotal late 19th-and early 20th-century events, colorful biographical anecdotes, and abstract ideas into a narrative whole that both enthralls and enlightens.The Metaphysical Club is a compellingly vital account of how the cluster of ideas that came to be called pragmatism was forged from the searing experiences of its progenitors' lives. Here are Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, and John Dewey, all of them giants of American thought made colloquially accessible both as human beings and as intellects.
Acerca del autor
LM![]()
Reseñas
time to do a weblog/wikipedia. paragraph per personality, add links between relationships
I am not too good on American history; this book did a very nice job of filling in lots of gaps. There is always a lot of talk around about why people fought the Civil War. Well, why did the South fire on Fort Sumter? Anyway, Menand does a very nice job describing how antislavery folks in the North mostly wanted to split with the South, while Unionists were not so opposed to slavery. The whole book is very much a pragmatist look at pragmatism - seeing pragmatism as a response to the situation after the Civil War. There is mention of how people took the ideas of Holmes, Peirce, James, and Dewey, and maybe their followers didn't live up to the potential of the ideas... but Menand doesn't really show us that. The story pretty much ends along with the lives of the principals. It's a complete book as it stands... but I guess just a few more hints of how to follow the trail might have been nice.My few brief forays into the writings of C. S. Peirce have left me befuddled. Menand's book at least reassured me that maybe the fault is not entirely mine. I was hoping that this book might give me an entry point into the threefold nature of a sign... OK, that a dictionary involves a kind of infinite regress, that's helpful. But I still didn't quite manage to count to three. No problem really - it wouldn't be fair to expect that level of completeness and precision from Menand. The core focus here is pragmatism, which is a sort of Darwinian view of how ideas evolve. Which reminds me, Menand gives a nice history of the reception of Darwin's ideas, and how these related to ideas about race, which clearly then connect to ideas about slavery... and immigration. Egads I must say... the political climate of our day sadly seems to be going back to hmmm like 1915 or something. That movie The Birth of a Nation was it? There's a level of crispness that I didn't quite find in reading this book. Probably the shortcoming is in my own superficial reading and thinking? But Menand describes modern society as being always in motion - always moving forward, if not upward. Hmmm. What does "forward" mean? Is there any kind of consistent direction? I suspect that we just bounce around in some space of possibilities, sometime orbiting in some basin of attraction, then flipping into a rapid spiral to some point of relative stability, before tipping over into yet another pattern. For sure we are always headed into the future, to the extent anyway that time really does have a direction. But the space of possibilities itself seems filled with trajectories that cross and tangle every which way. We just might drop back into some feudal scene. Modernity doesn't last forever.
good book for insight into the original historical and philosophical background of the concept of free speech and it's constitutional protection
Fascinating book on a subject I wasn't previously familiar with: the major strains of American thought between the Civil War and WWI. Under the banner of Pragmatism, Menand looks at four thinkers from the era: Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., William James, Charles Pierce, and John Dewey. It gets off to a sort of weird start as he dwells heavily on the Civil War, but as you get used to it you can start to see the overall thesis being hammered at. The Civil War was a traumatizing event in so many ways, shocking most of the thinkers of that time to understand why it happened and come up with ways for it to never happen again.
One of the biggest revelations of the book, and one that shouldn't have been as stunning to me, was Menand showing just how much everyone was racist back in the day. And even moreso, how much that racism drove scientific thought to try and justify itself. It didn't even happen in expected ways either: we see more modern scientific theories gaining credence over the flawed theories of the past, but due to their success in excusing racism instead of the evidence we rely on today. This isn't to disparage the huge leaps happening at the time, often with a foresight astonishing to today's scientists, but instead to note how much racism corrupted everything it touched.
This was kind of frustrating to read because while the prose itself is superb—Menand surely is one of the guiding lights of the New Yorker's style in its modern era, along with Remnick—there's not really a great arc to the whole book. Each of the chapters reads as if it were a New Yorker essay, and they don't really tell an emotional truth through the course of the story.
Sure, there's an overarching thesis haphazardly completed in the epilogue:pragmatism, ever mindful of the power of circumstance to determine truth, was itself birthed by the circumstances of postbellum America and killed off by the changed circumstances of the Cold War. But this thesis only lightly guides most of the book. The Civil War recedes with distance, and the internal politics of the movement start churning and changing its members. By the end of the book, Menand is down to pointing out the recognizable products of pragmatism—our conceptions of cultural pluralism, and a justification for free speech and other rights. It's certainly a great book, but I'm less sure if it's a good one.
One of the biggest revelations of the book, and one that shouldn't have been as stunning to me, was Menand showing just how much everyone was racist back in the day. And even moreso, how much that racism drove scientific thought to try and justify itself. It didn't even happen in expected ways either: we see more modern scientific theories gaining credence over the flawed theories of the past, but due to their success in excusing racism instead of the evidence we rely on today. This isn't to disparage the huge leaps happening at the time, often with a foresight astonishing to today's scientists, but instead to note how much racism corrupted everything it touched.
