Está en la página 1de 8

Human Rights Alert (NGO)

Joseph Zernik, PhD PO Box 31440, Jerusalem 91313 josephzernik@humanrightsalertngo.org


" 91313 3144 "

12-10-19 Beyond electronic voting machines - fraud in case management systems of the courts - Sustain and the Los Angeles Superior Court - Part II
Large-scale fraud on the People in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles Sustain - enables the deprivation of liberty and property with no due process of law.

Sustain, the electronic record system of the LASC, is believed to be one of the earliest in the nation, implemented around 1985. According to the web site of Sustain Corporation, it is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Daily Journal Corporation (NASDAQ: DJCO), and the system are by now implemented in 11 states and 3 nations. Who in fact controls Sustain Corporation remains unknown. Previous reports documented the invalidity of Sustain: The LASC publishes its legal public records online, subject to a "disclaimer", stating that such records are not valid and authoritative court records. (Fig 1) In parallel, the LASC denies public access to records, e.g. the Register of Actions (California civil docket), which the LASC considers the valid court records, by concealing them in the case management system of Sustain.

Figure 1. Disclaimer in Sustain online public records "this site does not consitute the official record of the court" [[i]] In parallel, the LASC has ceased almost universally from service and authentication/notice of entry of minutes, orders, and judgments by the Clerk of the Court. At the systems level, it is also be noted that the public records of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles (LASC), are maintained on servers, whose identity is uncertified. [[ii]] In response to inquiries, the LASC claimed that the servers are under custody of the County of Los Angeles, not the LASC. A. The case of Barbara Darwish (1998-2006)
In Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) in the LASC, a group of judges and the clerks colluded to take the 6unit Santa Monica rental property of Defendant Darwish. The hallmark of the simulated litigation in the LASC took place on May 13, 2002: Defendant Darwish appeared that morning at the LASC for the scheduled Jury Trial, but was deceived by the LASC and attorneys to proceed to the Municipal Court of Culver City, where an anonymous Muni Judge conducted on the same afternoon a simulated Court Trial. (Fig 2) Darwish later identified the "Muni Judge" - John Segal.

Superior Court records showed that neither a judgment, nor an appealable order was ever entered in the manner required by California law to make it effectual for any purpose. However, the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District (Los Angeles) took three (3) simulated appeals in the case two of them were denied, and the third was voluntarily dismissed. (Table 1) One of the simulated appeals produced a "published decision", which permits "oral modifications" of real estate contracts, overturning hundreds of years of common law, distilled into the Statute of Frauds (1677).

The case of Barbara Darwish commenced in 1998, a full decade prior to the onset of the "sub-prime crisis". The case shows that the routines of real estate fraud under simulated litigation in the LASC were already well estabslihed, involving large number of attorneys and judges. The LASC continues to deny access to the paper court file in this case. Regardless, due to its extensive documentation, the case was key part of the evidence, repeatedly submitted since 2008 to the US Attorney General and FBI Director with requests for Equal Protection of the 10 million residents of Los Angeles County, California, against racketeering by judges of the LASC.

Figure 2. Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) - Register of Actions [California docket jz] in Sustain - the electronic record system of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. In this civil real property matter, Ms Darwish appeared on the morning May 3, 2002 for a scheduled jury trial. Instead, she was deceived by attorneys and the Court to appear on the same afternoon for a "Court Trial" in the Culver City Municipal Court before "Muni Judge" , who remained anonymous. Declaration of Ms Darwsih clarified that it the "Muni Judge", who decided to take her 6-unit Santa Monica rental property was Judge John Segal. [[iii]]

eal #

App

Judgment California Court Date */ Notice ofAppeal Justices Appeal/ Trial Court

of

Disposition

3970

B16

Judge 09/05/02 12/19/02 Segal, John None Listed 11/24/04 Segal, John 04/26/06 11/24/04 Segal, John

Curry, Daniel Vogel, Charles (Concur) Hastings, J. (Concur) Curry, Daniel Epstein, Norman (Concur) Hastings, J. (Concur) None Listed

9667

B17

Affirmed in full Final Signed Published 113 Cal.App.4th 1331 Affirmed in full Final Voluntary dismissal Final

1327

B19

Table 1: Summary of Appeals in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) as they are recorded in the online public access system of the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District. None of the appeals was lawfully taken from a valid, entered judgment or appealable order of the trial court. [[iv]] * The public access system of the California Court of Appeal does not list any Dates of Entry of Judgments.

