Evan Spencer, Attorney at Law 305 Broadway, 14th Floor New York, New York 10007 el! 347!

"31!1#14 EvanSpencerE$%&aol!co' FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Apr(l 1, )014 PLAINTIFF FILES SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IN MATCH.COM LAWSUIT MelTech, Inc. Owner of Meliss Mi!wes".co# Procee!s A$ ins" IAC%In"er c"i&ecor', e" l. *la(nt(++ ,el ech, -nc! own$ the r(.ht$ to the ,el($$a ,(dwe$t and ,el($$a /arr(n.ton trade na'e$ and (ntellect0al property, (ncl0d(n. copyr(.hted photo.raph$ +eat0red (n h0ndred$ (+ not tho0$and$ o+ +ra0d0lent pro+(le$ on 1e+endant$2 we3 $(te$ over the pa$t $(4 year$! 5 h($ ca$e w(ll e$ta3l($h an ('portant le.al precedent re.ard(n. the l('(tat(on$ o+ Sect(on )30 o+ the 6o''0n(cat(on$ 1ecency Act,7 $a(d *la(nt(++2$ attorney Evan Spencer8 5-nternet $erv(ce prov(der$ have 0$ed th($ law a$ a $h(eld +or v(rt0ally all o+ the(r cond0ct 9.enerally de+a'at(on 3y th(rd:part(e$; and ,atch cla('$ (t ($ a de+en$e (n the pre$ent ca$e, 30t the $tat0te clearly $tate$ that (''0n(ty ($ not a++orded (n ca$e$ o+ -ntellect0al *roperty or Fra0d!7 A+ter the or(.(nal law$0(t wa$ +(led on Nove'3er )1, )013 a.a(n$t -A6<-nteract(vecorp and ,atch!co', they relea$ed the +ollow(n. $tate'ent8 5 he real $ca' here ($ th($ 'er(tle$$ law$0(t, wh(ch ($ +(lled w(th o0tland($h con$p(racy theor(e$ and cl0'$y +a3r(cat(on$ (n l(e0 o+ act0al or le.al 3a$($! =e2re con+(dent that o0r le.al $y$te' ($ a$ adept a$ we are at detect(n. $ca''er$ and w(ll d($'($$ th($ ca$e (n $hort order!7 5-n re$pon$e to 1e+endant$2 $tate'ent, the a'ended co'pla(nt wa$ +(led on >an0ary )7, )014, w(th appro4('ately 50 e4a'ple$ o+ +ake pro+(le$ on ,atch!co' and *eople ,ed(a $(te$, (ncl0d(n. 3,000 e4a'ple$ o+ +ake 0$erna'e$, 5 e4a'ple$ o+ +ake cele3r(ty pro+(le$, over 100 con$0'er co'pla(nt$ re.ard(n. +ake pro+(le$ on ,atch!co', a pre$$ relea$e +ro' the FB- re.ard(n. ro'ance $ca'$, and over )00 pa.e$ o+ $tat0te$, ca$e law, and e4h(3(t$ that $0pported the 'er(t$ o+ the ca$e,7 $a(d ,r! Spencer, 5'y cl(ent$ and - have 3een contacted 3y n0'ero0$ (nd(v(d0al$ and ent(t(e$ who$e photo.raph$ have 3een 0$ed (n +ake pro+(le$ on 1e+endant$2 we3 $(te$ 9(ncl0d(n. a .entle'an who appeared (n a +ake ?0r ('e!co' pro+(le a$ recently a$ ,arch )#, )014;! =h(le 'any other potent(al *la(nt(++$ or cla$$ 'e'3er$ w($hed to @o(n the ca$e, all were concerned a3o0t the(r pr(vacy 3e(n. (nvaded +0rther (+ the(r na'e wa$ a$$oc(ated w(th a Federal law$0(t! here+ore, (t wa$ a.reed 3y all that proceed(n. on 3ehal+ o+ a $(n.le corporate ent(ty at th($ t('e wo0ld 3e (n everyone2$ 3e$t (ntere$t$!7 5>0d.e F0r'an ha$ e$ta3l($hed a 3r(e+(n. $ched0le, re%0(r(n. 1e+endant$2 'ot(on to d($'($$ 3e $03'(tted 3y ,ay ), )013, allow(n. *la(nt(++ 0nt(l ,ay )3, )013 to $03'(t oppo$(t(on or a h(rd A'ended 6o'pla(nt (n re$pon$e 9wh(ch wo0ld 3e the la$t allowed a'end'ent (+ nece$$ary;, and allow(n. the 1e+endant$ 0nt(l >0ne ), )014 to re$pond! =e are con+(dent that the @0d.e w(ll not d($'($$ the ca$e and that d($covery w(ll con+(r' all o+ o0r alle.at(on$,7 $a(d ,r! Spencer, 5a v(ctory (n th($ ca$e w(ll have a po$(t(ve ('pact 0pon '(ll(on$ o+ con$0'er$ onl(ne and hold -A6 and ,atch acco0nta3le +or 'any year$ o+ wron.+0l cond0ct!7