0 calificaciones0% encontró este documento útil (0 votos)
4K vistas5 páginas
Argentina's government announced a new draft law aimed at sidestepping court rulings. But on Thursday, US District Judge Thomas Griesa called Argentina's proposed actions illegal. Financial isolation would bring significant disruptions to the country's economy, he says.
Argentina's government announced a new draft law aimed at sidestepping court rulings. But on Thursday, US District Judge Thomas Griesa called Argentina's proposed actions illegal. Financial isolation would bring significant disruptions to the country's economy, he says.
Argentina's government announced a new draft law aimed at sidestepping court rulings. But on Thursday, US District Judge Thomas Griesa called Argentina's proposed actions illegal. Financial isolation would bring significant disruptions to the country's economy, he says.
Argentinas Proposal to Bypass US Court Rulings Is Credit Negative for the Sovereign, Banks and Corporates From Credit Outlook Last Tuesday, the Government of Argentina (Caa1 negative) announced a new draft law aimed at sidestepping US court rulings that have blocked it from making payments to bondholders without simultaneously paying certain holdout bondholders. But on Thursday, US District Judge Thomas Griesa called Argentinas proposed actions illegal, forbidding third parties from assisting Argentina in circumventing court orders and raising serious questions about whether the proposal will be achievable. This article discusses the credit negative effect of the proposal on the sovereign and on Argentine banks and corporates. Argentinas move to sidestep US court rulings highlights the countrys weak institutional framework. Argentine banks involvement in a debt exchange is likely to further isolate them from the international financial community. Financial isolation would bring significant disruptions to the countrys economy and would be detrimental to corporates. The Sovereign Argentinas decision to ignore US legal rulings after voluntarily accepting the US courts jurisdiction in the past and the unpredictable approach taken to resolve the debt impasse are credit negative. These decisions also highlight Argentinas weak institutional framework, an important driver behind Argentinas low rating. Disbursements to holders of certain Argentine foreign-legislation bonds restructured in 2005 and 2010 have been frozen by US court orders since 26 June, when Argentina deposited the required amounts into a trustee account in Buenos Aires. US court rulings require Argentina to pay holdout bondholders concurrently with any payments it makes to holders of its restructured debt, which Argentina refuses to do. The original payment was due 30 June and the payment prohibition resulted in an event of default by Moodys definition on 30 July, at the end of a 30-day grace period. Argentina now seeks to bypass the payment prohibition via two separate approaches. First, the country proposes changing the trustee of the restructured bonds to Nacion Fideicomisos, a subsidiary of the government-owned commercial bank Banco de la Nacion (unrated), which would presumably follow government instructions. Second, it will offer restructured bondholders a voluntary exchange of foreign-legislation debt for local-legislation obligations, over which Argentina believes US courts would have no jurisdiction.
What is Moodys Credit Outlook? Published every Monday and Thursday morning, Moody's Credit Outlook informs our research clients of the credit implications of current events.
Gabriel Torres Vice President - Senior Credit Officer +1.212.553.3769 gabriel.torres@moodys.com
SOVEREIGN & SUPRANATIONAL 2 AUGUST 25, 2014
SECTOR COMMENT: ARGENTINAS PROPOSAL TO BYPASS US COURT RULINGS IS CREDIT NEGATIVE FOR THE SOVEREIGN, BANKS AND CORPORATES
Assuming the terms envisage a precisely like-for-like exchange, Argentinas proposal would, if successful, be an opportunity for restructured bondholders to receive all scheduled payments. However, it remains unclear whether the proposal will come into effect. Judge Griesas reaction will likely impede the current trustee and other involved parties from providing Argentina the data and assistance needed to carry out the swap or transfer funds to a new trustee. Even if a swap or transfer were possible, it is not clear whether the new trustee would be able to disburse funds within the US dollar clearing system given the US courts objections. The (P)Caa2 rating of these exchange securities encompasses the range of possible outcomes, including the likely loss to investors from the continuing default. Argentinas more belligerent approach will prevent the country from accessing international capital markets, and official reserves are already under pressure (see exhibit below). Official reserves, which are the governments sole source for meeting its foreign-currency obligations, have fallen 47% in the past three years. Continued pressure on reserves will likely exacerbate inflation that is already higher than 30% on an annual basis through faster devaluation, thereby deepening Argentinas ongoing recession. Argentinas Official Reserves Have Fallen 47% Since 2011
Source: Haver Analytics, Central Bank of Argentina
Banks Argentinas debt proposal are credit negative for Argentine banks because their potential involvement in the sovereign bond exchange is likely to further isolate them from the international financial community, limiting their ability to deal with US banks or other foreign institutions. Implementation of the swap will require the involvement of Argentine financial intermediaries and, in the context of the US Supreme Courts ruling, will place them in uncertain legal territory. The legal and financial uncertainties surrounding this move will deepen the countrys economic slump, leading to a longer-than-expected recession. The governments proposal would allow bondholders to ignore their current contracts and get paid in Buenos Aires, or swap their debt for new securities governed by Argentine law. The bill includes the removal of The Bank of New York Mellon (Aa2 stable, B-/a1 stable 1 ) as trustee for exchange bonds and the appointment of the government-owned Nacion Fideicomisos (unrated) as replacement trustee.