B. The case of Susan Lomas (2011-2012) In Lomas v Bank of America Corporation (KC0559379) in the LASC, Susan Lomas attempted to protect her property against fraud by Bank of America. Judge Peter Meeka conducted on Lomas proceedings, which, as was later discovered, were secretly noted in the simulated minutes in Sustain, "off of the record". (Fig 3) The minutes were not served on Lomas, neither were they authenticated by the Clerk of the Court. Lomas's access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket), was and continues to be denied by the LASC.

Figure 3. Lomas v Bank of America (KC0559379) Minutes of August 12, 2010 "Ex Parte Motion to Stay Enforcement of Write for Possession". The Minutes state "The ex parte application is read and considered in chambers and off of the record" The Minutes were never duly served or noticed by the Clerk of the Court, and are missing the integral authentication record "Certificate of Mailing and Notice of Entry by Clerk. [[v]] Ac-

cess to the Register of Actions (Califronia civil docket) in this case and most others in LASC is denied, even to parties in their own litigation. The case of Susan Lomas commenced over 10 years later than the case of Barbara Darwish. The methods of conducting simulated litigation in real estate matters remained the same. However, in the case of Lomas, a bank was the primary beneficiary. The case is also of interest, since it commenced after FBI issued testimonies to the US Congress of no criminality by sub-prime lenders underlying the current crisis, while Bank of America Corporation was recipient of hundreds of billions of USD in US taxpayer bailouts, under representations of no fraud in its operation, and while large-scale fraud by lenders and the courts on the People were "settled" by the US government and the attorney generals of the several states. C. The case of Richard Fine (2007-2011) In litigation of Marina Strand Colony II Homeowners Assn vs County of LA (BS109420), former US prosecutor Richard I. Fine, Attorney for Plaintiff, exposed and rebuked the taking by Los Angeles judges of "not permitted payments", which were labeled by media "bribes". Consequently, the State Bar of California disbarred Fine in 2007, and starting March 4, 2009 Fine was held by Sheriff Lee Baca of Los Angeles County in solitary "coercive confinement", which was then said to be indefinite. Eventually, Fine was released on September 17, 2010. No valid warrant, valid conviction, valid sentencing, valid booking records, or valid order for his release were discovered, only simulated legal public records. (Fig 4, Appendix 9)

Figure 4. Online Inmate Information Center, Sheriff of Los Angeles County fraud in booking records of Richard Fine. Richard Fine was placed under indefinite coercive solitary confinement, which ended up lasting 18 months, purportedly arrested and booked on location and by authority of the "Municipal Court of San Pedro", which did not and does not exist. The image is an excerpt from formal response by Sheriff Lee Baca to Michael Antonovitch, Supervisor of Los Angeles County. [[vi]]

Repeated requests were forwarded to Los Angeles Sheriff Lee Baca and to the LASC during the period of Fine's imprisonment, to correct the simulated legal public records and release Fine. The requests were ignored. Public access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket) continues to be denied by the LASC. The case of Richard Fine was also part of the evidence, forwarded to the US Attorney General and FBI with requests for Equal Protection of the People of Los Angeles against racketeering by the LASC. References
[i] Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles online public records disclaimer, accessible at: http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/civilcasesummary/index.asp [ii] Web page of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, at: http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/ [iii] Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) Register of Actions (California Civil Docket), accessible at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/34498017/ [iv] Zernik, J., "Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) - Complaint for Public Corruption against Justices and the Clerk of the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District, RE: Conduct of three pretense appeals alleged real estate fraud and racketeering by the Courts." (2011) http://www.scribd.com/doc/34725529/ [v] Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles Lomas v Bank of America (KC0559379) Minutes, accessible at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/51157264/ [vi] Antonovich, M, Los Angeles County Supervisor, "January 8, 2010 response from Sheriff Lee Baca in re: Arrest and booking records of Inmate Richard Fine (1824367)", including attachments, accessible at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/25555341/

Appendices
[1] Human Right Alert (NGO), Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States Los Angeles County, Califronia, as incorporated into the 2010 Human Rights Council Report with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession" (2010) http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/ [2] Zernik, J., "The Los Angeles Superior Court - Widespread Corruption, Patronized by the US Government" (2012) http://www.scribd.com/doc/46460640/ [3] Zernik, J., " Beyond voting machines - case management systems of the courts - Sustain and the Los Angeles Superior Court" (2008) http://www.scribd.com/doc/110477747/ [4] Zernik, J., " Computers & the courts: Sustain - case management system of the Los Angeles Superior Court - Registers of Action" http://www.scribd.com/doc/110475097/ _____________ Joseph Zernik, PhD < josephzernik@humanrightsalertngo.org> Sent from "1984", Iceland-based Internet Service Provider _____________ Human Rights Alert (NGO) * United States - the 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California.
[1] 10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States, where Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission was incorporated with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California." http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/

* State of Israel - the 2012 submission of Human Rights Alert to the HRC, titled, "Integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic record systems of the courts of the State of Israel', is scheduled for review in January 2013.