This was kind of frustrating to read because while the prose itself is superb—Menand surely is one of the guiding lights of the New Yorker's style in its modern era, along with Remnick—there's not really a great arc to the whole book. Each of the chapters reads as if it were a New Yorker essay, and they don't really tell an emotional truth through the course of the story.
Sure, there's an overarching thesis haphazardly completed in the epilogue:pragmatism, ever mindful of the power of circumstance to determine truth, was itself birthed by the circumstances of postbellum America and killed off by the changed circumstances of the Cold War. But this thesis only lightly guides most of the book. The Civil War recedes with distance, and the internal politics of the movement start churning and changing its members. By the end of the book, Menand is down to pointing out the recognizable products of pragmatism—our conceptions of cultural pluralism, and a justification for free speech and other rights. It's certainly a great book, but I'm less sure if it's a good one.
Challangingly dense, thought provoking and satisfying.My tags are a good guide to the contents: American History, Biography and Philosophy. Most of the book spans the years from the Civil War to the outbreak of WW1, The development of American philosphical thought told through the biographies and interactions of O.W. Holmes, Dewey, Charles Pierce, Benjamin Pierce and a number of others.Suprising readable and well constucted. Not sure I understood it all, but I learned much and enjoyed it. As a matter of fact, I wish it was longer.
I have read Louis Menand writing on T. S. Eliot and literary modernism, but here he tackles history, and it is not quite the same world. Non-historians are often the most popular history writers because they can tell a good story without getting to involved in the inevitably complicated interpretations professional historians relish; yet they often leave rigor on the side of the road. In what amounts to a quadruple biography, Mr. Menard does an excellent job of charting the birth of modern freedom of speech and cultural pluralism by examining the events that shaped the lives of protagonists Holmes, James, and Peirce. While it ventures into many different directions, covering topics in American history, notable pioneers of American higher education and philosophy, it mainly concerns the erosion of metaphysics and its eventual replacement by pragmatism as a dominant force in shaping American philosophy and its conception of ideas. The title of the book stems from the club formed by Holmes, James and Peirce. The author has the gift of vision but not focus. His asides can span entire chapters and leave the reader a bit bewildered. It's always worth thinking about why we believe what we do, and thinking about it with The Metaphysical Club is revealing.
The story of how American thought changed after the Civil War in attempt to comprehend the much more chaotic and expansive modern world it created, told through the intertwining lives of four of the men who led the way. I’ve studied the ideas of James, Peirce, Dewey, and Holmes, but learning about how those ideas shaped, and were shaped by the history they lived through is just fascinating. I’ve been trying for a few years to pin down my idea of America, whatever it is, and this is shaping up to be a crucial piece of the puzzle.
Maybe my favourite book ever.
24 October 2001 The Metaphysical ClubLouis Menand The American intellectual scene in the period between the Civil War and the First World War is the subject of this multiple biography. Oliver Wendell Holmes, Charles Pierce, William James and James Dewey are the main protagonists. The book takes its name from the informal debating club that these individuals and others formed in 1872, when they were all young men in Boston, taking courses at Harvard. They are ultimately associated with the philosophical movement of pragmatism. Pragmatism was never a popular term with its authors, but refers to the idea that thoughts are working assumptions about the real world that persist because they favor accurate predictions that are evolutionarily advantageous. The author starts with the experiences of Holmes in the Civil War, and suggests that the pragmatist philosophy originates in revulsion against the fanatical belief of the abolitionists that spawned the slaughter. This thesis ultimately gets lost in a wealth of fascinating detail about intellectual life and the lives of these characters, and it is by no means proved. The story brings in a lot of details about the history of this period in America that I did not know, and I found it fascinating to read about the Pullman strike, Eugene Debs, the Sedition Act in the First World War (especially with the current debates about increasing police powers in the current security crisis), and the growth of academic freedom in universities. The author never quite sides with or against pragmatism, but does suggest that interest in these philosophers is re-surging, and links this to the end of the Cold War. He claims that the Cold War made it impossible to preserve the skepticism needed to believe in pragmatism. .
One of those books you just happen to pick up whilst browsing in a store and get lucky with. Very well written, though a couple of chapters do get a little complicated and would obviously merit a second read - which I look forward to getting around to. Full of interesting stuff.
Who are we as "Americans"? What people and events have defined the America we now inhabit? Author, Louis Menand, offers a compelling argument that the America we now live in was significantly defined by figures and thinkers in the time directly after the Civil War. While school book history might define figures like Washington, Jefferson and Lincoln as wellsprings of our identity, their contribution feels rather remote and intangible. Menand makes the case that Supreme Court justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, philosophers William James and John Dewey, and statisticican Charles S. Peirce had more to do with defining our current beliefs and identity. Not only interesting subject matter, but really, really well-written and accessible. An intellectual joy.
One gets an excellent background in the thinking of previous generations of America.
Well deserving of the many awards it earned.