1 The bank ratings shown in this report are The Bank of New York Mellons deposit rating, its standalone bank financial strength rating/baseline credit assessment and the corresponding rating outlooks. $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 $40 $45 $50 $55 J a n - 1 0 M a r - 1 0 M a y - 1 0 J u l - 1 0 S e p - 1 0 N o v - 1 0 J a n - 1 1 M a r - 1 1 M a y - 1 1 J u l - 1 1 S e p - 1 1 N o v - 1 1 J a n - 1 2 M a r - 1 2 M a y - 1 2 J u l - 1 2 S e p - 1 2 N o v - 1 2 J a n - 1 3 M a r - 1 3 M a y - 1 3 J u l - 1 3 S e p - 1 3 N o v - 1 3 J a n - 1 4 M a r - 1 4 M a y - 1 4 J u l - 1 4 $
B i l l i o n Valeria Azconegui Assistant Vice President - Analyst +54.11.5129.2611 valeria.azconegui@moodys.com This publication does not announce a credit rating action. For any credit ratings referenced in this publication, please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the most updated credit rating action information and rating history.
SOVEREIGN & SUPRANATIONAL 3 AUGUST 25, 2014
SECTOR COMMENT: ARGENTINAS PROPOSAL TO BYPASS US COURT RULINGS IS CREDIT NEGATIVE FOR THE SOVEREIGN, BANKS AND CORPORATES
A swap for bonds under local jurisdiction would go against orders issued by US District Court Judge Griesa last year, which complicates the participation of US-based intermediaries and could result in those intermediaries being held in contempt of the US courts orders. The approval of this bill will likely reduce the chances that the sovereign, as well as banks and other market participants, will soon regain access to international markets. Argentine banks deposit mix has shifted dramatically since the introduction of foreign exchange and capital controls in November 2011. Foreign-currency funding only accounts for 8% of total liabilities following the sharp decline in dollar-denominated deposits triggered by the implementation of the restrictions (see exhibit below). Consequently, foreign trade facilities and interbank credit lines (which account for roughly 4% of total liabilities) are more important sources of funding to finance loans to exporters, particularly those related to agribusiness. A potential decrease in banks foreign-currency funding, coupled with less access to international markets, will discourage these types of loans (which were 10% of banks total lending two years ago, and have decreased to about 4% this year). This will further lower banks business prospects and margins amid decelerating lending growth and high inflation. Argentine Banks US Dollar Private-Sector Deposits and Loans Fall Sharply
Source: Central Bank of Argentina
Argentina has been in an economic recession since first-quarter 2014, with banks business volumes and earnings already declining, and the uncertainly about a sovereign debt swap and a prolonged default will likely make matters worse. Should the government proposal be approved by the Argentine National Congress, we expect a prolonged stagnation given that GDP growth will be hampered and inflation will rise, hurting both the employment rate and households real wages. Moreover, the lack of capital inflows and potentially rising capital outflows will likely pressure the foreign exchange rate and the Argentine Central Banks international reserves. Although the deteriorating operating environment will cause a decline in banks financial performance, there is little risk that lenders face an imminent solvency crisis. Banks reduced lending appetite has resulted in a buildup of liquidity, which has helped them prepare for the default and a weaker economy. Capitalization is strong, and deposits have remained relatively stable this year, despite rising anxiety among savers amid a currency devaluation.
