Why We Shouldn’t Accept Unrepeated Science—Our Author Responds to His Critics
by Ahmed Alkhateeb
Aug 17, 2016
4 minutes
Last month a long thread evolved on Hacker News, a popular discussion forum, in response to my Nautilus article, “We Should Not Accept Scientific Results That Have Not Been Repeated.” Much to my delight, it generated a rich conversation involving scientists and non-scientists alike. That’s fitting, since our inability to independently replicate our results, I argue, threatens to undermine trust in the scientific enterprise—something every citizen has a stake in.
Before I respond to the arguments against my position from the Hacker News community, allow me to quickly summarize my view. I think the irreproducibility crisis we are currently witnessing needs to be seen in a particular light.
You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.
Start your free 30 days