[1] 12-06-04 Human Right Alert's Submission; 2013 UPR of the State of Israel: "Integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic record systems of the courts of the State of Israel"

https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B8Aa2xQGbmk5QWtZcjVQLWVFZ0k https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B8Aa2xQGbmk5cjNxd2szX05oMkU _____ Human Rights Alert online: http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ Flag Counter: 145 http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert Total Reads: 945,129 Followers: 1,601 http://www.scribd.com/SeyagLizhuyotHaadam Total Reads: 45,147 http://twitter.com/inproperinla http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345 Total Item Views: 664,803+500,065 http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner http://www.facebook.com/joseph.zernik Facebook Friends: 4,165

http://www.opednews.com/author/author81971.html http://www.opednews.com/author/author42343.html ____________________________

Boycott the US presidential vote! It only legitimizes the illegitimate...


12-04-15 2012 Presidential election votes will be counted in Spain http://www.scribd.com/doc/89464081/

Occupy!
11-12-10 Where should Occupy go next? Civil Disobedience in the footsteps of Thoreau and Gandhi! http :// www.scribd.com/doc/75348301/ 12-06-08 Courts and Judges as racketeering enterprises under RICO (the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) - key element in the current financial crisis http://www.scribd.com/doc/96504009/

Secede! The US in its current form is simply unmanageable...


12-01-01 Secession - A Smart Business Move! http://www.scribd.com/doc/76877453/

Get Up, stand up, stand up for your rights!


_____________________________

Take away justice, then, and what are governments but great bandit bands?
Saint Augustine, Civitas Dei (City of God,4.4) _____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERT SAY ABOUT THE CURRENT FINANCIAL CRISIS? * "I think it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history," said Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School who has written articles analyzing the role of courts in the financial crisis. "I can't think of one where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Reuters (Jan 22, 2012) http://www.scribd.com/doc/79572282/ * Foreclosure fraud: The homeowner nightmares continue CNN (April 7, 2011) * About 3 million homes have been repossessed since the housing boom ended in 2006 That number could balloon to about 6 million by 2013 Bloomberg (January 2011) * "...a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences." Prof Paul Krugman, MIT (2011) http://www.scribd.com/doc/50753639/ _____________________________ WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?

* "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001) http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/ * "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted." Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001) http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/ * "Innocent people remain in prison" * "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..." LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306 / _____________________________ WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA? * "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California." United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report (2010) http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/ _____________________________ WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE STATE COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES? * "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations." Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute (2010) http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert _____________________________ WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE CONDITIONS IN THE PRISON IN MONROE COUNTY, TENESSEE? * "What goes on there is more like gulags of centuries ago." ACLU http://www.scribd.com/doc/72546279/ _____________________________ WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES? * "More than 100 law professors have signed on to a letter released today that proposes congressional hearings and legislation aimed at fashioning "mandatory and enforceable" ethics rules for Supreme Court justices for the first time. The effort, coordinated by the liberal Alliance for Justice, was triggered by "recent media reports," the letter said, apparently referring to stories of meetings and other potential conflicts of interest involving Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas among others." More than 100 law professors, as reported by the Blog of the Legal Times (February 2011) http://www.scribd.com/doc/49586436/ _____________________________ WHAT DID CHIEF JUDGE OF THE US COURT OF APPEALS, 5TH CIRCUIT, SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM? * "The American legal system has been corrupted almost beyond recognition..." Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, Edith Jones, speaking before the Federalist Society of Harvard Law School (February 2003) http://www.scribd.com/doc/50137887/ _____________________________ WHAT DID THE CHAIR OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM? * In a speech in Georgetown University, Senator Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee called for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" on the US Department of Justice. Transcript of Senator Leahy speech (2009) http://www.scribd.com/doc/38472251/ ____________________________

También podría gustarte