$0 $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 $14 $16 $18 J a n - 1 1 M a r - 1 1 M a y - 1 1 J u l - 1 1 S e p - 1 1 N o v - 1 1 J a n - 1 2 M a r - 1 2 M a y - 1 2 J u l - 1 2 S e p - 1 2 N o v - 1 2 J a n - 1 3 M a r - 1 3 M a y - 1 3 J u l - 1 3 S e p - 1 3 N o v - 1 3 J a n - 1 4 M a r - 1 4 M a y - 1 4 J u l - 1 4 $
B i l l i o n US Dollar Loans US Dollar Deposits
SOVEREIGN & SUPRANATIONAL 4 AUGUST 25, 2014
SECTOR COMMENT: ARGENTINAS PROPOSAL TO BYPASS US COURT RULINGS IS CREDIT NEGATIVE FOR THE SOVEREIGN, BANKS AND CORPORATES
Corporates The financial isolation resulting from an Argentine debt swap would bring significant disruptions to the countrys economy through GDP stagnation, inflation and currency devaluation. Local-currency depreciation will increase the cost of foreign-currency debt. We also expect a halt in government spending on public works and infrastructure. Rare beneficiaries of the turmoil will be those companies that earn foreign-currency revenue, yet have peso-denominated debt. Companies with Argentine peso revenue and foreign-currency debt include CableVision S.A. (Caa1 negative), which generates all of its revenues in pesos, yet approximately 90% of its debt is denominated in US dollars. A halt in federal and local government spending on public works and infrastructure would affect construction companies, such as Jose Cartellone Construcciones Civiles S.A. (Caa1 negative) and Electroingenieria S.A. (Caa1 negative), which generate more than 90% of their revenues from government contracts. Manufacturer dependency on foreign product inputs has declined over the past years, given the imported-goods controls in place. However, companies such as Newsan S.A. (B3 stable), Mirgor S.A. (Caa1 negative), Sullair Argentina S.A. (Caa1 stable) and Car Security S.A. (Caa1 negative) still import a reduced amount of products and raw materials. Even though the imports account for a small portion of their costs, if import permissions come to a halt for an extended period, the companies will be affected because some of the imported goods cannot be found in the domestic market. Exporters will benefit as the value of foreign-currency revenue increases in relation to Argentine peso depreciation. Asociacion de Cooperativas Argentinas Coop (B3 stable) generates 62% of its revenues in foreign currency and 58% of its debt is peso-denominated. Many rated non-financial companies in Argentina have elevated liquidity risk. These companies have significant debt coming due within one year, limited cash in relation to upcoming maturities, sizable negative free cash flow and they lack access to committed bank credit facilities. Companies with some combination of these factors include Carsa S.A., Longvie S.A., Papel Misionero S.A.I.F.C., and Zucamor S.A., which are all rated Caa1 negative.
Martina Gallardo Barreyro Analyst +54.11.5129.2643 martina.gallardobarreyro@moodys.com Veronica Amendola Vice President - Senior Analyst +54.11.5129.2610 veronica.amendola@moodys.com
SOVEREIGN & SUPRANATIONAL 5 AUGUST 25, 2014
SECTOR COMMENT: ARGENTINAS PROPOSAL TO BYPASS US COURT RULINGS IS CREDIT NEGATIVE FOR THE SOVEREIGN, BANKS AND CORPORATES
2014 Moodys Corporation, Moodys Investors Service, Inc., Moodys Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, MOODYS). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. (MIS) AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODYS CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODYS (MOODYS PUBLICATIONS) MAY INCLUDE MOODYS CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODYS DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODYS OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODYS PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODYS PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODYS ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODYS PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODYS PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODYS PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODYS ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODYS PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODYS CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODYS PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO CONSIDER MOODYS CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODYS PUBLICATIONS IN MAKING ANY INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODYS PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODYS from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODYS is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moodys Publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODYS and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODYS or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODYS. To the extent permitted by law, MOODYS and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODYS or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODYS IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moodys Corporation (MCO), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MISs ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading Shareholder Relations Corporate Governance Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy. For Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODYS affiliate, Moodys Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moodys Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to wholesale clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODYS that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a wholesale client and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to retail clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODYS credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail clients. It would be dangerous for retail clients to make any investment decision based on MOODYS credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. Report Number: 174711 Authors Gabriel Torres Valeria Azconegui Martina Gallardo Barreyro Veronica Amendola Production Specialist Wing Chan